avoiding injuries
Footballguy
How many more championships would Jordan have if he left the Bulls to construct his own all-star team instead of playing for the Barons?
LeBron has a better career TS% than Jordan, .581 to .569. Big fan of that stat.Also should be noted, why does Bron only have a .1% advantage in career fg%, especially when he plays so much closer to the rim than MJ did?
I'm a huge MJ fan but it's not fair to hold Lebron's first years in the league against him when MJ was playing against college players from age 18-20.Good stuff. With or without this I would never dispute anyone who says MJ was the best ever. I think he was. There are some arguments to be made for other guys. I have heard them, and I go with MJ.
Explain why it's stupid then. I would like to hear. I'm always open to differing viewpoints.I didn't disagree with anything. It was just a stupid comment on your part.
He was also much more physically mature when he started. LeBron entered the NBA at a much younger age.Lebron through 13 NBA seasons:
Jordan through 13 NBA seasons:
- 3 championships in 7 Finals appearances
- 4 MVPs, 3 Finals MVPs, ROY
- 10 1st team All NBA selections, 5 1st team All Defense selections
- 27.2 ppg, 7.2 rpg, 6.9 apg, 1.7 spg, 0.8 bpg, 3.4 topg, .498 FG%, .340 3FG%, .744 FT% (regular season)
ETA: It is also worth noting that Jordan effectively achieved those honors/awards in 11 seasons, not 13, since he played only 18 games in 1985-86 due to injury and only 17 games in 1994-95 when he returned from his baseball sabbatical.
- 6 championships in 6 Finals appearances
- 5 MVPs, 6 Finals MVPs, ROY, 1 DPOY
- 10 1st team All NBA selections, 9 1st team All Defense selections
- 31.5 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 5.4 apg, 2.5 spg, 0.9 bpg, 2.8 topg, .505 FG%, .332 3fg%, .835 FT% (regular season)
How is it holding it against him? He was 2nd team All NBA in his second season and 1st team All NBA in his third season.I'm a huge MJ fan but it's not fair to hold Lebron's first years in the league against him when MJ was playing against college players from age 18-20.
Interesting that you used the term "physically mature." I'm pretty sure Lebron was much more physically developed entering the NBA than Jordan. Jordan bulked up after he started taking beatings from the Bad Boys Pistons teams.He was also much more physically mature when he started. LeBron entered the NBA at a much younger age.
Still taking Timmy over Lebron.. for now.
come on. Even Duncan would say that's nuts. This is serious stuff, and only those of us that understand advanced analytics get it.come on. Even Duncan would say that's nuts.
I have no idea what you even mean here.I'm a huge MJ fan but it's not fair to hold Lebron's first years in the league against him when MJ was playing against college players from age 18-20.
Well it was less than three years difference and I think many people consider LeBron to be the most physically gifted player to ever play. He was 6'8" and 240 pounds coming out of high school, he was a monster. Jordan was tremendously athletic but James had the better physical tools when he was 18 than Jordan ever had.He was also much more physically mature when he started. LeBron entered the NBA at a much younger age.
Maybe this is more clear - Lebron's career from age 18-31 is not the same as Jordan's career from age 21-34.I have no idea what you even mean here.
Physically mature isn't the same thing as bulk. Of course James has been larger. He's a completely different body type - he's a forward and Jordan was a guard.Interesting that you used the term "physically mature." I'm pretty sure Lebron was much more physically developed entering the NBA than Jordan. Jordan bulked up after he started taking beatings from the Bad Boys Pistons teams.
Jordan was presumably more emotionally mature and perhaps had a better developed basketball IQ entering the league because of his college and Olympic experience. But I don't really see a big difference here, given Lebron was 2nd team All NBA in his second NBA season.
Yes, and at 35 he will have better physical tools that Jordan did. His ceiling, physically, is just higher. Look at him at 21 vs Jordan at 21. Just saying if his first 13 years started then, he'd likely be doing even better against Jordan's stats.Well it was less than three years difference and I think many people consider LeBron to be the most physically gifted player to ever play. He was 6'8" and 240 pounds coming out of high school, he was a monster. Jordan was tremendously athletic but James had the better physical tools when he was 18 than Jordan ever had.
Bron went to more finals than Jordan.Jordan 0 Finals losses
Bron 4 four FOUR Finals losses
Yup. I love that people hold finals losses against Lebron, but then don't hold regular ol playoff losses against Jordan. Takes some real magic to try and make that argument stick.Bron went to more finals than Jordan.
No. No. No. No one has ever had a Finals performance like the one we just saw LeBron have. Not in the history of the sport.Jordan is still the GOAT. LeBron is the closest since, but he would need at least two more seasons like this and another MVP to be considered. This run closed the gap a lot more than anything else he has done. It was a Jordanesque performance.
