New charges filed against Brandon Marshall (1 Viewer)

[Liquid Tension]

Has anybody mentioned that Marshall pled guilty to Driving While Ability Impaired on Friday the 12th? That's the current legal proceeding I'm concerned with - he got 1 year of probation from the Colorado Judge...

NFL knew about this too.

So they knew all this and that is why they reduced the suspension to 1 game...makes senseBTW, I am not denying what you are saying is correct Cecil

 

[cubbie5150]

Brandon Marshall is not a thug. Immature - yes, but hopefully he's growing up.Here's what I've heard and confirmed with different Broncos sources:New charges, but not a new incident. They hadn't decided whether to charge him or not until now. The NFL also knew about this when they suspended him.

Thank you. That was what I was going to suggest as well. One of my law school classmates (I'm not a practicing attorney, btw) is a District Attorney in Chicago. He's oftentimes told me of similar scenarios where criminal charges are held in abeyance for months for various reasons, whether it be reluctance on the part of the alleged victim to press charges (prosecutors would obviously prefer to have a "cooperative" "victim" testifying, for example), or even mundane administrative reasons. In any event, as the current charge appears to have arisen from the previously known events, I can't see how the NFL would see this as new circumstances to warrant further punishment. Brandon Marshall could not have known that it would take this long for a formal charge to be brought, thus, it doesn't appear he withheld anything from Goodell.

 

[Sheriff66]

Suspend him again please....

:non-owner:

 

[Stinkin Ref]

question

If the NFL knew about this when it handed down his suspension, that is fine... but they would not have known the outcome, correct? So the suspension he received could not have included the results of this incident. Meaning if found guilty or whatever the outcome is of this, he could face further suspension. Unless the agreement was "no matter what happens with your March incident, you will not be suspended anymore because you already told us about it". That seems a little shaddy.

 

[amnesiac]

People don't get it. You want thugs at WR. I have Marshall and picked up Chris Henry on waivers. Now, if only Braylon would rough somebody up I'd have 3 legit receivers who can catch.

he did get in trouble for driving 120 mph on rte 90 recently. that's all i got though.

 

[coolice]

Time to get Royal.

Bad news for me is that he is picked up in all my league and owners are either do not trade or baaaaaaaaaaaaad trader. Just over valueing their player way too much

 

[FFdork]

BTW, to those asking how this could/would be different than the Matt Jones case, I believe it's because of it dealing with substance use/abuse. Falls under a different category. The same way the Marshall DUI case didn't have a bearing on his recent suspension under the personal conduct policy.

 

[Chachi]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL.

Simple Math

ESPN yapping about Marshall all week

+

Bad Image for NFL

+

Roger Goodell

=

Suspension

 

[moderated]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

 

[CLIFF]

Interesting. If this is verified, Marshall could face more suspension this season.

Same here as a Royal owner

 

[King of the Jungle]

Mudda F........

 

[Stinkin Ref]

Interesting. If this is verified, Marshall could face more suspension this season.

You are a true definition of a hater. I hope this guy keeps lighting up defenses for the next 15 games just so you can be miserable for not drafting him.

quick question on fantasy football etiquette:Speaking only in terms of fantasy football: Is ok to hope that a stud player who is not on your team gets suspended? I just think there were probably many guys in week one who played the Marshall owner and thought to themselves "I'm glad he's suspended" along the same lines anybody going up agaginst Marshall on the future might think it would be good if he does get suspended. Or is it okay to think about, but not actually say because then you are a terd?

 

[thecardiackid]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

 

[JuniorNB]

Interesting. If this is verified, Marshall could face more suspension this season.

Same here as a Royal owner

The Royal-owner in me says: but the Cutler owner in me says:

 

[Tubalcane]

Sorry if this has already been posted (because I'm too lazy to scroll backwards and look). But I just got this from RTSports which cites KFFL:

Broncos | Marshall not likely to face suspension

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:26 -0700

KFFL has learned Denver Broncos WR Brandon Marshall isn't expected to face a suspension for his recent misdemeanor battery charges because the league was aware there was a chance he would be charged before he was suspended one game earlier this year.

