Breesisdaman
Footballguy
It will be available in the fiction sectionRumor is someone also is expected to film the beatdown the Saints will get tomorrow.
It will be available in the fiction sectionRumor is someone also is expected to film the beatdown the Saints will get tomorrow.
To be fair 60 of Shorts yards came in the 4th quarter when the starters were on the sidelines and 59 yards came on a single play where there was blown coverage (which isn't going to happen often vs. Seattle). So 4th quarter garbage time and 1 blown play account for 119 of Shorts 143 yards.It's kind if interesting to me how SEA had this stretch of Hilton, Andre and Shorts all having big days against them... and then nothing, nada, zip, no WR or TE has gone over 100 yards against them since (Boldin got close at 8/6/93/0).
And then we saw what they did vs the Saints. Just plain all out coverage all over the field plus terrific technique. Would be nice to find the weakness there but ..
Yes. I hear to combat it they all wore their pants backwards.Will practicing on a field with a Husky logo screw up their mindset?
Nah, they brought their Super Bowl trophy and are just staring at it for motivation.Will practicing on a field with a Husky logo screw up their mindset?
In the first game against Seattle Brees was 0/8 on passes attempted over 16 yards.SaintsInDome2006 said:seahawk 17 said:As a football fan, I love Drew Brees and one of the reasons is that he can't stop himself from taking big shots downfield. Not the recipe for success against Seattle, and it will be his downfall.proninja said:Let me rephrase: I don't think long, slow drives will work for them consistently. If they can put those together all game, they win.Henry Ford said:This is actually what I've been saying about the Saints for the past few pages. I don't agree that the Hawks' chances go up if the Saints game plan to do this. They're very, very good at it.proninja said:Underneath over the middle is what scares me. Without KJ playing at an all pro level (for the last Saints game, anyway) there could be a lot more there for Graham. But if all the Saints get is long, slow drives with runs and short passes over the middle, I like the hawks chances. IMO the way the Saints beat the hawks is for their strength, Brees, to beat our strength, the secondary. If Brees can't throw the ball downfield, it's going to be really tough to win.
But I do think Brees will take his shots downfield. And I do think if he doesn't hit them, they don't win. But really, I don't know that much, and could be way off base.He pretty much did Game 1, didn't he?I love Drew Brees and one of the reasons is that he can't stop himself from taking big shots downfield.
I recall one deep ball to Meachem out the gate, but that was largely it.
No INTs either.
I seem to recall him picking us a lot in big games. He must have some affinity for the Saints, but I have no idea why. Adam Schein used to do that on NFL Radio too.Merrill Hodge likes the Saints
I would rather not. I don't think much of Ingram at all, so if Thomas is out I won't be too mad about that. He's looked good when healthy this year, and I think we all agree the Saints need to run the ball effectively tomorrow to win.Pierre is officially questionable. Man it would be nice to have him.
I think Cowherd picked the Saints too, not sure. He said it would be close and then was gonna make his pick and I got busy doing something else and missed it.I seem to recall him picking us a lot in big games. He must have some affinity for the Saints, but I have no idea why. Adam Schein used to do that on NFL Radio too.Merrill Hodge likes the Saints
That's certainly what I think. They need to make the run a threat so at least some guys don't immediately drop into coverage, giving Brees a chance to find a wrinkle for some timely passes. If the run does nothing and it's 4 man rushes with 7 in coverage all day, that'll be all she wrote.I would rather not. I don't think much of Ingram at all, so if Thomas is out I won't be too mad about that. He's looked good when healthy this year, and I think we all agree the Saints need to run the ball effectively tomorrow to win.Pierre is officially questionable. Man it would be nice to have him.
2TDs to 5 INTs in 5 games seems like the numbers may be wrong. If only because he's thrown a TD pass in all but one game over the last four and a half seasons or so.Since people are talking about the weather.......Anyone else see Total Access tonight? I caught the end of a segment that said Brees was 0-5 in the rain with 2TDs to 5INTs. There had to be some other factor though, since it was only 5 games.
I'm pretty sure it was 2TDs-5INTs, but like I said I just caught the end of it....Either way it's a ridiculous stat that carries no weight, just curios which 5 games they were talking about if anyone saw it.2TDs to 5 INTs in 5 games seems like the numbers may be wrong. If only because he's thrown a TD pass in all but one game over the last four and a half seasons or so.Since people are talking about the weather.......Anyone else see Total Access tonight? I caught the end of a segment that said Brees was 0-5 in the rain with 2TDs to 5INTs. There had to be some other factor though, since it was only 5 games.
