jerseydevil20
Footballguy
I guess the 80s called Obama?
Yes, I'm expecting Members Only jackets to be making a return soon as well.I guess the 80s called Obama?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/09/politics/joseph-dunford-russia-greatest-threat/index.htmlJoint Chiefs nominee: Russia greatest threat to U.S.
By Jamie Crawford, National Security Producer
Updated 3:35 PM ET, Fri July 10, 2015
Washington (CNN)Russia currently poses the greatest global threat to the United States, according to the man slated to be President Barack Obama's top military adviser.
"Russia presents the greatest threat to our national security," Gen. Joseph Dunford told the Senate Armed Services committee during his confirmation hearing to be the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
With its large nuclear arsenal, destabilizing role in Ukraine and threat to NATO nations on its borders, Russia presents a significant challenge to the U.S., even as it faces threats like that of ISIS.
"If you want to talk about a nation that could pose an existential threat to the United States, I would have to point to Russia," Dunford said. "And if you look at their behavior, it's nothing short of alarming,"
...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9168533/Mitt-Romney-Russia-is-Americas-number-one-geopolitical-foe.html
I really want to support this guy. But sometimes he makes it so damn difficult. Doesn't he realize that, as the man who will be the Republican nominee, his words have impact overseas?
We don't need to have Russia as our enemy. We would be much better off in the long run with Russia as our friend, for a whole variety of reasons. If Romney is elected he has created a big mess here which he will have to clean up. I figure he thinks he's Ronald Reagan, but he isn't, just as today's Russia is not the Soviet Union.
My goodness, Mitt. Having (naturally) different national interests than us hardly makes a nation an enemy. The freaking Russkies have enough internal problems of their own and plenty of pressure on their immediate borders to worry much about us.
I stand by every word of this. Russia's participation will be vital to the success of the Iran deal. I don't like Putin, don't trust him, but we have to get past that. We have too many common interests.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9168533/Mitt-Romney-Russia-is-Americas-number-one-geopolitical-foe.html
I really want to support this guy. But sometimes he makes it so damn difficult. Doesn't he realize that, as the man who will be the Republican nominee, his words have impact overseas?
We don't need to have Russia as our enemy. We would be much better off in the long run with Russia as our friend, for a whole variety of reasons. If Romney is elected he has created a big mess here which he will have to clean up. I figure he thinks he's Ronald Reagan, but he isn't, just as today's Russia is not the Soviet Union.![]()
Tim doing his best to fill LHUCKS' shoes I see.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9168533/Mitt-Romney-Russia-is-Americas-number-one-geopolitical-foe.html
I really want to support this guy. But sometimes he makes it so damn difficult. Doesn't he realize that, as the man who will be the Republican nominee, his words have impact overseas?
We don't need to have Russia as our enemy. We would be much better off in the long run with Russia as our friend, for a whole variety of reasons. If Romney is elected he has created a big mess here which he will have to clean up. I figure he thinks he's Ronald Reagan, but he isn't, just as today's Russia is not the Soviet Union.![]()
I continue to be surprised at how many people support this goober. I don't get it. What does he have over you people?
So unless our next Joint Chief of Staff is wrong ("Russia currently poses the greatest global threat to the United States, according to the man slated to be President Barack Obama's top military adviser."), Romney has been proved right, he was just wrong to say it?I stand by every word of this.Russia's participation will be vital to the success of the Iran deal. I don't like Putin, don't trust him, but we have to get past that. We have too many common interests.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/9168533/Mitt-Romney-Russia-is-Americas-number-one-geopolitical-foe.html
I really want to support this guy. But sometimes he makes it so damn difficult. Doesn't he realize that, as the man who will be the Republican nominee, his words have impact overseas?