 

[roadkill1292]

Wait, there are two Gmans? (Gmen?) And why do they both hate America?

 

[Statler & Waldorf]

Sorry if this has already been posted (because I'm too lazy to scroll backwards and look). But I just got this from RTSports which cites KFFL:Broncos | Marshall not likely to face suspensionThu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:26 -0700KFFL has learned Denver Broncos WR Brandon Marshall isn't expected to face a suspension for his recent misdemeanor battery charges because the league was aware there was a chance he would be charged before he was suspended one game earlier this year.

First I saw of it and thank you!I figured as much though since it was an old issue. The ex probably just saw the pub he was getting and wanted something. Hell hath no fury right?

 

[Stinkin Ref]

Sorry if this has already been posted (because I'm too lazy to scroll backwards and look). But I just got this from RTSports which cites KFFL:Broncos | Marshall not likely to face suspensionThu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:26 -0700KFFL has learned Denver Broncos WR Brandon Marshall isn't expected to face a suspension for his recent misdemeanor battery charges because the league was aware there was a chance he would be charged before he was suspended one game earlier this year.

sorry but this makes no sense.....he can't already have been suspended for something that may not have even happened

 

[brednbuddah]

Sorry if this has already been posted (because I'm too lazy to scroll backwards and look). But I just got this from RTSports which cites KFFL:Broncos | Marshall not likely to face suspensionThu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:26 -0700KFFL has learned Denver Broncos WR Brandon Marshall isn't expected to face a suspension for his recent misdemeanor battery charges because the league was aware there was a chance he would be charged before he was suspended one game earlier this year.

case closed: good night everybody. thanks for coming. drive home safely.

 

[Stinkin Ref]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....

1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him

2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"

One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.

Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

 

[Tubalcane]

Sorry if this has already been posted (because I'm too lazy to scroll backwards and look). But I just got this from RTSports which cites KFFL:Broncos | Marshall not likely to face suspensionThu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:26 -0700KFFL has learned Denver Broncos WR Brandon Marshall isn't expected to face a suspension for his recent misdemeanor battery charges because the league was aware there was a chance he would be charged before he was suspended one game earlier this year.

sorry but this makes no sense.....he can't already have been suspended for something that may not have even happened

That's what I said when this stuff all went down earlier this year. But it appears that Goodell arbitrarily decided to suspend Marshall. I think that's why he backed down so easily. Am I wrong here anybody…Until last week Marshall hadn’t yet been convicted of anything? Please correct me if I’m wrong. I’d like to know.

 

[FavreCo]

Yeah, like Godell has no idea about this OLD incident and that charges COULD be filed.

Update:

The solicitor's office in Fulton County got their asses kicked by Marshall in FF this past week and this is their only way of getting even.

 

[Trap Play]

If true.

 

[Tubalcane]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league new about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

When you say the league suspended him you mean Goodell don't you. Cause I was under the impression that it's Goodells decision who gets suspended, and not the decision of any commitee or such. Since it was Goodell, and he already knew about the "march stuff" then it does make sense that no new suspension will be handed down.

 

[thatguy]

Seriously, the timing of these charges is very suspicious.

That said, if Goodell was aware of these potentially pending charges, and still reduced the suspension, I see no way he can go back on that and add further suspension regardless of the outcome.

 

[Statler & Waldorf]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

Well then if that is the case then no suspension can be handed to him until he goes to trial and is proven guilty, which will take place after the season. If they were going to suspend him on the speculation, they would have done so with the initial 3 game one they levied on him. So basically he won't miss anytime this season. At least that's what I'm hoping!

