What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

New study out Millienials worse off than Boomers (2 Viewers)

For full disclosure, I am a member of a labor union, have a history degree and just got done teaching a 3 week unit on business and labor unions during the late 1800s and early 1900s. 
Do you mind messaging me, the books or sites you used? I know my husband and I would probably enjoy reading this.

 
I agree with you that is was bad back then, I just think the views on  and push to get rid of unions is even stronger now.
I think you need to make a distinction between public and private sector unions to advance your argument. 

I see tons of pro-union coverage. 

I think the turn of the century also needs to be distinguished because the Wagner Act wasn't passed until 1937, and by then we had the buildup to war, and the reconstruction afterwards, which put downward pressure on unions and upward pressure on productivity. 

 
Sure, but labor unions were literally painted as communist fronts plotting to overthrow the government in the past. 
Now they are painted as freeloading drunks that want everything handed to them without having to work for it, while ruining our economy.

 
Sure, but labor unions were literally painted as communist fronts plotting to overthrow the government in the past. 
And employers were granted injunctions against unions from even existing. 

The tactics unions used were different back then and is reflected as such.*

And unions often were democratic socialist fronts, but we're getting way off topic. 

*By that I mean sit-downs, wildcats, and secondary strikes which are illegal today under the aegis of the original Wagner Act.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you need to make a distinction between public and private sector unions to advance your argument. 

I see tons of pro-union coverage. 

I think the turn of the century also needs to be distinguished because the Wagner Act wasn't passed until 1937, and by then we had the buildup to war, and the reconstruction afterwards, which put downward pressure on unions and upward pressure on productivity. 
You are probably right on the positive pieces you see on unions now compared to back then. We are all a victim of the time we live in, and the fact that I married into a very pro-union family and they have been in some kind of union for the last 50 years could skew my views a little.

 
And employers were granted injunctions against unions from even existing. 

The tactics unions used were different back then and is reflected as such.*

And unions often were democratic socialist fronts, but we're getting way off topic. 

*By that I mean sit-downs, wildcats, and secondary strikes which are illegal today under the aegis of the original Wagner Act.  
We are getting back to this point, at least in the midwest. Right to work, Prevailing wage laws are all either under attack or used to attack unions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also millennials are labeled as lazy, but that is the exact reputation Gen Xers had in the 90s. 
It seems like every generation says this about the next generation. I just think they are different, and different usually scares the masses.

 
You are probably right on the positive pieces you see on unions now compared to back then. We are all a victim of the time we live in, and the fact that I married into a very pro-union family and they have been in some kind of union for the last 50 years could skew my views a little.
My brother heads his teacher's union for either his district or his town, so my family is involved as well. Plenty of pro-union coverage in the media; plenty of resentment by the public and the school boards. 

 
I think right-to-work is much different than yellow dog contracts or granting injunctive relief against mere organizing. 

I think Ilov80s would do better describing this than I would; I just see a lot of distinctions between turn-of-the-century labor movements and modern ones in the organization, tactics, and perception thereof.  But I'm more of a dilettante. I took Labor Law in law school and delved into the history as a backdrop, and I've read my Howard Zinn and also a more modern author (Kevin Carson), but my brother schools me on labor law and the pressures and rules just from being the union rep.  

I'm also deeply free market, so I take more of Ayn Rand's approach to unions. Private unions and organization, fine. If subjected to market pressures and everyone is union, then unionism does sort of rule the day. Public unions, where public services are providing and bargaining is essentially contra-public, disastrous.

But this is not my area of expertise.   

 
Why is educating people online the answer? 
Cost mostly.

Higher education is like religion to me. I have as beauteous a love for the idea and possibilties of temples of learning as i do for the chance of a God, but religion & college are abiding institutions because of their means for population control, not the ends of their aspirations. Did not even apply to college - mostly in vengeful response to a father who was a scholarship boy and presumed i would be to the extent that he announced he would be spending that disposable portion of his income on vacations rather than college fund, but also because i wanted to see if i could make my way on my own - but saw a lot of them on tour and they looked like orgy pits and branding pens. That would be just barely excusable now except for the frightful and mostly useless cost.

If America is to remain the Land of the Big Idea and, thus, the beacon of progress for the world, we must be always willing to paddle the canoe faster than the rapids which would propel us toward the rocks. We cannot be willing to condemn coal hollers and steel towns as anachronisms and not hallowed halls and Top 5 Conferences.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To try and connect the ends of this thread, at my school we have some issues with younger staff members joining the unions. They are very resistant. It isn't that they are anti-union, they just don't want to give them money because they don't see the benefit to it. It takes a lot of explaining on why this important, but some are very selfish or short sighted. 

