Pip's Invitation
Footballguy
Faulkner is impenetrable mishmash. Paperback Writer is not.It worked for Faulkner
Faulkner is impenetrable mishmash. Paperback Writer is not.It worked for Faulkner
That is true. Those eyes have been hidden behind tinted glasses for years. He is 81, and he probably dyes his head hair and facial hair. He has no gray. It's sorta like being in disguise.He's been wearing shades almost constantly since 1985 or thereabouts
30th for you thenIs the Feb 13th deadline for real?
I was going to have to pull an all nighter this weekend but that gives me some time.
I love the idea of doing these but it's so hard to find the time. I am starting to feel silly even saying I am going to do it.
I really do want to and plan on doing this one. I think it will be interesting to see the list done under pressure.
Bathroom bookIt's a great vacation or bathroom book - breezy, 1 - 2 page stories. Loved it.
Bathroom bookAre toilet readers constipated people?
Is the Feb 13th deadline for real?
I was going to have to pull an all nighter this weekend but that gives me some time.
I love the idea of doing these but it's so hard to find the time. I am starting to feel silly even saying I am going to do it.
I really do want to and plan on doing this one. I think it will be interesting to see the list done under pressure.
Top 25 Mystery FFA Member lists are due Feb. 6th at midnightI was hoping for moobers to be the mystery author
Thank you.Faulkner is impenetrable mishmash. Paperback Writer is not.
They definitely cram a lot into the vocal melody, as Stevie was wont to do.Thank you.
As for "Paperback Writer", I don't usually care about lyrics so that doesn't bother me with this record. I'm not crazy about the vocal melody (though - weirdly - it reminds me of Stevie Wonder). But the playing is stunning to my ears.
I didn't know all this, but just listening to John talk about Klein after their first couple meetings it was hard to escape the idea that John was a sucker and he was being conned.On this date in 1969, the Beatles met for the first time as a group with noted slimeball crook Allen Klein, who had already been hired by John as his financial manager and would be hired thereafter by the group as their business manager over Paul's objections. This dispute, and Klein himself, should replace Yoko in the "why did the Beatles split up" narrative (which is not to say it was the only reason, but a bigger issue than Yoko ever was). John and George also later regretted their relationship with garbage-person Klein, leading to various lawsuits between the Beatles, individually and as a group, and Klein.
I am calling BS on this story. Rivulets of piss in the aisles? Cmon man that did not happen.Boy Band, eh? i believe urine denial if ya think the chumps of the '90s got such gushing responses ...
“Multiple people have claimed Beatles shows were known for their urine.” One of them was John B. Lynn, the son of the owner of a venue The Beatles played at. He told The Washington Post that the concert hall smelled like the pee of over-excited girls after the show.
In 2010, Irish singer-songwriter Bob Geldof told Q Magazine that he was stunned at the number of young girls “pissing themselves” at a Beatles show he attended in the 1960s.
"The Beatles was a case of watching females in excelsis,” he said. “It’s the old cliché, but you couldn’t hear them for all the screaming. I remember looking down at the cinema floor and seeing these rivulets of piss in the aisles. The girls were literally pissing themselves with excitement. So what I associate most with The Beatles is the smell of girls’ urine.”
![]()
no, that's why the stories are only a page or so long ...
Small world. Rivulets of Piss was the title of my collection of autobiographical avant garde poetry. The guy at Black Sparrow Press suggested the title in a nice letter regretting to inform me they wouldn’t publish it.Rivulets of Piss was the name of my one-man show on conservation. Critics called it "caustic" and "leaky".
IIRC, my legal team sent out a "cease & depissed" letter on that oneSmall world. Rivulets of Piss was the title of my collection of autobiographical avant garde poetry. The guy at Black Sparrow Press suggested the title in a nice letter regretting to inform me they wouldn’t publish it.
Best Beatle song for pooping? Old Brown Shoe?
Poop and pee stories are the hallmark of any great thread.
Best Beatle song for pooping? Old Brown Shoe?
First impressions are strong ones. You might like their early stuff, some of which, in the words of RA, is punk as feck.Reading all this love for the Beatles makes me feel the need to come clean. The wind-chill outside is around zero so it's not like I have anything else to do.
Even though I actively fight against it, I still harbor feelings about the Beatles that I developed as a pre-teen and struggle getting over. I've recounted on several occasions that my parents listened only to country music. At least it was what today is recognized as "good" country (Waylon, Willie, Merle, Dolly, Dottie, etc) but I had zero exposure to rock/pop until I got my own boom box and started religiously listening to the local Top 40 station ( and later binging MTV). I had of course heard of the Beatles, but I can't recall actually ever hearing a song except for maybe I Want to Hold Your Hand on Ed Sullivan clips.
Queue Nobody Told Me by John Lennon suddenly getting massive airplay on the radio when I was 11. I hated it. All my friends hated it. I mean, we thought it might be the worst song we had ever heard (the field was admittedly limited). Then Sir Paul came along with Say Say Say and Ebony and Ivory and the The Girl is Mine. I thought to myself, "How can the Beatles be so great when these songs suck so bad?"
When a classic rock station finally made it to my hometown, I quickly realized that my initial conclusion was woefully undercooked. Still, no one at my high school really listened to them and neither did my college friends, so I remained decidedly ambivalent. At one point over 15 years back, I bought a bunch of Beatles records at Princeton Record Exchange (one of the best records stores in the U.S., for the record) and tried to give them a legit shot. But then my son went from baby to toddler and the turntable got shelved for quite a while.
