What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Occupy Wall Street (2 Viewers)

Yeah, but who really gives a #### what you think... especially after you think its fine to blast that girl with the baton repeatedly and then insinuate about her being the cause and what she did wrong.... because she was peacefully protesting, which according to you, should be made illegal.
If she was home writing to her congresswoman, attending various open forums, doing something remotely constructive instead, she doesn't get the baton.
:shrug:
That's a big part of the problem.... the congresswoman is bought and paid for. Money has superseded Votes.It just may take "getting the baton" to effect the needed change to America away from corporate-fascism.
is the premise that all lawmakers are bought and paid for? If so, a full-on rebellion is the only fix, no?What do we burn first, the banks or the courthouses?
I don't know how to get money completely out of politics, but I know where to start....
Can it be as simple as a hard cap on campaign finances and expenditures for a candidate?
That would limit corporate money, not get it out entirely.
That wouldn't just be corporate. Make a hard cap that includes it all, individual, corporate, and personal.

You wouldn't "get it out entirely", they could still run a campaign on donations, but you would crush the influence purchasing.
I assume you'd also implement term limits since a hard cap would be a HUGE benefit to incumbents?
Not sure how true that is. Lets say at the congressional level, its 1 million... no more or less, including personal finances spent.

That's pretty obtainable for even the worst option. Sharon Angle, in 1/4 (3 months) raised 14 million dollars in a massive push by power brokers to oust the "other guy". Her opponent (Reid), in the same time frame raised 25 million.

Ludicrous.

As far as Term Limits... Im on board with them being implemented, and yet I see some really intelligent arguments against them. I would prefer to stifle the $$$/lobbying first and then re-visit the Term Limit option a couple years afterwards.

 
Occupy Wallstreet = those "awareness"/agenda tents at Lolapalooza and the like. Once someone with better schwag comes along, *poof*
Nothing wrong with that. That have made an incredibly strong statement.

And they may pick it back up at a later date, and it may continue to grow on its own during that time.
yep- that cities need to beef up their ordinances and permitting regulations regarding their parks and open space to prevent this from happening again.. what a waste of money
 
Occupy Wallstreet = those "awareness"/agenda tents at Lolapalooza and the like. Once someone with better schwag comes along, *poof*
Nothing wrong with that. That have made an incredibly strong statement.

And they may pick it back up at a later date, and it may continue to grow on its own during that time.
yep- that cities need to beef up their ordinances and permitting regulations regarding their parks and open space to prevent this from happening again.. what a waste of money
And how to properly s##t on police cars. That was a very strong statement indeed.
 
Occupy Wallstreet = those "awareness"/agenda tents at Lolapalooza and the like. Once someone with better schwag comes along, *poof*
Nothing wrong with that. That have made an incredibly strong statement.

And they may pick it back up at a later date, and it may continue to grow on its own during that time.
yep- that cities need to beef up their ordinances and permitting regulations regarding their parks and open space to prevent this from happening again.. what a waste of money
And how to properly s##t on police cars. That was a very strong statement indeed.
I love the last one "Honk if you're in debt"--like it was forced upon them. "I enjoyed the stuff I bought on credit while living above my means, but now that it's gone screw you for wanting me to pay it back!".
 
Freedom to Assembly? #### that, eh?

from http://occupywallst.org/

Updates

3:36 a.m. Kitchen tent reported teargassed. Police moving in with zip cuffs.

3:33 a.m. Bulldozers moving in

3:16 a.m. Occupiers linking arms around riot police

3:15 a.m. NYPD destroying personal items. Occupiers prevented from leaving with their possessions.

3:13 a.m. NYPD deploying sound cannon

3:08 a.m. heard on livestream: "they're bringing in the hoses."

3:05 a.m. NYPD cutting down trees in Liberty Square

2:55 a.m. NYC council-member Ydanis Rodríguez arrested and bleeding from head.

2:44 a.m. Defiant occupiers barricaded Liberty Square kitchen

2:44 a.m. NYPD destroys OWS Library. 5,000 donated books in dumpster.

2:42 a.m. Brooklyn Bridge confirmed closed

2:38 a.m. 400-500 marching north to Foley Square

2:32 a.m. All subways but R shut down

2:29 a.m. Press helicopters evicted from airspace. NYTimes reporter arrested.

2:22 a.m. Frontpage coverage from New York Times

2:15 a.m. Occupiers who have been dispersed are regrouping at Foley Square

2:10 a.m. Press barred from entering Liberty Square

2:07 a.m. Pepper spray deployed -- reports of at least one reporter sprayed

2:03 a.m. Massive Police Presence at Canal and Broadway

1:43 a.m. Helicopters overhead.

