What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Minn Vikings offence (1 Viewer)

jurb26

Footballguy
OK, so I've been a little out of the loop here recently not paying attention to football as much as normal. I started to think about how teams are shaking up for the draft and the Vikes really have my head spinning. So they are going into the season with Johnson as the startting QB, Moore/Taylor the RBs, Burleson as WR1 and then the same ol dog fight for Taylor/Robinson/Robinson/Williamson. Is this correct? What kind of production can we expect outa this group. I'm expecting a RBBC in Minn yet again, is there reason to believe it won't be? What about the WRs? Tons of talent in the group but will one emerge and can Johnson really get them the ball over the course of the whole year? Any thoughts form some Minn homers. I know we got an informative group of you guys around. :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Burleson is in Seattle. Taylor will be the full time back, they hand picked him. Moore will take some carries but Taylor should get atleast 70% of the carries baring injury. O.Smith will more than likely be cut. Koren Robinson looks to be the #1 WR. BJ looks to be the starting QB, with them potentially drafting a successor.

 
this from the Blog here;

March 12, 2006, 10:39

Vikings :: RB

RB C.Taylor Likely Featured Back For Vikings

Sean Jenson, St. Paul Pioneer Press - [Full Article]

"I am really excited about this opportunity I have been given," RB Chester Taylor said. "I played behind RB Jamal Lewis for four years, and standing on the sideline was just killing me a little bit, but I did what I had to do." Now, Taylor could do much more, perhaps touching the ball "20 to 30 times" a game, according to HC Childress. "Chester is a complete running back, who is thrilled to be featured in a West Coast attack," Taylor's agent, Ken Sarnoff, said.

 
I see MAJOR questions with regard to the Vikings' offense:

At QB, Johnson wasn't very good last season. He managed the game better than Culpepper had been doing but it's not like he was playing at a very high level. He had six games under 200 yards passing, including four games under 150. That's not very good. Plus he's not the most durable guy around having played a full season only three times in his career. It's a pretty safe bet to predict an injury for him so if the Vikings don't get a strong backup they could be in big trouble at this position.

At RB, I really like Taylor and he will be helped by Hutchinson's arrival at guard but nobody knows if he can play the position full time and take the pounding. He never received a firm commitment from Billick last season despite how bad Lewis looked which could be an indication of Billick's loyalty or him not believing enough in Taylor some combination. Again I like Taylor but there's a lot of questions about him.

At WR, this is an absolute mess. KRob is the most talented WR on the team but we all know his issues. Marcus Robinson is good for a couple of huge games and then he'll disappear and Williamson is still developing. This could be a potential problem area.

I do like Wiggins quite a bit at TE, though. I think he's very under-rated.

I like Brad Childress and I think he's going to do a very good job with the team, but he has a lot of work to do this season in my opinion. The Vikings' offense has major questions throughout the skill positions.

 
I see MAJOR questions with regard to the Vikings' offense:

At QB, Johnson wasn't very good last season. He managed the game better than Culpepper had been doing but it's not like he was playing at a very high level. He had six games under 200 yards passing, including four games under 150. That's not very good. Plus he's not the most durable guy around having played a full season only three times in his career. It's a pretty safe bet to predict an injury for him so if the Vikings don't get a strong backup they could be in big trouble at this position.

At RB, I really like Taylor and he will be helped by Hutchinson's arrival at guard but nobody knows if he can play the position full time and take the pounding. He never received a firm commitment from Billick last season despite how bad Lewis looked which could be an indication of Billick's loyalty or him not believing enough in Taylor some combination. Again I like Taylor but there's a lot of questions about him.

At WR, this is an absolute mess. KRob is the most talented WR on the team but we all know his issues. Marcus Robinson is good for a couple of huge games and then he'll disappear and Williamson is still developing. This could be a potential problem area.

I do like Wiggins quite a bit at TE, though. I think he's very under-rated.