I know I really liked Rubber Soul and Help! and that Maxwell's Silver Hammer kind of made me stabby, but I'm still mainly a blank slate. I tell people that have never seen The Wire that I'm jealous they get to experience it for the first time. I'm looking forward to the same kind of thing here. But nothing will ever make me not despise Nobody Told Me.
Reading all this love for the Beatles makes me feel the need to come clean. The wind-chill outside is around zero so it's not like I have anything else to do.
Even though I actively fight against it, I still harbor feelings about the Beatles that I developed as a pre-teen and struggle getting over. I've recounted on several occasions that my parents listened only to country music. At least it was what today is recognized as "good" country (Waylon, Willie, Merle, Dolly, Dottie, etc) but I had zero exposure to rock/pop until I got my own boom box and started religiously listening to the local Top 40 station ( and later binging MTV). I had of course heard of the Beatles, but I can't recall actually ever hearing a song except for maybe I Want to Hold Your Hand on Ed Sullivan clips.
Queue Nobody Told Me by John Lennon suddenly getting massive airplay on the radio when I was 11. I hated it. All my friends hated it. I mean, we thought it might be the worst song we had ever heard (the field was admittedly limited). Then Sir Paul came along with Say Say Say and Ebony and Ivory and the The Girl is Mine. I thought to myself, "How can the Beatles be so great when these songs suck so bad?"
When a classic rock station finally made it to my hometown, I quickly realized that my initial conclusion was woefully undercooked. Still, no one at my high school really listened to them and neither did my college friends, so I remained decidedly ambivalent. At one point over 15 years back, I bought a bunch of Beatles records at Princeton Record Exchange (one of the best records stores in the U.S., for the record) and tried to give them a legit shot. But then my son went from baby to toddler and the turntable got shelved for quite a while.
I know I really liked Rubber Soul and Help! and that Maxwell's Silver Hammer kind of made me stabby, but I'm still mainly a blank slate. I tell people that have never seen The Wire that I'm jealous they get to experience it for the first time. I'm looking forward to the same kind of thing here. But nothing will ever make me not despise Nobody Told Me.
Welcome. We like your kind here. In my first Beatles thread, three years and several lifetimes ago, I admitted that I was a very late Beatles adopter. Had many friends, primarily musicians I admired and enjoyed, who revered them, but I just didn't get it. Oddly enough, the only song I really knew of theirs from growing up was, as with you, "I Want To Hold Your Hand." I liked it well enough but didn't get the big deal.
Finally, I saw someone I loved perform "She Loves You" and it just ####### clicked. So I started to scour the catalog and discovered...everything. Every bit of music you could want, every genre, every scratch to my musical itch.
I'm saying again, welcome. Start wherever you want. Since you mentioned enjoying Rubber Soul and Help!, maybe go there along with Revolver. Those three are by far my favorite Beatles era. But no one could fault someone for loving the Sgt. Pepper's/white album, or the Abbey Road/Let It Be time, or the early stuff that blew the whole world the #### away.
I guess if I were to come at it fresh, I'd go in chronological order, if only to marvel at what one band could discover and produce in such a short period of time. Please Please Me to Abbey Road...FFS. The musical and technical innovations are unfathomable. And that's setting aside the beauty and wonder and joy of the music itself.
I also note that you knew Paul or John from their later works, but only (especially for Paul) from the pop crises among them. Both of them put out unbelievable solo works, though particularly Paul since he's had a lot longer to do it. I did a 291-song countdown of my favorites of those (and George released, pound-for-pound, the best of them), which you could look at if only to take in the last several dozen. For John, I'd start with the first Plastic Ono Band record, for George All Things Must Pass (of course), and for Paul check out Flaming Pie or obviously Band on the Run. Ringo...well, Ringo. He has had 21 records now, and I do have a couple of handsful of songs I think are wonderful.
Is one of the 160 already.
I do find those interesting, and it would be cool, but if it's too much effort for you, Getz or whoever, then that's OK.Would you guys like to have these for comparison and discussion of how wrong they are?
I do find those interesting, and it would be cool, but if it's too much effort for you, Getz or whoever, then that's OK.
Thought crossed my mine on this last week.Thoughts from the crew on write-ups from Getz and the others of us, in terms of including website/magazine stuff?
When I did the other two Beatles countdowns, I didn't include any rankings from NME, Rolling Stone, whatever, because I don't GAF. But in both the U2 and LZ countdowns they have included rankings and write-ups. Would you guys like to have these for comparison and discussion of how wrong they are?
Thought crossed my mine on this last week.
I don't really care about those and I hope we don't do it. Most of those types of lists seem way off base. And they will detract from the great comments from everybody when we do the count down. JMO.
I could be wrong, but I don't see many comments on those in the LZ thread, other than the one today that mentioned was was really bizarreOops.
I could be wrong, but I don't see many comments on those in the LZ thread, other than the one today that mentioned was was really bizarre
Probably my short attention span, but the LZ writeups are just way too long for me. So I auto skip those old list rankings and just read what he writes about which voters ranked it high and that info.Actually I'm not sure many people have read them in that thread or in U2, based on comments. But our man Pip reads them and comments, because he's awesome.
I dunno. We could instead just do a post after our countdown of how we compared to whatever lists are out there?
I really don't care about any of it. Obviously didn't include in my countdowns for that reason. Just trying to give the people what they want.