What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NCAA HOOPS THREAD! -- K petitions to get Maui Jim Maui Invitational moved to Transylvania (2 Viewers)

Who is worse?


  • Total voters
    278
I will be fading st Mary's and the zags, not sold on either'sbody of work and both failed the eye test miserably in the wcc tournament.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You realize AZ was missing two of their best players in that game, and most concede that az is a drastically better team now?
Arizona was actually playing better and more efficient at that time of year, and they're a slow team so kenpom should be favoring them, right?  Gonzaga has only gotten better since the Arizona game too.  Assuming that Arizona will pound Gonzaga is typical ignorant BS from a Power conference fan.  

 
They beat Florida, Arizona, Iowa State, and St. Mary's 3 times.  That's at least 5 top 25 RPI wins.  That's how they get their high seed despite the WCC.  
But St. Mary's is in the WCC as well.  So I don't buy their credentials either.  So Gonzaga beat Florida when they were in disarray, Arizona without a couple of guys, and Iowa State.  Three good wins all season.  I don't think that's #1 seed material and I'm reasonably sure they would have gone 9-9 at best in the ACC (even assuming they were located within reasonable traveling distance or had Scotty and a transporter).  

 
But St. Mary's is in the WCC as well.  So I don't buy their credentials either.  So Gonzaga beat Florida when they were in disarray, Arizona without a couple of guys, and Iowa State.  Three good wins all season.  I don't think that's #1 seed material and I'm reasonably sure they would have gone 9-9 at best in the ACC (even assuming they were located within reasonable traveling distance or had Scotty and a transporter).  
St. Mary's is around 10-15 in RPI.  Dont know how that's not 3 quality wins right there.  Florida was before their center got hurt.  Iowa State won their tournament.  Also, Gonzaga is not a slow team so they must really be good for kenpom to rank them at 1!  Sorry but your post reeks of Power conference bias.  

 
And only there because the North Carolina legislators and then-governor, now bye-byed, thought it was important to protect straight people everywhere from the ever-so-common harrowing public bathroom encounters with routinely found transgender predators.  Oh, well.  :)  

The funny thing about this is that Columbia initially put in a bid for these games and were the favorite to get them but the higher ups at SC didn't want it to affect Dawn Staley and the women's team ability to play at home for the 1st 2 rounds of the women's tourney. If we get that bid there's no telling where the Gamecocks would be sent to

  Were you guys (Gamecocks) good this season?  

We were decent. We were better earlier in the season. We were one of the better defensive teams in the nation for most of the year but with our lack of depth fatigue took it's toll down the stretch.

We have the SEC POTY in Sindarius Thornwell who is the only guard in the nation to average over 20pts and 7 rebounds a game and he lead the SEC in steals. After that is where the questions begin. No other consistant shooters on the team. Our 6'6" sophomore PG, PJ Dozier, is a former McDonald's AA but he's been inconsistant all year. Our best big man is 6'9" Chris Silva. He's still a little raw and only had 3 years of  basketball experience before he got on campus. He's very athletic but he has a bad habit of committing a lot of fouls and spending a lot of time sitting on the bench. We need him in the game. We have last years SEC 6 man of the year in Duane Notice that is primarily a 3 point shooter that plays good defense. If his shot is on we are hard to beat because teams can't focus primarily on Thornwell. 

It should be a good matchup with Marquette.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arizona was actually playing better and more efficient at that time of year, and they're a slow team so kenpom should be favoring them, right?  Gonzaga has only gotten better since the Arizona game too.  Assuming that Arizona will pound Gonzaga is typical ignorant BS from a Power conference fan.  
I don't even like Arizona.  I say this because we've seen overhyped Gonzaga teams before fall flat.  This team looks better but I'm not buying until they actually make a final four.  Congrats to them thought for getting that 1 seed.

