What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Montee Ball (1 Viewer)

Clopp, think you're being overly optimistic here. There are rumblings in Denver of benching Ball after the bye. Its not like he's this proven commodity. He had 120 carries last year on the most prolific offense in the history of the NFL. Really hard to gauge anything off of that. If the QB is throwing 5-6 td's game, i would guess you can even find some running room. He's looked mediocre at best. To think he can't just be benched for a CJ Anderson is being a bit negligent. This isn't a proven back with years of production here. I think another poor game, he could very well be backing up CJ in week 6. And I don't think that's being too bold either. In my opinion, he wont come near his 2nd rd price tag.
Yeah what proof you got? Cant find anyone saying anything even close to what your claiming here
Didn't see it in print, the guys on "the Audible" Football Guys podcast were saying it today, and they are usually tapped in pretty well.
LMFAO, yeah Cecil, ok sure

 
Clopp, think you're being overly optimistic here. There are rumblings in Denver of benching Ball after the bye. Its not like he's this proven commodity. He had 120 carries last year on the most prolific offense in the history of the NFL. Really hard to gauge anything off of that. If the QB is throwing 5-6 td's game, i would guess you can even find some running room. He's looked mediocre at best. To think he can't just be benched for a CJ Anderson is being a bit negligent. This isn't a proven back with years of production here. I think another poor game, he could very well be backing up CJ in week 6. And I don't think that's being too bold either. In my opinion, he wont come near his 2nd rd price tag.
Yeah what proof you got? Cant find anyone saying anything even close to what your claiming here
Didn't see it in print, the guys on "the Audible" Football Guys podcast were saying it today, and they are usually tapped in pretty well.
LMFAO, yeah Cecil, ok sure
Well why is it funny, what is this bizarro world? Montee Ball has done NOTHING in this league haha. Do u not think he can be benched or something??

Reading some of these posts, you would think we're talking about benching Shady McCoy for Chris Polk. My god

 
Clopp, think you're being overly optimistic here. There are rumblings in Denver of benching Ball after the bye. Its not like he's this proven commodity. He had 120 carries last year on the most prolific offense in the history of the NFL. Really hard to gauge anything off of that. If the QB is throwing 5-6 td's game, i would guess you can even find some running room. He's looked mediocre at best. To think he can't just be benched for a CJ Anderson is being a bit negligent. This isn't a proven back with years of production here. I think another poor game, he could very well be backing up CJ in week 6. And I don't think that's being too bold either. In my opinion, he wont come near his 2nd rd price tag.
Yeah what proof you got? Cant find anyone saying anything even close to what your claiming here
Didn't see it in print, the guys on "the Audible" Football Guys podcast were saying it today, and they are usually tapped in pretty well.
LMFAO, yeah Cecil, ok sure
Well why is it funny, what is this bizarro world? Montee Ball has done NOTHING in this league haha. Do u not think he can be benched or something??

Reading some of these posts, you would think we're talking about benching Shady McCoy for Chris Polk. My god
those guys have gotten the Denver backfield wrong for 3 years now,

 
Clopp, think you're being overly optimistic here. There are rumblings in Denver of benching Ball after the bye. Its not like he's this proven commodity. He had 120 carries last year on the most prolific offense in the history of the NFL. Really hard to gauge anything off of that. If the QB is throwing 5-6 td's game, i would guess you can even find some running room. He's looked mediocre at best. To think he can't just be benched for a CJ Anderson is being a bit negligent. This isn't a proven back with years of production here. I think another poor game, he could very well be backing up CJ in week 6. And I don't think that's being too bold either. In my opinion, he wont come near his 2nd rd price tag.
Yeah what proof you got? Cant find anyone saying anything even close to what your claiming here
Didn't see it in print, the guys on "the Audible" Football Guys podcast were saying it today, and they are usually tapped in pretty well.
LMFAO, yeah Cecil, ok sure
Well why is it funny, what is this bizarro world? Montee Ball has done NOTHING in this league haha. Do u not think he can be benched or something??

