I think you put a couple of extra letters on asset.I'm still trying to understand how a team that is up for sale, and may have a sale pending, trades away it's biggest asset. Shouldn't that be the new owner's decision?
Over 5000 fans in Minny have already voted & 78% think it's a bad trade....Instant Poll: About the Moss trade... Good riddance. 837 16%Bad news. It'll be a long time before the Vikes have a receiver as good again. 2574 49%Glad to see him go, but we should have gotten more. 1532 29%This trade should be only the beginning of the housecleaning. 355 7%
Report: Vikings ship Moss to Raiders for LB Harris, two picks Feb. 23, 2005Associated Press MINNEAPOLIS -- Randy Moss is heading for Oakland, the receiver's agent said Wednesday.Advertisement Dante DiTrapano, Moss' agent, told the Associated Press that the Minnesota Vikings and the Raiders had "come to an agreement on Randy playing for Oakland next year."The Vikings wouldn't confirm a deal."We have been in discussions with the Oakland Raiders, but there's nothing to announce," Rob Brzezinski, the team's vice president of football operations, told The Associated Press.DiTrapano said he didn't know the terms of the deal, but the St. Paul Pioneer Press reported the Vikings would get linebacker Napoleon Harris, along with the seventh overall pick and a late-round pick in the upcoming draft.The deal cannot become official until March 2, the start of the NFL's fiscal year.The flamboyant Moss had been the subject of trade rumors following this past season. He struggled with a hamstring injury and was fined $10,000 for pretending to pull down his pants and moon the Green Bay crowd during Minnesota's playoff win. He also drew criticism for leaving the field with 2 seconds left in a regular-season loss against Washington.On Tuesday, the Raiders re-signed Jerry Porter, their star wide receiver to a contract worth $20 million over five years. Porter could have become a free agent on March 2.
Jurb, your stealing my stuff... LOL. I completely agree. It won't do hurt or help Moss, IMO. He is still the no.1 WR in the league and will be fine.Can't type.Yeah becasue George and Frerotte were just leaving people in their dust ala Mike Vick.No. Which is why, as I said, lots of balls that Daunte would have hit him with will never even leave Kerry's hand. The fact that we're holding Kerry Collins up to Daunte Culpepper is hilarious. Kerry is not nearly as good as Daunte, and Moss will feel the effect of that.Collins can throw deep, but can he avoid the sack like Culpepper can?I disagree Collins throws one of the best deep balls in the league and you see what happenend when he finally developed chemistry with Porter.No--he's been that for a while. What will hurt is having Kerry Collins throwing him the ball instead of Daunte. Lots of balls that Daunte gets to him won't ever even leave Kerry's hand.Yeah, it's really going to hurt Moss to be the offensive centerpiece of a gameplan that calls for a lot of deep passes, because we all know he sucks at catching those.This is going to hurt Moss fantasy-wise a lot more than it will hurt Daunte, especially if they bring in one of the cap casualties and/or Braylon.![]()
How can you type with any sort of intellectual honesty that going from Daunte Culpepper to Kerry Collins will neither help nor hurt Moss?Jurb, your stealing my stuff... LOL. I completely agree. It won't do hurt or help Moss, IMO. He is still the no.1 WR in the league and will be fine.Can't type.Yeah becasue George and Frerotte were just leaving people in their dust ala Mike Vick.No. Which is why, as I said, lots of balls that Daunte would have hit him with will never even leave Kerry's hand. The fact that we're holding Kerry Collins up to Daunte Culpepper is hilarious. Kerry is not nearly as good as Daunte, and Moss will feel the effect of that.Collins can throw deep, but can he avoid the sack like Culpepper can?I disagree Collins throws one of the best deep balls in the league and you see what happenend when he finally developed chemistry with Porter.No--he's been that for a while. What will hurt is having Kerry Collins throwing him the ball instead of Daunte. Lots of balls that Daunte gets to him won't ever even leave Kerry's hand.Yeah, it's really going to hurt Moss to be the offensive centerpiece of a gameplan that calls for a lot of deep passes, because we all know he sucks at catching those.This is going to hurt Moss fantasy-wise a lot more than it will hurt Daunte, especially if they bring in one of the cap casualties and/or Braylon.![]()
![]()
There are different levels of excellence. Do you expect him to maintain the same with Kerry as with Daunte?Historically, Moss has excelled regardless of who his QB has been.
