Eephus
Footballguy
So..... anybody get tired of their artist?
Intentionally went for an artist who's been in four different bands plus collaborations and solo stuff.
So..... anybody get tired of their artist?
I was listening to them a lot about an 3 weeks ago. Maybe too much. Needed to switch it up and now that I’ve gone back, I am loving them again. I just overdid it a bit initially.So..... anybody get tired of their artist?
The form is really easy, you will do fineI'm back from my self-imposed hiatus. Hoping to spend a couple of hours in the morning catching up on the last 10 pages and then allowing myself the entire afternoon to figure out the submission form.
I ranked my band’s songs simply by how hard my nipples got (tiebreakers by time of day)….One question, and sorry if it's been answered already - what if the lists aren't ordered chronologically or by ranking? Could "other" be an option?
Nah. If that was going to happen, it would have happened years and years ago.So..... anybody get tired of their artist?
No, but I decided yesterday I need a break before we start. The last two tweaks I made to my order were minor and I ended up almost back to where I started in the first place. Figured it'd be better to write about those that got squeezed later rather than burning myself out on them soon after we get started. I am very curious to learn what those interested think of my tour through Green Day.So..... anybody get tired of their artist?
I used rankings as a road map, but with one intentional exception I tried to avoid stacking songs from the same album on top of each other. While the structure of a lot of their music is similar the sound from one album to the next isn't, so I thought the journey would be better with an ebb and flow rather than linear evolution.One question, and sorry if it's been answered already - what if the lists aren't ordered chronologically or by ranking? Could "other" be an option?
No, but it probably helps that I didn't hear most of their albums in full until a few years ago.So..... anybody get tired of their artist?
welcome back.allowing myself the entire afternoon to figure out the submission form.
I want to create top 31 playlists for four or five unselected artists.There are four or five unselected artists for [oh ****, what word do I use here] whom-which I want to create top 31 playlists.
Is Binky a caveman?The form is so easy, even Binky did it right and he made some changes!
Sent pm with info a few w eeks agoAll right. I've been out of this thread a few weeks, and missed the various discussions on how the lists need to be formatted. I see that the title of the thread attempts to explain it ... but I can't quite make out what's intended.
Is there a Google Sheet up with the lists submitted so far? If so, I can just crib that.
If no Google Sheet ... can someone post a two or three item list in this thread, formatted in the correct way? Alternatively, someone can just post an instruction to go elsewhere in this thread for pointers ("... it's all laid out on page 5 ...").
Thanks in advance.
Saw that ... OK. So long as the topmost song in the list is the favorite (#1 favorite song, 31 points, etc.), nothing else is needed except Song Title and Song Link?Sent pm with info a few weeks ago
No numbering needed if you put 1 at the top.Saw that ... OK. So long as the topmost song in the list is the favorite (#1 favorite song, 31 points, etc.), nothing else is needed except Song Title and Song Link?Sent pm with info a few weeks ago
So the following would consist of a full list #1 through #3? No numbering or anything else necessary?
Rockin' Heaven Down
![]()
If Looks Could Kill
![]()
City's Burning
![]()
I'll pm your list when I get home from with tonight. I've been doing that and all but a like two were perfect on first try. The two were easy to fix.List for the Hold Steady submitted. I think it was just as easy as folks said, but it would be great if @Zegras11 could give it a quick glance to be sure.
Like I wrote above, my list is neither in "favorite" nor chrono order. I've seen The Hold Steady 37 times and it will be 40 come the end of June, so my submission follows a "realistic" dream setlist for one of the upcoming shows. By realistic, I mean balancing my desire for rarities with the fact that the band will no doubt always play certain favorites as well songs from the newer albums. The latter part was especially important to me after reading a joke post on some music blog that said something like "Your favorite band's 'new' album just turned 10." I identified way too much with that, realizing that I spend too much time at shows rooting for obscure b-sides and getting a bit let down when a newer song is in the queue. This exercise really inspired me to listen to THS's last few records and helped me find a track or two that might even break my top 10. In the end, this also means that a couple of my ATF's also got left off, but isn't that the case at every concert you've ever been to?
Since a few other folks did this, my selections by the numbers:
Almost Killed Me (2004) - 5
Separation Sunday (2005) - 5
Boys and Girls in America (2006) -4
Stay Positive (2008) - 5
Heaven is Whenever (2010) - 3
Teeth Dreams (2004) - 1
Thrashing Through the Passion (2019) - 1
Open Door Policy (2021) - 2
The Price of Progress (2023) - 2
Various B-Sides/Rarities - 3
Yeah I was one. I thought I had read that putting the song title wasn’t necessary since the Spotify link would bring the name up. That wasn’t the case. It was simple to go back and add the song title. If I had read more carefully it would be almost impossible to mess it up.The two were easy to fix
I identified way too much with that, realizing that I spend too much time at shows rooting for obscure b-sides and getting a bit let down when a newer song is in the queue. This exercise really inspired me to listen to THS's last few records and helped me find a track or two that might even break my top 10. In the end, this also means that a couple of my ATF's also got left off, but isn't that the case at every concert you've ever been to?
