What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

It's time for the Tax Returns to be released. (1 Viewer)

It was based on Mueller’s referral and base evidence.  Mueller was definitely involved.
Mueller found some evidence of wrong doing and referred it to SDNY.  Trump's appointee reviewed it and agreed it was worth investigating then recused himself.  These are not Mueller's charges. You're conflating the two.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This was the big Trump-Russia collusion investigation.  If after two years of chasing Trump Mueller comes out with a few $100K to a porn star this is going to look like exactly what Trump said it was.  I can’t imagine what he will be like after that kind of vindication.
seeing the witness's that are cooperating with the gov't, seeing the redacted documents, seeing the pieces of information that have hit the news about conspiracy with Russia (CA, Wikileaks, numerous guilty pleas for lying about contacts, etc.) what is your confidence level that this is as bad as it gets and that Mueller has nothing else?  

 
I’m talking about Jomar, but Tump qualifies as well.
piss off.  I don't constantly surround myself with these people and if you can read and comprehend, you would have known that.  you want me to find a new job, move to a new state, and disown some family members because I'm surrounded by racists?  no thanks, I have kids in school and a great job.  

 
He's getting the investigations mixed up. This is not Mueller's.
It was Mueller’s evidence that started it.  He then referred it on.

Mueller was the one that asked for leniency on Cohen’s sentencing.

You are free to believe that there is no overlap with regard to Cohen here though.  I really don’t care.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
piss off.  I don't constantly surround myself with these people and if you can read and comprehend, you would have known that.  you want me to find a new job, move to a new state, and disown some family members because I'm surrounded by racists?  no thanks, I have kids in school and a great job.  
Except for the racist coworkers you mentioned.

 
It was Mueller’s.  He then referred it on.

Mueller was the one that asked for leniency on Cohen’s sentencing.

You are free to believe that there is no overlap here though.  I really don’t care.
Mueller asked for leniency because of Cohen's help in Mueller's investigation.  The only overlap was Mueller referring the case to SDNY.  After that, it was out of Mueller's hands. I see you really don't care, yet argue against facts.

 
Except for the racist coworkers you mentioned.
what do you mean, except for the racist co-workers?  you want me to leave my job and take a pay cut so I don't have to work with racists?  I mentioned that above.

you seem upset that there are racists and bigots in our midst, or just people who don't care if someone is that way.  that's a reflection on you and the type of person you are.  

 
When someone is investigated for a crime, and a whole host of other crimes are uncovered, shouldn't the response be "holy balls this guy is a real piece of ####" as opposed to "yea so what, you haven't even indicted him on the original charge!"

 
what do you mean, except for the racist co-workers?  you want me to leave my job and take a pay cut so I don't have to work with racists?  I mentioned that above.

you seem upset that there are racists and bigots in our midst, or just people who don't care if someone is that way.  that's a reflection on you and the type of person you are.  
:shrug:

I’m not the one surrounding myself with alleged racists and bigots.  I generally choose to avoid them.

 
It was Mueller’s evidence that started it.  He then referred it on.

Mueller was the one that asked for leniency on Cohen’s sentencing.

You are free to believe that there is no overlap with regard to Cohen here though.  I really don’t care.
This is different than this:

This was the big Trump-Russia collusion investigation.  If after two years of chasing Trump Mueller comes out with a few $100K to a porn star this is going to look like exactly what Trump said it was.  I can’t imagine what he will be like after that kind of vindication.
It's true Mueller found the initial evidence, it is untrue that it's part of his ongoing investigation.  It has nothing to do with Mueller other than him passing the information on to SDNY.  Mueller doesn't have it as part of his investigation and never has, so if Trump uses this as some sort of vindication in the "Trump-Russia collusion investigation" all it really tells us is he is as confused as is anyone who joins him in said belief.  :shrug:  

 
And I'll echo the sentiment that if campaign finance problems were the only thing found, it would be a big "whoopty dooooooooo".  Fortunately we are well beyond that bar.  At this point campaign finance problems are simply more evidence of the known.....it's throwing more paper on the pile.  It's not the foundation of anything the best I can tell.

 
:lol: I'm sure you do.  you seem like the type that's really bothered by racism and bigotry
That’s true.  I really couldn’t be happy at a job working with racists and bigots.  And if I lived in a community full of them I would definitely find a way to get my family out of there.

