What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jerry Sandusky accused of child molestation (3 Viewers)

Don't know if this has been reported in here or not... I thought that it was definitely worthy of a post.

NBC flub may have an impact on the Sandusky appeal.

link

 
Jerry Sandusky wants out of isolation in jail, attorney says

Also:

Rominger also said there is a 25-minute taped interview between Sandusky's adopted son, Matt, and police that Rominger and Amendola heard before making the decision not to have Sandusky testify at trial. Matt announced through his attorneys last week for the first time that he was abused by Sandusky. Rominger wouldn't get into the details of the tape, but said that Matt supported the testimony of Victim 4 -- the 28-year-old who was first to take the stand -- and also alleged his own abuse.
I’m dealing with this, but if I have to sit around in this cell for a few more days, I am going to go nutty.' ”
Pray for Jerry.
 
'hutchins929 said:
Don't know if this has been reported in here or not... I thought that it was definitely worthy of a post.

NBC flub may have an impact on the Sandusky appeal.

link
Pretty desperate reach there. The "flub" seemed pretty minor and harmless to me. Obviously the defense agreed or else they would have raised an objection during the trial.
 
I believe it is SOP to put all convicts on suicide watch for their first 72 hours in jail. I the important thing is this monster is in jail and will die there be it next week, next year or next decade. At this point, I'd like to see the attention shift away from his jail situation and move towards a greater collective awareness around the abuse of children. There are untold number of Sanduskys out there continuing to do harm to kids, often these kids have the same unfortunate upbringing as a lot of his victims. As a society, we don't do enough to put a stop to this abhorrent behavior.

 
Why do they put prisoners on suicide watch? Let them kill themselves. Would save tons of money. Heck every prison should have a carbon monoxide booth and available to any prisoner that is just tired of it all and wants to snuff it.

 
Here is a delusional Penn St. and Sandusky supporter..https://twitter.com/#!/EricCalcara_35
Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't use the twitter machine, so I'm a bit of a novice), but I don't see any reference to Penn State here. Lots of pro-Sandusky from this nutbag, but nothing about Penn State.This guy is clearly off in the head, but I want to make the distinction that there is a difference between supporting Penn State and supporting Sandusky.
 
Here is a delusional Penn St. and Sandusky supporter..https://twitter.com/#!/EricCalcara_35
Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't use the twitter machine, so I'm a bit of a novice), but I don't see any reference to Penn State here. Lots of pro-Sandusky from this nutbag, but nothing about Penn State.This guy is clearly off in the head, but I want to make the distinction that there is a difference between supporting Penn State and supporting Sandusky.
yeah, he's probably a pitt fan
 
Why do they put prisoners on suicide watch? Let them kill themselves. Would save tons of money. Heck every prison should have a carbon monoxide booth and available to any prisoner that is just tired of it all and wants to snuff it.
As goony as this thread has gotten lately, I think this idea does have some merit.
 
Jerry Sandusky is currently on suicide watch. He'll be sentenced in 90 days.
If this means throwing a rope with a noose already tied into Sandusky's cell and watching to see if he kills himself then I am all for it.
not very christian imo
jesus loves the little childrenall the children of the worldred and yellow black and whitethey are precious in his sightjesus loves the little children of the world
 
Jerry Sandusky is currently on suicide watch. He'll be sentenced in 90 days.
If this means throwing a rope with a noose already tied into Sandusky's cell and watching to see if he kills himself then I am all for it.
not very christian imo
jesus loves the little childrenall the children of the worldred and yellow black and whitethey are precious in his sightjesus loves the little children of the world
So does Jerry Sandusky.
 
Why do they put prisoners on suicide watch? Let them kill themselves. Would save tons of money. Heck every prison should have a carbon monoxide booth and available to any prisoner that is just tired of it all and wants to snuff it.
As goony as this thread has gotten lately, I think this idea does have some merit.
Generally I agree, but in this case that would be letting him off WAY too easy. I say keep this guy alive as long as humanly possible so that he can continue to live in his new hell.
 