We don't need to have Russia as our enemy. We would be much better off in the long run with Russia as our friend, for a whole variety of reasons. If Romney is elected he has created a big mess here which he will have to clean up. I figure he thinks he's Ronald Reagan, but he isn't, just as today's Russia is not the Soviet Union.![]()
I'm perhaps naive but I'm not immediately understanding why that's a bad thing.And in the MMQB department Romney was also right about the size of the navy sinking to such a small size marines would have to hitch rides on foreign ships. He was also mocked for that.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/06/21/marines-amphibious/28935549/
http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/obama-mocks-romneys-horses-and-bayonets/story-e6frfkui-1226501536584
Hm, not sure either, I think the point there was just that he was proven right that it was happening. The even odder thing was that Pres. Obama mocked him for it when as you say maybe he should have gone with it and defended it as the right strategy as that's what they were indeed doing.I'm perhaps naive but I'm not immediately understanding why that's a bad thing.And in the MMQB department Romney was also right about the size of the navy sinking to such a small size marines would have to hitch rides on foreign ships. He was also mocked for that.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/06/21/marines-amphibious/28935549/
http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/obama-mocks-romneys-horses-and-bayonets/story-e6frfkui-1226501536584
I don't get itI continue to be surprised at how many people support this goober. I don't get it. What does he have over you people?![]()
What have countries with smaller navies been doing to get past this problem?I'm perhaps naive but I'm not immediately understanding why that's a bad thing.And in the MMQB department Romney was also right about the size of the navy sinking to such a small size marines would have to hitch rides on foreign ships. He was also mocked for that.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/06/21/marines-amphibious/28935549/
http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/obama-mocks-romneys-horses-and-bayonets/story-e6frfkui-1226501536584
100% speculation here but I'm guessing a combination of working with their allies and not patrolling every corner of the globe.What have countries with smaller navies been doing to get past this problem?I'm perhaps naive but I'm not immediately understanding why that's a bad thing.And in the MMQB department Romney was also right about the size of the navy sinking to such a small size marines would have to hitch rides on foreign ships. He was also mocked for that.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/06/21/marines-amphibious/28935549/
http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/obama-mocks-romneys-horses-and-bayonets/story-e6frfkui-1226501536584
Only on odd-numbered days. On even-numbered days we are becoming Greece.Still searching the globe for international bogeymen?
Let the US do the heavy lifting.What have countries with smaller navies been doing to get past this problem?I'm perhaps naive but I'm not immediately understanding why that's a bad thing.And in the MMQB department Romney was also right about the size of the navy sinking to such a small size marines would have to hitch rides on foreign ships. He was also mocked for that.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/06/21/marines-amphibious/28935549/
http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/obama-mocks-romneys-horses-and-bayonets/story-e6frfkui-1226501536584
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_MYXlOdUcI&feature=youtu.beUS Warns Russia Over Airstrikes in Syria
1st page was full of gemsJust more rhetoric for the likes of Putin. It is shame, I think Obama is making good progress with Russia. When will we learn that our approach with other countries needs to be based on trade and facilitating an open dialogue? Not threats and military buildup. I guess the former doesn't play well with the American people.I don't think it's damaging really. Medved pretty much slapped Romney down on it and Wes Clark finished him off. The Russians don't take that crap seriously really. If he got elected they might use it against him at the table but in general they know it was just stupid campaign talk.It's worse than foolish. It's actually damaging to our national interests. It's by far Romney's worst comment of the campaign.What a foolish remark from Mr. Etch A Sketch.
This. Not even close.Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Do you agree that they are at least geopolitical?Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Didn't he call them a "Regional Power"?Do you agree that they are at least geopolitical?Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Pres. Obama could not even utter that much.
Second behind Canada.Some real gold here in the reaction to Romney's comment which through Georgia, Ukraine/Crimea, a lesser extent Kyrgyzstan and now Syria has shown without doubt that Romney was absolutely on the mark.
He's just a big thinker. The earth is a region of the solar system.Didn't he call them a "Regional Power"?Do you agree that they are at least geopolitical?Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Pres. Obama could not even utter that much.
I have always been suspicious of the CanucksSecond behind Canada.Some real gold here in the reaction to Romney's comment which through Georgia, Ukraine/Crimea, a lesser extent Kyrgyzstan and now Syria has shown without doubt that Romney was absolutely on the mark.
Can either of you please rank the top five? I have a draft coming up...This. Not even close.Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Dynasty or redraft? I've been making a boatload of cash in the geopolitical daily leagues.Can either of you please rank the top five? I have a draft coming up...This. Not even close.Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Glad you thougth about it long and hard. Maybe pay a tad more attention and gain a tad more understanding of what is happening before you spin your wheels next time?Russia is in Syria fighting Islamic jihadists. Thought about it long and hard, and I can see no other option but to declare war on Russia.
Did you pull anything stretching that hard?Truth is I don't consider Russia a geopolitical threat because I don't think we have any geopolitical foes. Our biggest foes are scientific, economic, and ideological. In no particular order:
1. World debt and our own debt.
2. Shrinking energy supply.
3. Climate change.
4. Militant radical Islamism.
5. The spread of nuclear weapons.
6. Threats to trade vs changes to manufacturing.
7. Isolationism, nativism, ignorance, poverty, lack of education, class divide, and racism (internal threats).
Compared to these significant problems, I don't see Russia as a threat. They're an annoyance, a poor country in economic trouble pretending that they are still the Soviet Union. It's both sad and pathetic. We're going to have strained relations with them over Syria and the Ukraine. But we're never going to fight s war with them. They'll never dominate Eastern Europe like they once did. So it's not really much of a foe.