In case you've missed the past 7 seasons of Moss' career (all of them). He has already played with 3 QBs at a minimum and really 4. 2 of which were not even remotly close to being "mobile." His stats have been just fine all 7 years. Me thinks its not that QB, but the talent of the WR in question here.How can you type with any sort of intellectual honesty that going from Daunte Culpepper to Kerry Collins will neither help nor hurt Moss?
Pretty much. I think Culpepper needs Moss much more than Moss needs Culpepper. What makes Moss great is his downfield ability. Nearly any starting NFL QB can heave it forty yards downfield. That's half of what they need to do in order to be successful with Moss.There are different levels of excellence. Do you expect him to maintain the same with Kerry as with Daunte?Historically, Moss has excelled regardless of who his QB has been.
Personally, I do. But I sure hope there are a lot more people out there who think like you. Mabye I will be able to nab Moss as the #3 WR off the board again much like I did 2 years ago!There are different levels of excellence. Do you expect him to maintain the same with Kerry as with Daunte?Historically, Moss has excelled regardless of who his QB has been.
He keeps Tice. He gets rid of Moss.Ah, yes. Red gives the Vike fans the finger before riding off into the sunset.The Vike fans got jobbed by Red McCombs once again.
Discussing on (local) espn radio yesterday how well Randy would fit with the Jets, they joked that leaving in the final minute wouldn't be a problem because with Jets clock mgmt, the game would be over before he got there.He also drew criticism for leaving the field with 2 seconds left in a regular-season loss against Washington.
They've been saying all offseason they are going to go with a much bigger rushing attack next year. With Kleinsasser coming back they should be able to. For fantasy this is not good news for Culpepper. The team might win more games though and whoever is starting at tailback could be huge for fantasy.Pepper threw for 3950 yards and 24 TDs this year that werent to Randy Moss. If they bring in a Burress/Muhammad/Mason, Pepper, and the Vikings offense(which returns Mike Rosenthal and Jim Kleinsasser) will be just fine.Yeah, I don't get this one... There's no way the Vikings are a top ten offense without Moss. And Napoleon Harris damn sure doesn't make their defense even top 15. This trade is ######ed from a Vikings fan point of view. Thirty-six million under the cap and guys like Kendrell Bell and Antonio Pierce available and yet they trade their best player for a decent linebacker. Man, I hate being a Vikings fan.
Actually it was Mortonsen (at least that's who I saw say that) and he did end by saying because of those things he felt a Moss trade was not gong to happen. Maybe the Raiders decided they don't need him to restructure or he just changed his mind.Am I dreaming this, or didn't John Clayton just report LAST NIGHT that there were talks about Moss to Oakland, but Moss was unwilling to restructure his deal, so it fell through.
Also mentioned was the fact that Moss would only go to Atlanta or Baltimore.
I don't think so. They never won with Randy -- The Babe brought the Sox championships, Randy... not so much.90 years from now are Viking fans going to be talking about the Randy Moss curse?
Champ Bailey has shutdown pants.Pffttttt!!I think Champ Bailey just soiled his pants.
I loved that one last year after the T.O. trade.Can someone pls. bump it?i cant wait for the
"transplant wrs dont produce on their new teams in year 1" thread
![]()
The only attitude problem Moss had in Minnesota is that he wanted to win, that kind of attitude doesn't go over in Minnesota.but,will they be a better TEAM because of it given the distractions and attitude problems Moss is known for?
If Mike Williams is there, this could turn out to be an ok trade in the long run. Williams doesn't have the character issues Moss has and will be a great target for Culpepper. While I hate to see Moss get traded, especially to the Raiders, I do understand why the Vikings would want to trade him. The major concern with Moss is how long he would keep his elite speed and if he could continue to dominate if he lost his ability to blow my people. The Vikings probably made a good trade in the long-term, unless Moss learns to dedicate himself to football and is able to keep his speed.If we knew we could get Mike Williams at #7 overall, I actually don't mind the trade at all (as a Vikings fan). I don't know very much about Harris (which probably doesn't bode well as an indicator for how good he would be in Purple), but Williams, a FA vet receiver, and $15-$20+ million more that Red/Fowler/Taylor will HAVE to spend going toward the defensive side of the ball would actually make the Vikings look a lot more like a playoff contender than they did during the 2004 season with Moss.