I believe it is SOP to put all convicts on suicide watch for their first 72 hours in jail. I the important thing is this monster is in jail and will die there be it next week, next year or next decade. At this point, I'd like to see the attention shift away from his jail situation and move towards a greater collective awareness around the abuse of children. There are untold number of Sanduskys out there continuing to do harm to kids, often these kids have the same unfortunate upbringing as a lot of his victims. As a society, we don't do enough to put a stop to this abhorrent behavior.
:goodposting: Good Organization

 
Matt Sandusky said that Jerry Sandusky, once Hall of Fame coach Joe Paterno's heir apparent, began sexually abusing him in the late 1980s, when he was 8 years old, and continued until he was 15, according to a police interview recording that NBC aired Tuesday. He was placed in foster care with the Sandusky family in January 1995, about a month after he set fire to a barn and several months after Long tried to cut him off from Sandusky and The Second Mile.

Matt Sandusky, who was adopted after he turned 18, described for investigators showering with the ex-coach and trying to avoid being groped in bed, according to the police recording.
Jerry Sandusky hasn't been charged with abusing his son. Unless Matt Sandusky alleges rape, which he didn't do in the police recording, the ex-coach cannot be charged criminally based on his son's accusations, because of the statute of limitations.
link (an informative read)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So CNN has copies of emails where Paterno was the ring leader in the coverup?
Ringleader and/or co-conspirator.And Gary Schultz is starting to look like more of a patsy than a lone wolf. Schultz was the one who suggested that they inform Second Mile and the Department Of Public Welfare; Paterno and Curley were the ones pushing for a coverup.

Translation of Curley's email: "After talking it over with Joe Paterno, I am uncomfortable with going to the authorities. I would be more comfortable meeting with Sandusky alone to tell him that we're aware of what he's done."

 
So CNN has copies of emails where Paterno was the ring leader in the coverup?
Ringleader and/or co-conspirator.And Gary Schultz is starting to look like more of a patsy than a lone wolf. Schultz was the one who suggested that they inform Second Mile and the Department Of Public Welfare; Paterno and Curley were the ones pushing for a coverup.

Translation of Curley's email: "After talking it over with Joe Paterno, I am uncomfortable with going to the authorities. I would be more comfortable meeting with Sandusky alone to tell him that we're aware of what he's done."
Imagine being involved this intimately in the coverup and you are worried about getting to coach your last game? Guy had no shame.
 
Where are paterno's emails that show him as the ringleader?Whats the chronology?
2/26/01: Schultz emails Curley and confirms that the next steps are to inform Second Mile and the Department Of Public Welfare.2/26/01: Curley meets with Paterno.2/27/01: Curley emails Schultz and Spanier: "After talking it over with Joe yesterday, I am uncomfortable with what we agreed were the next steps."
 
So CNN has copies of emails where Paterno was the ring leader in the coverup?
Per this article, yes. Kinda interesting they are coming out now
I am not a Paterno apologist but I don't think that article says anything of the sort. I would like to read the email thread before jumping to conclusions.
Sure it does. It alleges that Schultz and Curley had agreed to notify Second Mile and the Deparment of Welfare. After meeting with Joe, Curley changes his mind...Curley writes to Spanier and Schultz: "After giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe yesterday, I am uncomfortable with what we agreed were the next steps."

Sounds to me like it was only Joe's idea to keep it in house. And some people still believe that Paterno had no say and actually had people he reported to, he was just the football coach. Ok. :lol:

 
If those e-mails are legit Paterno certainly knew PSU was sweeping this under the rug and was, at best, complicit in the decision. Indefensible.

 
If it was all paterno and they knew emails existed, why would those guys perjure themselves to the point of being charged whereas joe was not charged? We need to see the emails. I know that the former fbi guy doing the psu internal investigation is under instructions to submit hos report to psu and the media at the same time so that there are no leaks or accusations of impropriety. Assume the emails will be in there, which is still a few weeks-month away.

 
If it was all paterno and they knew emails existed, why would those guys perjure themselves to the point of being charged whereas joe was not charged? We need to see the emails. I know that the former fbi guy doing the psu internal investigation is under instructions to submit hos report to psu and the media at the same time so that there are no leaks or accusations of impropriety. Assume the emails will be in there, which is still a few weeks-month away.
It would seem that Paterno admitted knowledge of the 1998 incident, or that he was never asked if he knew.They also apparently lied about the 2001 incident (McQueary), whereas Paterno told them what he knew (up to the part of passing it up the line).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it was all paterno and they knew emails existed, why would those guys perjure themselves to the point of being charged whereas joe was not charged? We need to see the emails. I know that the former fbi guy doing the psu internal investigation is under instructions to submit hos report to psu and the media at the same time so that there are no leaks or accusations of impropriety. Assume the emails will be in there, which is still a few weeks-month away.
Maybe they thought the 11 year old emails couldn't be retrieved? :shrug:
 
