Stompin' Tom Connors
Footballguy
And I respectfully think your dismissal of this feedback is indicative of either not really listening/understanding my issue, or not considering the fact that while something in a UI may be intuitive to its creator, the creator still needs to be open that users do not see it that way.Ok; I respectfully disagree here. If it says sit Golladay just look above to where Golladay is listed in the consensus lineup.
Three things:
1) If this is how I should read this, it's totally not intuitive.
2) If this is how I should read it, it is indeed a different experience than classic, and not an improvement IMHO. Note that in the classic version, Golladay shows up among a list of suggested alternate players in BOTH WR and FLEX line itmes, showing you what staffers think his relative value is against your starters and other potential FAs and players against each position separately (in the MyFBG experience Golladay shows up against other WRs in the consensus lineup, but only shows up as a start/sit once, as a WR in specific staff feedback -- not clear if he's a sit for WR but a start for flex, vice versa, neither, etc.).
3) I can appreciate that you may not have intended your post to come off snarky, but it's the way it landed with me when I'm only trying to provide feedback. I'm done providing it, so good luck, but would ask you to think about tone when someone is just trying to help.