Reading some of these posts, you would think we're talking about benching Shady McCoy for Chris Polk. My god
I don't think its the notion of benching Ball as it is it just sounds ridiculous. Why bench your starting RB after he has a week to work the kinks out? You think they would have benched him after he fumbled his first carry or later in the game when it was clear he wasn't getting it done. Instead, they give him a higher % of the carries and decrease CJs workload.

You think if FBGs was talking about it, espn would be. They have people in the locker room etc.

 
Clopp, think you're being overly optimistic here. There are rumblings in Denver of benching Ball after the bye. Its not like he's this proven commodity. He had 120 carries last year on the most prolific offense in the history of the NFL. Really hard to gauge anything off of that. If the QB is throwing 5-6 td's game, i would guess you can even find some running room. He's looked mediocre at best. To think he can't just be benched for a CJ Anderson is being a bit negligent. This isn't a proven back with years of production here. I think another poor game, he could very well be backing up CJ in week 6. And I don't think that's being too bold either. In my opinion, he wont come near his 2nd rd price tag.
Yeah what proof you got? Cant find anyone saying anything even close to what your claiming here
Didn't see it in print, the guys on "the Audible" Football Guys podcast were saying it today, and they are usually tapped in pretty well.
LMFAO, yeah Cecil, ok sure
Well why is it funny, what is this bizarro world? Montee Ball has done NOTHING in this league haha. Do u not think he can be benched or something??

Reading some of these posts, you would think we're talking about benching Shady McCoy for Chris Polk. My god
those guys have gotten the Denver backfield wrong for 3 years now,
Wait, you mean Ronnie Hillman can be dropped now?Clearly this is a motivational ploy for Ball

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.

 
Pretty sure denver is smart enough to figure out the problem with the running game isn't ball. If they had the slightest doubt we would have seen more of cj Anderson or hillman by now. They know what those guys can do and it is not being the feature back.

 
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
I can see them benching Ball, but benching him for Anderson just seems silly. CJ is less experienced than Ball, was a UDFA (compared to the 2nd round pick they've invested in Ball), and hasn't really played better anyway. I get that fantasy guys tend to react like the sky is falling when a top 10-15 draft pick isn't playing like a stud, but most teams don't actually operate that way.

 
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
He's had 11 carries in the 3 games haha.

And really he did pretty well with his first 9 (6.44 ypc)

I'm curious, how long do you think they give Ball to show something? Coming out of the bye, he's got ARZ/Jets/SF. 3 more stiff run D's

 
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
He's had 11 carries in the 3 games haha.

And really he did pretty well with his first 9 (6.44 ypc)

I'm curious, how long do you think they give Ball to show something? Coming out of the bye, he's got ARZ/Jets/SF. 3 more stiff run D's
If you know they are stiff run D's, you don't think Denver's coaching staff knows that as well? So if Ball doesn't do amazing against those teams, you really think CJ will do great against them? And if CJ doesn't, then why would the coaches bench Ball for him?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
He's had 11 carries in the 3 games haha.

And really he did pretty well with his first 9 (6.44 ypc)

I'm curious, how long do you think they give Ball to show something? Coming out of the bye, he's got ARZ/Jets/SF. 3 more stiff run D's
Barring a 2 fumble game and/or a few blown assignments that lead to Peyton getting lit up I don't understand how they could bench Ball, honestly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
CJ hasn't looked like garbage. Don't claim stuff that isn't true. I drafted ball in the beginning of the 3rd, but even I can see CJ has been looking much more explosive and running with purpose whereas Ball has not that's why I backed up ball with CJ.I understand ball was drafted really high but don't let your emotions get in the way of the obvious.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
CJ hasn't looked like garbage. Don't claim stuff that isn't true. I drafted ball in the beginning of the 3rd, but even I can see CJ has been looking much more explosive and running with purpose whereas Ball has not that's why I backed up ball with CJ.I understand ball was drafted really high but don't let your emotions get in the way of the obvious.
Anderson looked good in very limited touches against Indy and KC. In game where Ball fumbled the first carry, CJ was given 2 carries (for -1.5 yards) the entire game. What does that tell you?

