What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NBA Fanduel (4 Viewers)

Lol didn't the Lakers have this same issue last year? Yeah definitely have Budinger and Martin locked into my lineups now.

 
Yeah hard to not have lavine bud and Martin with them only having 7 guys. I am rolling with those 3, harden, gobert, Evans.

Not really wanting to roll the dice on Davis

 
His iffy ankle sucks and the stretch 4 of the suns may kind of suck too. Despite that, I think he would probably play given the playoff race. I REALLY hope the Pels are the 8th seed. Warriors - Pelicans would make me much less nervous than Warriors - Thunder

 
Congratulations Sean Kirpatrick!

Still threw a few Brow lineups in there just figuring his ownership would be low.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
rdubs30 said:
I REALLY hope the Pels are the 8th seed. Warriors - Pelicans would make me much less nervous than Warriors - Thunder
What, Westbrook scares you or something?

Funny how matchups work. I'm a pseudo Grizz guy and I'd rather see OKC as an opponent than most other teams would. The Grizz are built to deal with that better than most. We can't handle SA for crap though.

 
Yeah with LeBron out they are going to ask Kyrie to facilitate more, which is not his strong point. Not sure LeBron out helps him much. I would think it helps Love more

 
Does Kyrie get much of a bump w/ Lebron likely out?
He's had his biggest games w/Lebron playing. :shrug:
Yeah with LeBron out they are going to ask Kyrie to facilitate more, which is not his strong point. Not sure LeBron out helps him much. I would think it helps Love more
I think you are both right, but Love scares me. I may just avoid the whole thing, not like there aren't other options.

 
Lebron missed 12/30 - 1/11.

Irving averaged 37 which is a couple points over his average.

Love averaged 40 in that same stretch which is a healthy +7 to his yearly average.

 
Does Fasn Duel offer a player search function that allows me to find out how many FF points players scored the night before, the previous week, etc.??

 
Does Fasn Duel offer a player search function that allows me to find out how many FF points players scored the night before, the previous week, etc.??
Not that I have found, but I haven't looked much. I think they have to be playing that particular day.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
First Look at Friday

GPP LU

Paul/Parker

Wade/Foye

Carroll/HBarnes

Griffin/Bass

Adams

Cash LU

Westy/Smart

DGreen/LWilliams

J Green/Carrol

Gasol/Dirk

Adams

 
just for S#&ts and giggles $2 CBB GPP

Okafor-Duke

Lucky Jones-RMC

L Nash-OK St

A Jefferson-Duke

A G Olaseni- Iowa

T Kallnowski- David

P Forte-OK St

B Sullivan- David

A Hickey-OK St

 
Hey guys,

FYI, the projections on daily fantasy nerd have been updated and are more accurate than our previous default projections based on season and last 5 game averages. Here’s a screenshot of Monday’s FanDuel pearson correlations to compare the accuracy of these projection sources: BM, FC, NF, Swish, RW, and the new daily fantasy nerd projections listed as “dfn Proj”. The closer a value is to 1, the more accurate the projection source is.

You can see that the daily fantasy nerd projections are in the same ballpark as the other major projection sources. The Proj row is a weighted average Eric created using 25% BM, 25% FC, 25% Swish, and 25% dfn Proj. You can see that it had the highest performing projection and highlights the advantages of using weighted averages. Keep in mind that this was just one day’s worth of games, so the sample size is small.

A large caveat we’d like to mention is that the new daily fantasy nerd projections do not at the moment account for injury updates and news of who is starting and being benched. To do so requires significant investment that we don’t have at the moment. It is exciting though to see that these projections are performing well despite the absence of injury and start updates.

-r

 
Alex Len is a pita.

ETA: Now active. Glad I hustled and removed Wright from most of my entries. Even if it meant missing out on some ridiculous overlays.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Won a seat into this Wednesday's $25 Million$ Megaslam. Hoping I don't screw it up too badly. Have hit over 300 a few times but seems I wind up in the 260-280 range more often than not.

 
Pierce murdered my lineup yesterday. I had a pretty nice one going but for that turd.
Yeah, I know the math has had him up there for a couple games but I'm always too scared to play him. If it was on my advice, I duly apologize. I'm undecided on whether I should adjust the math sometimes on my personal feelings.

(Everyone over age 35 gets an automatic -5!) That's not age discrimination is it?

 
Pierce murdered my lineup yesterday. I had a pretty nice one going but for that turd.
Yeah, I know the math has had him up there for a couple games but I'm always too scared to play him. If it was on my advice, I duly apologize. I'm undecided on whether I should adjust the math sometimes on my personal feelings.(Everyone over age 35 gets an automatic -5!) That's not age discrimination is it?
Nah, it ain't on you. I was looking at him and you had him highly rated so I just went w/ it. Thought the narrative worked too. C'est la vie.

 
looks like they've rearranged the swat and shot sizes.

cj miles early foul trouble screwed me. we'll see how it shakes out, but he's in most of my lu's.

 
They're obviously pushing the shot. I'm guessing all the overlays recently in the shot #2 had something to do with this move. I'm all for it.

FD's focus on app releases has really left the desktop site antiquated. There is no reason to not have the ability to sort your entries on the live page or see the scores at each payout threshold at a given time on the live scoring page. Those should have been in the launch version. Contacted support and they said they are currently working on an update. Wonder how long they've been saying that. Tablets are great for reading; I hate navigating or anything requiring typing on them.