So your argument is that we are in a post geo-politics world? That there is no #1 geopolitical foe because it is no longer a relevant concept? I would call that a patently silly contention.Truth is I don't consider Russia a geopolitical threat because I don't think we have any geopolitical foes. Our biggest foes are scientific, economic, and ideological. In no particular order:
1. World debt and our own debt.
2. Shrinking energy supply.
3. Climate change.
4. Militant radical Islamism.
5. The spread of nuclear weapons.
6. Threats to trade vs changes to manufacturing.
7. Isolationism, nativism, ignorance, poverty, lack of education, class divide, and racism (internal threats).
Compared to these significant problems, I don't see Russia as a threat. They're an annoyance, a poor country in economic trouble pretending that they are still the Soviet Union. It's both sad and pathetic. We're going to have strained relations with them over Syria and the Ukraine. But we're never going to fight s war with them. They'll never dominate Eastern Europe like they once did. So it's not really much of a foe.
Not just any Islamic Jihadists, our Islamic Jihadists....Russia is in Syria fighting Islamic jihadists. Thought about it long and hard, and I can see no other option but to declare war on Russia.
Tim is 100% convinced there will be no more us vs. them wars between countries ever again.RedmondLonghorn said:So your argument is that we are in a post geo-politics world? That there is no #1 geopolitical foe because it is no longer a relevant concept? I would call that a patently silly contention.timschochet said:Truth is I don't consider Russia a geopolitical threat because I don't think we have any geopolitical foes. Our biggest foes are scientific, economic, and ideological. In no particular order:
1. World debt and our own debt.
2. Shrinking energy supply.
3. Climate change.
4. Militant radical Islamism.
5. The spread of nuclear weapons.
6. Threats to trade vs changes to manufacturing.
7. Isolationism, nativism, ignorance, poverty, lack of education, class divide, and racism (internal threats).
Compared to these significant problems, I don't see Russia as a threat. They're an annoyance, a poor country in economic trouble pretending that they are still the Soviet Union. It's both sad and pathetic. We're going to have strained relations with them over Syria and the Ukraine. But we're never going to fight s war with them. They'll never dominate Eastern Europe like they once did. So it's not really much of a foe.
But even if we stipulate that your assertion isn't absolute nonsense, of the list of above (which are a mix of very important concerns and some other stuff), Russia is a major factor in all of the bolded ones.
Russia is a not a major threat and they are a regional power whose interest sometimes conflicts with oursThat doesn't make them an enemy. It doesn’t make them a combatant. They don't represent the No. 1 national security threat.
That should have been clear to anyone that understands the phrase "geopolitical foe". Kinda sad that he had to spell it out further.I agree with Romney's several month later clarification
Russia is a not a major threat and they are a regional power whose interest sometimes conflicts with oursThat doesn't make them an enemy. It doesn’t make them a combatant. They don't represent the No. 1 national security threat.
And WWI was the War to End All Wars.Tim is 100% convinced there will be no more us vs. them wars between countries ever again.RedmondLonghorn said:So your argument is that we are in a post geo-politics world? That there is no #1 geopolitical foe because it is no longer a relevant concept? I would call that a patently silly contention.timschochet said:Truth is I don't consider Russia a geopolitical threat because I don't think we have any geopolitical foes. Our biggest foes are scientific, economic, and ideological. In no particular order:
1. World debt and our own debt.
2. Shrinking energy supply.
3. Climate change.
4. Militant radical Islamism.
5. The spread of nuclear weapons.
6. Threats to trade vs changes to manufacturing.
7. Isolationism, nativism, ignorance, poverty, lack of education, class divide, and racism (internal threats).
Compared to these significant problems, I don't see Russia as a threat. They're an annoyance, a poor country in economic trouble pretending that they are still the Soviet Union. It's both sad and pathetic. We're going to have strained relations with them over Syria and the Ukraine. But we're never going to fight s war with them. They'll never dominate Eastern Europe like they once did. So it's not really much of a foe.
But even if we stipulate that your assertion isn't absolute nonsense, of the list of above (which are a mix of very important concerns and some other stuff), Russia is a major factor in all of the bolded ones.
You ought to read this: http://www.vox.com/2015/6/29/8845913/russia-wartimschochet said:Truth is I don't consider Russia a geopolitical threat because I don't think we have any geopolitical foes. Our biggest foes are scientific, economic, and ideological. In no particular order:
1. World debt and our own debt.
2. Shrinking energy supply.
3. Climate change.
4. Militant radical Islamism.
5. The spread of nuclear weapons.
6. Threats to trade vs changes to manufacturing.
7. Isolationism, nativism, ignorance, poverty, lack of education, class divide, and racism (internal threats).
Compared to these significant problems, I don't see Russia as a threat. They're an annoyance, a poor country in economic trouble pretending that they are still the Soviet Union. It's both sad and pathetic. We're going to have strained relations with them over Syria and the Ukraine. But we're never going to fight s war with them. They'll never dominate Eastern Europe like they once did. So it's not really much of a foe.