 
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
CJ hasn't looked like garbage. Don't claim stuff that isn't true. I drafted ball in the beginning of the 3rd, but even I can see CJ has been looking much more explosive and running with purpose whereas Ball has not that's why I backed up ball with CJ.I understand ball was drafted really high but don't let your emotions get in the way of the obvious.
Cj has looked more explosive cause on a couple of his runs there wasn't 3 guys in the backfield when he got the handoff. I can count on one hand how many times ball has had some room after getting the ball across all 3 games. No rb would have good numbers with this oline right now

 
Gildz stop stating what you hope to happen as if it is something that will actually happen.

Benching Ball is pure speculation by Cecil and you are merely repeating his pure speculation as if it somehow a fact.

Ball doesn't have to be spectacular to remain the starting RB in Denver, he just needs to be better than CJ and Hillman, which he has been since he arrived.

 
You think if FBGs was talking about it, espn would be. They have people in the locker room etc.
Ummm... technically speaking, if FBGs is talking about it, then ESPN is, too. Cecil *IS* their guy in the locker room.

I haven't seen any rumblings in print that Denver's brass is dissatisfied with Ball, though. Most of the stuff I'm reading is happy to spread the blame around, like this:

http://www.denverbroncos.com/news-and-blogs/article-1/Montee-Ball-Run-game-needs-a-lot-of-work/0c64af10-10a2-422b-9885-7303c78980f0

The numbers posted by the Broncos' running game are disappointing through three weeks. The Broncos are 30th in yardage per carry, 28th in rushing yardage per game and 23rd in percentage of carries that moved the sticks. Those statistics don't reveal the process, but they are the results. And none of those rankings can be pinned on one running back or one blocker...

A major reason was a lack of space to operate. Denver's ballcarriers were hit in the backfield on 11 of 19 carries in Seattle (not including the first-half-ending kneeldown). One of those plays came when tight end Virgil Green was in the backfield next to quarterback Peyton Manning and was handed the football with third down and nine yards to go...

During a stretch that went from the end of the first quarter through the second, Broncos runners were hit behind the line of scrimmage on seven consecutive running plays. Ball, C.J. Anderson and Green managed 12 yards after contact on those plays, but relative to the line of scrimmage, their combined output on those seven runs was minus-4 yards.
 
You think if FBGs was talking about it, espn would be. They have people in the locker room etc.
Ummm... technically speaking, if FBGs is talking about it, then ESPN is, too. Cecil *IS* their guy in the locker room.

I haven't seen any rumblings in print that Denver's brass is dissatisfied with Ball, though. Most of the stuff I'm reading is happy to spread the blame around, like this:

http://www.denverbroncos.com/news-and-blogs/article-1/Montee-Ball-Run-game-needs-a-lot-of-work/0c64af10-10a2-422b-9885-7303c78980f0

The numbers posted by the Broncos' running game are disappointing through three weeks. The Broncos are 30th in yardage per carry, 28th in rushing yardage per game and 23rd in percentage of carries that moved the sticks. Those statistics don't reveal the process, but they are the results. And none of those rankings can be pinned on one running back or one blocker...

A major reason was a lack of space to operate. Denver's ballcarriers were hit in the backfield on 11 of 19 carries in Seattle (not including the first-half-ending kneeldown). One of those plays came when tight end Virgil Green was in the backfield next to quarterback Peyton Manning and was handed the football with third down and nine yards to go...

During a stretch that went from the end of the first quarter through the second, Broncos runners were hit behind the line of scrimmage on seven consecutive running plays. Ball, C.J. Anderson and Green managed 12 yards after contact on those plays, but relative to the line of scrimmage, their combined output on those seven runs was minus-4 yards.
Didn't know that. TY

 
Gildz stop stating what you hope to happen as if it is something that will actually happen.

