What, Westbrook scares you or something?rdubs30 said:I REALLY hope the Pels are the 8th seed. Warriors - Pelicans would make me much less nervous than Warriors - Thunder
He's had his biggest games w/Lebron playing.Does Kyrie get much of a bump w/ Lebron likely out?
He's had his biggest games w/Lebron playing.Does Kyrie get much of a bump w/ Lebron likely out?![]()
I think you are both right, but Love scares me. I may just avoid the whole thing, not like there aren't other options.Yeah with LeBron out they are going to ask Kyrie to facilitate more, which is not his strong point. Not sure LeBron out helps him much. I would think it helps Love more
Not that I have found, but I haven't looked much. I think they have to be playing that particular day.Does Fasn Duel offer a player search function that allows me to find out how many FF points players scored the night before, the previous week, etc.??
fantasynerd has great historical statsNot that I have found, but I haven't looked much. I think they have to be playing that particular day.Does Fasn Duel offer a player search function that allows me to find out how many FF points players scored the night before, the previous week, etc.??
Thanksfantasynerd has great historical statsNot that I have found, but I haven't looked much. I think they have to be playing that particular day.Does Fasn Duel offer a player search function that allows me to find out how many FF points players scored the night before, the previous week, etc.??
Yea, I always stay away from Hardon.hardon was the obvious fade tonight
Yeah, I know the math has had him up there for a couple games but I'm always too scared to play him. If it was on my advice, I duly apologize. I'm undecided on whether I should adjust the math sometimes on my personal feelings.Pierce murdered my lineup yesterday. I had a pretty nice one going but for that turd.
Nah, it ain't on you. I was looking at him and you had him highly rated so I just went w/ it. Thought the narrative worked too. C'est la vie.Yeah, I know the math has had him up there for a couple games but I'm always too scared to play him. If it was on my advice, I duly apologize. I'm undecided on whether I should adjust the math sometimes on my personal feelings.(Everyone over age 35 gets an automatic -5!) That's not age discrimination is it?Pierce murdered my lineup yesterday. I had a pretty nice one going but for that turd.
What's actually sadder is that I roll him out again with the "he can't possibly suck that badly 2 games in a row" rationale. Paul's been proving people wrong his entire career.Tennessee_ATO said:Nah, it ain't on you. I was looking at him and you had him highly rated so I just went w/ it. Thought the narrative worked too. C'est la vie.MikeMan said:Yeah, I know the math has had him up there for a couple games but I'm always too scared to play him. If it was on my advice, I duly apologize. I'm undecided on whether I should adjust the math sometimes on my personal feelings.(Everyone over age 35 gets an automatic -5!) That's not age discrimination is it?Tennessee_ATO said:Pierce murdered my lineup yesterday. I had a pretty nice one going but for that turd.
I have 7 entries and looking to win a few more bullets tonight.anyone playing the megaslam tomorrow? I'm thinking of doing ~5 entries.
If there weren't so many value plays today it would be easier to fade Westbrook. Originally had my lineup without him...now he's in though.Anyone have the fortitude to fade Westbrook tonight in cash games. Tough call to make, but I like my lineups a lot better without him.
I dont have him in my cash lineups...Anyone have the fortitude to fade Westbrook tonight in cash games. Tough call to make, but I like my lineups a lot better without him.
I have always had better luck playing the 50/50s and double ups, but that could be just me. Been on a terrible cold streak lately though so take it for what it's worth.What would be the better route to take, playing a bunch of head 2 heads or 50/50's? I've been getting into a ton of H2H the last few days. I'm pretty much break even since I started the other week, just enjoy having something on the games and have been playing 50-70 $1 H2H matches. I usually throw an entry into a $1 or $2 big GPP to just because.
It's been mixed for me. Some nights I'm thankful for h2hs against knuckleheads who somehow cobble together worse teams than mine. That has happened a heck of a lot actually. I cash often enough with teams that would not cash in 50-50s that I always mix the contests pretty evenly.I have always had better luck playing the 50/50s and double ups, but that could be just me. Been on a terrible cold streak lately though so take it for what it's worth.What would be the better route to take, playing a bunch of head 2 heads or 50/50's? I've been getting into a ton of H2H the last few days. I'm pretty much break even since I started the other week, just enjoy having something on the games and have been playing 50-70 $1 H2H matches. I usually throw an entry into a $1 or $2 big GPP to just because.
Search in the Shark Tank. The numbers guys did a pretty good analysis of variance and H2H vs. 50/50 play for football if memory serves. Dodds's blog also broke down his ROI for each type of game at each price point based. His lowest ROI was H2H by far. Based on all of the information I read, I bailed on H2H entirely for football and never looked back.Would playing like 50 h2h reduce variance? I've seen guys with 400 h2h over every buy in every day of the week. Guess I'm just thinking you could finish below the half mark and still not lose completely.
I've been stuck in a rut for a few weeks myself -- enough to get a little back in some 50/50's, but not near enough to offset my losses. I consistently have 1 turd and 1 semi-turd every day with 3-4 guys who go off. The net effect is a "so close" lineup that is generally worth about the same as a complete stinker.H2H's have more variance due to small sample size (1 other player) whereas 50/50's will net you a "fair" result relative to field due to the larger player pool. I prefer 50/50's.
Same disclaimer as snellman. Arctic cold streak here...March has been unkind.
same. My salvation has been playing very lightly since giving back too generously.I've been stuck in a rut for a few weeks myself -- enough to get a little back in some 50/50's, but not near enough to offset my losses. I consistently have 1 turd and 1 semi-turd every day with 3-4 guys who go off. The net effect is a "so close" lineup that is generally worth about the same as a complete stinker.H2H's have more variance due to small sample size (1 other player) whereas 50/50's will net you a "fair" result relative to field due to the larger player pool. I prefer 50/50's.
Same disclaimer as snellman. Arctic cold streak here...March has been unkind.
2 of the bottom 4 guys on my list. I'm devastated.No matter how hard a try I keep getting stuck with players with 0, 2 LUs last night, each score over 280 and Boozer 0 WTF, D Lee 0 WTF
Looked high and low and didn't find anything to explain thier absence.