What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (2 Viewers)

I think the only potential guard that would have fit and not cost Wright was C.J. Watson, and that's not exactly the same level of move.

I'm very intrigued by the backup Center spot now. No idea whats gonna happen.
The Nuggets are bound to start a fire sale in the next month or two.
Cavs asking if they can put Mozgov on layaway please.

I think the only potential guard that would have fit and not cost Wright was C.J. Watson, and that's not exactly the same level of move.

I'm very intrigued by the backup Center spot now. No idea whats gonna happen.
The Nuggets are bound to start a fire sale in the next month or two.
Ty Lawson would have been great too. I kind of assumed he would never be an option.

I wonder what Carlisle could do with JaVale. Dallas doesn't have the salary to make that work though. Not sure if Mozgov would work either. Is he much of a rim protector?
If Mozgov were available the Cavs would also be very interested in him.

Koufos is also "unhappy" with how Memphis is using him.

 
So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?

Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.

As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.

I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
You're missing the obvious Jose Calderon.

FWIW, Zach Lowe thinks this is a move more for next year than anything. They are in 6th anyway, so it's not like they are breaking up the Bulls.

 
Isaiah Thomas is apparently on the block. He would have probably have been cheaper and would have been a big upgrade on Barea even though they are similar types of players.

 
bees knees bucks pull another one out against the kings last night now they have to go and play the clips again and we will probably get beat by a million but jeez it will be nice to play some teams on this side of the big muddy again i feel like cuban won and we are in the west right now what the heck anyhow geanis played so that was good news and the ankle did not keep him out that guy is really somethng take that to the bank brohans

 
So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?

Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.

I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
You're missing the obvious Jose Calderon.

FWIW, Zach Lowe thinks this is a move more for next year than anything. They are in 6th anyway, so it's not like they are breaking up the Bulls.
Great shooter but Calderon was a terrible defender at his peak. He'd be challenging Lin for the worst defense in the league right now.

 
So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?

Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.

I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
Brandon Knight?

SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?

Not that it matters at this point.

 
So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?

Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.

I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
Brandon Knight?

SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?

Not that it matters at this point.
no i think they will no trade him i have heard no rumors about that at all on sportstalk here right now he is getting a lot of love but hey a paper bag full of rotten tomatos would get love from milwaukee after brandon jennings that guy was bad news i like crowder actually though and got to see him play here for marquette he could turn in to something i think take that to the bank bromigos

 
So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?

Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.

I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
Brandon Knight?

SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?

Not that it matters at this point.
He'd fit but the Bucks are going to be battling for a playoff spot (Eastern Conference :thumbup: ) and I doubt the new ownership would make a move like that which could hurt them short term.

 
also brohans he has looked pretty darn good to be honest i think they will try to get him to stick around i mean if you let him go who are your replacing him with that is how i look at it take that to the bank

 
So what PG fits this mold and more importantly one that is available?

Honestly, I love this move for the Mavs. They were getting #### on offense and defense from their PGs.
Good question. Right now, there probably isn't that much available. But there also wasn't a reason that Dallas had to make this move now. In a month maybe they could have gotten a guy like Chalmers and not had to give up Wright. Avery Bradley. Maybe Dragic if the Suns keep falling off pace (he isn't the greatest defender but he is a big improvement from what they have). The Knicks like to give away players so maybe Hardaway. And as others have said, Lawson or Watson.As you say, they're getting #### on offense from their PGs but they still have the best offense in the league. They didn't need help there. They just needed guys who could hold their on the defensive end and was a threat to shoot from the outside.

I don't hate the move. Any time you can get a top tier player for very little, you should likely do it. I just question whether he is a good fit there.
Brandon Knight?

SWC/Bucks worried enough about resigning him next year to take Nelson, Crowder, and a 1st?

Not that it matters at this point.
He'd fit but the Bucks are going to be battling for a playoff spot (Eastern Conference :thumbup: ) and I doubt the new ownership would make a move like that which could hurt them short term.
Hey, the Bucks would be the 8 seed in the West if the playoffs started today (and they were in the West).

I'm sure that's how it''ll look in April, too.

