What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Orleans Saints @ Seattle Seahawks Playoff Thread (2 Viewers)

That looked like obvious helmet to helmet. Not sure about the complaints
and you're obviously blind
I don't have access to dvr at the moment. If no helmet to helmet, he was hit in the head. Not sure what you were watching that made you think it wasn't a penalty
Penalty or not, it's horse#### and ruining the game

The safety is targeting the chest. The receiver is going to the ground and is less than 1 second from having his hands on the ball. The safety can only get so low so fast and still impact the play.

The rule should be about intention and it should be reviewable every time its called.
They probably don't need to add more reviewable plays.
They should probably focus on getting it right instead of assessing penalites because it looked bad at real speed

 
Anyone notice the PI the Harvin hit? Something was going to be called. They made the right one though; that was helmet on helmet.
Honestly, i really don' t know how you can control the way you hit at full speed. He either takes out his knees or aims for the middle of his body. Harvin bent over trying to prep for the hit. How can you stop yourself.

 
And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.

Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.
How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?

Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.
Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.
Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.

 
That looked like obvious helmet to helmet. Not sure about the complaints
and you're obviously blind
I don't have access to dvr at the moment. If no helmet to helmet, he was hit in the head. Not sure what you were watching that made you think it wasn't a penalty
Penalty or not, it's horse#### and ruining the game

The safety is targeting the chest. The receiver is going to the ground and is less than 1 second from having his hands on the ball. The safety can only get so low so fast and still impact the play.

The rule should be about intention and it should be reviewable every time its called.
They probably don't need to add more reviewable plays.
I tend to agree with his argument about WRs off balance and ducking. Problem is---Harvin was doing neither. That hit was textbook targeting and in college would have earned an ejection.

 
This is a very physical game. Love it. Though I think that as impressive as the Saints' effort has been so far, they're playing Seattle's game. They will be some broken down dudes by the fourth quarter at this rate.

When will New Orleans throw to a WR or TE?

 
And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.

Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.
How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?

Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.
Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.
Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.
So they aren't cheap and dirty hits, or you can't tell why they are, just that, "they just are"?

 
That looked like obvious helmet to helmet. Not sure about the complaints
and you're obviously blind
I don't have access to dvr at the moment. If no helmet to helmet, he was hit in the head. Not sure what you were watching that made you think it wasn't a penalty
Penalty or not, it's horse#### and ruining the game

The safety is targeting the chest. The receiver is going to the ground and is less than 1 second from having his hands on the ball. The safety can only get so low so fast and still impact the play.

The rule should be about intention and it should be reviewable every time its called.
They probably don't need to add more reviewable plays.
They should probably focus on getting it right instead of assessing penalites because it looked bad at real speed
How are you going to review "intention"?

 
This is a very physical game. Love it. Though I think that as impressive as the Saints' effort has been so far, they're playing Seattle's game. They will be some broken down dudes by the fourth quarter at this rate.

When will New Orleans throw to a WR or TE?
Once Seattle's defense is all tired out from these smashmouth running plays.

 
And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.

Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.
How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?

Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.
Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.
Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.
So they aren't cheap and dirty hits, or you can't tell why they are, just that, "they just are"?
Sorry, perhaps you missed the flag.

 
And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.

Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.
How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.
Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.
Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.
So they aren't cheap and dirty hits, or you can't tell why they are, just that, "they just are"?
When you go after the head of a guy with concussion issues in the past on his first down field target of the game and your franchise and coach have a history of putting bounties on hurting the other teams best player, I don't think it's unfair to point it out. Could it have been accidental? Sure. Did it look dirty? Yup.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top