 

[SCT]

Nothing to see here. Maybe you missed this in the thread:

Broncos | Marshall not likely to face suspension

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:51:26 -0700

KFFL has learned Denver Broncos WR Brandon Marshall isn't expected to face a suspension for his recent misdemeanor battery charges because the league was aware there was a chance he would be charged before he was suspended one game earlier this year.

 

[thatguy]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

Well then if that is the case then no suspension can be handed to him until he goes to trial and is proven guilty, which will take place after the season. If they were going to suspend him on the speculation, they would have done so with the initial 3 game one they levied on him. So basically he won't miss anytime this season. At least that's what I'm hoping!

But his initial suspension was based solely on pending and/or dropped charges... Doesn't it seem hypocritical to be able to suspend a player when the law has not yet proven a crime was even committed, then to add to those charges when the law does hand down a ruling? In the first case, they're essentially saying the law's decision does not matter, and in the second case, they are saying that the law's decision does matter. I just doesn't seem like they can have it both ways, which is why I don't see any further suspension coming regardless of the outcome.

 

[moderated]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

 

[Tubalcane]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

Well then if that is the case then no suspension can be handed to him until he goes to trial and is proven guilty, which will take place after the season. If they were going to suspend him on the speculation, they would have done so with the initial 3 game one they levied on him. So basically he won't miss anytime this season. At least that's what I'm hoping!

But his initial suspension was based solely on pending and/or dropped charges... Doesn't it seem hypocritical to be able to suspend a player when the law has not yet proven a crime was even committed, then to add to those charges when the law does hand down a ruling? In the first case, they're essentially saying the law's decision does not matter, and in the second case, they are saying that the law's decision does matter. I just doesn't seem like they can have it both ways, which is why I don't see any further suspension coming regardless of the outcome.

It seems that Goodell has the arbitrary authority to suspend players. If that is correct then it doesn't matter if it "seems hypocritical" (which it does) or if it doesn't make sense (which it doesn't) . It all depends on who the controlling legal authority is.

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

Well then if that is the case then no suspension can be handed to him until he goes to trial and is proven guilty, which will take place after the season. If they were going to suspend him on the speculation, they would have done so with the initial 3 game one they levied on him. So basically he won't miss anytime this season. At least that's what I'm hoping!

Even if he doesn't get suspended for this, what are odds he will do something else before the season is over?

 

[thatguy]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

 

[Tubalcane]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

Well then if that is the case then no suspension can be handed to him until he goes to trial and is proven guilty, which will take place after the season. If they were going to suspend him on the speculation, they would have done so with the initial 3 game one they levied on him. So basically he won't miss anytime this season. At least that's what I'm hoping!

Even if he doesn't get suspended for this, what are odds he will do something else before the season is over?

It sounds like he gets into trouble when he has free time. Maybe during the season he is focused on the job at hand and what not. Being that they have Rod Smith shadowing him, I would say the chances are greater that he steers clear until the off season or until a bye week.

 

[Statler & Waldorf]

there is no way this incident could have factored in Marshall's suspension that he has served already....1. his attorneys would not allow it to be considered, especially against him2. the league would not basically say "this is your suspension no matter what happens with your March incident"One would have to assume that since these are new charges that it is possible he could be suspended again.Even if the league knew about the incident already, they would not have been able to take it into account when handing down a suspension.

Well then if that is the case then no suspension can be handed to him until he goes to trial and is proven guilty, which will take place after the season. If they were going to suspend him on the speculation, they would have done so with the initial 3 game one they levied on him. So basically he won't miss anytime this season. At least that's what I'm hoping!

But his initial suspension was based solely on pending and/or dropped charges... Doesn't it seem hypocritical to be able to suspend a player when the law has not yet proven a crime was even committed, then to add to those charges when the law does hand down a ruling? In the first case, they're essentially saying the law's decision does not matter, and in the second case, they are saying that the law's decision does matter. I just doesn't seem like they can have it both ways, which is why I don't see any further suspension coming regardless of the outcome.