Benching Ball is pure speculation by Cecil and you are merely repeating his pure speculation as if it somehow a fact.

Ball doesn't have to be spectacular to remain the starting RB in Denver, he just needs to be better than CJ and Hillman, which he has been since he arrived.
What I hope to happen? I don't own a single share of Anderson/Hillman. I actually just dropped the 1 share of Hillman that I did own prior to last week's game.

Cecil wasn't speculating, he said there are 'rumblings'. He didn't say this is what I think will happen... Take it as u will.

Again, I own 1 share of Ball...Frankly I thought getting him mid 2nd was a value. Now I won't claim that Anderson/Hillman are better, because they probably aren't. But that doesn't mean Ball is good either.

I also can see Hillman being a much bigger factor coming out of the bye. Playing 3 teams with fast front 7's that swarm all over the run, that doesn't cater to a slower, stiffer back like Montee.

 
Quite honestly, Cecil doesn't seem to read the Denver backfield well at all. Perhaps he's too close or overanalyzes or something, but... Those "rumblings" may be little more than a couple of writers wondering, "Do you think they'd even consider benching Ball for Anderson?"

 
Quite honestly, Cecil doesn't seem to read the Denver backfield well at all. Perhaps he's too close or overanalyzes or something, but... Those "rumblings" may be little more than a couple of writers wondering, "Do you think they'd even consider benching Ball for Anderson?"
I lost faith in Cecil after I backed up McGahee with Hillman. Cecil is less a journalist and more a wanna-be general manager.

 
Quite honestly, Cecil doesn't seem to read the Denver backfield well at all. Perhaps he's too close or overanalyzes or something, but... Those "rumblings" may be little more than a couple of writers wondering, "Do you think they'd even consider benching Ball for Anderson?"
I lost faith in Cecil after I backed up McGahee with Hillman. Cecil is less a journalist and more a wanna-be general manager.
Or when Hillman was going to be the man the second time around.

Or when Hillman was going to be the passing down guy this time around.

Or pretty much any time with Ronnie Hillman.

 
I also can see Hillman being a much bigger factor coming out of the bye. Playing 3 teams with fast front 7's that swarm all over the run, that doesn't cater to a slower, stiffer back like Montee.
I don't know about this Ronnie Hillman talk. You're going out on a limb, a very flimsy one.

 
I also can see Hillman being a much bigger factor coming out of the bye. Playing 3 teams with fast front 7's that swarm all over the run, that doesn't cater to a slower, stiffer back like Montee.
I don't know about this Ronnie Hillman talk. You're going out on a limb, a very flimsy one.
they had hillman out there when they ran the same passing play 3 times in a row to score the game tying TD sunday

 
Quite honestly, Cecil doesn't seem to read the Denver backfield well at all. Perhaps he's too close or overanalyzes or something, but... Those "rumblings" may be little more than a couple of writers wondering, "Do you think they'd even consider benching Ball for Anderson?"
I lost faith in Cecil after I backed up McGahee with Hillman. Cecil is less a journalist and more a wanna-be general manager.
Or when Hillman was going to be the man the second time around.Or when Hillman was going to be the passing down guy this time around.

Or pretty much any time with Ronnie Hillman.
I have to agree with this. I have been a FBG member since they created the site and the content was free. Cecil always was the Bronco “guru”. I understand that he’s got his finger on the pulse of the broncos a LOT better than me, but his “predictions” were always off, especially on the running back situation. He lost me completely when I went for Hillman also. Two years in a row I drank Cecil’s Kool-Aid. When your job is to know one thing, you think he’d do better. Local guys around in these parts are more on the pulse of the Packers and I get some pretty good info from them. I think it’s because they are journalists first, not pretending to be general managers/coaches.

