What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

LeSean McCoy traded to the Bills (1 Viewer)

"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Well since you seem to be including college, probably more than you think.

Jeremy Maclin for one.

 
So in successive years the Chipper has removed the "faces of the franchise" in DeSean Jackson and LeSean McCoy. I know Shady counted $12 million against the cap and had a relatively disappointing season by his lofty standards, but he still finished 3rd in rushing and is still an elite RB. Chip believes in his system for certain, but now the Eagles have question marks at QB and RB. And if Maclin doesn't get re-signed, WR becomes an issue.

And now the chase for Mariota begins. The way Chip's going, the team should be renamed "Duck Dynasty". :rolleyes: .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Jeremy Maclin.
So, 1?

 
GroveDiesel, on 04 Mar 2015 - 08:44 AM, said:
Snotbubbles, on 04 Mar 2015 - 08:26 AM, said:
GroveDiesel, on 04 Mar 2015 - 07:21 AM, said:
Donnybrook, on 04 Mar 2015 - 12:05 AM, said:
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Jeremy Maclin.
So, 1?
Looks like McCoy would have been cut anyways, how much more did you think they would get? Alonso is young and ACL injuries aren't what they used to be and his salary is nothing. What's not to like?

 
So in successive years the Chipper has removed the "faces of the franchise" in DeSean Jackson and LeSean McCoy...

...And now the chase for Mariota begins... .
That was my 1st thought, too. These two things are incongruous to me, though I know there's been talk. If taking the "Anyone can play in my system" approach, why spend what it will take to get Mariota even if he was "your guy"?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So in successive years the Chipper has removed the "faces of the franchise" in DeSean Jackson and LeSean McCoy...

...And now the chase for Mariota begins... .
That was my 1st thought, too. These two things are incongruous to me, though I know there's been talk. If taking the "Anyone can play in my system" approach, why spend what it will take to get Mariota even if he was "your guy"?
He didn't release/trade those guys because of an "anyone can play in my system" approach. He's never had that approach. He wants big WRs, he's said that from day 1. "Big guys beat up on little guys". So he never had an "anyone can play in my system" approach. What he's done is change his system to the talent that he has.

 
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Jeremy Maclin.
So, 1?
Frank Gore

Casey Hampton

 
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Jeremy Maclin.
So, 1?
Thought Thomas Davis and Demeco Ryan's have had success after multiple ACL tears. It doesn't happen too often.
 
So in successive years the Chipper has removed the "faces of the franchise" in DeSean Jackson and LeSean McCoy...

...And now the chase for Mariota begins... .
That was my 1st thought, too. These two things are incongruous to me, though I know there's been talk. If taking the "Anyone can play in my system" approach, why spend what it will take to get Mariota even if he was "your guy"?
He didn't release/trade those guys because of an "anyone can play in my system" approach. He's never had that approach. He wants big WRs, he's said that from day 1. "Big guys beat up on little guys". So he never had an "anyone can play in my system" approach. What he's done is change his system to the talent that he has.
You mean he's changed the talent to the system, right?

 
If Kelly really wants Spiller as many here are insinuating and Rex is going to release him anyway, then why didn't Kelly just ask for him as part of the trade? If I were Spiller, it would seem to me that the Eagles didn't want me.
Can you trade a free agent?

 
So in successive years the Chipper has removed the "faces of the franchise" in DeSean Jackson and LeSean McCoy...

...And now the chase for Mariota begins... .
That was my 1st thought, too. These two things are incongruous to me, though I know there's been talk. If taking the "Anyone can play in my system" approach, why spend what it will take to get Mariota even if he was "your guy"?
He didn't release/trade those guys because of an "anyone can play in my system" approach. He's never had that approach. He wants big WRs, he's said that from day 1. "Big guys beat up on little guys". So he never had an "anyone can play in my system" approach. What he's done is change his system to the talent that he has.
You mean he's changed the talent to the system, right?
A combination of both. He came in and used a system of plays that best fit what he had at the time. As the talent around him changes, the system will morph into the type of system he eventually wants.