1:38 a.m. Unconfirmed reports of snipers on rooftops.

1:34 a.m. CBS News Helicopter Livestream

1:27 a.m. Unconfirmed reports that police are planning to sweep everyone.

1:20 a.m. Subway stops are closed.

1:20 a.m. Brooklyn bridge is closed.

1:20 a.m. Occupiers chanting "This is what a police state looks like."

1:20 a.m. Police are in riot gear.

1:20 a.m. Police are bringing in bulldozers.
 
"They're beating people in there," Matt Baldwin said. "My wife's pregnant. I had to get her out of there before they beat her and killed my baby ... we made it clear we were nonviolent."

:thumbup: Brilliant idea having your pregant wife live among the disease and rodents in the 1st place not to mention the crime and potential riots.... I'm sure most doctors would highly recommend that.

But, hey This is Bigger than just a baby.

If this is it..... I'm just thankful a lot of people weren't injured or worse.

 
"They're beating people in there," Matt Baldwin said. "My wife's pregnant. I had to get her out of there before they beat her and killed my baby ... we made it clear we were nonviolent." :thumbup: Brilliant idea having your pregant wife live among the disease and rodents in the 1st place not to mention the crime and potential riots.... I'm sure most doctors would highly recommend that.But, hey This is Bigger than just a baby.If this is it..... I'm just thankful a lot of people weren't injured or worse.
You are so misinformed and willfully ignorant that it hurts my brain.
 
The mayor’s comments at a City Hall news conference came about seven hours after hundreds of police officers moved into clear the park after warning that the nearly two-month-old camp would be “cleared and restored” but that demonstrators who did not leave would face arrest. The protesters, about 200 of whom have been staying in the park overnight, initially resisted with chants of “Whose park? Our park!”
 
The mayor's comments at a City Hall news conference came about seven hours after hundreds of police officers moved into clear the park after warning that the nearly two-month-old camp would be "cleared and restored" but that demonstrators who did not leave would face arrest. The protesters, about 200 of whom have been staying in the park overnight, initially resisted with chants of "Whose park? Our park!"
"Cleared and restored [without any type of shelter]"
 
The mayor's comments at a City Hall news conference came about seven hours after hundreds of police officers moved into clear the park after warning that the nearly two-month-old camp would be "cleared and restored" but that demonstrators who did not leave would face arrest. The protesters, about 200 of whom have been staying in the park overnight, initially resisted with chants of "Whose park? Our park!"
"Cleared and restored [without any type of shelter]"
What is your point?
 
this thing doesn't seem to be going away
Update?
Judge Orders City to Allow Occupy Wall Street Back into Zuccotti ParkNovember 15, 2011 8:43am

MANHATTAN — Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Zuccotti Park would remain closed while the city sought clarification on a judge's order earlier in the morning ordering the city to allow protesters back into Zuccotti Park.

Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Lucy Billings issued the temporary restraining order at 6:30 a.m. barring the city and Brookfield Properties, which owns Zuccotti Park, from evicting Occupy Wall Street protesters or preventing them from returning to the park with their tents and tarps. About 200 people were arrested during the overnight raid that saw hundreds of police in riot gear surround the park.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this thing doesn't seem to be going away
Update?
Judge Orders City to Allow Occupy Wall Street Back into Zuccotti ParkNovember 15, 2011 8:43am

MANHATTAN — Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Zuccotti Park would remain closed while the city sought clarification on a judge's order earlier in the morning ordering the city to allow protesters back into Zuccotti Park.

Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Lucy Billings issued the temporary restraining order at 6:30 a.m. barring the city and Brookfield Properties, which owns Zuccotti Park, from evicting Occupy Wall Street protesters or preventing them from returning to the park with their tents and tarps. About 200 people were arrested during the overnight raid that saw hundreds of police in riot gear surround the park.
Trying to determine if they need to allow their gear (tents et al) back in.
 
