Jeff Pasquino
Footballguy
News expected today.
I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.
Keep it classy, guys.
I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.

Keep it classy, guys.
Should we start a pool? I'll go with 12 months, including time served.News expected today.I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.Keep it classy, guys.
Give me 28 months with credit, of course, for time served.Should we start a pool? I'll go with 12 months, including time served.News expected today.I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.Keep it classy, guys.
You think he's going to get less than his lackeys did, they got 18-21? He's the big fish. Big fish don't get less than the little fish. I say it's more than 24 months.PatrickT said:Should we start a pool? I'll go with 12 months, including time served.Jeff Pasquino said:News expected today.I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.Keep it classy, guys.
Was watching something last night, or maybe I read it somewhere, can't recall. Even if he only got 6 months, he's still lost far more than the other guys. It's estimated he's lost 100 million or more in salary, endorsements etc. Add to that that he'll never be able to regain whatever standard of living he had prior to the event. Supposedly, that could/would weigh into the decision.You think he's going to get less than his lackeys did, they got 18-21? He's the big fish. Big fish don't get less than the little fish. I say it's more than 24 months.PatrickT said:Should we start a pool? I'll go with 12 months, including time served.Jeff Pasquino said:News expected today.I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.Keep it classy, guys.
But he is also an avid hunter.The judge owns 2 dogs.
Did it say that this judge was likely to consider those factors? Nothing I have heard or read about this guy leads me to believe that there would be a break for that. Judges aren't really supposed to give a break on jail time based on money lost on the outside. From what I read he's a by the book sentencer who gave the little guys close to the max recommended sentence due to the heinousness of the crime. Vick was the ring leader, the money and the big name behind it all. I don't think Vick gets a break just becuase he was rich beforehand. He should be held more responsible for not distancing himself from this. He also failed a drug test while waiting. I just don't see leniency in this judge's arsenal.Was watching something last night, or maybe I read it somewhere, can't recall. Even if he only got 6 months, he's still lost far more than the other guys. It's estimated he's lost 100 million or more in salary, endorsements etc. Add to that that he'll never be able to regain whatever standard of living he had prior to the event. Supposedly, that could/would weigh into the decision.You think he's going to get less than his lackeys did, they got 18-21? He's the big fish. Big fish don't get less than the little fish. I say it's more than 24 months.PatrickT said:Should we start a pool? I'll go with 12 months, including time served.Jeff Pasquino said:News expected today.I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.Keep it classy, guys.
But they probably hunt with him. He doesn't hunt them.But he is also an avid hunter.The judge owns 2 dogs.
That there is HUGE.. Will the league have passed him by come 2010?23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.
According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.
And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
That's right. The judge asked him if he really agreed with that provision even though the sentence could be 5 years. He said yes and knew he couldn't appeal. Is it probation? I thought it would be parole.23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.
According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.
And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
Seems about right...maybe a bit more than I thought when things first started getting serious. BUT, I really think this is another case where honesty and coming clean would have REALLY served him better. Hindsights a #$%@#$.So, 2010 season before he's even able to play? Or anyone think he gets out and immediately gets picked up by a team for the '09 season? Not like he'll be in shape, or in the mindset of football, nor does he have the , uhh..."quickest" mind to pick up a new playbook in 2 months time.I put a 40% chance that he's completely done with football; whether by being banned by Goddell, or by simply being "black listed" by NFL owners/GM's.23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment. And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
Apparently, you were correct. I think 2 years is too much, personally.Did it say that this judge was likely to consider those factors? Nothing I have heard or read about this guy leads me to believe that there would be a break for that. Judges aren't really supposed to give a break on jail time based on money lost on the outside. From what I read he's a by the book sentencer who gave the little guys close to the max recommended sentence due to the heinousness of the crime. Vick was the ring leader, the money and the big name behind it all. I don't think Vick gets a break just becuase he was rich beforehand. He should be held more responsible for not distancing himself from this. He also failed a drug test while waiting. I just don't see leniency in this judge's arsenal.Was watching something last night, or maybe I read it somewhere, can't recall. Even if he only got 6 months, he's still lost far more than the other guys. It's estimated he's lost 100 million or more in salary, endorsements etc. Add to that that he'll never be able to regain whatever standard of living he had prior to the event. Supposedly, that could/would weigh into the decision.You think he's going to get less than his lackeys did, they got 18-21? He's the big fish. Big fish don't get less than the little fish. I say it's more than 24 months.PatrickT said:Should we start a pool? I'll go with 12 months, including time served.Jeff Pasquino said:News expected today.I heard it starts soon (10AM Eastern) but could take several hours.Keep it classy, guys.