Any talk about Hillman is in one ear and out the other. Permanently

 
This morning they were saying the RBs have been hit behind the line 25 times in 62 attempts. The rumblings I have heard is they are thinking of making changes to the o-line not the RBs other then they might be open to trading Hillman to open a spot for Bibbs who they are afraid might be signed off the practice squad by another team.

 
Ball has stunk as a rusher, but his pass protection is *dramatically* improved over last season. He was holding seattle players at bay better than the O-Line last Sunday. I don't think they bench him.

 
Fox is a notoriously conservative coach, I think we are weeks away from any change with Ball. But if he does continue to play at this level the other guys will get a shot. I'd think it would be a slow process, starting with increased reps, nothing major like a "Benching".

 
The fact is Ball was great in blitz pickup against a tough Seattle defense. He spent most of the game cleaning up the mess from the offensive line. When he was actually getting handed the ball, he was usually getting hit at the same time or shortly thereafter.

If they are going to start benching people in Denver, they need to look at the five fat guys up front who can't seem to block anything for him first.

His job has always been to keep Peyton's jersey clean, and it is priority number one, two, three, four, five.
 
The fact is Ball was great in blitz pickup against a tough Seattle defense. He spent most of the game cleaning up the mess from the offensive line. When he was actually getting handed the ball, he was usually getting hit at the same time or shortly thereafter.

If they are going to start benching people in Denver, they need to look at the five fat guys up front who can't seem to block anything for him first.

His job has always been to keep Peyton's jersey clean, and it is priority number one, two, three, four, five.
Great point here. Ball has a tight grip on the starting job. That doesn't mean he's going to get many carries, but he's unlikely to lose his job at this point.

 
Two words for u : Juwan Thompson

Not Hillman

Not CJ Anderson

Juwan Thompson...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
need2know said:
Brewtown said:
Two words for u : Juwan Thompson

Not Hillman

Not CJ Anderson

Juwan Thompson...
No way in hell they put a guy with zero pass blocking exp in with manning.
CJ anderson had a lot of hype last year and never played... you sure this juwan guy isnt on track for 2015 work?

 
Maybe now is a time to zig when others are zagging with Ball.

I would be more concerned if others were getting carries, but that's not happening. I also agree with the point about protecting Manning, which was something Moreno was known for.

Denver has another 3 weks of tough defensive matchups coming out of the bye, but after that weeks 8-15 look pretty nice. He should have a shot at some TDs coming up too, Denver will be getting a lead in some games certainly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lets break down the first three weeks of montee balls production

Week1

Vs indy 23 carries for 67 yards w td. 2 rec 16 yards. Bad ypc but indy run def has been good so far this year. Limited mccoy the next week. 15 fps, not bad at all

Week2

Vs kc. 12 carries for 60 yards 3 rec for 30 yards. Better ypc but only 12 carries. Disappointing game as many thought denver would hammer kc but it turned out to be a close game and denvers offense sputtered at times. 9 fps. Not great but def take it with no td and only 12 carries

Week3

@ sea. 14 carries 38 yards 2 rec 6 yards 1 fumble. Run game was awful all game. 2 fps w fumble. It's not really that shocking when you consider it was in sea.

His average game will likely be like weeks 1/2 and he will prob have 2 to 3 games with multiple scores. Sounds like a rb I would like to start every week

 
Anderson has looked like garbage and ball is still getting the bulk of the carries . I simply don't believe there is any reliable talk of ball getting benched.
I can see them benching Ball, but benching him for Anderson just seems silly. CJ is less experienced than Ball, was a UDFA (compared to the 2nd round pick they've invested in Ball), and hasn't really played better anyway. I get that fantasy guys tend to react like the sky is falling when a top 10-15 draft pick isn't playing like a stud, but most teams don't actually operate that way.
short of injury, best Anderson owners could hope for is 50/50 split IMVHO. He could be the Bradshaw to Ball's TRich

Anderson owner also need to worry about the love Hillman was getting...probably a matter of time until he fumbles though

