bigreese82
Footballguy
seems a little low...was looking at 7-8 tds
Any one else think the same? or agree with the 5 tds? Homers?
Any one else think the same? or agree with the 5 tds? Homers?

Last edited by a moderator:
Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.
Antsports has him at WR #28 (round 7.10) for a 12 team, non-flex league.Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.7-8 TDS would put him right around wr 20Could be good value again..What's his ADP look like?
Griese has an interesting history - each time he moves to a new team he beats out the incumbent starter but the team soon realizes that he can only not lose games and is not goods enough to win them.if Griese starts or sees plenty of playing time, definitely 7-9 tds!
doesn't Moose put up lofty #'s about every other year or so? last year was the off year, maybe this is the boom year again?!
He will go well over five if Griese gets in at QB and still over if Rex keeps the job. Defenite value pick up so far.seems a little low...was looking at 7-8 tds
Any one else think the same? or agree with the 5 tds? Homers?![]()
I agree with Bloom. This is too weird.Moose suffered through the worst QB play this side of SF and was playing with a broken hand for part of the season. He'll have some bounceback this season and should be their best red zone target. 7-8 TDs is very reasonable.
Moose had a broken hand last year, and played with a rookie QB. It doesn't erase his solid history, not least of all that he's had one of the best, if not the best, fantasy seasons for a wide receiver EVER. Moose has got some nice tread left on the tires, IMHO.It is and forever will be a run-first offense. I know a Bears QB has not thrown 20 TD's in at least 20 years, some food for thought. With Benson and Jones back there, the 2005 QB will be lucky to average 1 TD/game (or 16 overall).
Orton was bad. Moose wasn't stellar himself. Never seen a guy ##### on the field about not getting the ball so much and drop so many passes and unable to get open.
I agree you can only buy Moose right now because you're not going to get crap if you sell him. I wouldn't mind him as a #4 WR, but I'll assume that isn't going to happen.
I think he's a Keyshawn clone (excellent blocker & possession WR). Only Moose must be a #1 on the Bears. I'd actually prefer Keyshawn myself. I see Keyshawn and Moose putting up similar #'s. A S.Smith injury makes Key a solid #2 fantasy WR in my book. I believe the last 2 top fantasy #1 WR's have been Carolina Panthers.
It is and forever will be a run-first offense. I know a Bears QB has not thrown 20 TD's in at least 20 years, some food for thought. With Benson and Jones back there, the 2005 QB will be lucky to average 1 TD/game (or 16 overall).
Orton was bad. Moose wasn't stellar himself. Never seen a guy ##### on the field about not getting the ball so much and drop so many passes and unable to get open.
I agree you can only buy Moose right now because you're not going to get crap if you sell him. I wouldn't mind him as a #4 WR, but I'll assume that isn't going to happen.
I think he's a Keyshawn clone (excellent blocker & possession WR). Only Moose must be a #1 on the Bears. I'd actually prefer Keyshawn myself. I see Keyshawn and Moose putting up similar #'s. A S.Smith injury makes Key a solid #2 fantasy WR in my book. I believe the last 2 top fantasy #1 WR's have been Carolina Panthers.
Ron Turner returned to the offensive cordinator position this past season after leading the Fighting Illini for six or seven years. He was the Bears O-Cord when Kramer threw for 29 TD's.
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1987 atl | 3 | 45 92 48.9 559 6.1 4 5 | 2 10 0 |
| 1991 det | 13 | 136 265 51.3 1635 6.2 11 8 | 35 26 1 |
| 1992 det | 7 | 58 106 54.7 771 7.3 4 8 | 12 34 0 |
| 1993 det | 5 | 87 138 63.0 1002 7.3 8 3 | 10 5 0 |
| 1994 chi | 6 | 99 158 62.7 1129 7.1 8 8 | 6 -2 0 |
| 1995 chi | 16 | 315 522 60.3 3838 7.4 29 10 | 35 39 1 |
| 1996 chi | 4 | 73 150 48.7 781 5.2 3 6 | 8 4 0 |
| 1997 chi | 15 | 275 477 57.7 3011 6.3 14 14 | 27 83 2 |
| 1998 chi | 8 | 151 250 60.4 1823 7.3 9 7 | 13 17 1 |
| 1999 sdg | 6 | 78 141 55.3 788 5.6 2 10 | 5 1 0 |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| TOTAL | 83 | 1317 2299 57.3 15337 6.7 92 79 | 153 217 5 |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+