mad sweeney
Footballguy
Weird how I don't see you making the same reply to all the other posts that are clearly meant to anger others.Was this meant to anger someone? I cannot see any purpose in posting this.Who dat secondary that cheats?
Weird how I don't see you making the same reply to all the other posts that are clearly meant to anger others.Was this meant to anger someone? I cannot see any purpose in posting this.Who dat secondary that cheats?
They should probably focus on getting it right instead of assessing penalites because it looked bad at real speedThey probably don't need to add more reviewable plays.Penalty or not, it's horse#### and ruining the gameI don't have access to dvr at the moment. If no helmet to helmet, he was hit in the head. Not sure what you were watching that made you think it wasn't a penaltyand you're obviously blindThat looked like obvious helmet to helmet. Not sure about the complaints
The safety is targeting the chest. The receiver is going to the ground and is less than 1 second from having his hands on the ball. The safety can only get so low so fast and still impact the play.
The rule should be about intention and it should be reviewable every time its called.
5 minutes into this game and it shows why Hawks fans are the worst on this board.
Honestly, i really don' t know how you can control the way you hit at full speed. He either takes out his knees or aims for the middle of his body. Harvin bent over trying to prep for the hit. How can you stop yourself.Anyone notice the PI the Harvin hit? Something was going to be called. They made the right one though; that was helmet on helmet.
Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.
Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
Only hard hits when Seattle does it, when the Saints do it, it's cheap and dirty.Looks like the saints came to play ball today. Some hard hitting going on out there.
Now you're getting it.Only hard hits when Seattle does it, when the Saints do it, it's cheap and dirty.Looks like the saints came to play ball today. Some hard hitting going on out there.
I tend to agree with his argument about WRs off balance and ducking. Problem is---Harvin was doing neither. That hit was textbook targeting and in college would have earned an ejection.They probably don't need to add more reviewable plays.Penalty or not, it's horse#### and ruining the gameI don't have access to dvr at the moment. If no helmet to helmet, he was hit in the head. Not sure what you were watching that made you think it wasn't a penaltyand you're obviously blindThat looked like obvious helmet to helmet. Not sure about the complaints
The safety is targeting the chest. The receiver is going to the ground and is less than 1 second from having his hands on the ball. The safety can only get so low so fast and still impact the play.
The rule should be about intention and it should be reviewable every time its called.
You gonna do this all day?Only hard hits when Seattle does it, when the Saints do it, it's cheap and dirty.Looks like the saints came to play ball today. Some hard hitting going on out there.
So they aren't cheap and dirty hits, or you can't tell why they are, just that, "they just are"?Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.
Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
The flags on the goalposts were limp.Bad call IMO given the conditions
How are you going to review "intention"?They should probably focus on getting it right instead of assessing penalites because it looked bad at real speedThey probably don't need to add more reviewable plays.Penalty or not, it's horse#### and ruining the gameI don't have access to dvr at the moment. If no helmet to helmet, he was hit in the head. Not sure what you were watching that made you think it wasn't a penaltyand you're obviously blindThat looked like obvious helmet to helmet. Not sure about the complaints
The safety is targeting the chest. The receiver is going to the ground and is less than 1 second from having his hands on the ball. The safety can only get so low so fast and still impact the play.
The rule should be about intention and it should be reviewable every time its called.
It's Claude. And yes. They'll call that hit every time; as they should.you serious Clark?Anyone notice the PI the Harvin hit? Something was going to be called. They made the right one though; that was helmet on helmet.
Once Seattle's defense is all tired out from these smashmouth running plays.This is a very physical game. Love it. Though I think that as impressive as the Saints' effort has been so far, they're playing Seattle's game. They will be some broken down dudes by the fourth quarter at this rate.
When will New Orleans throw to a WR or TE?
Now you're getting it.Only hard hits when Seattle does it, when the Saints do it, it's cheap and dirty.Looks like the saints came to play ball today. Some hard hitting going on out there.
Sorry, perhaps you missed the flag.So they aren't cheap and dirty hits, or you can't tell why they are, just that, "they just are"?Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.
Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.
Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.
When you go after the head of a guy with concussion issues in the past on his first down field target of the game and your franchise and coach have a history of putting bounties on hurting the other teams best player, I don't think it's unfair to point it out. Could it have been accidental? Sure. Did it look dirty? Yup.So they aren't cheap and dirty hits, or you can't tell why they are, just that, "they just are"?Sorry, no way would that accusation ever be made or stick to the Saints.Again, tell me how they are cheap and dirty hits.What's going to be funny is when there's a flag on Seattle and you take the other viewpoint.How are they dirty and cheap? Because they are hard hits?Laughable coming from a Seahawk fan.Soon as the saints stop making cheap and dirty (and probably smart) hits we'll stop pointing it out.And quit with the cheap and dirty talk.
Big stand by the Saints after that horrid series and punt.