 
I think Gonzaga is good, (huge fan of williams-goss going back to HS and the entire starting lineup could make the rotation at any team in the country) but I give very little weight to the wins over St. Mary's. They had a couple of ok wins out of conference (Nevada and Dayton both made the tournament) but other than that, their schedule was terrible. There's a reason this same group was left out of the tournament last year despite a gaudy 27-5 record.

They don't have anyone that can create off the dribble and their post guys aren't all that skilled either (when they play Gonzaga, they basically just throw up prayers over the big Pole without any idea of what they're doing).  They're the 2nd best team in a bad league and their lack of athletes plays right into gonzaga's hands (especially this year, since they have multiple high major talents on the perimeter). They dont have 1 guy who could start for Gonzaga. At least BYU had Mikka.

They can make some 3's, so I guess they'll have a puncher's chance based on that, but I have a feeling VCU is just going to chase them off the line over and over again then run them into the ground. St. Mary's plays the 2nd slowest temp of the country and VCU will speed them up and get them out of their comfort zone.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't even like Arizona.  I say this because we've seen overhyped Gonzaga teams before fall flat.  This team looks better but I'm not buying until they actually make a final four.  Congrats to them thought for getting that 1 seed.
That's a myth.  Google it,  They've played to or over their seed expectation most years.  Last year, which should be the best comparison since its the most recent, they made it to the sweet 16 as an 11.  

 
Here is the thing, if I take away kenpom, how can anyone really justify Wichita State as a great team?  The subjective eye test?  I'm sure they are better than a 10 seed but I'm not sure a computer saying they are the 8th best is any better at judging just because all they proved is they are good at being mediocre to bad teams.  
You could put Wichita as the 7 and Dayton the 10 in the same game/bracket and not tell any difference.  The 7-10 seeds and probably 6 and 11's too are all pretty close and come down to matchups and getting hot.

 
St. Mary's is around 10-15 in RPI.  Dont know how that's not 3 quality wins right there.  Florida was before their center got hurt.  Iowa State won their tournament.  Also, Gonzaga is not a slow team so they must really be good for kenpom to rank them at 1!  Sorry but your post reeks of Power conference bias.  
I knew you were going to accuse me of that eventually - and you held out longer than I thought you would - but you're aiming that nerf gun at completely the wrong person.  I'm a Duke fan, an Iowa fan, and a Northwestern fan now that Collins is there, but I absolutely love the non-power conference schools and what they bring to college basketball, so much so that I never, ever, use the terms "mid-major" and "low-major" because I think they're stupid and condescending.  I've also been to about 90 college basketball arenas, so about 25-30% of the Division I total, and that includes many, many lower-profile programs.  I enjoy those games thoroughly and it's refreshing not to deal with the OAD nonsense and other garbage that infests the "power conferences" (such as, e.g., providing prostitutes for players or creating a whole phony academic department to keep athletes eligible, to take just two recent examples, and I'll add in the fact that Bruce Pearl has a job in a "power conference" as further evidence of my position.)  I am also not a college football fan of any kind (I watch, at most, the title game every season), so there's no college football power-conference bias for me there either; my college sports attention is just about 100% devoted to basketball.  I absolutely love it when teams from lower-profile conferences roll overrated "power conference" teams and even had to feel happy for Mercer and Lehigh when they beat Duke teams with ridiculously exploitable flaws in recent seasons (even as mad as I was at Duke).

I already said that I admire Gonzaga (with one non-athletic exception) and what they've achieved.  But honestly, St. Mary's status as a top 15 RPI team is equally silly; the RPI has to start somewhere and obviously, since the Gaels didn't lose to the Pepperdine/San Diego/San Francisco/Portland/Pacific gauntlet too often either, their RPI is inflated greatly as well as a result of what happened during the season.  Is Gonzaga good?  Sure.  Is any team that got beaten on their home floor - in a huge comeback - by Brigham Young deserving of a #1 seed?  No.  They were a three seed at best, but I would have been happy to see them as a 2. 