I like Brad Childress and I think he's going to do a very good job with the team, but he has a lot of work to do this season in my opinion. The Vikings' offense has major questions throughout the skill positions.
Pretty much agree with you packersfan. I am very happy about Burleson being gone as a WIlliamson owner, but I hae very little faith in Johnson for an entire year. Who the heck are their backups again? I love the additions they made to the running game in Hutch, Risherdson and Taylor. I'm not sure how they will use the RBs as of yet though. Moore still seems to be in the fold IMO. Do they plan on drafting a QB early this year?
 
You will see a bunch of nothing from the skill positions.

But, they do have an allpro LG.
And running behind an All-Pro LG and former All-Pro Center and a very good LT would produce nothing from the skill positions. Excellent analysis from a bitter seahawk fan.

 
It's fair to say that they probably won't look a thing like the Vikings offense of the past few years. What that really means is up for discussion, but one can assume that they will take on the look of the pre-TO Eagles offense and, save for the QB, have the same general make-up. I.e., a bunch of decent but not great WRs, a dual threat RB (C. Taylor) and a solid pair of TEs.

Their success almost completely falls on the shoulders of Brad Johnson or his successor. That's the part that gives me pause.

 
You will see a bunch of nothing from the skill positions.

But, they do have an allpro LG.
And running behind an All-Pro LG and former All-Pro Center and a very good LT would produce nothing from the skill positions. Excellent analysis from a bitter seahawk fan.
And All Pro fullback in Tony Richardson from KC.
 
You will see a bunch of nothing from the skill positions.

But, they do have an allpro LG.
And running behind an All-Pro LG and former All-Pro Center and a very good LT would produce nothing from the skill positions. Excellent analysis from a bitter seahawk fan.
And All Pro fullback in Tony Richardson from KC.
Good point. My follow-up question to that is has Childress ever utilized the full-back to a high degree in Philly? I guess with Richardson you almost need to, especially for blocking.
 
You will see a bunch of nothing from the skill positions.

But, they do have an allpro LG.
And running behind an All-Pro LG and former All-Pro Center and a very good LT would produce nothing from the skill positions. Excellent analysis from a bitter seahawk fan.
And All Pro fullback in Tony Richardson from KC.
Jon Ritchie was used mainly as a blocking back, paving the way for guys like Westbrook, Duce, and that other 4th round pick who's name escapes me to all put up great combined numbers.Good point. My follow-up question to that is has Childress ever utilized the full-back to a high degree in Philly? I guess with Richardson you almost need to, especially for blocking.
 
You will see a bunch of nothing from the skill positions.

But, they do have an allpro LG.
And running behind an All-Pro LG and former All-Pro Center and a very good LT would produce nothing from the skill positions. Excellent analysis from a bitter seahawk fan.
And All Pro fullback in Tony Richardson from KC.
Good point. My follow-up question to that is has Childress ever utilized the full-back to a high degree in Philly? I guess with Richardson you almost need to, especially for blocking.
Jon Ritchie was used mainly as a blocking back, paving the way for guys like Westbrook, Duce, and that other 4th round pick who's name escapes me to all put up great combined numbers.
 
Brad Johnson 9 MIN DET 15 22 0.68 136 2 0 1 -1 0 14.7Brad Johnson 10 MIN NYG 18 31 0.58 144 0 0 0 0 0 7.2Brad Johnson 11 MIN GB 18 30 0.60 196 0 1 4 13 0 10.1Brad Johnson 12 MIN CLE 19 28 0.68 207 3 1 3 -2 0 21.2Brad Johnson 13 MIN DET 17 23 0.74 256 2 0 4 8 0 21.6Brad Johnson 14 MIN STL 16 25 0.64 146 0 0 1 -1 0 7.2Brad Johnson 15 MIN PIT 16 30 0.53 143 0 2 1 6 0 5.8Brad Johnson 16 MIN BAL 25 36 0.69 248 2 0 0 0 0 20.4Brad Johnson 17 MIN CHI 27 40 0.68 247 2 0 0 0 0 20.4On a more positive outlook.Brad Jhonson..

wk 9 high comp % plus 2 tds = 15 fpts

wk 10 the whole off was bad against the giants. still won the game i think?

wk 11 another stinker against GB still a 60% comp rate

wk 12 68% comp. 3 tds.. Cleveland

wk 13 64% comp 0tds- a dud.. because he was played against STL alot

wk 14 - Pitt bench him

wk15 Balt - 69% comp 2tds

wk 16 again 68% comp 2 tds

2003 TB - 276 fpts

2002 TB- 237 fpts

Minn offence might be similar to Tampa Bay?

