What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Let's talk Moose's projection? (1 Viewer)

bigreese82

Footballguy
seems a little low...was looking at 7-8 tds

Any one else think the same? or agree with the 5 tds? Homers? :popcorn:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.

 
Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.
:goodposting: 7-8 TDS would put him right around wr 20Could be good value again..What's his ADP look like?

 
Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.
:goodposting: 7-8 TDS would put him right around wr 20Could be good value again..What's his ADP look like?
Antsports has him at WR #28 (round 7.10) for a 12 team, non-flex league.
 
if Griese starts or sees plenty of playing time, definitely 7-9 tds!

doesn't Moose put up lofty #'s about every other year or so? last year was the off year, maybe this is the boom year again?!

 
if Griese starts or sees plenty of playing time, definitely 7-9 tds!

doesn't Moose put up lofty #'s about every other year or so? last year was the off year, maybe this is the boom year again?!
Griese has an interesting history - each time he moves to a new team he beats out the incumbent starter but the team soon realizes that he can only not lose games and is not goods enough to win them.
 
seems a little low...was looking at 7-8 tds

Any one else think the same? or agree with the 5 tds? Homers? :popcorn:
He will go well over five if Griese gets in at QB and still over if Rex keeps the job. Defenite value pick up so far.
 
Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.
I agree with Bloom. This is too weird.
 
I like a healthy Mushy this year. I think his receptions could push into the high 80s or low 90s if the offense can finally get clicking, along with at least a half dozen TDs. You can only buy MM right now. Wait to sell him until late season.

 
It is and forever will be a run-first offense. I know a Bears QB has not thrown 20 TD's in at least 20 years, some food for thought. With Benson and Jones back there, the 2005 QB will be lucky to average 1 TD/game (or 16 overall).

Orton was bad. Moose wasn't stellar himself. Never seen a guy ##### on the field about not getting the ball so much and drop so many passes and unable to get open.

I agree you can only buy Moose right now because you're not going to get crap if you sell him. I wouldn't mind him as a #4 WR, but I'll assume that isn't going to happen.

I think he's a Keyshawn clone (excellent blocker & possession WR). Only Moose must be a #1 on the Bears. I'd actually prefer Keyshawn myself. I see Keyshawn and Moose putting up similar #'s. A S.Smith injury makes Key a solid #2 fantasy WR in my book. I believe the last 2 top fantasy #1 WR's have been Carolina Panthers.

 
It is and forever will be a run-first offense. I know a Bears QB has not thrown 20 TD's in at least 20 years, some food for thought. With Benson and Jones back there, the 2005 QB will be lucky to average 1 TD/game (or 16 overall).

Orton was bad. Moose wasn't stellar himself. Never seen a guy ##### on the field about not getting the ball so much and drop so many passes and unable to get open.

I agree you can only buy Moose right now because you're not going to get crap if you sell him. I wouldn't mind him as a #4 WR, but I'll assume that isn't going to happen.

I think he's a Keyshawn clone (excellent blocker & possession WR). Only Moose must be a #1 on the Bears. I'd actually prefer Keyshawn myself. I see Keyshawn and Moose putting up similar #'s. A S.Smith injury makes Key a solid #2 fantasy WR in my book. I believe the last 2 top fantasy #1 WR's have been Carolina Panthers.
Moose had a broken hand last year, and played with a rookie QB. It doesn't erase his solid history, not least of all that he's had one of the best, if not the best, fantasy seasons for a wide receiver EVER. Moose has got some nice tread left on the tires, IMHO.

 
It is and forever will be a run-first offense. I know a Bears QB has not thrown 20 TD's in at least 20 years, some food for thought. With Benson and Jones back there, the 2005 QB will be lucky to average 1 TD/game (or 16 overall).

Orton was bad. Moose wasn't stellar himself. Never seen a guy ##### on the field about not getting the ball so much and drop so many passes and unable to get open.

I agree you can only buy Moose right now because you're not going to get crap if you sell him. I wouldn't mind him as a #4 WR, but I'll assume that isn't going to happen.

I think he's a Keyshawn clone (excellent blocker & possession WR). Only Moose must be a #1 on the Bears. I'd actually prefer Keyshawn myself. I see Keyshawn and Moose putting up similar #'s. A S.Smith injury makes Key a solid #2 fantasy WR in my book. I believe the last 2 top fantasy #1 WR's have been Carolina Panthers.

Ron Turner returned to the offensive cordinator position this past season after leading the Fighting Illini for six or seven years. He was the Bears O-Cord when Kramer threw for 29 TD's.

  +---------------------------------------+-----------------+

                |              Passing                  |    Rushing    |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

| Year  TM |  G |  Comp  Att  PCT    YD  Y/A  TD INT |  Att  Yards  TD |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

| 1987 atl |  3 |    45    92  48.9  559  6.1  4  5 |    2    10  0 |

| 1991 det |  13 |  136  265  51.3  1635  6.2  11  8 |    35    26  1 |

| 1992 det |  7 |    58  106  54.7  771  7.3  4  8 |    12    34  0 |

| 1993 det |  5 |    87  138  63.0  1002  7.3  8  3 |    10    5  0 |

| 1994 chi |  6 |    99  158  62.7  1129  7.1  8  8 |    6    -2  0 |

| 1995 chi | 16 | 315 522 60.3 3838 7.4 29 10 | 35 39 1 |

| 1996 chi |  4 |    73  150  48.7  781  5.2  3  6 |    8    4  0 |

| 1997 chi |  15 |  275  477  57.7  3011  6.3  14  14 |    27    83  2 |

| 1998 chi |  8 |  151  250  60.4  1823  7.3  9  7 |    13    17  1 |

| 1999 sdg |  6 |    78  141  55.3  788  5.6  2  10 |    5    1  0 |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

|  TOTAL  |  83 |  1317  2299  57.3 15337  6.7  92  79 |  153  217  5 |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top