 
But Rondo isn't a shooter.
And that is the potential problem. Rondo without the ball in his hands is pretty useless on offense. So either the entire offense adapts to his playmaking, taking the ball out of Dirk's and Ellis' hands, or he plays off the ball and kills their spacing. Big changes. They've certainly got the coach to do it but it isn't without risk. I think they'd be just as far ahead getting a good shooting PG who can play a little D and keeping Wright.
Grantland agrees with ya. Doesn't think the Mavs needed to make a move, and fears Rondo's need to control the ball will make the team less efficient.They do mention Dallas' poor play against playoff teams, and that the strategic goal is to add a player with big time planking skills that can lead a run, or at least be the 2nd best player come the playoffs.

Obviously I like the move, but now that I slept on it, I concede there is risk.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
But Rondo isn't a shooter.
And that is the potential problem. Rondo without the ball in his hands is pretty useless on offense. So either the entire offense adapts to his playmaking, taking the ball out of Dirk's and Ellis' hands, or he plays off the ball and kills their spacing. Big changes. They've certainly got the coach to do it but it isn't without risk.I think they'd be just as far ahead getting a good shooting PG who can play a little D and keeping Wright.
Grantland agrees with ya. Doesn't think the Mavs needed to make a move, and fears Rondo's need to control the ball will make the team less efficient.They do mention Dallas' poor play against playoff teams, and that the strategic goal is to add a player with big time planking skills that can lead a run, or at least be the 2nd best player come the playoffs.

Obviously I like the move, but now that I slept on it, I concede there is risk.
I like it less and less now that guys like Lowe and Haralabob are ragging on his defence.

 
But Rondo isn't a shooter.
And that is the potential problem. Rondo without the ball in his hands is pretty useless on offense. So either the entire offense adapts to his playmaking, taking the ball out of Dirk's and Ellis' hands, or he plays off the ball and kills their spacing. Big changes. They've certainly got the coach to do it but it isn't without risk.I think they'd be just as far ahead getting a good shooting PG who can play a little D and keeping Wright.
Grantland agrees with ya. Doesn't think the Mavs needed to make a move, and fears Rondo's need to control the ball will make the team less efficient.They do mention Dallas' poor play against playoff teams, and that the strategic goal is to add a player with big time planking skills that can lead a run, or at least be the 2nd best player come the playoffs.

Obviously I like the move, but now that I slept on it, I concede there is risk.
I like it less and less now that guys like Lowe and Haralabob are ragging on his defence.
If this were virtually any other franchise I'd hate it. He's wildly overrated as a defender, and on the offensive end changing anything at all for the Mavs is like doing plastic surgery on Adriana Lima. But I just assume Rick Carlisle has a master plan that's way beyond my comprehension.

 
This boring double-OT Spurs/Blazers game is going to make us miss the entire 1H of the Lakers game!!! :hot:

Oh, wait.... that's a good thing.

 
Lillard was unconscious.

It's funny how every Lakers game I catch some of, Bryant has a terrible shooting night, yet the Lakers play well. Funny how that works, considering some would have us believe that it's Bryant and a bunch of scrubs.

 
Lillard was unconscious.

It's funny how every Lakers game I catch some of, Bryant has a terrible shooting night, yet the Lakers play well. Funny how that works, considering some would have us believe that it's Bryant and a bunch of scrubs.
Its too bad he couldn't swallow his pride and take on a different role. He'd be a big help as a 6th man for a team like Detroit or Philly.

 
Bulls with good win in Memphis sans Rose & Gibson. Mirotic is so smooth. Dude already plays like a 10 year vet. If/when he improves his post game (and gets stronger), he'll be a star. Made a great transition so far from overseas.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Our Mavericks are going to dominate.
Rondo debuts tomorrow night!

Also, I think the Mavs have a pretty strong board contingent. We're just a quiet bunch compared to the Raptors/Heat/Lakers/Dubs group. Not sure why. Love our team. Love Cuban. Gonna have to try and work for that man someday.

 


Two buses of Raptors fans made the journey to The Palace of Auburn Hills to take advantage of the plentiful tickets. Raptors general manager Masai Ujiri rode part of the way in each bus and distributed free t-shirts to those on board.
:thumbup:

 
Kobe is definitely in on operation get a top pick. It looked like he put himself back in the game last night. He's certainly capable of making tough shots but that's pretty much all he takes nowadays.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top