OK great I didn't think we would all agree with Romney that Russia isn't an enemy.That should have been clear to anyone that understands the phrase "geopolitical foe". Kinda sad that he had to spell it out further.I agree with Romney's several month later clarification
Russia is a not a major threat and they are a regional power whose interest sometimes conflicts with oursThat doesn't make them an enemy. It doesn’t make them a combatant. They don't represent the No. 1 national security threat.
You guys were totally right. We should be fighting Russia in Ukraine in Syria.HellToupee said:1st page was full of gemsJust more rhetoric for the likes of Putin. It is shame, I think Obama is making good progress with Russia. When will we learn that our approach with other countries needs to be based on trade and facilitating an open dialogue? Not threats and military buildup. I guess the former doesn't play well with the American people.I don't think it's damaging really. Medved pretty much slapped Romney down on it and Wes Clark finished him off. The Russians don't take that crap seriously really. If he got elected they might use it against him at the table but in general they know it was just stupid campaign talk.It's worse than foolish. It's actually damaging to our national interests. It's by far Romney's worst comment of the campaign.What a foolish remark from Mr. Etch A Sketch.
especially if Russia votes against the US in a UN vote, as the big bad foe.You guys were totally right. We should be fighting Russia in Ukraine in Syria.HellToupee said:1st page was full of gemsJust more rhetoric for the likes of Putin. It is shame, I think Obama is making good progress with Russia. When will we learn that our approach with other countries needs to be based on trade and facilitating an open dialogue? Not threats and military buildup. I guess the former doesn't play well with the American people.I don't think it's damaging really. Medved pretty much slapped Romney down on it and Wes Clark finished him off. The Russians don't take that crap seriously really. If he got elected they might use it against him at the table but in general they know it was just stupid campaign talk.It's worse than foolish. It's actually damaging to our national interests. It's by far Romney's worst comment of the campaign.What a foolish remark from Mr. Etch A Sketch.
Probably need to upgrade them into the Axis of Evilespecially if Russia votes against the US in a UN vote, as the big bad foe.You guys were totally right. We should be fighting Russia in Ukraine in Syria.HellToupee said:1st page was full of gemsJust more rhetoric for the likes of Putin. It is shame, I think Obama is making good progress with Russia. When will we learn that our approach with other countries needs to be based on trade and facilitating an open dialogue? Not threats and military buildup. I guess the former doesn't play well with the American people.I don't think it's damaging really. Medved pretty much slapped Romney down on it and Wes Clark finished him off. The Russians don't take that crap seriously really. If he got elected they might use it against him at the table but in general they know it was just stupid campaign talk.It's worse than foolish. It's actually damaging to our national interests. It's by far Romney's worst comment of the campaign.What a foolish remark from Mr. Etch A Sketch.
Sure that is exactly what we are sayingWe should be fighting Russia in Ukraine in Syria.HellToupee said:1st page was full of gemsJust more rhetoric for the likes of Putin. It is shame, I think Obama is making good progress with Russia. When will we learn that our approach with other countries needs to be based on trade and facilitating an open dialogue? Not threats and military buildup. I guess the former doesn't play well with the American people.I don't think it's damaging really. Medved pretty much slapped Romney down on it and Wes Clark finished him off. The Russians don't take that crap seriously really. If he got elected they might use it against him at the table but in general they know it was just stupid campaign talk.It's worse than foolish. It's actually damaging to our national interests. It's by far Romney's worst comment of the campaign.What a foolish remark from Mr. Etch A Sketch.
Well that's an aggressively stupid post.You guys were totally right. We should be fighting Russia in Ukraine in Syria.HellToupee said:1st page was full of gemsJust more rhetoric for the likes of Putin. It is shame, I think Obama is making good progress with Russia. When will we learn that our approach with other countries needs to be based on trade and facilitating an open dialogue? Not threats and military buildup. I guess the former doesn't play well with the American people.I don't think it's damaging really. Medved pretty much slapped Romney down on it and Wes Clark finished him off. The Russians don't take that crap seriously really. If he got elected they might use it against him at the table but in general they know it was just stupid campaign talk.It's worse than foolish. It's actually damaging to our national interests. It's by far Romney's worst comment of the campaign.What a foolish remark from Mr. Etch A Sketch.
The argument I've made repeatedly is that 'acting tough' doesn't actually solve anything. In fact, I think it would play right into Putin's hands because I think he'd love to be at war with the U.S.SaintsInDome2006 said:Do you agree that they are at least geopolitical?cstu said:Russia is still not our #1 geopolitical foe.
Pres. Obama could not even utter that much.