First off, Jordan's first 13 seasons took him to age 35, not 34.Maybe this is more clear - Lebron's career from age 18-31 is not the same as Jordan's career from age 21-34.
I'm not saying he's better than Jordan yet, but he's clearly on that path. If he wins a couple more MVP's and another title (especially if it's for the Cavs) playing like he just did then I'm going to declare him GOAT.First off, Jordan's first 13 seasons took him to age 35, not 34.
Aside from that, IMO this is being overstated. Jordan played 101 games at UNC; Lebron played 79 games as a rookie in the NBA. By the time he turned 20, he had played more games in the NBA than Jordan did in college. And he gained NBA experience in playing those games, which was better than college experience. Lebron's season 4 was equivalent to Jordan's rookie season in the NBA, and Lebron had 251 games of NBA experience by the time he started his 4th season.
Furthermore, we know that in Jordan's next 3 seasons after age 31, he added 3 championships, 2 MVPs, and 3 Finals MVPs. I doubt Lebron will match that. If he does, then he may very well justifiably be viewed as the GOAT.
But you think you can beat Pacman in a fight, so your opinion is irrelevant.Still taking Timmy over Lebron.. for now.
Really? I'll even exclude Jordan, you may want to take a look what Shaq did from '00 to '02.No. No. No. No one has ever had a Finals performance like the one we just saw LeBron have. Not in the history of the sport.
Not saying these last two weeks make LeBron the GOAT, but Jordan never had a Finals where he played this well.
Even with that... the two playing styles are so different it's unfair to both to try to equate them. Offensively, LeBron is a lot more like Magic than Jordan. And defensively, LeBron is more like... well, I can't think of a good analogue. Maybe Pistons-era Rodman before he became a rebounding specialist. Maybe mid-2000s Garnett when he should still chase the ball around without losing track of where he would go to get the rebound.
Kobe went 6-24 in a game 7 and Lebron just put on what was an absolutely dominating performance in all phases of the game.Both in their prime, game 7 NBA finals. I'd rather have Kobe over Lebron.
Thanks!Kobe went 6-24 in a game 7 and Lebron just put on what was an absolutely dominating performance in all phases of the game.
Makes sense!
No I don't.But you think you can beat Pacman in a fight, so your opinion is irrelevant.
James has never had as much help as Jordan always had when winning titles.Maybe it's because I grew up in Chicago and never saw Michael lose (born in '83) but I don't think I can put Lebron up top until he wins 6. Hell 2 of them needed a dream team to accomplish. I think he's currently wherever Duncan is at for GOAT.
Bosh and Wade didn't help?Ghost Rider said:James has never had as much help as Jordan always had when winning titles.
I said "as much" help, not "no" help. It helps to read, sir.Bosh and Wade didn't help?
I think you underestimate Wade and Bosh's help. Sir.I said "as much" help, not "no" help. It helps to read, sir.
I have not seen enough tape of those early NBA type games but how is it possible for a guy to get 40 boards in a game? I get that he was probably bigger than anybody else but in today's NBA a guy who grabs 14 boards in a playoff game is seen as terrific, approach 20 and it is classified as legendary. What are the most amount of boards in a single game in the modern era? What was it about the game back the ? Were there just more opportunities? More misses?elguapo07 said:Really? I'll even exclude Jordan, you may want to take a look what Shaq did from '00 to '02.
And I realize it doesn't count because basketball reference doesn't have too much on it but you may want to research the 1962 finals to see what Bill Russell and Elgin Baylor did.
Here's a preview - Baylor scored 61pts in game 5 while Russell went 30 and 40(that is rebounds) in game 7 while averaging 27 boards per game.
Only if he also had Shaq.Annyong said:Both in their prime, game 7 NBA finals. I'd rather have Kobe over Lebron.
Comparing Lebron to Jordon just shows what a legendary figure Lebron is already. You're taking the unanimous choice of best player to ever lace up the sneakers and using it as the barometer of which to measure Lebron. Well, James finishes second in that comparison. However, he is the only one Lebron finishes second to. He accomplished something in this finals that will never happen again. Finishing 1st in points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks is absolutely mind boggling. Not only has it never been done in a finals before, it has never been done in any playoff series EVER. One day, we'll tell our kids and grandkids about that and they won't believe it.Jordan gets older, stops taking it to the hoop anywhere near as much as he used to, and develops one of the best mid range games ever.
Lebron gets older, loses the ability to shoot, and takes it to the hoop every play.
Just crazy. Lebron is a monster.
Still Jordan for me. The numbers never tell the whole story. I think we all know Jordan wins 8 straight titles if he never retires the first time. Also, Jordan should have probably been given the MVP like 10 times. The voting on that stuff is kind of silly sometimes.