I wonder if the Vikings Brass are quietly worried about Moss losing a bit of his "burst" as a result of those hammie problems from last year. Moss at 29-30 running a 4.4-4.5 is scary....but not nearly as scary as a 25-26 year old Moss running a 4.3 or lower.....![]()
Yes, good one and you being a Patriots fan answer this question; wasn't Dillion suppost to have a bunch of baggage as well?At least Davis is not signing a over-the-hill player, but Moss has his own baggage. Good luck Raider fans.
I don't see how Porter doesn't realize from the get go that he is Moss's b****. Moss is the big dog on that team if this happens.Besides, Moss doesn't have a particularly aggressive personality.Anybody think, if this goes through, that there will be too much head butting right from the get-go between these two ego's that neither one ends up productive? Porter ain't giving up #84 for Moss, and I can see some locker room brawls carrying over to the field.
...or not. That's just another angle.
The kid he beat up in high school may disagree with that statment. As a matter of fact I think he lurks these boards.I don't see how Porter doesn't realize from the get go that he is Moss's b****. Moss is the big dog on that team if this happens.Besides, Moss doesn't have a particularly aggressive personality.Anybody think, if this goes through, that there will be too much head butting right from the get-go between these two ego's that neither one ends up productive? Porter ain't giving up #84 for Moss, and I can see some locker room brawls carrying over to the field.
...or not. That's just another angle.
Nope, but they can afford Davenport or AtrainI know all this trade talk is good, but does this mean that my boy Lamont Jordan is not going to sign with the Raiders??????? Calling out Raiders Homers, do they have enough money for Lamont??? I hope Lamont is not greedy because this Oakland situation has me licking my lips.
With a back-ended contract the Raiders could still afford Jordan after cutting Gannon and trading Woodson.Nope, but they can afford Davenport or AtrainI know all this trade talk is good, but does this mean that my boy Lamont Jordan is not going to sign with the Raiders??????? Calling out Raiders Homers, do they have enough money for Lamont??? I hope Lamont is not greedy because this Oakland situation has me licking my lips.![]()
if Moss was so valuable wouldn't more teams be after him? The real money is in TV rights not jersey selling.I think the Vikes are doing the right thing trading Moss, but they better get more then what is being reported....and even if Fowler doesn't get the Vikes, how does getting rid of a $$$$$ player like Moss help Red deal the team?
I don't know if its been covered because I didn't read the entire thread, but I don't know what you're basing the above opinion on.Collins wasn't sacked near as many times as Culpepper was. In fact, Culpepper was sacked almost twice as many times (46) as Collins was (25). That would lead me to believe that Collins would get the ball to Moss better than Culpepper did.What will hurt is having Kerry Collins throwing him the ball instead of Daunte. Lots of balls that Daunte gets to him won't ever even leave Kerry's hand.
I don't know if its been covered because I didn't read the entire thread, but I don't know what you're basing the above opinion on.Collins wasn't sacked near as many times as Culpepper was. In fact, Culpepper was sacked almost twice as many times (46) as Collins was (25). That would lead me to believe that Collins would get the ball to Moss better than Culpepper did.What will hurt is having Kerry Collins throwing him the ball instead of Daunte. Lots of balls that Daunte gets to him won't ever even leave Kerry's hand.
Just my 2 cents.
The absence of Moss doesn't help Minnesota's RBs. It will hurt them.I'll believe it when (and IF) it happens. Maybe I'm just blind by the thought of trading the most dynamic WR in NFL history since Jerry Rice would be a completely stupid move by Minnesota.... but hey, weirder things have happened!
IF this were to turn out true, I think Oakland is getting an absolute steal. Love him or hate him, Moss would immediately bring Oakland back to glory. They would need a few more pieces filled, but they are on the cusp of the playoffs again with this move (again, IF true).
Culpepper value =![]()
Collins value =![]()
MIN RBs (whoever comes out on top) =![]()
Porter =![]()
MIN WRs = too early to tell