 
Lets break down the first three weeks of montee balls production

Week1

Vs indy 23 carries for 67 yards w td. 2 rec 16 yards. Bad ypc but indy run def has been good so far this year. Limited mccoy the next week. 15 fps, not bad at all

Week2

Vs kc. 12 carries for 60 yards 3 rec for 30 yards. Better ypc but only 12 carries. Disappointing game as many thought denver would hammer kc but it turned out to be a close game and denvers offense sputtered at times. 9 fps. Not great but def take it with no td and only 12 carries

Week3

@ sea. 14 carries 38 yards 2 rec 6 yards 1 fumble. Run game was awful all game. 2 fps w fumble. It's not really that shocking when you consider it was in sea.

His average game will likely be like weeks 1/2 and he will prob have 2 to 3 games with multiple scores. Sounds like a rb I would like to start every week
That's great, so when do those multiple score games come into play....Against ARZ/NYJ/SF ? Those 3 teams have combined to allow 2 td's in 9 games to opposing RB's. Good luck.

Ball's 1st awesome game won't come until week 8 vs SD. Not exactly thrilling for those who took him in the 1st/2nd...

 
Clopp, think you're being overly optimistic here. There are rumblings in Denver of benching Ball after the bye. Its not like he's this proven commodity. He had 120 carries last year on the most prolific offense in the history of the NFL. Really hard to gauge anything off of that. If the QB is throwing 5-6 td's game, i would guess you can even find some running room. He's looked mediocre at best. To think he can't just be benched for a CJ Anderson is being a bit negligent. This isn't a proven back with years of production here. I think another poor game, he could very well be backing up CJ in week 6. And I don't think that's being too bold either. In my opinion, he wont come near his 2nd rd price tag.
Yeah what proof you got? Cant find anyone saying anything even close to what your claiming here
Didn't see it in print, the guys on "the Audible" Football Guys podcast were saying it today, and they are usually tapped in pretty well.
LMFAO, yeah Cecil, ok sure
Well why is it funny, what is this bizarro world? Montee Ball has done NOTHING in this league haha. Do u not think he can be benched or something??

Reading some of these posts, you would think we're talking about benching Shady McCoy for Chris Polk. My god
I don't think its the notion of benching Ball as it is it just sounds ridiculous. Why bench your starting RB after he has a week to work the kinks out? You think they would have benched him after he fumbled his first carry or later in the game when it was clear he wasn't getting it done. Instead, they give him a higher % of the carries and decrease CJs workload.

You think if FBGs was talking about it, espn would be. They have people in the locker room etc.
Because he isn't any good?

 
When you start saying things like: "Well he has a tough schedule so we really shouldn't expect him to do well until week 9", you know you have backed a slug. These are the types of things Trent owners said last year.

 
When you start saying things like: "Well he has a tough schedule so we really shouldn't expect him to do well until week 9", you know you have backed a slug. These are the types of things Trent owners said last year.
The guy who said that is one of the haters, not one of the backers.

 
I'm not giving up on Ball: With the fall of AP, my RB core relies on him and Gio, so I have no other choice but to hope he turns it around.

However, I'm realizing I let the experts sway my drafting to guys they say will blow up, and not the guys we know are proven because they "had a lot of carries" or "are prone to injury" etc etc. I take full responsibility for who I draft, but sometimes I think we have to realize guys like Ball (who are mostly unproven) aren't studs just because they become the back in a Peyton offense. Sometimes the guys like Murray and Lynch who seem like yesterday's news are the real studs.

My 2 cents.
If anyone drafted Ball over Murray and Lynch, (non-dynasty) they should just give up the hobby.
lol. ball went ahead of lynch in every single ffpc draft that i saw. he went ahead of murray in about half. his adp was well ahead of lynchs and a few spots ahead of murray in the ffpc. but ya, those guys dont know anything about ff.

and no, i didnt draft him. i was quite happy to take lynch in the 3rd round.