 
That’s true.  I really couldn’t be happy at a job working with racists and bigots.  And if I lived in a community full of them I would definitely find a way to get my family out of there.
yes, I bet you would. at least this is the internet and I don't have to deal with racists and people who don't have a problem supporting racists so to ignore you go.  

the fact that you think you don't work with or live around racists and bigots is quite telling.  might be harder to recognize when you find yourself agreeing with them all day.  

good day, sir

 
piss off.  I don't constantly surround myself with these people and if you can read and comprehend, you would have known that.  you want me to find a new job, move to a new state, and disown some family members because I'm surrounded by racists?  no thanks, I have kids in school and a great job.  
So are you saying that what is best for you and your family outweighs other things? 

 
So are you saying that what is best for you and your family outweighs other things? 
He said he was happy at his job, but that his coworkers are racists and bigots.  He couldn’t move because his kids have school, but his neighbors are racists and bigots.  Just odd.

 
If this is truly how you feel - then the real "waste" of resources was in implementing these laws in the first place.

We are a nation of laws - either they mean something, and apply to everyone, or they should be stricken from the books.  What we can't have are laws that are selectively enforced against certain classes of people, but not everyone.
From an article I read recently - "federal election laws are like “No Smoking” signs in France: rules that exist only for our amusement".

History is replete with egregious examples of wrongdoing that were never pursued (and this one is iffy at best).  I realize the thrust of this SC is supposed to be Russia collusion, but this branch of investigation is a lark.  And I say that as someone who would much rather Pence in that seat than what we've got now.

 
From an article I read recently - "federal election laws are like “No Smoking” signs in France: rules that exist only for our amusement".
This would have been useful to know for the many individuals and entities that have been punished or paid a fine for violating them in the past.  

 
History is replete with egregious examples of wrongdoing that were never pursued (and this one is iffy at best).
Iffy?

There was over a quarter million dollars secretly paid in order to influence the presidential election. How is that anyway an iffy at best scenario?

 
This would have been useful to know for the many individuals and entities that have been punished or paid a fine for violating them in the past.  
Lots of fines.   Very little of anything beyond that.  Seems like a lot of winking and nodding.  Nobody wants to seriously ding someone when they could get caught doing things similar.

 
nice to know updated talking points have been distributed to everyone.
Yup, goal posts are officially at "so what, he committed some minor felonies!  Everyone does it."

I think Trump defenders need to go back a revisit where this all started and the denials that were being pushed.

 
Stealthycat said:
different topic and this one is going sidetracked enough

but seriously if Russia is proven to be nothing, the tax returns are nothing ..... will Democrats stop ?  no - they won't, you know it, I know it ..... they will continue to do anything and everything because of their anti-Trump hatred

did ya'll see the farm bill passed today? I just looked on CNN home page .... nothing, not a peep.... can't give GOP and Trump credit, that's a golden rule right now, REPORT NOTHING POSITIVE on Trump

and people see it, and people hate it
What important work did Trump do on the Farm Bill? 

 
What important work did Trump do on the Farm Bill? 
I saw Trump tweeting about this non-stop...oh, wait, no that was Cohen, Witch Hunt and how it's completely fine to commit felonies...

Trump doesn't even care about any of this...he cares about one thing only...TRUMP.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
FOX News is also missing a story about a Russian woman who admited in court she was part of an organized Russian espionage plot to infiltrate the GOP. 

 
What a crock of ####.  Campaign contribution violations are rampant in D.C.  The Clinton’s were experts at it.  I couldn’t care less about this.  It’s just partisan mudslinging.  It’s not going to change anything and Trump isn’t going anywhere.

If there is something with Russia collusion then that’s a different matter.  I expect Mueller will have some charges in that arena pending.  It’s been almost two years of this.
Then take the laws off the books.  Simple as that.

 
Things I learned today: I need to buy a moving truck. 

If I come across a racist at my job or community I have to move. 2019, the year of the nomads. 

 
From an article I read recently - "federal election laws are like “No Smoking” signs in France: rules that exist only for our amusement".

History is replete with egregious examples of wrongdoing that were never pursued (and this one is iffy at best).  I realize the thrust of this SC is supposed to be Russia collusion, but this branch of investigation is a lark.  And I say that as someone who would much rather Pence in that seat than what we've got now.
Campaign finance violations are something to be concerned about and take action on. There's no comfortable level of cynical acceptance of this kind of activity. Particularly when we're talking about elections at the Federal level. I'm surprised you'd be so cavalier about it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Campaign finance violations are something to be concerned about and take action on. There's no comfortable level of cynical acceptance of this kind of activity. Particularly when we're talking about elections at the Federal level. I'm surprised you'd be so cavalier about it.
Especially a violation that very well may have changed the outcome of an election.