4 out of 6 weeks Brad Johnson was around 20 fpts not to bad.

Most likely a prime target for commitee. or more accuratly stated draft three qbs and hope one gets hot.

 
In short, I expect to see an offense very similar to Tampa's offense under Gruden. An offense that will be built around the running game, whether it be from the power-I or two tightend sets. For the West-Coast offense passing; I think every passing offense in the NFL looks the same (playbook wise), so I don't expect to see anything 'new' or 'cutting' edge. Basically the same triangle-reads, spreading the ball around and heavy attention to the short and intermediate zones.

 
You will see a bunch of nothing from the skill positions.

But, they do have an allpro LG.
And running behind an All-Pro LG and former All-Pro Center and a very good LT would produce nothing from the skill positions. Excellent analysis from a bitter seahawk fan.
I am not a bitter Seahawk fan. I wish Hutchinson nothing but the best. But, to answer the original question concerning the Vikes offense, I BELIEVE that they have a great OL while being below average at all of the skill posiotions. That doesn't mean that their offense will be ineffective. This is simply my opinion!!
 
I agree that Chester is their guy for 06. However, why is Maroney visiting this week? Is this strictly a PR move because he is a local kid?

University of Minnesota running back Laurence Maroney will visit with the Vikings this week.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/s...ll/14293355.htmIt is interesting that a few mocks I have seen still have MIN taking a RB.
I don't think it really means anything as Vince Young is visiting also.
 
you'll see the Eagles ,sans T.O., in the Vikings offense in 2006...

in other words, boring no-name wr's, and brittle rb's like Westbrook or Taylor or Mewelde Moore catching tons of passes but rushing for very few yards...

the TE position in Minny could be fruitful to the savvy fantasy drafter..TE's did well under Childress when he coached in Philly.. :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At RB, I really like Taylor and he will be helped by Hutchinson's arrival at guard but nobody knows if he can play the position full time and take the pounding. He never received a firm commitment from Billick last season despite how bad Lewis looked which could be an indication of Billick's loyalty or him not believing enough in Taylor some combination.
This is key here. Jewis was horrible last year and had a bad attitude; it was ever suggested that he was not playing hard because he does not want to get hurt and not be able to sign a large contract new year.But on the other side of the coin you have the Ravens who before the season started last year matched a 3 million dollar offer from the Browns to keep Taylor.

LINK

Why did they do this? Was matching the Brown's offer just an insurance policy because of Lewis going to jail?

 
wk 10 the whole off was bad against the giants. still won the game i think?
I think that was the one where they returned a punt, kick, and an interception for TDs. Only time in NFL history a team did all three in one game IIRC.
 
They have Matt Birk returning which is a plus. The oline should be in disarray less since the players who were new to playing with each other (along with playing at all on that right side) should have gelled more.

They upgraded their blocking front seven with the addition of Hutchinson and T-Rich.

Kleinsasser is a good blocking TE, and Wiggins has proven to be an effective receiver.

Their WRs are sketchy, but I see no reason for them not to be productive.

Brad Johnson is the wildcard IMO.

I think the Vikes have made several solid upgrades, and I truly believe their defense will be one of the better defenses in the league.

They are second in their division and perhaps the most well rounded in the NFC North. On paper, I consider them contenders for a wildcard in the NFC.

So outside of not being perfect and having a brand spanking new HC, I see no reason why good fantasy players cannot come out of this team.

Unfortunately, the names of the players we'd be looking to draft, C. Taylor & WRs, don't carry much in the way of recent performance, but I expect one of their WRs to be in the 1000-1100 & 6 range and a healthy Taylor would be at a minimum a solid #2 RB.

