Obviously your comprehension is off, I said he might stink and he might not. Nice try.
Of course not. Because the NFL is full of Richards.For the record, i do think what mcdaniels did is a total **** move. I just dont think it prevents him from getting other jobs.
For the record, i do think what mcdaniels did is a total **** move. I just dont think it prevents him from getting other jobs.
True but look at the QBs of the final four teams this season: aside from Brady you had Nick Foles, Case Keenum, and Blake Bortles.Not the sole reason, but look at the difference with GB with and without Rodgers.
It will certainly prevent him from some opportunities, many owners and other coaches, assistants, etc. will swear him off forever and would never trust him again. However, McDaniels is still young and time passing will cause people to discount this, just as the Colts were foolish enough to discount everything McDaniels did when he drove the Bronco's into the ground.For the record, i do think what mcdaniels did is a total **** move. I just dont think it prevents him from getting other jobs.
There may be a team that will consider McDaniels for their HC, especially if he has success w/o Brady and/or Belichick, but this maneuver certainly didn't improve his chances.It will certainly prevent him from some opportunities, many owners and other coaches, assistants, etc. will swear him off forever and would never trust him again. However, McDaniels is still young and time passing will cause people to discount this, just as the Colts were foolish enough to discount everything McDaniels did when he drove the Bronco's into the ground.
Plus there are bad, desperate owners out there.The Browns for example...
I lost track of how many national writers and more pertinently ex-GM's/league execs who say things like he'll never get another HC job outside of NE or like Casserley said he burned bridges he do does not even know. Does not mean they are right, just means it's not a real crazy thought to think he's done what his agent said he would be doing which was committing career suicide.For the record, i do think what mcdaniels did is a total **** move. I just dont think it prevents him from getting other jobs.
Thats not the consensus from league executives.For the record, i do think what mcdaniels did is a total **** move. I just dont think it prevents him from getting other jobs.
I did, it doesn't mean he will, which I also said, and it doesn't mean he can't do well and still not be those guys. You are connecting some vague dots. Anyways I am done with your trolling, good luck.So you didn’t bring up BB and Carroll in your post and say that McDaniels could possibly do well in his next HC gig because they did?
I guess my comprehension is off then.
Still young? He's 41. Not a kid anymore.It will certainly prevent him from some opportunities, many owners and other coaches, assistants, etc. will swear him off forever and would never trust him again. However, McDaniels is still young and time passing will cause people to discount this, just as the Colts were foolish enough to discount everything McDaniels did when he drove the Bronco's into the ground.
Plus there are bad, desperate owners out there.The Browns for example...
That's young for an NFL head coach. Most head coaches are 50 and older. Had McDaniels not backed out, there would have been only 3 or 4 head coaches younger than him, most of which just got hired for the first time this year.Still young? He's 41. Not a kid anymore.
Meaningless at this time. What matters is what they say/do when he's interested in their job. Like many here, these executives dont like the move and since they have no skin in the game, they can say so. I bet tons of "executives" would say they'd never want a Barry Bonds or Clemens on their team...until it they actually have the choice. It's funny how cloudy things get when they actually affect your business or team.Thats not the consensus from league executives.
Meaningless at this time. What matters is what they say/do when he's interested in their job. Like many here, these executives dont like the move and since they have no skin in the game, they can say so. I bet tons of "executives" would say they'd never want a Barry Bonds or Clemens on their team...until it they actually have the choice. It's funny how cloudy things get when they actually affect your business or team.
What exactly has McDaniels done in coaching that is even remotely equitable to what the performances that Bonds or Clemens put up as players in their sport?Talent wasnt the point. People say all kinds of thing when it doesnt matter.Yep. Just ask Colin Kaepernick.
What exactly has McDaniels done in coaching that is even remotely equitable to what the performances that Bonds or Clemens put up as players in their sport?
It is completely different for many reasons. Two you didn't mention:I'm a Jets fan, so my perspective on this should be jaded, but I think what McDaniels did to the Colts is far worse than what BB did to the NYJ. I think the Jets just assumed that BB was going to take over for Parcells and never really interviewed him or pfficially "offered" him the job, they just basically said "here it is get started". Now he surely could have handled it better than writing and reading some cryptic note during a press conference where he was to be introduced, but otherwise he didn't really screw them over - and honestly I think he really just felt he had to get away from Parcells in order to run his own show.