I'm pretty sure it was 2TDs-5INTs, but like I said I just caught the end of it....Either way it's a ridiculous stat that carries no weight, just curios which 5 games they were talking about if anyone saw it.2TDs to 5 INTs in 5 games seems like the numbers may be wrong. If only because he's thrown a TD pass in all but one game over the last four and a half seasons or so.Since people are talking about the weather.......Anyone else see Total Access tonight? I caught the end of a segment that said Brees was 0-5 in the rain with 2TDs to 5INTs. There had to be some other factor though, since it was only 5 games.
The 5 games were Brees record in the rain. By the way 4:45 am in Seattle and it is raining and very, very windy. Rain is coming down sideways in many different directions due to wind gusts. Hawks have won many games in these exact conditions.I'm pretty sure it was 2TDs-5INTs, but like I said I just caught the end of it....Either way it's a ridiculous stat that carries no weight, just curios which 5 games they were talking about if anyone saw it.2TDs to 5 INTs in 5 games seems like the numbers may be wrong. If only because he's thrown a TD pass in all but one game over the last four and a half seasons or so.Since people are talking about the weather.......Anyone else see Total Access tonight? I caught the end of a segment that said Brees was 0-5 in the rain with 2TDs to 5INTs. There had to be some other factor though, since it was only 5 games.
He just had Popeyes. Cut him some slack.I honestly just can't stand Brees with all his licking his fingers.
Eight, that's more than I figured but perhaps I was thinking more of the deeper (well deeper than 16) variety like the early pass to Meachem.In the first game against Seattle Brees was 0/8 on passes attempted over 16 yards.SaintsInDome2006 said:seahawk 17 said:As a football fan, I love Drew Brees and one of the reasons is that he can't stop himself from taking big shots downfield. Not the recipe for success against Seattle, and it will be his downfall.proninja said:Let me rephrase: I don't think long, slow drives will work for them consistently. If they can put those together all game, they win.Henry Ford said:This is actually what I've been saying about the Saints for the past few pages. I don't agree that the Hawks' chances go up if the Saints game plan to do this. They're very, very good at it.proninja said:Underneath over the middle is what scares me. Without KJ playing at an all pro level (for the last Saints game, anyway) there could be a lot more there for Graham. But if all the Saints get is long, slow drives with runs and short passes over the middle, I like the hawks chances. IMO the way the Saints beat the hawks is for their strength, Brees, to beat our strength, the secondary. If Brees can't throw the ball downfield, it's going to be really tough to win.
But I do think Brees will take his shots downfield. And I do think if he doesn't hit them, they don't win. But really, I don't know that much, and could be way off base.He pretty much did Game 1, didn't he?I love Drew Brees and one of the reasons is that he can't stop himself from taking big shots downfield.
I recall one deep ball to Meachem out the gate, but that was largely it.
No INTs either.
http://www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2013/12/drew_brees_passing_game_vs_the_11.html
I just wanted to point out what a great article this is.WARNING: Following article by respected professional football statistical analyst could be harmful to the health of New Orleans Saints fans.
http://www.footballperspective.com/division-preview-new-orleans-at-seattle/#more-16781
Division Preview: New Orleans at Seattle by Chase Stuart on January 10, 2014 in Current Events, Playoffs
...
The 20-point difference between Seattle’s average home margin and the New Orleans’ average road margin — which, for brevity’s sake, I’m going to call the “projected MOV” — is very high, even by historical standards. In fact, only 20 playoff games since 1950 featured a game with a larger projected MOV.
The average points spread was Home Team -9.3. Based on the points spread in each game, we would have expected the home team to win exactly 74% of their games. In other words, Vegas has typically done a good job in these situations. And the Seahawks, with a projected MOV of 20.0 and a points spread of -8, fit comfortable into this group. Giving the team a 70-75% chance of winning seems reasonable.
Establishing the run sounds easy, but the only way to do it is to be effective on first down carries. As it turns out, the Saints are pretty good at that. During the regular season, New Orleans averaged 5.29 YPC on 1st-and-10 runs in the first three quarters when the score was within 14 points That was the 2nd best rate in the league, trailing only Chicago. The best defense in those situations was the Jets, allowing just 3.17 yards per carry. The second best? Seattle, at 3.29. This is a true matchup of strength versus strength.