 
Can we say this was mutually beneficial? Those do happen. This is like Clinton pprtis for Champ Bailey. Both were good and both improved the teams they went to at their respective positions.

 
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Jeremy Maclin.
So, 1?
Frank Gore

Casey Hampton
Terry Allen

Allen, the Vikings' ninth-round draft pick in 1990, already had suffered an ACL injury when he tore the other one during practice in the summer of 1993.

Yet Allen came back in 1994 and ran for 1,031 yards and. He then went to Washington and posted back-to-back 1,300-yard seasons. He had 1,309 yards and 10 touchdowns in 1995 and career highs for yards (1,353) and touchdowns (21) in 1996.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder if the Bills shopped Kiko around to every team. I would be disappointed, as a Packer fan, if the Packers did not at least pursue this option some.

 
Insein, on 04 Mar 2015 - 10:01 AM, said:Can we say this was mutually beneficial? Those do happen. This is like Clinton pprtis for Champ Bailey. Both were good and both improved the teams they went to at their respective positions.
That's what I'm thinking, could be a good deal for both sides....although I would rather have Champ Bailey.

 
I wonder if the Bills shopped Kiko around to every team. I would be disappointed, as a Packer fan, if the Packers did not at least pursue this option some.
Supposed Eagles were about to cut McCoy and shopped him around. Bills took 20 mins to throw Kiko at them and said sold.

 
Seems like a solid deal for both sides if it goes through. If McCoy refuses to report and the trade doesn't go through--seems like Philly will obviously just release him. I just wonder if that's dangerous knowing that Dallas has a solid o-line and I could see them going after McCoy if he were to hit the market. In any case--at this moment--I really think Sproles outlook just got a lot better looking fantasy wise.

 
I wonder if the Bills shopped Kiko around to every team. I would be disappointed, as a Packer fan, if the Packers did not at least pursue this option some.
Supposed Eagles were about to cut McCoy and shopped him around. Bills took 20 mins to throw Kiko at them and said sold.
One guy no one ever heard of tweeted it, so it must be so.
Bruce Arians said that he knew that McCoy was available but wasn't "the right fit." Don't know if he meant fitting the offense or fitting the cap.

 
I wonder if the Bills shopped Kiko around to every team. I would be disappointed, as a Packer fan, if the Packers did not at least pursue this option some.
Supposed Eagles were about to cut McCoy and shopped him around. Bills took 20 mins to throw Kiko at them and said sold.
One guy no one ever heard of tweeted it, so it must be so.
Bruce Arians said that he knew that McCoy was available but wasn't "the right fit." Don't know if he meant fitting the offense or fitting the cap.
Arizona has been a pretty decently run organization the past 10 or so years. Paying 10mil for any RB is pretty dumb in the todays NFL market. It's highly possible to get CJ Spiller, Shane Vereen, AD, Murray, Mark Ingram, Reggie Bush and Frank Gore all cheaper than that plus a deep rookie class. Writing certainly was on the wall for Shady, hindsight is 20/20 but it shouldn't have come as a surprise and the Bills could have just retained Spiller. Bad deal on their part just taking on McCoy's salary.

 
I wonder if the Bills shopped Kiko around to every team. I would be disappointed, as a Packer fan, if the Packers did not at least pursue this option some.
given that he was moved for an elite talent at a position of need, I'm not sure what the Packers would have been able/willing to offer in return.

 
I wonder if the Bills shopped Kiko around to every team. I would be disappointed, as a Packer fan, if the Packers did not at least pursue this option some.
Supposed Eagles were about to cut McCoy and shopped him around. Bills took 20 mins to throw Kiko at them and said sold.
One guy no one ever heard of tweeted it, so it must be so.
Probably at least something to it, as Ladianian said yesterday McCoy told him he did not expect to return. One way or another, the Eagles were never going to pay him close to $10million this season and he was never going to take a pay cut-only a restructure but if he'd have done that any money taken off the top of this year would have just been converted to a guarantee. Something had to give in this situation, personally I believe the tweet, had they not found a trade partner they would have just cut him.

