Doesn't the sample size point apply to declaring someone a JAG before he's even had a start in the NFL?
Someone made the point that Miami let him go so he can't be good. That seems ridiculous when talking about that inept organization.
I agree Miami has a pretty inept front office, but it still says something when a team in need of RBs cuts a guy they drafted after just one year. But that's just one part. The reason I called him a JAG was from the sum of these parts:
1) mediocre college resume and combine
2) pre-draft scout reports on par with JAG
3) actual draft position pretty low (5.31 - 14th RB selected, I believe)
4) three games played as a rookie
5) cut after 1 year from RB needy team
6) experts still not impressed by his NFL film from 2 years
The book is not written on him, but there's enough data that we can say the arrow is leaning more to JAG than hidden gem. Maybe he's the next Priest Holmes, but FF is a game of odds and the odds of Gillislee being better than a JAG are slim. But again, this was just a
minor point of a quick answer to someone's question. Not sure why everyone wants to take issue with it. You guys been rostering him for 3 years on your dynasty squads? He's probably a nice one week spot start if McCoy misses this game. Why such vigor in defending his non-JAG honor??