 
Especially a violation that very well may have changed the outcome of an election.
the stupid part of all of this is that they didn't have to pay anyone off.  Trump supporters were clearly OK with issues much more important than this, what with the ##### grabbing, handicap mocking, veteran slamming, immigrant bashing, racial discriminating, business bankrupting, and all of the other stupid things Trump said and did before and during the campaign.  he could have had a rally and announced that he was banging porn stars just after Melania gave birth, and his supporters would've probably started booing Melania or chanting to lock her up.  

 
The very nature of a campaign finance violation means apossible change in outcome of an election.
I had thought about editing to "presidential" election.  But by your own admission, Trump's alleged felonies may have resulted in an illegitimate president.   Strange, and yet you're ok with all of it.

 
I had thought about editing to "presidential" election.  But by your own admission, Trump's alleged felonies may have resulted in an illegitimate president.   Strange, and yet you're ok with all of it.
True.  I’m not concerned with how the pornstar payout was done.  It certainly wouldn’t lead me to think a presidential election should be nullified.

 
True.  I’m not concerned with how the pornstar payout was done.  It certainly wouldn’t lead me to think a presidential election should be nullified.
I'll admit that in the grand scheme of crimes Trump and Trump Org may be guilty of, felonies with respect to campaign finance laws are probably at the bottom. 

 
What a crock of ####.  Campaign contribution violations are rampant in D.C.  The Clinton’s were experts at it.  I couldn’t care less about this.  It’s just partisan mudslinging.  It’s not going to change anything and Trump isn’t going anywhere.

If there is something with Russia collusion then that’s a different matter.  I expect Mueller will have some charges in that arena pending.  It’s been almost two years of this.
Clearly

 
True.  I’m not concerned with how the pornstar payout was done.  It certainly wouldn’t lead me to think a presidential election should be nullified.
Is there a campaign finance line that if crossed, would concern you? Seems like such an odd stance to take for paying hush money to influence an election seems like a pretty simple "too far" for most people

 
has anyone talked about nullifying the presidential election or where did that come from?

I think what would happen is that the POTUS would be impeached, tried in the Senate, removed from office and then tried in a court of law.  there is nothing in the process about nullifying the election and Pence would be POTUS

 
Iffy?

There was over a quarter million dollars secretly paid in order to influence the presidential election save DJT from personal embarrassment with his new wife and baby. 
This is what his lawyer is going to say, and it's plausible (IMO, it's probably a bit of both).  Not sure how this prosecution flies - we have direct precedent with John Edwards, and he was found not guilty. 

I think we all know that the two add on charges Cohen pled (i.e. coerced) to are designed to add the veneer of plausibility to the charges.  

 
This is what his lawyer is going to say, and it's plausible (IMO, it's probably a bit of both).  Not sure how this prosecution flies - we have direct precedent with John Edwards, and he was found not guilty. 

I think we all know that the two add on charges Cohen pled (i.e. coerced) to are designed to add the veneer of plausibility to the charges.  
If you think the Edwards case helps Trump, you should read up on the details of each case.

As the judge in the Edwards case pointed out, if helping the campaign was just part of the reason for the payments then that's enough to be a felony.  Both Cohen *and* Pecker testified that the hush money was for the campaign.

Edwards' payments were far different than Trump's in both intent and timing.  Edwards last payment came on the day he withdrew from the campaign, while Trump's was the week of the election.

 
This is what his lawyer is going to say, and it's plausible (IMO, it's probably a bit of both).  Not sure how this prosecution flies - we have direct precedent with John Edwards, and he was found not guilty. 

I think we all know that the two add on charges Cohen pled (i.e. coerced) to are designed to add the veneer of plausibility to the charges.  
I don't see how the Edwards ruling applies.  In Edwards' case it was argued that he was protecting his dying wife from the beginning.  Trump has no dying wife and he didn't seem to give a #### until he started running for office.  If that's not enough of a difference the fact that he argued he was a crap human being, acknowledge that he in fact did cheat, but claims he didn't know he was using campaign money would be another significant difference.  If that's not enough you have to other parties saying they were part of the conspiracy.

The only real place where they two stories are comparable are around the fact they were both cheating on their wives and got caught.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top