If it was all paterno and they knew emails existed, why would those guys perjure themselves to the point of being charged whereas joe was not charged? We need to see the emails. I know that the former fbi guy doing the psu internal investigation is under instructions to submit hos report to psu and the media at the same time so that there are no leaks or accusations of impropriety. Assume the emails will be in there, which is still a few weeks-month away.
Maybe they thought the 11 year old emails couldn't be retrieved? :shrug:
Given that Joe was old school italian he probably never even used a phone, let alone email, now that i think of it. So we may not see much actual evidence from him. Those other guys though are dumber than they look if they didnt realize emails are always out there. Where did any of them admit to 1998 knowledge? I didnt see that part?Do the emails indicate what info they DID gather on sandusky and that 2001 incident? I assume Jerry's defense to them would have been he was just horsing around, so i wonder if they actually id'd the victim and talked to him at all. And then jerry would say to schultz "remember in 1998 they accused me as well but they never charged me because its all bs.". And then would play in his good reputation with them. They or mcqueary should have gone to the cops for sure. This dude was a phony sociopathic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it was all paterno and they knew emails existed, why would those guys perjure themselves to the point of being charged whereas joe was not charged? We need to see the emails. I know that the former fbi guy doing the psu internal investigation is under instructions to submit hos report to psu and the media at the same time so that there are no leaks or accusations of impropriety. Assume the emails will be in there, which is still a few weeks-month away.
Maybe they thought the 11 year old emails couldn't be retrieved? :shrug:
Given that How was old school italian ge probably bever even used a phone, let alone email, now that i think of it. So we may not see much actual evidence from him. Those other guys though are dumber than they look if they didnt realize emails are always out there. Where did any if them admit to 1998 knowledge? I didnt see that part?Do the emails indicate what info they DID gather on sandusky and that 2001 incident?
Read the CNN article posted by Bananafish.It states Curley perjured himself about the 1998 incident. You asked why Paterno wasn't charged with perjury and I suggested either he admitted knowledge or they didn't ask him as possible explanations.ETA - Based on the article, the 1998 incident is not related to the perjury charges - those stem from the 2001 incident. Based on the emails, it could be added to at least Curley's list.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IIRC what I saw last night, the President of PSU said 'I'm supportive' of the plan to NOT go to Second Mile or Child Welfare, then added that the only downside was that would potentially put the University in a difficult position if the problem wasn't solved by going directly to Sandusky.

In other words, they really thought they could sweep it under the rug by going to Sandusky directly. They knew the e-mails were still there -- they were just willing to gamble that they could disappear the problem without having it become public.

In other other words... these guys and the University are effed if those e-mails exist as reported.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it was all paterno and they knew emails existed, why would those guys perjure themselves to the point of being charged whereas joe was not charged? We need to see the emails. I know that the former fbi guy doing the psu internal investigation is under instructions to submit hos report to psu and the media at the same time so that there are no leaks or accusations of impropriety. Assume the emails will be in there, which is still a few weeks-month away.
Maybe they thought the 11 year old emails couldn't be retrieved? :shrug:
Given that Joe was old school italian he probably never even used a phone, let alone email, now that i think of it. So we may not see much actual evidence from him. Those other guys though are dumber than they look if they didnt realize emails are always out there. Where did any of them admit to 1998 knowledge? I didnt see that part?Do the emails indicate what info they DID gather on sandusky and that 2001 incident? I assume Jerry's defense to them would have been he was just horsing around, so i wonder if they actually id'd the victim and talked to him at all. And then jerry would say to schultz "remember in 1998 they accused me as well but they never charged me because its all bs.". And then would play in his good reputation with them. They or mcqueary should have gone to the cops for sure. This dude was a phony sociopathic.
Everybody in the chain, McQueary, Joe, and the 3 admin guys, should have gone to the cops. McQueary immediately, but also after he found nothing happened to Sandusky. Joe should have taken McQueary to the cops, but if the emails are true, that thought probably never crossed his mind as he actually convinced the 3 admin not to. The 3 admin should have gone with their first instinct and reported this properly, rather than putting the school at risk. All for what? How did Joe convince Curley?
 
"The only downside for us is if the message (to Sandusky) isn't 'heard' and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it," Spanier purportedly writes.
Yeah, that was the main thing to consider: "us".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top