so apparently there WAS some investigation into Hillegas....lol...lot of info for someone who wasn't looked at as a suspect....
as i recall, that research was not done by the police or attorneysso apparently there WAS some investigation into Hillegas....lol...lot of info for someone who wasn't looked at as a suspect....
Who described their relationship as "abusive"?They had broken up and gotten back together numerous times over the past five years. At the time of her murder, they were broken up again, and their relationship was described as "abusive".
That alone is not enough to suspect him of the murder (although it is enough to consider him a potential suspect). But with additional evidence on top of their on and off again abusive relationship, he should have been seriously investigated. There was sufficient evidence, but again, as has been said time and time and time again in this thread, the police were so focused on wanting it to be Avery, they ignored the evidence pointing to Hillegas.
Evidence that should have led to an investigation of Hillegas:
1) He lied to police. Halbach's car had a broken blinker light. Hillegas told police that it was damaged months before her disappearance and that Halbach had filed an insurance claim, but didn't use the money to repair the blinker. The insurance company however says no such claim was ever made. What was Hillegas trying to hide by lying about the broken blinker?
2) Dr. Larry Blum, a pathologist from Rockford, Ill., reviewed television news footage showing Hillegas with several scratches to his hands as he was organizing volunteer search efforts. "It is my opinion, to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty in the field of forensic pathology, that Mr. Hillegas' right hand ... appears discolored ... the abrasions I observed on the back of Mr. Hillegas' left hand are consistent with scratches inflicted by fingernails."
3) During the searches, volunteers were used. Hillegas used a fake name to be part of the volunteer search teams, using at least once the name Mr. Kilgus. On Nov 7th, 2005 he accessed the Avery property without signing in at the command post. He was seen on the property, but with no records of his arrival, no one knows how long he was there or what he had brought with him. It was after this date that much of the evidence (bones, etc..) were found, despite the search efforts being much more vigorous Nov 5th and 6th that turned up nothing.
4) Pam Sturm, the person who found the Rav4, conferred with Hillegas and Scott Bloedorn, a close friend of Hillegas, who lived with Halbach at the time of her disappearance, just hours before locating the vehicle.
5) He has no alibi for his activities from Oct 31st to Nov 4th.
Again, this is in no way suggesting that he is a MORE LIKELY suspect than Avery. It is saying the police failed to give Hilegas the attention he deserved as a suspect.
I don't think it could ever be proven that Avery is innocent, but clearly given the cluster#### the police turned the investigation into due to the bias they had against him, he's not guilty beyond reasonable doubt. He should be free, and that may mean a killer gets to go free. But beyond reasonable doubt is the bar we've set before we lock people up for murder.
Zellner filed a motion trying to pin it on Hillegas. That's where most of that stuff came from.as i recall, that research was not done by the police or attorneys
It seems more likely that it was written by someone from law enforcement who was cataloging the map into evidence, so it may not even be Hillegas they were talking to, but another member of his "group".If I am joining the search party and some dude with the clipboard says whats your name and I say Ryan Hillegas....I can see pretty easy how he might have written down Ryan Kilgus...now if Hillegas himself wrote down Kilgus, thats a different story...
Hell no. Couldn't take it.you guys are going to make me re-watch this series
You really need me to elaborate on why the guy she dumped that kept trying to hang around in her life had motive to kill her? It's one of the most (if not THE) commonest murder scenarios throughout history.@cockroach...still waiting on a response to this one too....your comment "Hillegas on the other hand"....seems to indicate you think he had motive and wanted her dead....I missed that part so was wondering if you could expand....assuming it has to be more than "he seemed a little sketchy"....
Let's not forget that there's good evidence that Halbach left the Avery property alive.You really need me to elaborate on why the guy she dumped that kept trying to hang around in her life had motive to kill her? It's one of the most (if not THE) commonest murder scenarios throughout history.
On access to the property: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRa7yPDjBzk
I'm sure you'll take those two young men on their word. I do not. The hard swallows, nervous darting looks. I doesn't sound like they're being very honest at all.
On the pword: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5wT9DQhUgs
On his lack interrogation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V6ZW2ggw7g
So Theresa's brother was involved too?You really need me to elaborate on why the guy she dumped that kept trying to hang around in her life had motive to kill her? It's one of the most (if not THE) commonest murder scenarios throughout history.
On access to the property: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRa7yPDjBzk
I'm sure you'll take those two young men on their word. I do not. The hard swallows, nervous darting looks. I doesn't sound like they're being very honest at all.
What good evidence is that?Let's not forget that there's good evidence that Halbach left the Avery property alive.
It was Dassey's forced "confession" that says she didn't.
On November 6, 2005, Bobby Dassey’s older brother Bryan told Wisconsin Department of Justice officials that Bobby had told him in the days prior that he saw Halbach leave the Averys’ property.What good evidence is that?