The 1974 album must be pretty special. Will you be talking about why you picked so many songs from it?Since I think Eephus was the only other one with Jorge Ben Jor in the worldwide countdown, my list by the numbers may only make any sense to him, but I’ll share anyway. I think ended up with a good mix from most of his various phases — early samba/bossa nova stuff in the mid-60s, late 60s Tropicália, early 70s samba rock, and more electric/funk stuff in the mid-1970s. He’s still around and been active since then (with a lot of releases in the 1980s), but nothing after that was just able to make my cut (and not where I’d start for someone new to him, so left out).
Samba Esquema Novo (1963) - 2
Big Ben (1965) - 1
Jorge Ben (1969) - 4 (album cover is my avatar)
Fôrça Bruta (1970) - 3
Negro É Lindo (1971) - 1
Ben (1972) - 1
A Tábua de Esmeralda (1974) - 7
Solta o Pavão (1975) - 4
Gil e Jorge (with Gilberto Gil) (1975) - 1
África Brasil (1976) - 4
A Banda Do Zé Pretinho (1978) - 1
Releases with other artists (1968, 1970) - 2
If someone asked me where they should start with a dive into his work, I’d tell them to put on A Tábua de Esmeralda and play it front to back. It’s a bit of a concept album; the title refers to the Emerald Tablet and Hermes Trismigestus — while the concept is a bit unusual, it is pretty widely regarded as his masterpiece. The album has a bit more of an Afro-Brazilian sound, and probably my favorite sound of his.The 1974 album must be pretty special. Will you be talking about why you picked so many songs from it?Since I think Eephus was the only other one with Jorge Ben Jor in the worldwide countdown, my list by the numbers may only make any sense to him, but I’ll share anyway. I think ended up with a good mix from most of his various phases — early samba/bossa nova stuff in the mid-60s, late 60s Tropicália, early 70s samba rock, and more electric/funk stuff in the mid-1970s. He’s still around and been active since then (with a lot of releases in the 1980s), but nothing after that was just able to make my cut (and not where I’d start for someone new to him, so left out).
Samba Esquema Novo (1963) - 2
Big Ben (1965) - 1
Jorge Ben (1969) - 4 (album cover is my avatar)
Fôrça Bruta (1970) - 3
Negro É Lindo (1971) - 1
Ben (1972) - 1
A Tábua de Esmeralda (1974) - 7
Solta o Pavão (1975) - 4
Gil e Jorge (with Gilberto Gil) (1975) - 1
África Brasil (1976) - 4
A Banda Do Zé Pretinho (1978) - 1
Releases with other artists (1968, 1970) - 2
I hope you need choices 3 to 31 lol. I onky entered 2 to familiarise myself
@Just Win Baby Foo Fighters @falguy AC/DC @Ghost Rider Porcupine Tree @landrys hat Doves @simey Ray Charles @neal cassady Frank Zappa @Hov34 Spoon @zazale deadmau5 @simsarge BTO @DrIanMalcolm Bruce Springsteen @zamboni Simon and Garfunkel @Eephus Damon Albarn @ditkaburgers Beyonce @Val Rannous ZZTop @scorchy The Hold Steady @Doug B Heart @timschochet Elton John @Manster Les Claypool @Northern Voice The Tragically Hip @otb Bauhaus @snellman Queen @titusbramble The Prodigy The above are the lists I still need. Deadline is a week from tonight. Check your PM for info on how to enter. Thanks!!
I wonder if there’s a singer/group out there with exactly 31 songs. That would be interesting to rank.
Monday: My brief concert experience with the band.
He played the skin flute, and he was quickly escorted out of the concert hall.Monday: My brief concert experience with the band.
What did you play?
He played the skin flute, and he was quickly escorted out of the concert hall.Monday: My brief concert experience with the band.
What did you play?
Baby what a big surprise.He played the skin flute, and he was quickly escorted out of the concert hall.Monday: My brief concert experience with the band.
What did you play?
Look AwayBaby what a big surprise.He played the skin flute, and he was quickly escorted out of the concert hall.Monday: My brief concert experience with the band.
What did you play?
Hopefully this is not only the beginning of jokes at my expense.These comments make me smile.
They’re a band where I could see 20 different people rank 20 different songs #1.There will definitely be some disagreement with my #1 for Queen
Yeah. They dabbled in so many different styles and had something for everyone.They’re a band where I could see 20 different people rank 20 different songs #1.There will definitely be some disagreement with my #1 for
Even though I love AIC I've never listened to their post Layne stuff so looking forward to those tracks.Album (/EP) Breakdown. Put in spoiler in case people prefer more of a surprise.
Facelift - 3
Sap - 1
Dirt - 6
Jar of Flies - 5
Alice In Chains - 4
Black Gives Way To Blue - 3
The Devil Put Dinosaurs Here - 2
Rainier Fog - 3
Misc. - 4
And that's 23 with Layne and 8 without.