As for Lebron leading this finals in all statistical categories, while an amazing feat, this was the series to do it. Neither team has a great rebounder, great assist man, great thief, or great shot locker. Bron played like 46 minutes a game and has the ball in his hands every play, while playing D against a team playing fast and throwing up long shots with lots of rebounding opportunities.
That's because most fans understand what Pippin was.Forget Jordan and James in this argument for a second.
Scottie Pippen gets completely disregarded in any argument.
They played at an obscene pace.I have not seen enough tape of those early NBA type games but how is it possible for a guy to get 40 boards in a game? I get that he was probably bigger than anybody else but in today's NBA a guy who grabs 14 boards in a playoff game is seen as terrific, approach 20 and it is classified as legendary. What are the most amount of boards in a single game in the modern era? What was it about the game back the ? Were there just more opportunities? More misses?
This was before the 3 so you'd think the shots would be of highe percentage
how about the 24 second clock
Yes. Yes. Yes. LeBron lead his team to a Finals win. Jordanesque, means Jordan-like. Not a copy, but similar in some trait, which I'm indicating he lead his team to a series win like Jordan used to.Bruce Dickinson said:No. No. No. No one has ever had a Finals performance like the one we just saw LeBron have. Not in the history of the sport.
Not saying these last two weeks make LeBron the GOAT, but Jordan never had a Finals where he played this well.
Even with that... the two playing styles are so different it's unfair to both to try to equate them. Offensively, LeBron is a lot more like Magic than Jordan. And defensively, LeBron is more like... well, I can't think of a good analogue. Maybe Pistons-era Rodman before he became a rebounding specialist. Maybe mid-2000s Garnett when he should still chase the ball around without losing track of where he would go to get the rebound.
50s/60s NBA was played at a ridiculous pace and teams shot in the high 30%-low 40%. That season teams put up 118.8 PPG on 42% shooting. I few years ago in one of these threads I looked at Russell and Wilt's rebounding, making an approximation of missed shots while they were on the court (something like their minutes/48 * average missed shots in the NBA) and how many rebounds they grabbed. Their rebounding percentages were in line with what you would expect from a studly rebounder in today's NBA but not as good as the rebounding specialists (the guys like Reggie Evans or Marcus Camby who ditch defensive assignments to grab rebounds). Also, those guys played almost all game every game, where most all-star centers today play 32-34 mpg.I have not seen enough tape of those early NBA type games but how is it possible for a guy to get 40 boards in a game? I get that he was probably bigger than anybody else but in today's NBA a guy who grabs 14 boards in a playoff game is seen as terrific, approach 20 and it is classified as legendary. What are the most amount of boards in a single game in the modern era? What was it about the game back the ? Were there just more opportunities? More misses?
This was before the 3 so you'd think the shots would be of highe percentage
how about the 24 second clock
Exactly, and he's not even done yet. These debates could be, and probably will be one way or the other, completely different in 5 years. Yet here we are now.Comparing Lebron to Jordon just shows what a legendary figure Lebron is already. You're taking the unanimous choice of best player to ever lace up the sneakers and using it as the barometer of which to measure Lebron. Well, James finishes second in that comparison. However, he is the only one Lebron finishes second to. He accomplished something in this finals that will never happen again. Finishing 1st in points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks is absolutely mind boggling. Not only has it never been done in a finals before, it has never been done in any playoff series EVER. One day, we'll tell our kids and grandkids about that and they won't believe it.
James is solidly in the 2-5/6 argument now.It's interesting what one series has done for LeBron - we now can have a reasonable and valid conversation about he and Jordan and who is better. I'm not sure anybody other than the biggest James supporter was favoring James. It's doesn't seem as far-fetched now if he doesn't have a dramatic drop off.
I still have Jordan #1 as I think he wins 8 straight if Stern didn't suspend him.![]()
A few things I can think of. Early 60s teams averaged around 150 ball possessions and 118 points which us about 50% more possessions per game. Also when Wilt entered the league in 1960 there were just a handful of players taller than 6'8 - Russell being one of them. Also not only did Russell have a height advantage but he was also a superior athlete and basically dominated the game from a defensive standpoint.I have not seen enough tape of those early NBA type games but how is it possible for a guy to get 40 boards in a game? I get that he was probably bigger than anybody else but in today's NBA a guy who grabs 14 boards in a playoff game is seen as terrific, approach 20 and it is classified as legendary. What are the most amount of boards in a single game in the modern era? What was it about the game back the ? Were there just more opportunities? More misses?
This was before the 3 so you'd think the shots would be of highe percentage
how about the 24 second clock