 
That's a myth.  Google it,  They've played to or over their seed expectation most years.  Last year, which should be the best comparison since its the most recent, they made it to the sweet 16 as an 11.  
A myth?  1 elite 8 and a couple of sweet 16's since 2000.  They've had a couple 28-4 and 29-3 type teams lose in the round of 64 and 32.  Hopefully they make a big run for you this year but I just think AZ is better.  

 
I knew you were going to accuse me of that eventually - and you held out longer than I thought you would - but you're aiming that nerf gun at completely the wrong person.  I'm a Duke fan, an Iowa fan, and a Northwestern fan now that Collins is there, but I absolutely love the non-power conference schools and what they bring to college basketball, so much so that I never, ever, use the terms "mid-major" and "low-major" because I think they're stupid and condescending.  I've also been to about 90 college basketball arenas, so about 25-30% of the Division I total, and that includes many, many lower-profile programs.  I enjoy those games thoroughly and it's refreshing not to deal with the OAD nonsense and other garbage that infests the "power conferences" (such as, e.g., providing prostitutes for players or creating a whole phony academic department to keep athletes eligible, to take just two recent examples, and I'll add in the fact that Bruce Pearl has a job in a "power conference" as further evidence of my position.)  I am also not a college football fan of any kind (I watch, at most, the title game every season), so there's no college football power-conference bias for me there either; my college sports attention is just about 100% devoted to basketball.  I absolutely love it when teams from lower-profile conferences roll overrated "power conference" teams and even had to feel happy for Mercer and Lehigh when they beat Duke teams with ridiculously exploitable flaws in recent seasons (even as mad as I was at Duke).

I already said that I admire Gonzaga (with one non-athletic exception) and what they've achieved.  But honestly, St. Mary's status as a top 15 RPI team is equally silly; the RPI has to start somewhere and obviously, since the Gaels didn't lose to the Pepperdine/San Diego/San Francisco/Portland/Pacific gauntlet too often either, their RPI is inflated greatly as well as a result of what happened during the season.  Is Gonzaga good?  Sure.  Is any team that got beaten on their home floor - in a huge comeback - by Brigham Young deserving of a #1 seed?  No.  They were a three seed at best, but I would have been happy to see them as a 2. 
Point taken on the Power Conference thing but we just have to agree to disagree on the 1 seed thing.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PAC-12 hasn't been to the Final 4 since 2008?  Didn't realize that.  I like UCLA and Arizona could both change that this year but didn't realize how bad they've been the last decade.

 
PAC-12 hasn't been to the Final 4 since 2008?  Didn't realize that.  I like UCLA and Arizona could both change that this year but didn't realize how bad they've been the last decade.
Really tough for UCLA- if they get there they'll earn it. 

The way Arizona is playing Id pick them against any opponent. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really tough for UCLA- if they get there they'll earn it. 

The way Arizona is playing Id pick them against any opponent. 
I agree that both teams are very good, (i've got them both in the final 4) but have you actually seen any opponent that doesn't play on the West Coast?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't watched a lot of Arizona but it feels like if you have a defender that can shut down Trier they aren't all that great.  Markinnen is good but not great.  I could see Florida State beating them but the game if it happens would be on the west coast.  

 
Point taken on the Power Conference thing but we just have to agree to disagree on the 1 seed thing.  
Understood, and that's fine.  I honestly mean no disrespect to fans of Gonzaga, and I am certainly no Arizona fan (ugh, perish that thought immediately), so if that's the regional final I will be rooting for the Bulldogs quite vocally.  :)   Arizona's path of SLC to San Jose to Phoenix (okay, Glendale) annoys me. 

 
That's not what I said.  They aren't overhyped most years.  In the years where they've had great regular season and get a high seed they fall short of expectations.  Sorry I wasn't more clear.
Fair enough, even though it's not entirely accurate. But with an All American at guard and NBA one and done prospects coming off the bench, this is a quite frankly a much different team from those.  

