What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mike Bell Hysteria (1 Viewer)

You think Mike Bell will be on the WW in most leagues by week 5?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
I just cannot believe that this poll got over 350 votes. It really is hysteria.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just really can't imagine anyone being too comfortable here... the best situation is to be the T Bell or Cobbs owner since you DIDN'T waste a high pick!

 
I just really can't imagine anyone being too comfortable here... the best situation is to be the T Bell or Cobbs owner since you DIDN'T waste a high pick!
Even though M Bell could still get the job, I'll bet those who spent a high pick on him are a little nervous right now. Can't say they weren't warned.
 
I could see Cobbs leap frogging Tatum to start....whatever Shanny does T.Bell will be the C of P.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
tatum didn't start last year. why is this year different?

it seems obvious, and there are now years of proof-that shanahan doesn't want to start tatum bell.

 
I just really can't imagine anyone being too comfortable here... the best situation is to be the T Bell or Cobbs owner since you DIDN'T waste a high pick!
Even though M Bell could still get the job, I'll bet those who spent a high pick on him are a little nervous right now. Can't say they weren't warned.
Agreed. I'm targeting Cobbs (doubt I'll get him from waivers), but otherwise have no dog in the race now. I had Mike Anderson last year, and after that I'm almost HOPING to not get Cobbs!! What a crazy backfield - good to know nothing's changed in Denver!!
 
Voted no.
Of course that doesn't necessarily mean you think Mike Bell will be playing by then either. He could be riding the pine but people will be too afraid to drop him.I voted when the poll first started. Have no idea which way I went. I assume no.
 
Voted no.
Of course that doesn't necessarily mean you think Mike Bell will be playing by then either. He could be riding the pine but people will be too afraid to drop him.I voted when the poll first started. Have no idea which way I went. I assume no.
Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean I think Mike Bell *WON'T* be playing by then, either.
 
Voted no.
Of course that doesn't necessarily mean you think Mike Bell will be playing by then either. He could be riding the pine but people will be too afraid to drop him.I voted when the poll first started. Have no idea which way I went. I assume no.
Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean I think Mike Bell *WON'T* be playing by then, either.
:D FWIW I think he will be playing regularly then.FWIW I hope Cobbs, not Bell, is playing regularly then.
 
If people can hold onto Ron Dayne last year, they'll hold onto Mike Bell this year. I voted no, too.

 
If people can hold onto Ron Dayne last year, they'll hold onto Mike Bell this year. I voted no, too.
Oh, I don't know, maybe they will see another reach on the WW and send Mr. M Bell packing.Edited to say, I didn't mean to imply that Denver will see another reach on the WW, when in fact I meant Denver will insert another player that would be on most FF league waiver wires, like Cecil Sapp or Nash, lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If people can hold onto Ron Dayne last year, they'll hold onto Mike Bell this year. I voted no, too.
Oh, I don't know, maybe they will see another reach on the WW and send Mr. M Bell packing.
Is there really such a thing as a "reach" on the WW? I mean, it's not like you have your choice between Tomlinson, Alexander, or Mike Bell here.
 
SSOG said:
JohnnyU said:
If people can hold onto Ron Dayne last year, they'll hold onto Mike Bell this year. I voted no, too.
Oh, I don't know, maybe they will see another reach on the WW and send Mr. M Bell packing.
Is there really such a thing as a "reach" on the WW? I mean, it's not like you have your choice between Tomlinson, Alexander, or Mike Bell here.
My fault that I implied Denver will see another reach on the WW, when in fact I meant Denver will insert another player that would be on most FF league waiver wires, like Cecil Sapp or Nash, lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JohnnyU was almost on the money; he is still on most rosters, but those owners can only pray for Bell to get hurt . . .

nice call . . .

 
With all the Mike Bell talk, I predict he will be on most league waiver wires by week 5.
In essentially 7 leagues that I'm in with waivers, he's not available (and never has been) in all seven. I would say that this was a very bad prediction.
 
The real question is.

Will Tatum Bell keep his starting job , and the answer is no.

Believe me in 2 to 3 weesk Tatum will either get injured or fumble the football too often and get benched .

 
He actually popped up in a league of mine and I grabbed him.