 
Can we say this was mutually beneficial? Those do happen. This is like Clinton pprtis for Champ Bailey. Both were good and both improved the teams they went to at their respective positions.
The way it helps Buffalo is that they would never be able to sign McCoy as a free agent. Because they aren't a desirable destination they are forced to overpay to get good players. In that sense I guess it was beneficial.

 
I think just moving the big contract is good for the Eagles. They can be active in free agency if they want to. They may have guys they are targeting. Maybe they cleared space, added Alonso and will go after ADP or DeMarco Murray? There are a lot of RB options out there. Freeing the cap space creates a lot of opportunity.

 
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Thomas Davis
yeah, I think davis tore his 3x

 
Insein, on 04 Mar 2015 - 10:01 AM, said:Can we say this was mutually beneficial? Those do happen. This is like Clinton pprtis for Champ Bailey. Both were good and both improved the teams they went to at their respective positions.
That's what I'm thinking, could be a good deal for both sides....although I would rather have Champ Bailey.
I agree this deal on paper looks like it makes sense for both teams

The Bills were #3 in total defense and #5 in scoring defense last year without Kiko – so he appears to be expendable. They gain a proven RB for a coach that believes in running the rock.

The Eagles obviously didn’t want to spend a ton on the RB position so they gain cap space and a promising player on the cheap (cap wise) at a position they need help

 
Can we say this was mutually beneficial? Those do happen. This is like Clinton pprtis for Champ Bailey. Both were good and both improved the teams they went to at their respective positions.
In terms of talent and production for the next year or two it could be mutually beneficial. When considering contracts and age, this is a lopsided ### trade.

 
Everyone talking about shady going to a worse supporting cast but how about Kiko, coming off a torn up knee, going to a team that has no where near the d-line that Kiko got the luxury of playing behind?
I don't know much about the Buffalo DL but ours played very well last season FWIW
You should look at the Bills D then because, yes, Philly played nice, but the Bills D was NASTY last year and had been very good for a few years now. They don't get a lot of publicity but they bring it. Philly's D isn't close.

 
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
And sometimes they just dont look the same. There isnt a single Eagles fan who watching him the past 2 years that will tell you he looked as fast, decisive, ellusive etc from 2013 to 2014

 
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).


Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
This post would have merit if he wasn't coming off of his worst season ever, after tallying 700+ touches over his last two years. If this had happened after 2013 the reaction would be much different (and for good reason). Maybe it was just a bad year, but it's just as likely that it was the start of the slide.

 
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
Shady is a good RB, but he is not in the same class as AP, making this comparison invalid. AP is a generational talent. A first ballot HOFer type talent (maybe not now, due to off field incidents).

Shady looked pretty average last year, playing on a real good offense behind a real good OL. $10M+ is way too much for him IMO, and I dont think its even arguable. Im not saying he isnt going to help the Bills offense, because he probably is. I am just saying to cool the jets on the AP comparisons.

 
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
His career low for a season is actually 4.1 and he's been at 4.2 twice. But other than splitting hairs if we just look at the past 3 seasons I'd say two of those seasons he was closer to what I'd label as good and not great. Last year he just seemed a bit sluggish.

If the Bills had got AP I would in fact say they got a stud RB. A RB that gives them the ability to run with power and a homerun threat, a RB that has shown he can function without great blocking or even with mediocore QB play. I don't feel that way about McCoy with the Bills. He's a significant updgrade for sure but with a bad OL and weak QB I just don't think he's the kind of chain moving RB you can rely on with the kind of consistency of a Peterson.