McDaniels accepted the Colts job 4-5 weeks ago - so they stopped their search process. He brought assistants aboard that were offered contracts by the team and signed and on the day before his press conference got cold feet. He left the Colts in a terrible position to scramble and start their search all over again a few weeks before the combine starts. They also now need to find a HC that's willing to work with a staff that McDaniels put together. There's no reason that he shouldn't be a man and honor his commitments if he wasn't man enough to let them know weeks ago he wasn't 100% sure he was coming. Bill Belichick was a bit socially awkward and maybe even a bit insecure at the time (needed out of Parcell's shadow) but McDaniel is a world class weasel.
You guys humor me for a second. Lots of folks are suggesting JMD was a disaster in DEN and his bailing on the Colts was in bad form (both of which I agree with). But taking things one step further, many people feel he is a disaster in waiting no matter where he becomes a head coach.
But JMD was instrumental in developing TB12 from a game manager into an actual weapon. JMD, TB, BB, and Randy Moss basically remade the Patriots playbook in 2007 and NE has been an offensive force ever since.
In other threads, people are now ushering in Jimmy Garoppolo as possibly one of the next top quarterbacks . . . and JMD would have been the one that worked with him for 3.5 years in NE. He also took Matt Cassel from a college back up into a serviceable QB. He also helped bring along Jacoby Brissett, who was able to start within weeks for the Colts.
That's several QB's that he's helped develop, so why couldn't he do that again either in NE or for another team? I get that he whiffed and whiffed hard on Tim Tebow, but he helped get the Patriots to 8 Super Bowls (he left the Rams and came back to the Patriots for the 2011 post season).
Do people think he could draft and develop another decent QB? He will likely have a say in who NE targets as the heir to Brady.
There are a lot of comments in numerous threads saying that a team is nothing without a QB and having a good QB can radically transform a team. That's why I mentioned JMC as potentially being able to insert and develop a decent QB. In other threads, people were pointing to Shanahan's system as being one that will yield a good to great QB.I'm not ready to attribute Brady's growth to McDaniels and in general a lot of overlaying issues.
How much was BB to credit for growth and development of some of these players? How much of an impact did Brady have on growth of other QB's? When he was not working with those two outstanding leaders who did he develop?
I would for sure not say he can't develop a decent QB, I'd tend to think he can do that at least that but why are you only focusing on that aspect? There is more to being a head coach.
What did Brady say about Charlie Weis?There are a lot of comments in numerous threads saying that a team is nothing without a QB and having a good QB can radically transform a team. That's why I mentioned JMC as potentially being able to insert and develop a decent QB. In other threads, people were pointing to Shanahan's system as being one that will yield a good to great QB.
People will point to Brady and BB before they would ever look at JMD, but IMO he was a big part of the NE success. If you don't believe me, believe Brady, as he's said so on multiple occasions.
I think most players will give their long time coaches accolades, I don't put a lot of stock in that.People will point to Brady and BB before they would ever look at JMD, but IMO he was a big part of the NE success. If you don't believe me, believe Brady, as he's said so on multiple occasions.
Yeah, we're going to have to disagree on that oneYou guys humor me for a second. Lots of folks are suggesting JMD was a disaster in DEN and his bailing on the Colts was in bad form (both of which I agree with). But taking things one step further, many people feel he is a disaster in waiting no matter where he becomes a head coach.
But JMD was instrumental in developing TB12 from a game manager into an actual weapon. JMD, TB, BB, and Randy Moss basically remade the Patriots playbook in 2007 and NE has been an offensive force ever since.
In other threads, people are now ushering in Jimmy Garoppolo as possibly one of the next top quarterbacks . . . and JMD would have been the one that worked with him for 3.5 years in NE. He also took Matt Cassel from a college back up into a serviceable QB. He also helped bring along Jacoby Brissett, who was able to start within weeks for the Colts.
That's several QB's that he's helped develop, so why couldn't he do that again either in NE or for another team? I get that he whiffed and whiffed hard on Tim Tebow, but he helped get the Patriots to 8 Super Bowls (he left the Rams and came back to the Patriots for the 2011 post season).
Do people think he could draft and develop another decent QB? He will likely have a say in who NE targets as the heir to Brady.
Cassel had not started a game since high school and 8 years later had a 3700/21 season with 11 wins in NE. Is that not serviceable?Yeah, we're going to have to disagree on that one
Did it last or was it a fluke?Anarchy99 said:Cassel had not started a game since high school and 8 years later had a 3700/21 season with 11 wins in NE. Is that not serviceable?