I am amazed that people still go in to every week asking questions like there will suddenly be a development or a change in the situation. Especially considering the situation has stayed the same week after week, for more then a few years now.

What I find more ironic, is that some people actually had a change of heart on Mike Bell during his bye week.

 
The real question is.Will Tatum Bell keep his starting job , and the answer is no.Believe me in 2 to 3 weesk Tatum will either get injured or fumble the football too often and get benched .
Doubt it. JMHO.Injuries are hard to predict, and it'd take a strong history of fumbling for Tatum to ride the pine- a history that he has not, to this point in his career, demonstrated. People usually don't develop bad habits overnight.
 
Yep, I'm pretty sure he's not on most league WW, but he may as well be. I was wrong about that, but I wasn't wrong about the Mike Bell hysteria being ridiculous. Lots of folks paid out the whazoo for this guy, and it wasn't justified. He sucked at Arizona and wasn't drafted for a reason.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep, I'm pretty sure he's not on most league WW, but he may as well be. I was wrong about that, but I wasn't wrong about the Mike Bell hysteria being ridiculous. Lots of folks paid out the whazoo for this guy, and it wasn't justified. He sucked at Arizona and wasn't drafted for a reason.
Then that should have been the thesis of your thread.
 
Yep, I'm pretty sure he's not on most league WW, but he may as well be. I was wrong about that, but I wasn't wrong about the Mike Bell hysteria being ridiculous. Lots of folks paid out the whazoo for this guy, and it wasn't justified. He sucked at Arizona and wasn't drafted for a reason.
Then that should have been the thesis of your thread.
I agree with you 100%.
 
Yep, I'm pretty sure he's not on most league WW, but he may as well be. I was wrong about that, but I wasn't wrong about the Mike Bell hysteria being ridiculous. Lots of folks paid out the whazoo for this guy, and it wasn't justified. He sucked at Arizona and wasn't drafted for a reason.
Then that should have been the thesis of your thread.
I agree with you 100%.
Good call in theory for what it's worth.
 
The real question is.

Will Tatum Bell keep his starting job , and the answer is no.

Believe me in 2 to 3 weesk Tatum will either get injured or fumble the football too often and get benched .
I've seen you post this in multiple threasds- and you could not be more wrong about how Shannie handles his RBs and fumbling - they have to have MULTIPLE GAMES of "important" fumbles before he even CONSIDERS benching them.Injuries, I refuse to predict.

You are simply wrong on how Shannie handles his RBs who fumble - Griffin didn't even lose his job until he got hurt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a small 10x16 dynasty league I'm cutting him for bye week help but in a larger league I'm definately holding. Dealt him for good value a few weeks ago in another. I will guaruntee that at some point this season he will have value again ... Tatum Bell is not an elite carry the load back. When the weather turns they'll want a between the tackles option.

 
1 early fumble.........
Yer point?How many times do folks need to be shown that Shannie does NOT pull his RBs just for fumbles - they have to fumble multiple times at important parts of the game.First possession in wet weather? Not gonna impact TB at all.
 
In a small 10x16 dynasty league I'm cutting him for bye week help but in a larger league I'm definately holding. Dealt him for good value a few weeks ago in another. I will guaruntee that at some point this season he will have value again ... Tatum Bell is not an elite carry the load back. When the weather turns they'll want a between the tackles option.
I couldn't disagree more, and even if I did agree, Mike Bell isn't that guy who can get it done. If something happen to TB, I can see someone like Cobbs or even Sapp getting a shot. The Mike Bell expierment was short lived. Hell, I don't think it ever got started. Like I said earlier, he went undrafted for a reason. Check out his stats at Arizona while you're at it.Edited to say, in defense of Mike Bell, neither Sapp nor Cobbs were drafted either :bag:

Edited again to say Cobbs was drafted in the 4th rd. oops.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Edited to say, in defense of Mike Bell, neither Sapp nor Cobbs were drafted either :bag:
I'm pretty sure Cobbs was selected in the 5th round by the Pats.Anyways, good call, I waived Mike Bell in 2 of the 3 leagues I owned him in just yesterday. As much as it pains me.
 
The strange thing about this whole situation is that right now it actually looks like it was all a :yawn: .

lol at the language filter and PTMTB. First time I've ever said that for the record.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top