I'm reminded of Grand Funk.I wanted to feature Chicago because they put out incredible, and incredibly popular, music between 1969 and 1977, and yet have generally not gotten the accolades that bands with that kind of track record receive. Despite selling over 40 million albums in the US and over 100 million albums worldwide, and having 20 US top 10 hit singles (including three No. 1s), and having its best songs from 1969 to 1977 remain fixtures on radio to this day, and having an original lineup with seven incredibly talented musicians and writers who earned the respect of their peers, the band was not inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame until 2016, and did not have anyone inducted in the Songwriters Hall of Fame until Peter Cetera, Robert Lamm and James Pankow were in 2017. They were even underappreciated in the FBG geographic countdowns, with only one song selected in the U.S. countdown and none in the worldwide one (for which their albums from 1975 to 1980 were eligible).
As Robert Lamm told Dan Rather in 2021: "For 52 years, it's been very difficult for many people in the music press world to discuss Chicago intelligently or at all, because we are hard to categorize. You can't pin us down."
I tend to like bands with talent (which does not always equate to virtuosic wankery) that try their hands at different genres, and Chicago fits the bill. They boasted three outstanding songwriters in keyboardist Lamm, guitarist Kath and trombonist James Pankow, with bassist Cetera coming into his own as a writer as time went on, and three fantastic singers in Cetera, Kath and Lamm. And they boasted one of the greatest guitarists of his generation in Kath, who was incredibly technically accomplished -- Jimi Hendrix once told the band that "your guitar player is better than me" -- and could play with grit, soul, flash or fire, whatever was called for. His tragic death in 1978 was one of the rock world's greatest losses.
I also like that Chicago envisioned themselves as "a rock and roll band with horns" and never forgot that until the '80s. Unlike jazz, where the horns dominated, or R&B, where the horns punctuated, with Chicago the horns were fully integrated with the rhythm section and sometimes served as counterpoints to the lead vocals. Rarely in their 1969-80 recordings will you hear the "tossed-in sax solo" approach that Krista hates so much.
Also in their favor was that they tried many different genres and experiments despite being a consistent presence on the charts. Helping was that they had multiple songwriters and singers, and a unique policy that the writer of the song was not necessarily the one to sing it. Lamm "cast" singers in his mind while writing his songs. Pankow conducted auditions in the studio, often with all three of the main singers attempting the lead vocal before one was decided upon. Cetera and Kath usually sang what they wrote, but not always.
For a band that had as much success in quality and sales as Chicago did, I think they remain underrated -- granted, some of that is due to the post-Kath material that hasn't aged well -- and I hope this exercise shows how they deserve to be considered one of rock's most important bands.
There is definitely some of the same "lack of respect despite popularity" element in play.I'm reminded of Grand Funk.I wanted to feature Chicago because they put out incredible, and incredibly popular, music between 1969 and 1977, and yet have generally not gotten the accolades that bands with that kind of track record receive. Despite selling over 40 million albums in the US and over 100 million albums worldwide, and having 20 US top 10 hit singles (including three No. 1s), and having its best songs from 1969 to 1977 remain fixtures on radio to this day, and having an original lineup with seven incredibly talented musicians and writers who earned the respect of their peers, the band was not inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame until 2016, and did not have anyone inducted in the Songwriters Hall of Fame until Peter Cetera, Robert Lamm and James Pankow were in 2017. They were even underappreciated in the FBG geographic countdowns, with only one song selected in the U.S. countdown and none in the worldwide one (for which their albums from 1975 to 1980 were eligible).
As Robert Lamm told Dan Rather in 2021: "For 52 years, it's been very difficult for many people in the music press world to discuss Chicago intelligently or at all, because we are hard to categorize. You can't pin us down."
I tend to like bands with talent (which does not always equate to virtuosic wankery) that try their hands at different genres, and Chicago fits the bill. They boasted three outstanding songwriters in keyboardist Lamm, guitarist Kath and trombonist James Pankow, with bassist Cetera coming into his own as a writer as time went on, and three fantastic singers in Cetera, Kath and Lamm. And they boasted one of the greatest guitarists of his generation in Kath, who was incredibly technically accomplished -- Jimi Hendrix once told the band that "your guitar player is better than me" -- and could play with grit, soul, flash or fire, whatever was called for. His tragic death in 1978 was one of the rock world's greatest losses.
I also like that Chicago envisioned themselves as "a rock and roll band with horns" and never forgot that until the '80s. Unlike jazz, where the horns dominated, or R&B, where the horns punctuated, with Chicago the horns were fully integrated with the rhythm section and sometimes served as counterpoints to the lead vocals. Rarely in their 1969-80 recordings will you hear the "tossed-in sax solo" approach that Krista hates so much.
Also in their favor was that they tried many different genres and experiments despite being a consistent presence on the charts. Helping was that they had multiple songwriters and singers, and a unique policy that the writer of the song was not necessarily the one to sing it. Lamm "cast" singers in his mind while writing his songs. Pankow conducted auditions in the studio, often with all three of the main singers attempting the lead vocal before one was decided upon. Cetera and Kath usually sang what they wrote, but not always.
For a band that had as much success in quality and sales as Chicago did, I think they remain underrated -- granted, some of that is due to the post-Kath material that hasn't aged well -- and I hope this exercise shows how they deserve to be considered one of rock's most important bands.