 
Fair enough, even though it's not entirely accurate. But with an All American at guard and NBA one and done prospects coming off the bench, this is a quite frankly a much different team from those.  
Is Collins really going to enter the draft? Seems like a poor decision given the depth of this year's group. He'd be better off going back and being the star as a soph. Draft express has him in their 2018 mock.

He's definitely a talent, but I'd worry that his production is inflated by the league. Again, how many WCC even have a big guy with a prayer of defending a future lottery pick?

 
Pains me to say it because I don't care for either team but I really like how Arizona and Louisville have things in front of them. I think both teams will do very well in this year's tournament. 

 
Fair enough, even though it's not entirely accurate. But with an All American at guard and NBA one and done prospects coming off the bench, this is a quite frankly a much different team from those.  
You could very well be right.  It would be nice to see them take down a blue blood or two.

 
Is Collins really going to enter the draft? Seems like a poor decision given the depth of this year's group. He'd be better off going back and being the star as a soph. Draft express has him in their 2018 mock.

He's definitely a talent, but I'd worry that his production is inflated by the league. Again, how many WCC even have a big guy with a prayer of defending a future lottery pick?
I agree that he should stay but a bunch of people on the zag forums who are apparently in the know see him as leaving.  

 
St. Mary's is around 10-15 in RPI.  Dont know how that's not 3 quality wins right there.  Florida was before their center got hurt.  Iowa State won their tournament.  Also, Gonzaga is not a slow team so they must really be good for kenpom to rank them at 1!  Sorry but your post reeks of Power conference bias.  
Well he was crying upthread about poor Duke getting screwed in the seeding every year so take his analysis with a mountain of salt

 
Well he was crying upthread about poor Duke getting screwed in the seeding every year so take his analysis with a mountain of salt
Poor Duke getting screwed each year?!?  Geez.  I guess that's relative to each person's perspective but seems like every year, teams like NC, ND, Kentucky, Louisville, Zona, etc all have major contrast of style type landmine teams in their way and Duke always has a "gauntlet" Of VCMU, East Texas of the Valley, and St. George's community or something.  Seems like every year, they are in the Sweet 16 before they ever face a team anyone has ever seen play twice or more. 

Looking at the last decade, look at these 1st couple of round games:  It's actually worse than I remember.  Yale, Albany, Lehigh, Mercer, Ark Pine-bluff.  You would think somewhere in the law of averages, Duke would play a team that, even in a down year, would face a name opponent.  Not one single UCLA, Texas, Florida, Louisville, etc.  Just one guy's opinion. 


016


2-1


Defeated North Carolina-Wilmington in first round, 93-85
Defeated Yale in second round, 71-64
Lost to Oregon in regional semifinal, 82-68


2015


6-0


Defeated Robert Morris in first round, 85-56
Defeated San Diego State in second round, 68-49
Defeated Utah in regional semifinal, 63-57
Defeated Gonzaga in regional final, 66-52
Defeated Michigan State in National Semifinal, 81-61
Defeated Wisconsin in National Championship, 68-63


2014


0-1


Lost to Mercer in first round, 78-71


2013


3-1


Defeated Albany in first round, 73-61
Defeated Creighton in second round, 66-50
Defeated Michigan State in regional semifinal, 71-61
Lost to Louisville in regional final, 85-63


2012


0-1


Lost to Lehigh in first round, 75-70


2011


2-1


Defeated Hampton in first round, 87-45
Defeated Michigan in second round, 73-71
Lost to Arizona in regional semifinal, 93-77


2010


6-0


Defeated Arkansas-Pine Bluff in first round, 73-44
Defeated California in second round, 68-53
Defeated Purdue in regional semifinal, 70-57
Defeated Baylor in regional final, 78-71
Defeated West Virginia in National Semifinal, 78-57
Defeated Butler in National Championship, 61-59