"They're beating people in there," Matt Baldwin said. "My wife's pregnant. I had to get her out of there before they beat her and killed my baby ... we made it clear we were nonviolent." :thumbup: Brilliant idea having your pregant wife live among the disease and rodents in the 1st place not to mention the crime and potential riots.... I'm sure most doctors would highly recommend that.But, hey This is Bigger than just a baby.If this is it..... I'm just thankful a lot of people weren't injured or worse.
You are so misinformed and willfully ignorant that it hurts my brain.
Yeah. Pretty much what I have thought of your POV on all this...But, I said all along that I have sympathy and agree with a lot of what I think OWS stands for.....It's the method of OCCUPYING and setting up a dangerous disease infested situation while draining resources and hurting businesses and people's quality of life who live in the area that I disagree with most... I thought all along this was a stupid way of making a point and all the stragglers and hanger-ons would only harm their mission.Again, so far I'm most happy that we didn't see riots and a lot of injuries out of this. :thumbup: If THAT hurts your brain then IMO, you're going to hurt a lot in this life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The mayors comments at a City Hall news conference came about seven hours after hundreds of police officers moved into clear the park after warning that the nearly two-month-old camp would be cleared and restored but that demonstrators who did not leave would face arrest. The protesters, about 200 of whom have been staying in the park overnight, initially resisted with chants of Whose park? Our park!
I was leaving my office at about 12:30 am last night, which is on Maiden lane and saw an army of cops going up that street to the park. Kind of crazy as for at least 10 minutes vans with cops in riot gear were going up the street followed by a ton of paddy wagons. Thought about going to watch the action because that was the only possible destination but wanted some sleep after a nice 16 hour day at work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"They're beating people in there," Matt Baldwin said. "My wife's pregnant. I had to get her out of there before they beat her and killed my baby ... we made it clear we were nonviolent." :thumbup: Brilliant idea having your pregant wife live among the disease and rodents in the 1st place not to mention the crime and potential riots.... I'm sure most doctors would highly recommend that.But, hey This is Bigger than just a baby.If this is it..... I'm just thankful a lot of people weren't injured or worse.
You are so misinformed and willfully ignorant that it hurts my brain.
Sounds like a great place to bring the pregnant wife. :thumbup:
Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway wrote in the motion that giving the protesters full run of the park would lead to re-creation of the "unsafe and unsanitary conditions and the substantial threat to public safety" that the city said led to the eviction. There was evidence, he wrote, that the protesters were stockpiling weapons. Mr. Holloway described a "steady accumulation of combustibles, smoking, and other hazards" at the site and said that makeshift weapons, "such as cardboard tubes with metal pipes inside, had been observed among the occupiers' possessions," and that after the Oct. 1 Brooklyn Bridge march, "knives, mace and hypodermic needles were observed discarded on the roadway."Thus," he added, "it was our understanding that the protesters may have had a significant number of items that could potentially be used as weapons.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/updates-on-the-clearing-of-zuccotti-park/?hp
 
Lies about safety and almost everyone that disagrees with the OWS folk are cheering the lies on. Somehow I find it's possible to even become more cynical about this country.

 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment? Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
You mean the right to peaceably assemble. That one?
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment? Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
He would prefer individuals' safety be taken care of by something like the Patriot Act, rather than handled by the group. Conservatives are pro-Police-State.
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment? Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
He would prefer individuals' safety be taken care of by something like the Patriot Act, rather than handled by the group. Conservatives are pro-Police-State.
So are far too many Democrats.
 
If this has been posted, I apologize.

It was posted before and it still sucks. It's just a guy talking. Maybe he should try to incorporate some humor, some actual photos of the events, or some quotes from people there.Is there any reason why people should listen to "Bill Whittle" ?
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment? Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
He would prefer individuals' safety be taken care of by something like the Patriot Act, rather than handled by the group. Conservatives are pro-Police-State.
Handled by the group?BTW, conservatives aren't pro-police state, they are pro-law and order which sometimes requires police involvement.
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.

 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.
My concerns are genuine. Not sure why you set up the OR statement. Occupying this "park" is the method these people have chosen to be heard. I'm not doubting that NYC still approves permits and such. The fact that they require permits is a huge problem. Permits are about as clear of a restriction of free speech as I can think of and should be abolished immediately. As should most restrictions placed on protests.

No I don't see much potential for a catastrophic result. If that was the city's fear, they should take 90% of the cops and send them back to their normal duties. Let the remaining 10% enforce any meaningful laws that are broken.

 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.
My concerns are genuine. Not sure why you set up the OR statement. Occupying this "park" is the method these people have chosen to be heard. I'm not doubting that NYC still approves permits and such. The fact that they require permits is a huge problem. Permits are about as clear of a restriction of free speech as I can think of and should be abolished immediately. As should most restrictions placed on protests.

No I don't see much potential for a catastrophic result. If that was the city's fear, they should take 90% of the cops and send them back to their normal duties. Let the remaining 10% enforce any meaningful laws that are broken.
You're a child.
 