 
Cost mostly.

Higher education is like religion to me. I have as beauteous a love for the idea and possibilties of temples of learning as i do for the chance of a God, but religion & college are abiding institutions because of their means for population control, not the ends of their aspirations. Did not even apply to college - mostly in vengeful response to a father who was a scholarship boy and presumed i would be to the extent that he announced he would be spending that disposable portion of his income on vacations rather than college fund, but also be i wanted to see if i could make my way on my own - but saw a lot of them on tour and they looked like orgy pits and branding pens. That would be just barely excusable except for the frightful and mostly useless cost.

If America is to remain the Land of the Big Idea, we must be always willing to paddle the canoe faster than the rapids which would propel us toward the rocks. We cannot be willing to condemn coal hollers and steel towns as anachronisms and not hallowed halls and Top 5 Conferences.
They still do. They did in the nineties, and they do now. My higher education experience was akin to a sleep away camp. My boarding school experience in high school and then my non-profit job where I got to read for five years taught me way more than my own self-discipline allowed me at the university I went to.  

 
Cost mostly.

Higher education is like religion to me. I have as beauteous a love for the idea and possibilties of temples of learning as i do for the chance of a God, but religion & college are abiding institutions because of their means for population control, not the ends of their aspirations. Did not even apply to college - mostly in vengeful response to a father who was a scholarship boy and presumed i would be to the extent that he announced he would be spending that disposable portion of his income on vacations rather than college fund, but also because i wanted to see if i could make my way on my own - but saw a lot of them on tour and they looked like orgy pits and branding pens. That would be just barely excusable now except for the frightful and mostly useless cost.

If America is to remain the Land of the Big Idea, we must be always willing to paddle the canoe faster than the rapids which would propel us toward the rocks. We cannot be willing to condemn coal hollers and steel towns as anachronisms and not hallowed halls and Top 5 Conferences.
So you are saying only secondary education online?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To try and connect the ends of this thread, at my school we have some issues with younger staff members joining the unions. They are very resistant. It isn't that they are anti-union, they just don't want to give them money because they don't see the benefit to it. It takes a lot of explaining on why this important, but some are very selfish or short sighted. 
Millenials?

;)

 
Cost mostly.

Higher education is like religion to me. I have as beauteous a love for the idea and possibilties of temples of learning as i do for the chance of a God, but religion & college are abiding institutions because of their means for population control, not the ends of their aspirations. Did not even apply to college - mostly in vengeful response to a father who was a scholarship boy and presumed i would be to the extent that he announced he would be spending that disposable portion of his income on vacations rather than college fund, but also because i wanted to see if i could make my way on my own - but saw a lot of them on tour and they looked like orgy pits and branding pens. That would be just barely excusable now except for the frightful and mostly useless cost.

If America is to remain the Land of the Big Idea, we must be always willing to paddle the canoe faster than the rapids which would propel us toward the rocks. We cannot be willing to condemn coal hollers and steel towns as anachronisms and not hallowed halls and Top 5 Conferences.
So you are really only speaking to higher ed? Almost every college has online programs. I got my masters online. I do think socialization and connections are major reason college is important and can't fully be replaced by online classes. We argue whether the current level of socialization is good or bad, but it is important. 

 
So you are really only speaking to higher ed? Almost every college has online programs. I got my masters online. I do think socialization and connections are major reason college is important and can't fully be replaced by online classes. We argue whether the current level of socialization is good or bad, but it is important. 
This is what I was getting at. For primary education there is no way you can have it all online or even most of it online without having a very bad effect on the future generations, and I agree with you about the bolded part for the 1st four years of college.

 
So you are really only speaking to higher ed? Almost every college has online programs. I got my masters online. I do think socialization and connections are major reason college is important and can't fully be replaced by online classes. We argue whether the current level of socialization is good or bad, but it is important. 
I'm saying we gotta strip the ####er down, education top-to-bottom, as surely as we do govt and our manufacturing economy. i have some fairly revolutionary theories on education, esPECially @ the beginning, which i will eventually outline (after the more urgent & important behavioral stuff) on the blog i'll be releasing this year but, for the purposes of this thread, i'm insisting that higher education exists as it does as a social institution more than a laboratory of learning and is a Leviathan which deserves to be founding gasping its last on the shores of progress without a major overhaul.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is what I was getting at. For primary education there is no way you can have it all online or even most of it online

So you are really only speaking to higher ed? Almost every college has online programs. I got my masters online. I do think socialization and connections are major reason college is important and can't fully be replaced by online classes. We argue whether the current level of socialization is good or bad, but it is important. 
So if it is so important to party for four years while getting a degree that won't get you a job, why are people complaiining about the price then?