2009


2-1


Defeated Binghamton in first round, 86-62
Defeated Texas in second round, 74-69
Lost to Villanova in regional semifinal, 77-54


2008


1-1


Defeated Belmont in first round, 71-70




 
Last edited by a moderator:
Poor Duke getting screwed each year?!?  Geez.  I guess that's relative to each person's perspective but seems like every year, teams like NC, ND, Kentucky, Louisville, Zona, etc all have major contrast of style type landmine teams in their way and Duke always has a "gauntlet" Of VCMU, East Texas of the Valley, and St. George's community or something.  Seems like every year, they are in the Sweet 16 before they ever face a team anyone has ever seen play twice or more. 
Stop it you big meanie jerk!! They don't even get the Greensboro invitational this year!  It's a veritable gauntlet.

 
Stop it you big meanie jerk!! They don't even get the Greensboro invitational this year!  It's a veritable gauntlet.
No doubt. I wasn't even going to go that route (thought maybe it WAS just me that seemed to think they played the first weekend in their practice gym every year while teams like Gonzaga gets shipped to Tulsa or Arizona gets sent to Indianapolis to play Louisville.  

 
and sam hauser is an up and commer got to see him win the state tourney with his bro at spash basically marquette and can get hot and drill three balls or they can be cold and look really really ordinary hot and cold all year take that to the bank shot brohans 
I'm pulling for the latter.
i will remember this and if sc gets out i will say to everyone in the tavern that in the zone said it would be this way and they will be like what and i will say look just own it in the zone said it and so it is written so let it be done take that to the bank bromigos 

 
Just to switch gears a bit (and I don't really understand all the high-level "think tank" that goes into it) but do the top conference tournaments really mean anything anymore?  Seems to be that teams in conferences outside the ACC can't really make a push by winning their tourney IF they were already expected to do well. Example: Kentucky has really become a different team the last few weeks. They won 10 or 11 in a row and won their tourney and didn't seem to move one bit.  Conversely, North Carolina didn't seem to be hurt one bit by not at least going to the title game in theirs.  

I just have the opinion that the committee missed something here. Not comparing those two teams directly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i will remember this and if sc gets out i will say to everyone in the tavern that in the zone said it would be this way and they will be like what and i will say look just own it in the zone said it and so it is written so let it be done take that to the bank bromigos 
What tavern are we hitting up, GB?

 
Marquette is sort of an uneven team. Overachieved a bit this year. They beat Nova in January but then lost back to back to Providence and St. John's. They can shoot though and will be a tough out if they are on fire. They aren't very long but Luke Fischer at 6'11" can be troublesome. He's got a "white guy motor."
Spot on. They're very young, led by 3 very talented Freshman including the top 3 Point shooter in the country, Markus Howard, Sam Houser and Andrew Rousey. Kaitin Reinhart is a super streaky shooter and when he's cold he doesn't stop which I think is on Wojo to get him out of the game. Frustrates the hell out of me. I think an underrated player is Hanif Cheatem. Kid can ball.

They can be hot and cold, but they're young, Fischer is playing well too. They need to play better Defense and hit their shots in crunch time, which when they lose, is their downfall.

 
Committee to Duke: when you lost to N.C. State at home on January 23, your seed was pretty much locked in, guys. 

Committee to UNC: did you finish with *****ONLY***** four regular season losses in that conference??????  OMG SRSLY?  Well, there's simply no need to examine things any further.  Here's a ticket to the Elite Eight.

:lol:    Every year. 

Years →


'79


'80


'84


'85


'86


'87


'88


'89


'90


'91


'92


'93


'94


'96


'97


'98


'99


'00


'01


'02


'03


'04


'05


'06


'07


'08


'09


'10


'11


'12


'13


'14


'15


'16


'17


Seeds →


2


4


3


3


1


5


2


2


3


2


1


3


2


8


2


1


1


1


1


1


3


1


1


1


6


2


2


1


1


2


2


3


1


4


2

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top