The only thing that truly scares me, is Brad Johnson at QB. He looked good in spots last year, but will he be able to carry that over into this year? If not, their depth at the QB position is scary.

 
I agree that Chester is their guy for 06.  However, why is Maroney visiting this week?  Is this strictly a PR move because he is a local kid? 

University of Minnesota running back Laurence Maroney will visit with the Vikings this week.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/s...ll/14293355.htmIt is interesting that a few mocks I have seen still have MIN taking a RB.
I don't think it really means anything as Vince Young is visiting also.
Childress said the team will bring more than 30 draft- eligible players to Winter Park during the next three weeks for visits. The list includes Vanderbilt quarterback Jay Cutler, but Childress said he didn't see Texas quarterback Vince Young on the list. "All of [the visitors] fit into different categories," Childress said, "whether it's a medical question, a personality question or a guy that we're legitimately interested in."
 
Why all the love for Wiggins? He didn't even touch the field until Kleinsasser got hurt. Kleinsasser is an added weapon I think. They could line him up in the slot, use him as TE, and even let him run the ball on the goalline. I just don't understand why people have forgotten about Kleinsasser. The guy played all over the field on offense.

 
I agree that Chester is their guy for 06.  However, why is Maroney visiting this week?   Is this strictly a PR move because he is a local kid?  

University of Minnesota running back Laurence Maroney will visit with the Vikings this week.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/s...ll/14293355.htmIt is interesting that a few mocks I have seen still have MIN taking a RB.
I don't think it really means anything as Vince Young is visiting also.
Childress said the team will bring more than 30 draft- eligible players to Winter Park during the next three weeks for visits. The list includes Vanderbilt quarterback Jay Cutler, but Childress said he didn't see Texas quarterback Vince Young on the list. "All of [the visitors] fit into different categories," Childress said, "whether it's a medical question, a personality question or a guy that we're legitimately interested in."
MONDAY NOTES* QB or Not QB Part I: The Vikings have about 30 draft-eligible players scheduled for visits -- both to talk to and to have the team's medical personnel check them out. Among them is QB Jay Cutler. Who isn't on the list? According to Childress, QB Vince Young. We've been told otherwise.

 
MONDAY NOTES

* QB or Not QB Part I: The Vikings have about 30 draft-eligible players scheduled for visits -- both to talk to and to have the team's medical personnel check them out. Among them is QB Jay Cutler. Who isn't on the list? According to Childress, QB Vince Young. We've been told otherwise.
Ok, that's Denver, and Minnesota at least who used Vince Young's name to throw off the media. You also have Houston using him as their "we arent going to take Bush" dodgeball. This could be a popular joke developeing around the rookie events amoung the league. We might be hearing Vince's name a lot whenever a team is asked who they are going to draft.We all know a team isnt going to tell the media who they want or dont want. We've all heard Vince jokes since the Wunderlik. Here's your bone media. Go play with it.

 
Why all the love for Wiggins? He didn't even touch the field until Kleinsasser got hurt. Kleinsasser is an added weapon I think. They could line him up in the slot, use him as TE, and even let him run the ball on the goalline. I just don't understand why people have forgotten about Kleinsasser. The guy played all over the field on offense.
IMO, Kleinsasser is a good blocking TE, who was dual cast as a receiver at times, but his main strength is as a blocker. Not to take away anything from his receiving skills though, which are adequate.It's not that people have "forgotten" about Kleinsasser, it's just that his main role is that of a blocker.

 
Why all the love for Wiggins?  He didn't even touch the field until Kleinsasser got hurt.  Kleinsasser is an added weapon I think.  They could line him up in the slot, use him as TE, and even let him run the ball on the goalline.  I just don't understand why people have forgotten about Kleinsasser.  The guy played all over the field on offense.
IMO, Kleinsasser is a good blocking TE, who was dual cast as a receiver at times, but his main strength is as a blocker. Not to take away anything from his receiving skills though, which are adequate.It's not that people have "forgotten" about Kleinsasser, it's just that his main role is that of a blocker.
:goodposting: Kleinsasser's hands are decent, but it's after the catch that he has trouble holding onto the ball - I think that Childress wants to pound the ball this year and Kleinsasser will be big part of that not the pass catching machine that Wiggins is.

 
expect a lot of passess to RB/FB's and TEs.

