'chinawildman said:
'JAA said:
'chinawildman said:
Should Pead impress when/if SJax goes down, does anyone really think they'll still go full-blown committee just because he's 10lbs lighter than what a prototype RB should be? Pead's assets are his ability to change direction with minimal deceleration, and receiving chops. Everything says FF gold to me.
Name the last 3 RBs that meet the same criteria and were FF gold?
Matt Forte, Jamaal Charles, LeSean McCoy. Next question...
Forte is 6'2" 218 lbsMcCoy is 5'10" 208 lbs and took over for Westbrook who was 5'10" 203 lbs, so he is actually closer to prototypical than the guy he replaced.
So, you got one, Charles. Do two more.
Haha, thanks for doing part of the homework for me... Westbrook, well done. And yea it's really not that hard... how about that chris johnson guy too?Seriously, does anyone think that a 5lb difference in weight is going to make or break the makings of a good RB?
Apparently, most people do because taiwan Jones is the same height as Pead and 5 pounds lighter (was before his rookie season) and Jones is in a system where he is ideal. He has elite speed and plays behind a Rb that has never made it through a season. YET, almost no one sees HIM as a viable replacement. So why would anyone want to jump on board with Pead who was not a consensus top 5RB before he was drafted?Let em be clear, I'm not trying to slam Pead. I honestly don't know much about the guy. I'm just trying to point out an answer and show the scenario based on the question asked. to me, Taiwan Jones would be a slam dunk before Pead would but, for whatever reason, people seem ready to push SJAX to the side. Yeah, he's frustrating in his own right, and always seems questionable and has all this and that going on, but I really can't see anyone drafting him thinking he is truly useful for a year or two (other than the SJAX owners..for them it makes a ton of sense..like DMAC owners having Taiwan).