I'm fine with that too. I don't know what the conditions of the intial suspension were, but I'm just concerned about this season and from the looks of it, it looks like he'll be fine.

 

[24seven]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

 

[Stinkin Ref]

when Marshall was suspended, charges in this case had not even been filed....

so call me crazy, but it would seem that neither side wold want to factor "this incident" into the suspension that has already been handed down....Marshall's attorney's would look terrible if they allowed something that hadn't even been filed to negatively affect their client....and the league (Goddell) would not want to say that part of the reason Marshall is suspended is beacuse of this incident that may not even have happened as far as they knew at the time.....because if charges do get filed and they have, and then the incident becomes more serious (say assault, etc) then what the league was told ear;ler, they would have then handed down a punishment that would not have been appropriate for the crime (too lenient)....beacuse what/how long Marshall gets suspended can have an affect on suspensions of other players down the road...

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL.

Simple Math

ESPN yapping about Marshall all week

+

Bad Image for NFL

+

Roger Goodell

=

Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!

Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.

I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

Sorry, but if she's coming at me with a knife I'm going to do more than beat on her, I'm going to try and kill her. It's called self defense.

 

[thehornet]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

youre a fool.

 

[24seven]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

Sorry, but if she's coming at me with a knife I'm going to do more than beat on her, I'm going to try and kill her. It's called self defense.

Well if you are that defenseless where you couldn't take a knife from a woman and hold her down while you call the police then you my friend must be 5'1 110lbs. And you would Kill her???? wow...no the true colors of this board are coming out. and people wonder why this world is going to hell in a hand basket!!

 

[Tubalcane]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

I would disagree with that...if a women is trying to stab you with a knife, you would not try to defend yourself?The fact is we don't know what happened. Perhaps Marshall got that cut while he was defending himself against a knife-weilding angry girlfriend. We simply don't know. And until the truth in the matter comes out (which probably will never happen) there's no reason to speculate or jump to conclusions. Apparantly Goodell was satisfied with a one game suspension, and that's really all that matters.

 

[BoulderBob]

Nice guy, but I don't take into account an individuals ethics when drafting...nor do most NFL teams, apparently...

He has a few years to "shape up", so to speak...but if I hear of any more negative incidents, I doubt the kid sticks around in the NFL...

 

[thatguy]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

Sorry pal, but I disagree. You feel free to be your self-righteous self and sit way up there on your soapbox. As for me, if a woman starts beating up on me, and I can't get her to stop, I'm sorry to tell you that not only would it be within the law, it would be my God given right, to do whatever was in my power to get her to stop. If that means hitting her, so be it. Woman are not above the law - unfortunately, because of sentiment's just like yours, there a ton of abused husbands out there who would be laughed at if they attempted to file charges, or thrown in jail if they fought back.

 

[MCguidance]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

Hypothetically speaking what if that woman was Miss Olympia and you were going to die, would it be ok then? What if it was a woman coming at you with a knife, would it be ok then? Just playing devil's advocate for a second here. And no, I don't condone beating women, but it's never good to speak in blanket statements or generalities.

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

youre a fool.

No need to get personal. In fact, beating your girlfriend is a TAD bit more than "immature".

 

[moderated]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

Come on now, use some common sense. He's a professional athlete and as far as men go in the top 1% of strength in the world. He could easily contain her. The only justification he could have in attacking her would be if she came at him with a weapon. Now i guess that's possible and she's the one who cut his arm up, but i highly doubt she is powerful enough to even get close enough to him in a fight to slash his arm as bad as it was slashed. He could have threw her down long before she could have cut him that deep.So if it comes out that she actually knifed him then she's fair game, otherwise their is no excuse.But also it shows BM is an idiot for constantly being around a woman who calls the cops on him. It takes a pretty moronic person to stick around if someone is lying calling the police on you everyday.

 

[thatguy]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL.

Simple Math

ESPN yapping about Marshall all week

+

Bad Image for NFL

+

Roger Goodell

=

Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!

Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.

I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

But the fact that your saying what if the girlfriend was beating him first and if it makes a difference???? I don't care WHO you are, in no situation is it ever ok to hit a woman. NEVER EVER EVER.

Sorry, but if she's coming at me with a knife I'm going to do more than beat on her, I'm going to try and kill her. It's called self defense.

Well if you are that defenseless where you couldn't take a knife from a woman and hold her down while you call the police then you my friend must be 5'1 110lbs. And you would Kill her???? wow...no the true colors of this board are coming out. and people wonder why this world is going to hell in a hand basket!!

Going to hell? If that's your idea of hell, we've been in hell for a long time, because less than a century ago it was commonplace for men to knock their women and children around as they deemed fit.

 

[Marc Levin]

I am a criminal defense attorney. Making this case last until the end of the NFL season is the simplest thing in the world. And, if this story is true (I've yet to see a legitimate news outlet carry the story - PFT doesn't count), then I'd still be suspicious about the strength of the case, given that there was a 6 month delay in the filing of charges - that suggests either late reporting or evidentiary problems. I don't see this as being fantasy relevant until next season. Unless you have him in my leagues - then trade the turd to me at a discount please.

Right. And wouldn't they have to have dated photos of her bloody lip or whatever body part(s) he supposedly did damage to?

Her word and the fact that cops showed up to a domestic violence call would be good enough to bring charges, but if he was arrested at the scene, and she had ANY physical marking on her (including any bruising on the arms from being grabbed forcefully), they'd have snapped pics.

 

[Cecil Lammey]

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

How am I clouded? I am NOT A BRONCO FAN. yes, I cover the team but I am in fact more clear on this situation than most. When did I say that beating your girlfriend was immature? I said that Brandon Marshall was immature. Please keep my name out of your mouth unless you are posting a direct quote.Let me be very clear: beating your girlfriend is not right, in any situation.I was not EXCUSING Marshall for deplorable behavior.

 

[Tubalcane]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

What if his girlfriend was beating on him first? Does that make a difference? I'm not saying he's a stand up guy, but you seem to hate for the sake of hating - you have no f'in clue what actually transpired. None of us do.

Come on now, use some common sense. He's a professional athlete and as far as men go in the top 1% of strength in the world. He could easily contain her. The only justification he could have in attacking her would be if she came at him with a weapon. Now i guess that's possible and she's the one who cut his arm up, but i highly doubt she is powerful enough to even get close enough to him in a fight to slash his arm as bad as it was slashed. He could have threw her down long before she could have cut him that deep.So if it comes out that she actually knifed him then she's fair game, otherwise their is no excuse.But also it shows BM is an idiot for constantly being around a woman who calls the cops on him. It takes a pretty moronic person to stick around if someone is lying calling the police on you everyday.

I think you drastically underestimate the ability of a women to push the buttons of a male.

 

[moderated]

Just seen this scroll on ESPN. The circus is about to begin, Maybe Mark Schlerith(sp) can give us another lesson on morals today, tomorrow and everyday beyond. Get ready folks, ESPN has it now, they'll fill up hours of programming with it and before you know it Goodell will be forced to suspend him because it's going to put another blackeye on the NFL. Simple MathESPN yapping about Marshall all week+Bad Image for NFL+Roger Goodell=Suspension

VINDICATION, ONE TIME!!!Finally this loser is going to get what he deserves.I'm hoping for a year suspension but will settle for 8-10 games.

You two need to get a room...and thanks Cecil for the voice of reason here.

Cecil is clouded when it comes to Bronco's.He considers beating your girlfriend "immature". I would think it's a lot more then being immature, there was no age where i thought it was right to beat on females, even when i was a preteen. Excusing that as being immature is ridiculous.

youre a fool.

Let's tone it down hornet, no need to get personal. You have your thoughts and i have mine, if you can't/don't want to read mine then by all means block me.