K Rob will be #1 receiver

T. WIlliamson is #2

and TT should be #3

Marcus Robinson will have moments but definite # 4, goal line receiver type role.

Chester most likely will be #1 back but don't be surprised at RBBC.

 
Vikings receivers ready for new chances

Williamson competing to start; Robinson happy with featured role

BY DON SEEHOLZER, Pioneer Press

Vikings coach Brad Childress says he isn't looking for any one wide receiver to step up and fill Nate Burleson's shoes, but Troy Williamson is up for the challenge.

The team's No. 1 draft choice from last year used a three-day weekend minicamp to begin the process of proving he is an NFL starter, while Koren Robinson settled confidently into his new role as No. 1 receiver.

"I've been ready to do that since I came into the league," Robinson said. "I had my issues, but I feel like I'm now back to where I want to be in my life and just focusing on football."

With his off-field problems behind him, Robinson moved to the top of the Vikings' receivers chart even before Burleson left for Seattle, signing a three-year, $12.7 million contract on the eve of free agency.

Coming off a season in which he made the Pro Bowl as a kickoff returner but caught just 22 passes, Robinson is looking forward to playing a feature role as lead receiver in the Vikings' new West Coast offense.

"I'm loving it," he said. "It's the same offense I played in when I was in Seattle. I had a big year (in 2002) with 1,240 yards and 78 catches, so I'm looking forward to it. I'm the No. 1 guy right now, and I'm looking forward to a big year.'

So is Williamson, who is being given the first shot at the other starting receiver spot.

He had an unspectacular rookie season with the Vikings, catching 24 passes for 372 yards and two touchdowns, but Williamson said he felt much more at home during this minicamp than he did a year ago.

"Right now, I'm just getting into the playbook and learning what I've got to do," he said. "I'm just going on from there. The draft, you really don't know what's going to happen. Now I know what's going on and what I can expect come training camp."

Based on what Robinson has seen this offseason, Williamson has the right stuff to live up to the Vikings' expectations.

"I feel like he's going to be the other starter with me," Robinson said. "We're going to rely on him. He's going to have to carry his weight and some of the load on offense. I feel like his focus is up during the offseason workout program. He's trying to learn the playbook as fast as he can and doing extra stuff to get better to show everybody his mind is right and he's ready to help us to the next level."

Looking back on his rookie season, Williamson called it "pretty much a learning experience," but Childress has said he expects the former South Carolina star to blossom this fall.

Offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell said he and the other coaches feel good about their receiving corps, even without Burleson.

"Well, we look at it as an opportunity for those other guys that are still here," Bevell said. "We felt like we had a good stable of wide receivers. That was a strong point of this offense, and we still feel that way. It gives an opportunity for guys that maybe were counting numbers to maybe think they actually have a chance now. They've all put forth great effort. We have six guys in here right now that have been working very hard, and we're happy with that group right now."

Childress seemed less pleased when asked Sunday to evaluate the minicamp performance of his receivers.

"In general, guys that get paid to run need to make sure that they're able to run," he said. "I think we need to be in a little bit better condition. That's always a question this time of year. Body weight and conditioning — those are two things that take no talent to take care of. I would say that, across the board, as a team we could be at a little bit better level of cardio condition."

That comment was typical of the no-nonsense, businesslike atmosphere of Childress' first minicamp. But Robinson sees the method behind the tough-love strategy.

"I like coach," he said. "He's a straight shooter, just straightforward. Right now, he has to set a standard. Some people might think he's being hard, but this is his first head-coaching job. This is all new to him. You want guys to do what you say, so you've got to come in and step on some toes a little bit. Once you set a standard, everybody can relax.

"Everybody calls him a disciplinarian. I don't know if that's what was needed here, but I feel it will help us out in the little parts of the game and normal everyday life in the locker room, and that will carry over into the season."

