pollardsvision
Footballguy
I think this will end very badly for Dallas.
Cavs asking if they can put Mozgov on layaway please.The Nuggets are bound to start a fire sale in the next month or two.I think the only potential guard that would have fit and not cost Wright was C.J. Watson, and that's not exactly the same level of move.
I'm very intrigued by the backup Center spot now. No idea whats gonna happen.
If Mozgov were available the Cavs would also be very interested in him.Ty Lawson would have been great too. I kind of assumed he would never be an option.The Nuggets are bound to start a fire sale in the next month or two.I think the only potential guard that would have fit and not cost Wright was C.J. Watson, and that's not exactly the same level of move.
I'm very intrigued by the backup Center spot now. No idea whats gonna happen.
I wonder what Carlisle could do with JaVale. Dallas doesn't have the salary to make that work though. Not sure if Mozgov would work either. Is he much of a rim protector?
You're missing the obvious Jose Calderon.Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?
Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.
I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
Great shooter but Calderon was a terrible defender at his peak. He'd be challenging Lin for the worst defense in the league right now.You're missing the obvious Jose Calderon.Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?
Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
FWIW, Zach Lowe thinks this is a move more for next year than anything. They are in 6th anyway, so it's not like they are breaking up the Bulls.
Evacuate all the schoolchildren!The Nuggets are bound to start a fire sale in the next month or two.I think the only potential guard that would have fit and not cost Wright was C.J. Watson, and that's not exactly the same level of move.
I'm very intrigued by the backup Center spot now. No idea whats gonna happen.
Brandon Knight?Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?
Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
no i think they will no trade him i have heard no rumors about that at all on sportstalk here right now he is getting a lot of love but hey a paper bag full of rotten tomatos would get love from milwaukee after brandon jennings that guy was bad news i like crowder actually though and got to see him play here for marquette he could turn in to something i think take that to the bank bromigosBrandon Knight?Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?
Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?
Not that it matters at this point.
He'd fit but the Bucks are going to be battling for a playoff spot (Eastern ConferenceBrandon Knight?Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?
Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?
Not that it matters at this point.
Hey, the Bucks would be the 8 seed in the West if the playoffs started today (and they were in the West).He'd fit but the Bucks are going to be battling for a playoff spot (Eastern ConferenceBrandon Knight?Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?
Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?
Not that it matters at this point.) and I doubt the new ownership would make a move like that which could hurt them short term.
Better than anything they've had.
Better than anything they've had.
They need to start by ditching the gawd awful name instead of new logos.
Grantland agrees with ya. Doesn't think the Mavs needed to make a move, and fears Rondo's need to control the ball will make the team less efficient.They do mention Dallas' poor play against playoff teams, and that the strategic goal is to add a player with big time planking skills that can lead a run, or at least be the 2nd best player come the playoffs.And that is the potential problem. Rondo without the ball in his hands is pretty useless on offense. So either the entire offense adapts to his playmaking, taking the ball out of Dirk's and Ellis' hands, or he plays off the ball and kills their spacing. Big changes. They've certainly got the coach to do it but it isn't without risk. I think they'd be just as far ahead getting a good shooting PG who can play a little D and keeping Wright.But Rondo isn't a shooter.
I like it less and less now that guys like Lowe and Haralabob are ragging on his defence.Grantland agrees with ya. Doesn't think the Mavs needed to make a move, and fears Rondo's need to control the ball will make the team less efficient.They do mention Dallas' poor play against playoff teams, and that the strategic goal is to add a player with big time planking skills that can lead a run, or at least be the 2nd best player come the playoffs.And that is the potential problem. Rondo without the ball in his hands is pretty useless on offense. So either the entire offense adapts to his playmaking, taking the ball out of Dirk's and Ellis' hands, or he plays off the ball and kills their spacing. Big changes. They've certainly got the coach to do it but it isn't without risk.I think they'd be just as far ahead getting a good shooting PG who can play a little D and keeping Wright.But Rondo isn't a shooter.
Obviously I like the move, but now that I slept on it, I concede there is risk.
If this were virtually any other franchise I'd hate it. He's wildly overrated as a defender, and on the offensive end changing anything at all for the Mavs is like doing plastic surgery on Adriana Lima. But I just assume Rick Carlisle has a master plan that's way beyond my comprehension.I like it less and less now that guys like Lowe and Haralabob are ragging on his defence.Grantland agrees with ya. Doesn't think the Mavs needed to make a move, and fears Rondo's need to control the ball will make the team less efficient.They do mention Dallas' poor play against playoff teams, and that the strategic goal is to add a player with big time planking skills that can lead a run, or at least be the 2nd best player come the playoffs.And that is the potential problem. Rondo without the ball in his hands is pretty useless on offense. So either the entire offense adapts to his playmaking, taking the ball out of Dirk's and Ellis' hands, or he plays off the ball and kills their spacing. Big changes. They've certainly got the coach to do it but it isn't without risk.I think they'd be just as far ahead getting a good shooting PG who can play a little D and keeping Wright.But Rondo isn't a shooter.
Obviously I like the move, but now that I slept on it, I concede there is risk.
If only they'd waited half a year or so, they could have been named after something from Toy Story instead. The Woodies, The Buzzes...Cliff Clavin said:Better than anything they've had.Raider Nation said:
They need to start by ditching the gawd awful name instead of new logos.
Kinda dig it... follows a lot of the "Flatter" design trends that are hot right now, with a touch of a retro feel.Raider Nation said:
the best part about that old one was the way it looked like a dinosore ate part of the pants its like hey man welcome to canada but watch out for the dinosores they are fn everywhere up here and they will eat the hell out of your pants take that to the bank brohansRaider Nation said:Baby steps.popsecret said:Hate itRaider Nation said:
Its too bad he couldn't swallow his pride and take on a different role. He'd be a big help as a 6th man for a team like Detroit or Philly.Lillard was unconscious.
It's funny how every Lakers game I catch some of, Bryant has a terrible shooting night, yet the Lakers play well. Funny how that works, considering some would have us believe that it's Bryant and a bunch of scrubs.
Rondo debuts tomorrow night!Our Mavericks are going to dominate.
I bet on all the teams that covered tonight. /i####strikes2k
Two buses of Raptors fans made the journey to The Palace of Auburn Hills to take advantage of the plentiful tickets. Raptors general manager Masai Ujiri rode part of the way in each bus and distributed free t-shirts to those on board.
Oh my god, I was tired so I turned this off at 106-97.Fun game in San Antonio! 3rd OT....Blazers now in control. Quietest best team west of Memphis.
He needs to be stopped.
someone put Jmon on suicide watch.He needs to be stopped. Love how the bench did all of the heavy lifting to get them in it just to hand it to Kobe for the brick.