 
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
Shady is a good RB, but he is not in the same class as AP, making this comparison invalid. AP is a generational talent. A first ballot HOFer type talent (maybe not now, due to off field incidents).

Shady looked pretty average last year, playing on a real good offense behind a real good OL. $10M+ is way too much for him IMO, and I dont think its even arguable. Im not saying he isnt going to help the Bills offense, because he probably is. I am just saying to cool the jets on the AP comparisons.
Shady is every bit as good as Peterson.

 
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
Shady is a good RB, but he is not in the same class as AP, making this comparison invalid. AP is a generational talent. A first ballot HOFer type talent (maybe not now, due to off field incidents).

Shady looked pretty average last year, playing on a real good offense behind a real good OL. $10M+ is way too much for him IMO, and I dont think its even arguable. Im not saying he isnt going to help the Bills offense, because he probably is. I am just saying to cool the jets on the AP comparisons.
Shady is every bit as good as Peterson.
Ok...but no. Not really all that close.

 
I think this pretty much nails it

Phil Savage ‏@SeniorBowlPhil 22m22 minutes ago Fairhope, AL

In Alonso/McCoy trade, each head coach thinks his system can "manufacture" production from position. Rex on D at ILB and Chip on O at RB.
Bills assume 10 mil, Philly 700k.
Bills get a Rb who has led the NFl in rushing, has the sickest moves since Barry, and his career low for a season is 4.2YPC (better than the typical average of a starting RB).

Eagles get a one hit wonder coming off a torn up knee whose only NFL production came behind playing in free range behind a dominant line.

Sometimes you get what you pay for.

If this were Adrian Peterson, even at his age and salary, people would be saying "OMG! Rex has a stud RB..He's gonna be awesome!"

A great deal of this reaction is coming from A) the rarity that big name players are actually traded and B)the short-term bitterness many Shady owners from last year are remembering as their basis of Shady.

People who pay big for players and get burned love nothing more than to see those players fail. But they forget that sometimes GREAT players have down years.
As a huge fan of LT I know how swift the end can come - for him it was his 8th season and McCoy is entering his 7th. McCoy is still very good, but he's soon to have the highest RB salary in the league after Peterson is cut.

I've said the trade comes down to Alonso - if he's a starting LB for the Eagles the next two years it's a huge win for them, if he's not then they merely break even.

I do understand the trade from the Bills point of view - they have a great defense and a, ahem, 'uncertain' QB situation. Getting McCoy allows them to attempt to replicate the Seahawks success without relying too much on their QB. It's an interesting strategy, we'll see how it works.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
I looked this up after Paul Richardson tore his ACL for the second time. I think there were three people that came back and had careers, but only one came back and was remotely considered a "star".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the Bills had got AP I would in fact say they got a stud RB. A RB that gives them the ability to run with power and a homerun threat, a RB that has shown he can function without great blocking or even with mediocore QB play. I don't feel that way about McCoy with the Bills. He's a significant updgrade for sure but with a bad OL and weak QB I just don't think he's the kind of chain moving RB you can rely on with the kind of consistency of a Peterson.
problem solved

 
-CE- said:
GroveDiesel said:
Snotbubbles said:
GroveDiesel said:
Donnybrook said:
Faust said:
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
Jeremy Maclin.
So, 1?
Maclin tore his ACL twice?
First was went he started college in 2006.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
-CE- said:
GroveDiesel said:
Donnybrook said:
Faust said:
"He is entering his seventh season and he will turn 27 this summer. That might not seem old, but in running-back years, it's ancient." - Pete Prisco
Ok, and how many NFL players have been stars after tearing their ACL more than once? Seems like that's an overlooked piece.
I looked this up after Paul Richardson tore his ACL for the second time. I think there were three people that came back and had careers, but only one came back and was remotely considered a "star".
was it thomas davis?

 
2013 Bills #20 in total defense (#4 passing and #28 rushing)

2014 Bills #4 in total defense (#3 in passing and #11 rushing)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top