Lies about safety and almost everyone that disagrees with the OWS folk are cheering the lies on. Somehow I find it's possible to even become more cynical about this country.
Here's the thing--the people cracking down on this protest aren't the wealthy or corporate America. The mayors of Atlanta and Oakland are both Democrats. Bloomberg is Independent (though he is wealthy). The police are unionized 99%ers. The fact that the crackdowns aren't coming from those that the protesters directly oppose, but those that they tend to affiliate with or allege to represent says a lot about the nature of the protests.
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.
My concerns are genuine. Not sure why you set up the OR statement. Occupying this "park" is the method these people have chosen to be heard. I'm not doubting that NYC still approves permits and such. The fact that they require permits is a huge problem. Permits are about as clear of a restriction of free speech as I can think of and should be abolished immediately. As should most restrictions placed on protests.

No I don't see much potential for a catastrophic result. If that was the city's fear, they should take 90% of the cops and send them back to their normal duties. Let the remaining 10% enforce any meaningful laws that are broken.
You're a child.
I thought the bolded was an interesting point. I kind of agree with it. Why do you need a permit to assemble on public property?
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.
My concerns are genuine. Not sure why you set up the OR statement. Occupying this "park" is the method these people have chosen to be heard. I'm not doubting that NYC still approves permits and such. The fact that they require permits is a huge problem. Permits are about as clear of a restriction of free speech as I can think of and should be abolished immediately. As should most restrictions placed on protests.

No I don't see much potential for a catastrophic result. If that was the city's fear, they should take 90% of the cops and send them back to their normal duties. Let the remaining 10% enforce any meaningful laws that are broken.
You're a child.
I thought the bolded was an interesting point. I kind of agree with it. Why do you need a permit to assemble on public property?
Planning? Administration? Fairness? I would like to protest the NBA lockout this weekend at Zuccotti Park, however with the Occupiers there, my message was not being heard. Now I will have my time to have my voice heard in the location of my choosing.

 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.
My concerns are genuine. Not sure why you set up the OR statement. Occupying this "park" is the method these people have chosen to be heard. I'm not doubting that NYC still approves permits and such. The fact that they require permits is a huge problem. Permits are about as clear of a restriction of free speech as I can think of and should be abolished immediately. As should most restrictions placed on protests.

No I don't see much potential for a catastrophic result. If that was the city's fear, they should take 90% of the cops and send them back to their normal duties. Let the remaining 10% enforce any meaningful laws that are broken.
Not what the Supreme Court has said. Of course I do think many times these permit requirements are over done to limit speech but at some point you are going to have Time, Place and Manner restrictions.
 
Mello, I assume you think it is a safe environment?

Can you explain the part of the park where they have volunteers to watch women sleep so they don't get raped?
I think it's as safe as any other group of people. There are scum out there. When they rape or otherwise hurt someone, they should be caught and punished. Those concerns do not override peoples' rights to assembly and free speech.
Are your concerns really about people's right to free speech and assemble OR the rights for a group to Live in and take over a Park?

I'm pretty sure many groups still apply for and get permits to assemble and speak all the time in NYC.

I can't believe more people don't see the potential here for a catastrophic result given the people from all walks that this attracted.
My concerns are genuine. Not sure why you set up the OR statement. Occupying this "park" is the method these people have chosen to be heard. I'm not doubting that NYC still approves permits and such. The fact that they require permits is a huge problem. Permits are about as clear of a restriction of free speech as I can think of and should be abolished immediately. As should most restrictions placed on protests.

No I don't see much potential for a catastrophic result. If that was the city's fear, they should take 90% of the cops and send them back to their normal duties. Let the remaining 10% enforce any meaningful laws that are broken.
You're a child.
I thought the bolded was an interesting point. I kind of agree with it. Why do you need a permit to assemble on public property?
1) If you're the Westboro Baptist Church so the popo can plan to protect your 1st amendment rights instead of letting someone kill you.2) To be able to accommodate multiple groups requesting the same time/place.

I'm sure there are many other reasons but those are a couple that come to mind quickly.

 
The constitutionality of protest permits has already been adjudicated: Cox v. New Hampshire 1941. Good luck overturning it.

"The obvious advantage of requiring application for a permit was noted as giving the public authorities notice in advance so as to afford opportunity for proper policing. And the court further observed that, in fixing time and place, the license served 'to prevent confusion by overlapping parades or processions, to secure convenient use of the streets by other travelers, and to minimize the risk of disorder'."

"If a municipality has authority to control the use of its public streets for parades or processions, as it undoubtedly has, it cannot be denied authority to give consideration, without unfair discrimination, to time, place and manner in relation to the other proper uses of the streets. We find it impossible to say that the limited authority conferred by the licensing provisions of the statute in question as thus construed by the state court contravened any constitutional right."

COX v. NEW HAMPSHIRE

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top