 
Fox is a notoriously conservative coach, I think we are weeks away from any change with Ball. But if he does continue to play at this level the other guys will get a shot. I'd think it would be a slow process, starting with increased reps, nothing major like a "Benching".
He is a notoriously conservative coach, or was before McCoy/Gase and Manning took over things. Who knows how often Manning has checked out of runs.

I don't know what it is about some of the great QBs - Brees, Rodgers, Brady, Manning - when they get set up with a potentially great RB it seems like the sky is the limit, 'oh the space they'll have', 'the defense will be on their heels'.... but no what happens is that somehow or other defenses line up in such a way as to entice the QB to throw. Maybe they want that, you would think they would want the opponent to run, not pass because of the damage these guys can do. This almost never works out where you get a GREAT top-4 QB and a GREAT top-10 RB. Maybe Moreno last year, for a while, but that may have been an anomaly because of the Broncos' easy schedule and the way they were jumping on teams early with big leads. The schedule is tougher this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lets break down the first three weeks of montee balls production

Week1

Vs indy 23 carries for 67 yards w td. 2 rec 16 yards. Bad ypc but indy run def has been good so far this year. Limited mccoy the next week. 15 fps, not bad at all

Week2

Vs kc. 12 carries for 60 yards 3 rec for 30 yards. Better ypc but only 12 carries. Disappointing game as many thought denver would hammer kc but it turned out to be a close game and denvers offense sputtered at times. 9 fps. Not great but def take it with no td and only 12 carries

Week3

@ sea. 14 carries 38 yards 2 rec 6 yards 1 fumble. Run game was awful all game. 2 fps w fumble. It's not really that shocking when you consider it was in sea.

His average game will likely be like weeks 1/2 and he will prob have 2 to 3 games with multiple scores. Sounds like a rb I would like to start every week
That's great, so when do those multiple score games come into play....Against ARZ/NYJ/SF ? Those 3 teams have combined to allow 2 td's in 9 games to opposing RB's. Good luck.

Ball's 1st awesome game won't come until week 8 vs SD. Not exactly thrilling for those who took him in the 1st/2nd...
They may come during one of those games. Who knows? He will stay in my lineup so I don't miss it. My team is good enough to win without the same player scoring big every single week. I took ball late second btw
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you start saying things like: "Well he has a tough schedule so we really shouldn't expect him to do well until week 9", you know you have backed a slug. These are the types of things Trent owners said last year.
I agree, although I fall on the other side of the divide and actually expect Ball to do pretty well, even against the tougher defenses coming up.

 
Pretty much exactly right. The Cardinals, like the Texans, don't need a quarterback to win football games. However, also like the Texans, it will eventually catch up to them. One of the ways a great defense wins is by making opposing teams one dimension and with the Broncos they don't even have to try all that hard since the run blocking is laughable on the Broncos side of the ball.

Speaking of ball, Montee Ball had a few things to add about the running game that I wholly agreed with. He explained, "Focus on what we do. Everyone has to do their assignments and if the line does their job, if the running backs do their job, receivers do their job, we’ll have success in the run game."

It was a perfect way to put the onerous on everyone when everyone knows the real problem is the line not doing their job in the run game. Hopefully those guys up front appreciated the fact that Ball could have thrown them under the bus and rightfully so, but didn't. So step it the $*%^ up!
http://www.milehighreport.com/2014/9/30/6870523/denver-broncos-sets-focus-on-the-arizona-cardinals-for-week-5-horse

 
Back in my lineup over Davis/Taliaferro/D-Jax.

As long as he's getting the lion's share of the carries, at some point he'll have a very good game. He's still on pace for 1,152 combined yards and 5 TDs. Not at all what I hoped from him, but his only useless week was week 3 against Seattle. His 3.37 YPC is Richardson-esque, hopefully it gets better.

 
C.J. Anderson is a healthy scratch against Arizona. Ronnie Hillman is the #2. Montee Ball's job is still not in jeopardy.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top