 
So if it is so important to party for four years while getting a degree that won't get you a job, why are people complaiining about the price then?
I didn't say party. Now there are a lot of people that choose to use college as little more than a big party. That's on them and it could end up having a longterm negative impact on their life (fail out of school, develop drinking/drug/sex problems, not getting positioned to gain employment, etc). There are people that do more than just party at college. They meet life long friends, make connections with future potential employers, do internships, join clubs, play sports, do charity, do research, etc. 

 
I didn't say party. Now there are a lot of people that choose to use college as little more than a big party. That's on them and it could end up having a longterm negative impact on their life (fail out of school, develop drinking/drug/sex problems, not getting positioned to gain employment, etc). There are people that do more than just party at college. They meet life long friends, make connections with future potential employers, do internships, join clubs, play sports, do charity, do research, etc. 
I would guess that there is a significant correlation between them that see it as a big party and those that come out with a massive debt and a hard time getting ahead

 
I'm saying we gotta strip the ####er down, education top-to-bottom, as surely as we do govt and our manufacturing economy. i have some fairly revolutionary theories on education, esPECially @ the beginning, which i will eventually outline (after the more urgent & important behavioral stuff) on the blog i'll be releasing this year but, for the purposes of this thread, i'm insisting that higher education exists as it does as a social institution more than a laboratory of learning and is a Leviathan which deserves to be founding gasping its last on the shores of progress without a major overhaul.
I am definitely interested to read your blog. However, I will leave this post alone and it could have it's own thread and would take us way off track. 

 
I'm saying we gotta strip the ####er down, education top-to-bottom, as surely as we do govt and our manufacturing economy. i have some fairly revolutionary theories on education, esPECially @ the beginning, which i will eventually outline (after the more urgent & important behavioral stuff) on the blog i'll be releasing this year but, for the purposes of this thread, i'm insisting that higher education exists as it does as a social institution more than a laboratory of learning and is a Leviathan which deserves to be founding gasping its last on the shores of progress without a major overhaul.
I would be interested in reading it as well.

 
I would guess that there is a significant correlation between them that see it as a big party and those that come out with a massive debt and a hard time getting ahead
As you said, it's a guess, but lets not act like Gen X didn't party their asses off in college. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As you said, it's a guess, but lets not act like Gen X didn't party their asses off in college. 
Of course we did. And there were a lot of (what turned ut to be) useless education going on.

Like last year's draft it might be early to pass judgment on the Millennials, or at least broadbrushing them.

If I may offer an opinion, then it seems as if, while many acknowledge that the leeway for slacking off has steadily reduced since the boomer's heyday, the Millenials seem to whine more about it (could be an effect of more efficient communications) and do less about it (while at the same time wanting to change the world, just as soon as they finish their cafe latte or maybe tomorrow)

 
I am definitely interested to read your blog. However, I will leave this post alone and it could have it's own thread and would take us way off track. 
fair enough

I would be interested in reading it as well.
If the powers-that-be allow it, i'll be promoting it pretty heavily around here when the time comes. It was supposed to open last fall, but the key to it - beyond thrice-weekly columning - is a handbook for self-reform (using personal inventory, behavioral checklists & emotional waste management to clear the way for happiness and productivity) that is being written for posterity as much as anything and, therefore, brings out my natural fussiness in extremis, causing delays. Will keep you apprised.....

 
Of course we did. And there were a lot of (what turned ut to be) useless education going on.

Like last year's draft it might be early to pass judgment on the Millennials, or at least broadbrushing them.

If I may offer an opinion, then it seems as if, while many acknowledge that the leeway for slacking off has steadily reduced since the boomer's heyday, the Millenials seem to whine more about it (could be an effect of more efficient communications) and do less about it (while at the same time wanting to change the world, just as soon as they finish their cafe latte or maybe tomorrow)
Funny, people said a lot of the same stuff about the lazy self absorbed "Friends generation". 