LINK

 
I agree that Chester is their guy for 06.  However, why is Maroney visiting this week?  Is this strictly a PR move because he is a local kid? 

University of Minnesota running back Laurence Maroney will visit with the Vikings this week.
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/s...ll/14293355.htmIt is interesting that a few mocks I have seen still have MIN taking a RB.
I don't think it really means anything as Vince Young is visiting also.
He is planning on a visit next week. The coaches might not be there, thoughhttp://vikings.scout.com/2/520939.html

 
i dont know what to expect overall from this O, but I would think their Oline should be solid enough to get some things done. as far as Childress' philosopy goes, it's really yet to be determined. Hes no longer just an Ocoordinator. As a HC, he could become a little more conservative and run the ball more than the Eagles did. that would be a good thing for the Vikes obviously. Chester Taylor seems capable, but he's still a big ? imo. He's not proven much of anything. as a Koren Robinson owner, Im pretty psyched to see what the guy can do as a #1. hes bouncing back from his addictions with alcohol, and I applaud him for his efforts. i hope the guy can stay clean and sober. if he does, write it down...he'll dominate the competition.

 
I think this O will be very well balanced but not the big-play type of O that we're used to seeing. With a strong D and a good kicking game, they should still put up 20 points or so, I HOPE.

As for the question about the love of Wiggins, he was putting up good numbers before Kleinsasser was hurt. Kleinsasser seems too thick and he NEVER puts the ball away when he catches it. I cringe everytime he catches a swing pass and the defender is there to stick him.

As for the discussion about the Vikings passing on seeing Vince Young one more time, all that could mean to me is they are satisfied on him already and don't need to see him.

 
If K-Rob is the #1 WR, then they are in trouble.
Wow, thats some in depth coverage there young cheese. KRob steps in off the street last year for this club and takes on a role he was completely unprepared to do and gets voted to the Pro Bowl.....playing out of position. He's in the process of paying his dues currently, but he paid a large portion of them last year already. KRob is as good as or better than half the #1s in this league. Make no mistake. He's just like anyone else...needs an opportunity. He's been a drunk. We all know this. It could have been alot worse. But were going to leave the past where it belongs...in the past, and move forward with this kid. He's got as much pure talent as just about any WR playing today. Lets see if he can hold onto the ball 80 or more times this season. Outside of TO, this is the best WR Childress has ever worked with.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If K-Rob is the #1 WR, then they are in trouble.
Wow, thats some in depth coverage there young cheese. KRob steps in off the street last year for this club and takes on a role he was completely unprepared to do and gets voted to the Pro Bowl.....playing out of position. He's in the process of paying his dues currently, but he paid a large portion of them last year already. KRob is as good as or better than half the #1s in this league. Make no mistake. He's just like anyone else...needs an opportunity. He's been a drunk. We all know this. It could have been alot worse. But were going to leave the past where it belongs...in the past, and move forward with this kid. He's got as much pure talent as just about any WR playing today. Lets see if he can hold onto the ball 80 or more times this season. Outside of TO, this is the best WR Childress has ever worked with.
That's alright, Solo. Frenzy is still pissed about the Hutchinson fiasco.Let it go, FF, let it go :bye:

 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year. The bulb seems to have turned on. Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?). Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today. I now have a man-crush. That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:

 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year. The bulb seems to have turned on. Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?). Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today. I now have a man-crush. That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year.  The bulb seems to have turned on.  Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?).  Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today.  I now have a man-crush.  That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
Yes. That part makes me nervous.I do NOT think they're going to acquire Matt Schaub for a 1st rounder. If they were going to do that, they would have already so that he could participate in the mini-camps. They will most likely draft a QB in the 2nd, unless one of the Big 3 drops to #17.

 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year.  The bulb seems to have turned on.  Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?).  Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today.  I now have a man-crush.  That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
Yes. That part makes me nervous.I do NOT think they're going to acquire Matt Schaub for a 1st rounder. If they were going to do that, they would have already so that he could participate in the mini-camps. They will most likely draft a QB in the 2nd, unless one of the Big 3 drops to #17.
Personally, I think the Schaub deal is still a go; it is just contingent on 'if' the Vikings trade up for a quarterback; which is contingent on which quarterbacks drop at the end of April.I would not be suprised to see Schaub still go to Minnesota for the #17 pick.