Her cousin is Pam Sturm. I don't think she or Ryan are telling the "truth, whole truth and nothing but" in their testimonies at trial. That, among a host of other factors, gives me reasonable doubt in this case.So Theresa's brother was involved too?
He said she took a cash payout from the insurance company. "Months" is pretty typical to get an insurance company to just send you a check for car damage. It should have been investigated to determine why he said she got a cash payout. The police failed to do so.1. The light;
"S/A Fassbender ultimately spoke with Ryan Hillegas, a friend of Teresa Halbach's. Hillegas did some checking with family and friends and reported back to S/A Fassbender that Halbach had, in fact, damaged the parking light area of her car and actually made an insurance claim. Hillegas advised that Halbach took a cash payout for the damage and had not repaired it".
That's the big lie to police. Also, it doesn't say anything about "months" before. Do you have a cite for that anywhere? Could it be that maybe the light had been knocked out and Theresa was planning to file a claim but no one really knew where she was in the process and were speculating? Just FYI, Halbach made a call to an insurance company just days before she disappeared.
I agree. It should have been investigated to determine what they were. The police failed to do so.2. A grainy video showing something "consistent with" fingernail scratches, doesn't make them fingernail scratches. In fact it doesn't even make them scratches necessarily.
He didn't check in to the command post after being spotted on the property. He wasn't "allowed access" to anything by the command post anymore than all of us are allowed access to property outside of crime scenes. The issue is how he appeared on the salvage property without checking in. It should have been investigated to determine how it happened. The police failed to do so.3. The name Kilgus appears on a hand-written map as "Ryan Kilgus Group" and is in different hand-writing than that of whoever drew the map. It's not clear at all that Hillegas either drew the map or wrote "Ryan Kilgus Group" on the paper. If he did select as a fake name his own first name and a last name that sounds almost exactly like his own, he's a bigger idiot than Avery.
As for his access to the property;
Just so we're clear Mr. -- I'm sorry. Just so
10 we're clear, Mr. Hillegas, the area that you were
11 allowed access to was the outside of the Avery
12 property itself, in other words, the surrounding
13 properties, not within the salvage property; is
14 that true?
15 A. Yes.
I agree. It should have been investigated to determine what they discussed. The police failed to do so.4. Pam Sturm was part of the search team and Hillegas and Bloedorn were directing the search teams. Not exactly a red-flag that they might have "conferred".
Because he had no alibi from Oct 31 to Nov 4th. It wasn't until Nov 4th that he got involved with the search. It should have been investigated to determine where he was for those days. The police failed to do so.5. How can you say he has no alibi for 4 days? Several of the activities you cite here would constitute at least partial alibis during those days.
Uh, yeah he was. Trial testimony from Buting's cross;He didn't check in to the command post after being spotted on the property. He wasn't "allowed access" to anything by the command post anymore than all of us are allowed access to property outside of crime scenes.
17 Q. And even on the 5th, and thereafter, when the
18 search narrowed into the Avery's area and
19 surrounding areas, the police actually let you
20 through some check points, along with some other
21 searchers, you leading them to come and search
22 the area, right?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Within the perimeter of the area around the Avery
25 property that they had made off limits to the
1 general public, right?
2 A. Yes.
Of course he says the police allowed him there. But there's no record of him checking in.Uh, yeah he was. Trial testimony from Buting's cross;
Hey ren....just got done semi binging Evil Genius.....pretty awesome docu...but it left me with one question I wanted answered....did the hooker ever get in trouble for her admitted roll in this....she knew all about it and was paid to find him....you may not know, but just curious...Just wanted to give yall a heads up, Evil Genius is a new crime doc on Netflix that MAM fans will find very compelling.
I don't think so. It's been a while since I watched it, but it could be that she plausibly didn't know she was an accomplice to the crime or something.Stinkin Ref said:Hey ren....just got done semi binging Evil Genius.....pretty awesome docu...but it left me with one question I wanted answered....did the hooker ever get in trouble for her admitted roll in this....she knew all about it and was paid to find him....you may not know, but just curious...
I think u mean Bobby instead of Brendon.Avery names two other possible killers
In an about face claims that the police did not plant the blood in Teresa Halbach's vehicle but Brendon Dassey did
Not a complete about face this time. She also had Ryan Hillegas planting the blood when he was the "real killer" prior to Bobby. I think she had to accept that the EDTA test is scientifically valid and LE planting the blood is a non-starter, even for her.Avery names two other possible killers
In an about face claims that the police did not plant the blood in Teresa Halbach's vehicle but Bobby Dassey did
No, because the police verifiably DID set him up. Maybe not for the murder of TH, but for the rape in 85. They don't ever get a pass for that, even if it's proven that Steven is a killer.so hopefully now we can put to rest all the crooked cops, police set him up because they were going to owe him millions, etc...talk
in retrospect....did they maybe make some mistakes/not do everything by the book in the investigation....sure....probably happens in most investigations....not sure there has ever been a "perfect" investigation...but at least now maybe people will quit talking about the police trying to set him up....