 
Funny, people said a lot of the same stuff about the lazy self absorbed "Friends generation". 
They seemed like a bunch of wankers, the lot of 'em

(The characters in "Friends", obviously)

But at least most of them had jobs :P  

 
They seemed like a bunch of wankers, the lot of 'em

(The characters in "Friends", obviously)

But at least most of them had jobs :P  
Yeah, they worked really hard, earned evey thing they had. Friends was the ultimate Gen X fantasy. You live with all your friends, drink coffee all day and almost never have to worry about anything except you and your friends personal problems. Just kidding, I am on the border between Gen X and Millen, depends what source you look at. I'm either a young Xer or old Millen. I see both sides, but self identify with the latter. 

 
I don't think that Millenials are lazy so much as they just have different priorities. They'll work hard for something they believe in, but when you aren't motivated by material wealth or career achievement benchmarks (climbing the corporate ladder), then you'll focus on things other than historical measures of success and ambition, which leads to a perception by prior generations of a lack of work ethic (i.e., laziness). This is a rank generalization of course, and based in large part on my anecdotal experiences. But a fair number of millenials I've worked with have the attitude that they're okay making less money if they don't have to work as many hours, thus freeing them to pursue other passions.  Many in my world consider that a hallmark of laziness, but others may consider it evidence of a healthy outlook on life. 

 
I don't think that Millenials are lazy so much as they just have different priorities. They'll work hard for something they believe in, but when you aren't motivated by material wealth or career achievement benchmarks (climbing the corporate ladder), then you'll focus on things other than historical measures of success and ambition, which leads to a perception by prior generations of a lack of work ethic (i.e., laziness). This is a rank generalization of course, and based in large part on my anecdotal experiences. But a fair number of millenials I've worked with have the attitude that they're okay making less money if they don't have to work as many hours, thus freeing them to pursue other passions.  Many in my world consider that a hallmark of laziness, but others may consider it evidence of a healthy outlook on life. 
The interesting moment comes when the children of the Millennials start expressing their worldview. How close or far from their parents will they fall?

 
Which is what many would call lazy.
I think there's a difference in this case.  

I think Gen X was more about the idea that they were looking for their own version of the American Dream that didn't jibe with that of their parents.  I don't recall Gen-X being a bunch of whiners about not having the material things (or career paths/advantages) that their parents deemed important. They might have only wanted to be part time fry cooks with ample opportunity to hang out with their friends....but I don't recall them clamoring that fry cooks should be paid as much as a mid-level manager. 

To that, I think millenials want....but they don't want to work for it.  It's a generalized view obviously...but I stand by my observations that millenials want the things that their parents have(be it home ownership/well paying jobs with a good amount of vacation/flexible "on their terms" hours at work/ etc.).....without realizing or acknowledging that their parents spent a long time to achieve that. 

 
What you are talking about it changing our entire economic system to help you out.  Nobody cares about anyone but themselves.  When you are 10 years from retirement, you go ahead and give your money to the young bucks.  


That is the fundamental problem.


Also the guiding principle of capitalism. 
Most decidedly not the "guiding" principle of capitalism. One is smart to expect utter selfishness & greed from human beings, but not to accept nor allow it. Now that we are closing in on 40 years of customer culture, I'm sure it feels that way to most FFAppers, but citizen culture - whether solicited by one's immediate community or religious, ethical or governing institutions - is an ethos which should and has been (til very recently) emphasized with equal vigor as enterprise for the duration of the American Miracle.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Basically. It is a Gen X Manager and then old people and high school kids.  I live in a college town and no one from the university or the recent grads are working there. 
Hard to generalize ... around here, the fast food places are almost exclusively by young adults from lower-middle-class-to-poor backgrounds. Almost exclusively minorities, as well. Some high school age, but many more 20-somethings.

I am curious about what jobs the typical suburban white teenagers get around here these days. Other than Chik-Fil-A ... it ain't fast food.

 
Hard to generalize ... around here, the fast food places are almost exclusively by young adults from lower-middle-class-to-poor backgrounds. Almost exclusively minorities, as well. Some high school age, but many more 20-somethings.

I am curious about what jobs the typical suburban white teenagers get around here these days. Other than Chik-Fil-A ... it ain't fast food.
Plenty of suburban white teens at my local ff places. 

 
Plenty of suburban white teens at my local ff places. 
I never see kids at these places.  Usually just burned out looking adults.  I would't let my kid work in ff in fear that he would pick up a meth habit from management. 

 
I never see kids at these places.  Usually just burned out looking adults.  I would't let my kid work in ff in fear that he would pick up a meth habit from management. 
Weird, most of my local ff workers are clean, happy teens.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top