Huh. Sounds a lot like what I posted on Wednesday.JohnnyU said:According to ESPN Patriots reporter Mike Reiss, OC Josh McDaniels was given "no assurances" that he would succeed Bill Belichick as New England's next head coach.
Most assumed that McDaniels had been tapped as Belichick's eventual successor (hence him leaving Indianapolis at the altar this week), but apparently that's not the case. In fact, McDaniels has said privately that he'd prefer not to succeed Belichick in New England, feeling that it would be a "hard act to follow." It appears McDaniels was hesitant to move his family, including his four children, to Indianapolis, and was persuaded to stay in his current position after getting a "significant raise." Belichick, who acts as the Patriots' de facto GM in addition to his head-coaching duties, also promised to give McDaniels a voice in roster construction and salary cap decisions. It will be hard for McDaniels to get another head-coaching job outside of New England after flaking on the Colts.
I guess ESPN is running out of news, lol.Huh. Sounds a lot like what I posted on Wednesday.
menobrown said:Anyone have any idea why Bob Quinn is so sour on McDaniels after working together for so many years? Quinn not only never interviewed him for the job but said he drew up a list of 5 candidates when he started and he was not on it? Basically in a polite way he was saying he really had no interest in talking to him about the Lions job.
I think they preferred to keep JBC, not a requirement but a preference. They did mainly interview DC's, but they did interview Shurmur and just reading between the lines of Quinn's answer the other day I just did not get a sense they had interest in McDaniels.Aren't they wanting to keep Jim Bob Cooter around? If so, that pretty much eliminated someone like McDaniels before the search even began.
And he turned Kyle Orton into a pretty serviceable QB.Anarchy99 said:You guys humor me for a second. Lots of folks are suggesting JMD was a disaster in DEN and his bailing on the Colts was in bad form (both of which I agree with). But taking things one step further, many people feel he is a disaster in waiting no matter where he becomes a head coach.
But JMD was instrumental in developing TB12 from a game manager into an actual weapon. JMD, TB, BB, and Randy Moss basically remade the Patriots playbook in 2007 and NE has been an offensive force ever since.
In other threads, people are now ushering in Jimmy Garoppolo as possibly one of the next top quarterbacks . . . and JMD would have been the one that worked with him for 3.5 years in NE. He also took Matt Cassel from a college back up into a serviceable QB. He also helped bring along Jacoby Brissett, who was able to start within weeks for the Colts.
That's several QB's that he's helped develop, so why couldn't he do that again either in NE or for another team? I get that he whiffed and whiffed hard on Tim Tebow, but he helped get the Patriots to 8 Super Bowls (he left the Rams and came back to the Patriots for the 2011 post season).
Do people think he could draft and develop another decent QB? He will likely have a say in who NE targets as the heir to Brady.
This is all stafford i think. He is super close to cooter and perhaps with having to wait so long on matty patty...it was just easier to keep cooter. Perhaps without jim caldwellmenobrown said:Anyone have any idea why Bob Quinn is so sour on McDaniels after working together for so many years? Quinn not only never interviewed him for the job but said he drew up a list of 5 candidates when he started and he was not on it? Basically in a polite way he was saying he really had no interest in talking to him about the Lions job.
they can be alot more aggressive Wasn't it pretty bad also to put your eggs in the Tebow basket? Let's face it, McDaniels didn't have a clue as a HC.And he turned Kyle Orton into a pretty serviceable QB.
I think McDaniels is one of the better offensive minds in the league. Denver's defense was just SO bad when he was there it kind of hid that.
We will never really know because his time in Denver was over before Tebow got a real chance to play.Wasn't it pretty bad also to put your eggs in the Tebow basket? Let's face it, McDaniels didn't have a clue as a HC.
Please don't be a Tebow apologist.We will never really know because his time in Denver was over before Tebow got a real chance to play.
All I'll say about Tebow is that, as bad as he was, he got a LOT worse the further he went on without McDaniels as his new coaches tried to change things.
Regardless, his 3 starts with McDaniels were pretty decent by Tebow standards. He went over 300 total yards in two the three and the offense scored 23, 24, and 28 points in the games with him at the helm. He only went downhill from there.Please don't be a Tebow apologist.