 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year.  The bulb seems to have turned on.  Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?).  Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today.  I now have a man-crush.  That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
Yes. That part makes me nervous.I do NOT think they're going to acquire Matt Schaub for a 1st rounder. If they were going to do that, they would have already so that he could participate in the mini-camps. They will most likely draft a QB in the 2nd, unless one of the Big 3 drops to #17.
Put me in the camp (it's a lonely one) that thinks Brad Johnson will be just fine this year. He won't put up 3500 yards and 30 td's, but he will be Mark Brunellish.
 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year.  The bulb seems to have turned on.  Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?).  Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today.  I now have a man-crush.  That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
Yes. That part makes me nervous.I do NOT think they're going to acquire Matt Schaub for a 1st rounder. If they were going to do that, they would have already so that he could participate in the mini-camps. They will most likely draft a QB in the 2nd, unless one of the Big 3 drops to #17.
Put me in the camp (it's a lonely one) that thinks Brad Johnson will be just fine this year. He won't put up 3500 yards and 30 td's, but he will be Mark Brunellish.
And if the running game does what Childress wants it to Brad Johnson will be just fine at QB this year. I have to keep reminding myself I'm on a Fantasy Football board when I read all the critisism of Johnson.

 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year.  The bulb seems to have turned on.  Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?).  Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today.  I now have a man-crush.  That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
Yes. That part makes me nervous.I do NOT think they're going to acquire Matt Schaub for a 1st rounder. If they were going to do that, they would have already so that he could participate in the mini-camps. They will most likely draft a QB in the 2nd, unless one of the Big 3 drops to #17.
Personally, I think the Schaub deal is still a go; it is just contingent on 'if' the Vikings trade up for a quarterback; which is contingent on which quarterbacks drop at the end of April.I would not be suprised to see Schaub still go to Minnesota for the #17 pick.
Blue Onion, I hope you are right. But I think more and more that a LB is in our first round pick with a QB at some point in the second.
 
I think that the Vikings offense is going to look more like the Chiefs than the Eagles.

Few people realize how well McKinnie was playing at the end of the year last year.  The bulb seems to have turned on.  Now add in a little Steve Hutchinson, Matt Birk, and Tony Richardson to the mix and all of a sudden, I'm getting very intrigued as to Chester Taylor's chances at big numbers.

I'm also beginning to wonder if they may not draft a TE in round 1 (Pope?).  Round 2 certainly.

BTW - KFAN had an interview with Richardson today.  I now have a man-crush.  That is one SOLID character guy. :thumbup:
There still going to need a QB to deliver the ball.
Yes. That part makes me nervous.I do NOT think they're going to acquire Matt Schaub for a 1st rounder. If they were going to do that, they would have already so that he could participate in the mini-camps. They will most likely draft a QB in the 2nd, unless one of the Big 3 drops to #17.
Personally, I think the Schaub deal is still a go; it is just contingent on 'if' the Vikings trade up for a quarterback; which is contingent on which quarterbacks drop at the end of April.I would not be suprised to see Schaub still go to Minnesota for the #17 pick.
Blue Onion, I hope you are right. But I think more and more that a LB is in our first round pick with a QB at some point in the second.
Personally, I would rather them hold tight at 17; taking Cutler or best LB available at the 17 pick.My comments above were what I think the Triangle of Authority is thinking.

 
My dream scenario:

both Cutler and Sims sitting there at 17 - we phone the Falcons and tell them it's a 2nd round pick for Schaub or we take Cutler and they can pound sand.

If they bite and take a 2nd for Schaub we take Sims with the 17th and have our QB for the future and our LB of destiny.

 
My dream scenario:

both Cutler and Sims sitting there at 17 - we phone the Falcons and tell them it's a 2nd round pick for Schaub or we take Cutler and they can pound sand.

If they bite and take a 2nd for Schaub we take Sims with the 17th and have our QB for the future and our LB of destiny.
:drool: :thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top