Of course, the real strength in this game belongs to the Seattle pass defense. And you can even extend that to the whole Seattle passing game. In 2013, the Seahawks averaged 7.26 ANY/A (Russell Wilson, while not throwing often, threw efficiently) and allowed 3.19 ANY/A, for a remarkable 4.07 ANY/A differential. ... Seattle’s 4.07 ANY/A differential is the 9th best since 1970. The table below shows the top 25 in ANY/A differential from 1970 to 2013: half of the first 24 teams made the Super Bowl, with nine of them winning it all. ... Take a moment and admire that Washington averaged 5 more ANY/A than it allowed in 1991. That’s incredible. But the team from the state of Washington in 2013 is pretty darn good, too. Teams that are dominant in the passing game tend to do very well, and I’m not too keen to go against history here.
While the Seahawks dominated most of the pass differential metrics, the Saints made history in one of these categories, too. New Orleans gained 4918 passing yards and allowed only 3105 passing yards. That 1813 yard difference is largest by any NFL team in history. The 1961 Oilers, led by George Blanda, Bill Groman, and Charley Hennigan, actually gained 2,001 more passing yards than they allowed, but Houston of course was an AFL team. And there’s a bit of an asterisk here because of the games played: the 1943 Bears, 1951 Rams, and 1967 Jets also had a larger passing yards differential on a per-game basis. But regardless, that puts the Saints in some pretty impressive company. The Oilers, Bears, and Rams all won their league’s championships that season, and Joe Namath’s Jets won the Super Bowl the next season. The team with the fifth largest passing yards differential on a per-game basis, prior to the Saints, was the 2006 Colts, also a Super Bowl champion.
Prediction: Seattle 31, New Orleans 14
You should have lead with how awesome those sweats are.http://saintsreport.com/forums/f2/saints-practice-pics-1-10-seattle-318835/#.UtC8p3ky3Kc
Saints walk through at Huskies stadium. Warning there are allegations in the thread that Carroll taped the last walk through at the Clink. Whether true or not Carroll is bringing a lot of this type heat on himself with the Teams PED' trouble and the "beating the odds" on getting flagged for PI tactics. Then the USC stuff. I don't know if "Spying" is the real reason the Saints were slippery in selecting their walk through site and then changing it last minute this time but some fans have jumped to those conclusions so be warned before clicking the link.
Maybe with the high winds SEA bunches up on the line more thinking the Saints won't pass, so maybe this hurts, but it hurts both teams. Also right now, Wilson will be affected by the wind just as much and maybe more as Brees is extremely effective in short range passing, again, I'll more than take it.During the regular season, New Orleans averaged 5.29 YPC on 1st-and-10 runs in the first three quarters when the score was within 14 points.
Good points. I like the saints chances if the long passing game of both teams is taken away. Saints pass D much worse than Seattle pass D. A grind em out game with FG's? I'm in. If Nostradamus said this game was going to end 15 - 12, I'd be ecstatic.How about an "on the ground" wind and rain report?
In terms of rain, it's been covered but we don't mean the misty thing, is it "heavy"?
I am happy with high winds, the Saints were going to have to play a nearly perfect game with a pass heavy approach.
Maybe with the high winds SEA bunches up on the line more thinking the Saints won't pass, so maybe this hurts, but it hurts both teams. Also right now, Wilson will be affected by the wind just as much and maybe more as Brees is extremely effective in short range passing, again, I'll more than take it.During the regular season, New Orleans averaged 5.29 YPC on 1st-and-10 runs in the first three quarters when the score was within 14 points.
Maybe the stat does carry some weight then, I just find it hard to believe Brees has only played 5 games in the rain which is why I was thinking there was some other factor.The 5 games were Brees record in the rain. By the way 4:45 am in Seattle and it is raining and very, very windy. Rain is coming down sideways in many different directions due to wind gusts. Hawks have won many games in these exact conditions.I'm pretty sure it was 2TDs-5INTs, but like I said I just caught the end of it....Either way it's a ridiculous stat that carries no weight, just curios which 5 games they were talking about if anyone saw it.2TDs to 5 INTs in 5 games seems like the numbers may be wrong. If only because he's thrown a TD pass in all but one game over the last four and a half seasons or so.Since people are talking about the weather.......Anyone else see Total Access tonight? I caught the end of a segment that said Brees was 0-5 in the rain with 2TDs to 5INTs. There had to be some other factor though, since it was only 5 games.
Well, then at least three of those games were pre-2008 or so. Which is cool and all, but Wilson was still in high school. I don't think he was doing much better.I'm pretty sure it was 2TDs-5INTs, but like I said I just caught the end of it....Either way it's a ridiculous stat that carries no weight, just curios which 5 games they were talking about if anyone saw it.2TDs to 5 INTs in 5 games seems like the numbers may be wrong. If only because he's thrown a TD pass in all but one game over the last four and a half seasons or so.Since people are talking about the weather.......Anyone else see Total Access tonight? I caught the end of a segment that said Brees was 0-5 in the rain with 2TDs to 5INTs. There had to be some other factor though, since it was only 5 games.