 
Tennessee_ATO said:
MikeMan said:
Tennessee_ATO said:
Pierce murdered my lineup yesterday. I had a pretty nice one going but for that turd.
Yeah, I know the math has had him up there for a couple games but I'm always too scared to play him. If it was on my advice, I duly apologize. I'm undecided on whether I should adjust the math sometimes on my personal feelings.(Everyone over age 35 gets an automatic -5!) That's not age discrimination is it?
Nah, it ain't on you. I was looking at him and you had him highly rated so I just went w/ it. Thought the narrative worked too. C'est la vie.
What's actually sadder is that I roll him out again with the "he can't possibly suck that badly 2 games in a row" rationale. Paul's been proving people wrong his entire career.

 
Anyone have the fortitude to fade Westbrook tonight in cash games. Tough call to make, but I like my lineups a lot better without him.

 
Anyone have the fortitude to fade Westbrook tonight in cash games. Tough call to make, but I like my lineups a lot better without him.
If there weren't so many value plays today it would be easier to fade Westbrook. Originally had my lineup without him...now he's in though.

 
Anyone have the fortitude to fade Westbrook tonight in cash games. Tough call to make, but I like my lineups a lot better without him.
I dont have him in my cash lineups...

Lillard...rjackson

Derozan...kpope

Gay...tprince

Noel...trobinson

Kanter

Liked my lineup better without him in it.

 
What would be the better route to take, playing a bunch of head 2 heads or 50/50's? I've been getting into a ton of H2H the last few days. I'm pretty much break even since I started the other week, just enjoy having something on the games and have been playing 50-70 $1 H2H matches. I usually throw an entry into a $1 or $2 big GPP to just because.

 
What would be the better route to take, playing a bunch of head 2 heads or 50/50's? I've been getting into a ton of H2H the last few days. I'm pretty much break even since I started the other week, just enjoy having something on the games and have been playing 50-70 $1 H2H matches. I usually throw an entry into a $1 or $2 big GPP to just because.
I have always had better luck playing the 50/50s and double ups, but that could be just me. Been on a terrible cold streak lately though so take it for what it's worth.

 
What would be the better route to take, playing a bunch of head 2 heads or 50/50's? I've been getting into a ton of H2H the last few days. I'm pretty much break even since I started the other week, just enjoy having something on the games and have been playing 50-70 $1 H2H matches. I usually throw an entry into a $1 or $2 big GPP to just because.
I have always had better luck playing the 50/50s and double ups, but that could be just me. Been on a terrible cold streak lately though so take it for what it's worth.
It's been mixed for me. Some nights I'm thankful for h2hs against knuckleheads who somehow cobble together worse teams than mine. That has happened a heck of a lot actually. I cash often enough with teams that would not cash in 50-50s that I always mix the contests pretty evenly. :shrug:

 
H2H's have more variance due to small sample size (1 other player) whereas 50/50's will net you a "fair" result relative to field due to the larger player pool. I prefer 50/50's.

Same disclaimer as snellman. Arctic cold streak here...March has been unkind.

 
Would playing like 50 h2h reduce variance? I've seen guys with 400 h2h over every buy in every day of the week. Guess I'm just thinking you could finish below the half mark and still not lose completely.

 
Would playing like 50 h2h reduce variance? I've seen guys with 400 h2h over every buy in every day of the week. Guess I'm just thinking you could finish below the half mark and still not lose completely.
Search in the Shark Tank. The numbers guys did a pretty good analysis of variance and H2H vs. 50/50 play for football if memory serves. Dodds's blog also broke down his ROI for each type of game at each price point based. His lowest ROI was H2H by far. Based on all of the information I read, I bailed on H2H entirely for football and never looked back.

I realize that football isn't necessarily the same as hoops, but it might help as a starting point for some analysis. At the end of the day, data is king. The guys playing regularly on this thread ought to be able to quickly find real-life answers to these types of questions in their collective data.

 
H2H's have more variance due to small sample size (1 other player) whereas 50/50's will net you a "fair" result relative to field due to the larger player pool. I prefer 50/50's.

Same disclaimer as snellman. Arctic cold streak here...March has been unkind.
I've been stuck in a rut for a few weeks myself -- enough to get a little back in some 50/50's, but not near enough to offset my losses. I consistently have 1 turd and 1 semi-turd every day with 3-4 guys who go off. The net effect is a "so close" lineup that is generally worth about the same as a complete stinker.

 
H2H's have more variance due to small sample size (1 other player) whereas 50/50's will net you a "fair" result relative to field due to the larger player pool. I prefer 50/50's.

Same disclaimer as snellman. Arctic cold streak here...March has been unkind.
I've been stuck in a rut for a few weeks myself -- enough to get a little back in some 50/50's, but not near enough to offset my losses. I consistently have 1 turd and 1 semi-turd every day with 3-4 guys who go off. The net effect is a "so close" lineup that is generally worth about the same as a complete stinker.
same. My salvation has been playing very lightly since giving back too generously.

 
No matter how hard a try I keep getting stuck with players with 0, 2 LUs last night, each score over 280 and Boozer 0 WTF, D Lee 0 WTF

Looked high and low and didn't find anything to explain thier absence.

 
No matter how hard a try I keep getting stuck with players with 0, 2 LUs last night, each score over 280 and Boozer 0 WTF, D Lee 0 WTF

Looked high and low and didn't find anything to explain thier absence.
2 of the bottom 4 guys on my list. I'm devastated. ;)

But yeah, that is uber-frustrating!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top