Anarchy99 said:You guys humor me for a second. Lots of folks are suggesting JMD was a disaster in DEN and his bailing on the Colts was in bad form (both of which I agree with). But taking things one step further, many people feel he is a disaster in waiting no matter where he becomes a head coach.
But JMD was instrumental in developing TB12 from a game manager into an actual weapon. JMD, TB, BB, and Randy Moss basically remade the Patriots playbook in 2007 and NE has been an offensive force ever since.
In other threads, people are now ushering in Jimmy Garoppolo as possibly one of the next top quarterbacks . . . and JMD would have been the one that worked with him for 3.5 years in NE. He also took Matt Cassel from a college back up into a serviceable QB. He also helped bring along Jacoby Brissett, who was able to start within weeks for the Colts.
That's several QB's that he's helped develop, so why couldn't he do that again either in NE or for another team? I get that he whiffed and whiffed hard on Tim Tebow, but he helped get the Patriots to 8 Super Bowls (he left the Rams and came back to the Patriots for the 2011 post season).
Do people think he could draft and develop another decent QB? He will likely have a say in who NE targets as the heir to Brady.
Wait, what?When Tom Brady was in his young formative years and had just moved into being one the top 5 QBs in the league, McDaniels was - wait for it - a D assistant for NE.
When he was a HC in DEN the O scheming was literally a joke. That doesn’t begin to speak about how incredibly sophomoric his behavior was there.
I think he may be riding the coattails of greatness, not building it. I hope he does get a chance again so we can put some of the wild speculation about his uncanny football mind to bed once and for all. From everything I’ve seen when he was the one calling the shots, he didn’t have a clue.
.
Wait, what?
Literally none of this makes any sense.
Prior to McDaniels taking over as OC Brady had a career high of 28 TDs and had one 4000+ yard passing season, which he eclipsed just barely during a season where there was no official OC but it was rumored that McDaniels was calling the plays. Then in 2007, McDaniels' second year as official OC, the Pats had that record setting season where they broke every offensive record imaginable. Brady's career high in TDs went from 28 to 50. His career high in yards went from 4100 (3800 not counting the year where McDaniels was rumored to have been an off the books OC) to 4800.
All in all, Brady has had 8 seasons with a QB rating above 97. McDaniels was OC for 7 of them.
And regarding Denver, maybe you weren't playing fantasy football back then, but lots of people wanted a piece of that Kyle Orton led offense. Quite different than the previous Kyle Orton led offense that no one wanted a part of.
The point with Denver wasn't that they were some vaunted offense, but rather that they were a top 15 offense both years with the pathetic Kyle Orton and Tim Tebow at the helm. Neither of those guys had even a top 25 season without him. Like I mentioned above, Tebow's metrics basically cut in HALF when looking at his numbers without McDaniels vs. with him.No, what doesn’t make sense is giving McDaniels credit for Brady’s success. Not after seeing McDaniels’ performance when he was away from NE. Hard to believe that you think you hold such a strong position that you can be insulting given the evidence available. I watched every game of McDaniels’ HC tenure in Denver, as well as PS and TC, and saw him run a mediocre team right into the toilet. That it got so bad that he had to be fired in-season during his second season as a HC, despite what you seem to believe was a vaunted offense - which in fact was a trainwreck.
In the meantime, we all saw the NE O functioning just as well without McDaniels while he was in DEN as it did with McDaniels there. You could make the argument it was better while he was gone than it was immediately before he left and after he was rehired.
Yes, if you lose a locker room. He's not a good communicator, but neither is Belichick, but BB knows how to get the most out of his players. I'm not sold that JM can as the top guy. I also question his ability to draft talent. He showed that in Denver. Perhaps he's learned over the years, but if I were a Patriots fan I would want him to stay as an OC if he stays in NE when BB leaves, not become their HC.Can be a great OC, even a good developer of QBs, and never be a decent head coach.
While I think they did prefer to retain JBC, not a condition of new head coach but a preference, I don't think it had to do with their lack of interest in McDaniels and if it had would have been easy for Quinn to say. I can't find the article but from a few days ago that was in the Detroit Free Press but the way Quinn answered the question leads me to strongly believe even if JBC said he was leaving he still would not have been interested in McDaniels.This is all stafford i think. He is super close to cooter and perhaps with having to wait so long on matty patty...it was just easier to keep cooter. Perhaps without jim caldwellthey can be alot more aggressive