So having Manitowoc sheriffs on the scene was bad, but NOT having the Manitowoc Coroner on the scene was also bad? You need to pick a horse.not allowing the coroner on the scene to having Manitowac sheriffs on the scene at all.
And yet it's the individuals directly accused of sitting on evidence and that have been or will be deposed in Avery's case against the county that are somehow allowed on? My horse is the one without the obvious bias. So, let's say the guy who's kinda like a scientist and has special training and isn't accused of being unjust to the suspect do his job? Is it really that difficult to see the suspicious conflict of interest there?So having Manitowoc sheriffs on the scene was bad, but NOT having the Manitowoc Coroner on the scene was also bad? You need to pick a horse.
I think you're grossly overstating the role of Colborn especially, but regardless, how would it possibly help the appearance of a "suspicious conflict of interest" to have an elected official of Manitowoc County deeply involved in the investigation? Tip, it wouldn't. If she HAD been there the defense and documentary makers would have #####ed about that too.And yet it's the individuals directly accused of sitting on evidence and that have been or will be deposed in Avery's case against the county that are somehow allowed on? My horse is the one without the obvious bias. So, let's say the guy who's kinda like a scientist and has special training and isn't accused of being unjust to the suspect do his job? Is it really that difficult to see the suspicious conflict of interest there?
At the very least, they strongly hoped it was Avery... and that strong hope very likely caused the crappy investigative job they did.so hopefully now we can put to rest all the crooked cops, police set him up because they were going to owe him millions, etc...talk
in retrospect....did they maybe make some mistakes/not do everything by the book in the investigation....sure....probably happens in most investigations....not sure there has ever been a "perfect" investigation...but at least now maybe people will quit talking about the police trying to set him up....
the claim of "crappy investigations" happens in almost every case...its usually the first thing you hear...(see every episode of 20/20 or 48 Hours, etc.)...people (defense) will always try to find holes or something they did wrong...many times that is their only hope of getting reasonable doubt, when the evidence is soooo overwhelming like it is in this case...as mentioned before...there probably never has been a "perfect" investigation....and also as mentioned before with the evidence they had and the Dassey confession (no matter how you feel about it)...it is understandable for them to somewhat limit their focus to people on the property....so while to a certain extent they should "look for other suspects"....once the evidence leads you very strongly in one direction that will and should be your focus....at this point, now that they have been convicted , it is up to the defense to come up with the evidence to show why the case should be reopened....good luck with that, I guess we will see...we'll see if they do a perfect investigation job...At the very least, they strongly hoped it was Avery... and that strong hope very likely caused the crappy investigative job they did.
The issue isn't that there was a crappy investigation. The issue is why there was a crappy investigation.the claim of "crappy investigations" happens in almost every case...its usually the first thing you hear...(see every episode of 20/20 or 48 Hours, etc.)...people (defense) will always try to find holes or something they did wrong...many times that is their only hope of getting reasonable doubt, when the evidence is soooo overwhelming like it is in this case...as mentioned before...there probably never has been a "perfect" investigation....and also as mentioned before with the evidence they had and the Dassey confession (no matter how you feel about it)...it is understandable for them to somewhat limit their focus to people on the property....so while to a certain extent they should "look for other suspects"....once the evidence leads you very strongly in one direction that will and should be your focus....at this point, now that they have been convicted , it is up to the defense to come up with the evidence to show why the case should be reopened....good luck with that, I guess we will see...we'll see if they do a perfect investigation job...
Grosshttps://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/2018/07/19/making-murderer-no-launch-date-new-episodes-netflix-series/797627002/
"Rech said he plans to release a trailer and some clips from “Convicting a Murderer” this fall, with the entire eight-part series to be available on a streaming service by the fall of 2019."
I'm in... but 10 more episodes seems like a bit much at this point.A short teaser trailer for Part 2 was released on social media Tuesday morning. The series contains 10 episodes.
Well, they made 10 episodes, they must've found a lot more stuff that we don't know about.Not sure how it will be remotely interesting at this point. We all know the results of everything, unlike in the original series where I knew nothing.
yeah maybe they'll surprise me. The original was riveting so I'd like that.Well, they made 10 episodes, they must've found a lot more stuff that we don't know about.
Or they've turned 3 episodes of solid content into 10 episodes. That's my fear at least.Well, they made 10 episodes, they must've found a lot more stuff that we don't know about.
One of the police, Weigert, was just recently elected sheriff.I think it could be compelling. I'm interested to see Zellner's work and the family's reaction to all the fanfare after the show. I'm sure we'll get to see how it's affected the lives of scumbag Manitowoc PD and disgraces like Ken Kratz/Len Kachinsky.
Are Dassey/Avery basically dead in the water at this point?Looking forward to this.