Parole is when you get out early, probation is supervision after you're released.That's right. The judge asked him if he really agreed with that provision even though the sentence could be 5 years. He said yes and knew he couldn't appeal. Is it probation? I thought it would be parole.23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.
According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.
And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
It has been awhile since I have done any Federal Defense work, but IIRC you used to get 1 day off of your sentence for every 4 weeks of "good" behavior. That would reduce his sentence by about 24 days, FWIW.23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.
According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.
And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
He should regret not coming clean right away. His inconsistencies of culpability is one of the reasons they've (talking heads) said that he got more than the recommended sentence. He repeatedly lied about it (which will probably hurt him when Goodell "sentences" him), he tried to hedge in his admissions of guilt, and didn't come clean until all the chips were stacked against him. If he had come clean right away, saved the feds time and cooperated then he probably wouldn't be in as much trouble as he is now. He wasn't going to win a court case about this and it would've delayed any possible return to the league if he did go to trial.I wonder if Vick regrets not fighting the charges. He plead guilty and with no criminal record he still got almost 40% of the maximum sentence.
Yes, that was Cossack. He speculated that the NFL "sentence" would also be concurrent with the 20+ month sentence.Would ANY team really gamble on this guy for 2009?According to ESPN radio, the minimum he has to serve is 85% of his sentence before he can be released. That's 20.5 months, best case scenario.
I've said it from the beginning...2010 at the earliest, more than 3.5 years since his last meaningful snap in the NFL. How close to 'football' shape could he possibly be in at that point?That there is HUGE.. Will the league have passed him by come 2010?23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.
According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.
And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
I beleive it was the DA.IIRC, the federal case is independent of the charges the locals could proceed upon. Which could mean even more years/punishment.
Maybe someone else remembers better than I if this is till the case.
I know we all can't get enough of the podunk sheriff that bumbled along earlier in Vick-gate...
Agreed although considering the lack of qb depth in the NFL and the fact that Vick will only be 30 in 2010 I think there is a very good chance he could be back.After that, he will likely get suspended for 1 year, that would be the 2010 season, which would mean some team could take a shot on a QB that has no accuracy, that hasn't played in 4 years, and that is getting older fast. I'm sure his speed won't be the same 4 years from now.
As a QB, I find it highly unlikely that he'll be effective again. I doubt he'll get the same nutritional/supplemental intake and exercise regimen to keep him in football shape but it won't be hard to regain that when he gets out. He won't be taking hits and punishment, he's not going to be in gen pop (due to his outside money it isn't safe for him I believe I've heard) so he won't be getting shanked or showered. I think he has a very good shot at being a WR or KR. He'd be a great Slash type player. But full time QB, I doubt it. His skills won't be as impressive in 3 years as they are now and those skills compensated for his pure QB shortcomings.I've said it from the beginning...2010 at the earliest, more than 3.5 years since his last meaningful snap in the NFL. How close to 'football' shape could he possibly be in at that point?That there is HUGE.. Will the league have passed him by come 2010?23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.
According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.
And also a reminder that his plea agreement includes a provision that he can't appeal the sentence, which is higher than the prosecutors recommended in the plea deal.
Yep...you're right...IdI beleive it was the DA.IIRC, the federal case is independent of the charges the locals could proceed upon. Which could mean even more years/punishment.
Maybe someone else remembers better than I if this is till the case.
I know we all can't get enough of the podunk sheriff that bumbled along earlier in Vick-gate...
7) How serious a crime is dogfighting? 45.5% Very serious
Yes. He'll be 30 by that point with 4 years out of football. His game needed polishing beforehand and he is a PR nightmare. With a 1 year sentence he would have had a shot but I don't see this happening.Will the league have passed him by come 2010?
He's already under suspension from the league. By the time he's released he will have already been under suspension for over 2 years.23 Months according to ESPN, along wth 3 year's probation.According to their legal analyst, and with prior discussions, thee's no time off for good behavior in the Fed system. He'll serve very close to the whole 23 months. He won't be out until October 09 and then have to deal with a league punishment.