Weren't the Saints the #2 pass D in the league?Good points. I like the saints chances if the long passing game of both teams is taken away. Saints pass D much worse than Seattle pass D. A grind em out game with FG's? I'm in. If Nostradamus said this game was going to end 15 - 12, I'd be ecstatic.How about an "on the ground" wind and rain report?
In terms of rain, it's been covered but we don't mean the misty thing, is it "heavy"?
I am happy with high winds, the Saints were going to have to play a nearly perfect game with a pass heavy approach.
Maybe with the high winds SEA bunches up on the line more thinking the Saints won't pass, so maybe this hurts, but it hurts both teams. Also right now, Wilson will be affected by the wind just as much and maybe more as Brees is extremely effective in short range passing, again, I'll more than take it.During the regular season, New Orleans averaged 5.29 YPC on 1st-and-10 runs in the first three quarters when the score was within 14 points.
Banged up right now. Loss of Vacarro was huge. Not a fan of Harper covering anybodyWeren't the Saints the #2 pass D in the league?Good points. I like the saints chances if the long passing game of both teams is taken away. Saints pass D much worse than Seattle pass D. A grind em out game with FG's? I'm in. If Nostradamus said this game was going to end 15 - 12, I'd be ecstatic.How about an "on the ground" wind and rain report?
In terms of rain, it's been covered but we don't mean the misty thing, is it "heavy"?
I am happy with high winds, the Saints were going to have to play a nearly perfect game with a pass heavy approach.
Maybe with the high winds SEA bunches up on the line more thinking the Saints won't pass, so maybe this hurts, but it hurts both teams. Also right now, Wilson will be affected by the wind just as much and maybe more as Brees is extremely effective in short range passing, again, I'll more than take it.During the regular season, New Orleans averaged 5.29 YPC on 1st-and-10 runs in the first three quarters when the score was within 14 points.
Fair enough. Harper had his one good coverage play of the season last week, so no doubt will fall apart this week.Banged up right now. Loss of Vacarro was huge. Not a fan of Harper covering anybodyWeren't the Saints the #2 pass D in the league?Good points. I like the saints chances if the long passing game of both teams is taken away. Saints pass D much worse than Seattle pass D. A grind em out game with FG's? I'm in. If Nostradamus said this game was going to end 15 - 12, I'd be ecstatic.How about an "on the ground" wind and rain report?
In terms of rain, it's been covered but we don't mean the misty thing, is it "heavy"?
I am happy with high winds, the Saints were going to have to play a nearly perfect game with a pass heavy approach.
Maybe with the high winds SEA bunches up on the line more thinking the Saints won't pass, so maybe this hurts, but it hurts both teams. Also right now, Wilson will be affected by the wind just as much and maybe more as Brees is extremely effective in short range passing, again, I'll more than take it.During the regular season, New Orleans averaged 5.29 YPC on 1st-and-10 runs in the first three quarters when the score was within 14 points.
Quite the opposite. One end of the stadium is open.Doesn't the structure of the Seahawks' stadium prevent wind from being a major problem? Or am I imagining that?
That's the Superdome.Doesn't the structure of the Seahawks' stadium prevent wind from being a major problem? Or am I imagining that?
I don't remember the specific play, but I think it was on the field goal drive by the Eagles right before the end. I turned to my wife and said "well, there's his great play for the year. Better hope they don't get the ball back."Which big coverage play did Harper have last week, the one where he tripped and fell when he was right in between the ball & Cooper in the end zone?
wind should help the under also.Line is zooming to 10 with the weather news.
Love the under (which is ~47.5 I think)!wind should help the under also.Line is zooming to 10 with the weather news.
haha...i know they say it about at least a couple open air stadiums. thought seattle was one.That's the Superdome.Doesn't the structure of the Seahawks' stadium prevent wind from being a major problem? Or am I imagining that?
A huge number of those holds were Charles Brown.Seattle's secondary leads the league in PI. Saints lead the league in offensive holding. This does not bode well for either team.
http://nfl.si.com/2014/01/11/nfl-officials-playoff-game-calls/
Line is zooming to 10 with the weather news.
You guys can't quit being snarky for ten minutes, can you.Line is zooming to 10 with the weather news.![]()
Line moved to Seattle because of some huge sharp plays, weather prediction hasn't changed.
The truth is snarky now?You guys can't quit being snarky for ten minutes, can you.Line is zooming to 10 with the weather news.![]()
Line moved to Seattle because of some huge sharp plays, weather prediction hasn't changed.