I agree. Brady has made chicken salad out of chckenchit using far lesser ingredients. And if there is one thing you can say about 85, it's that the man LOVES football.Expect a career year for Chad. From 2003-2007 he was a top 10 fantasy wr. He hasn't lost a step folks. This will be a career year for Chad.
Maybe another name change - Ochouno has a nice ring to it...Hernandez had better refuse to give up 85.
I'm not so sure. An over-the-hill Terrell Owens came to town and made Chad Johnson seem like he was a JV player by comparison. I think Johnson's best days are behind him.Expect a career year for Chad. From 2003-2007 he was a top 10 fantasy wr. He hasn't lost a step folks. This will be a career year for Chad.
Isn't that what they were saying about Moss when he left the Raiders?Best possible landing spot but I have no interest in him at all. He's done IMO, he was fairly invisible and unexplosive last year. He can still catch and run routes so he'll be a good NFL wr for what the Pats will use him for but those game breaking plays are gone.
Chad was never near Moss but Moss was dogging it and everyone knew it. Chad wasn't, he plays, he tries, he's just not near a star player anymore. He's about 4 years removed from a good year and I just don't think it's possible for him to come close to what Moss did. I think 75-1000-8 would be a great year for him IMO and close to his ceiling.Isn't that what they were saying about Moss when he left the Raiders?Best possible landing spot but I have no interest in him at all. He's done IMO, he was fairly invisible and unexplosive last year. He can still catch and run routes so he'll be a good NFL wr for what the Pats will use him for but those game breaking plays are gone.
I agree 100%. His stats & play say it all.Chad was never near Moss but Moss was dogging it and everyone knew it. Chad wasn't, he plays, he tries, he's just not near a star player anymore. He's about 4 years removed from a good year and I just don't think it's possible for him to come close to what Moss did. I think 75-1000-8 would be a great year for him IMO and close to his ceiling.Isn't that what they were saying about Moss when he left the Raiders?Best possible landing spot but I have no interest in him at all. He's done IMO, he was fairly invisible and unexplosive last year. He can still catch and run routes so he'll be a good NFL wr for what the Pats will use him for but those game breaking plays are gone.
All that plus the fact that Ocho is three years older than Moss was when he arrived to NE. Plus with Moss dogging it for all those years in OAK, he his legs had to be even younger and fresher!Edit: 75/1000/8 seems pretty high. I'd love to see him do great, and he definitely could, but it's too hard to tell where he could fit in in BBs system. Could honestly see him in the 30/450/3 range. Then again, he could go 80/1200/12. Hard to tell with BB and no where near the talent level Moss was at though so I'm going to go on the low side and say 50/700/4.I agree 100%. His stats & play say it all.Chad was never near Moss but Moss was dogging it and everyone knew it. Chad wasn't, he plays, he tries, he's just not near a star player anymore. He's about 4 years removed from a good year and I just don't think it's possible for him to come close to what Moss did. I think 75-1000-8 would be a great year for him IMO and close to his ceiling.Isn't that what they were saying about Moss when he left the Raiders?Best possible landing spot but I have no interest in him at all. He's done IMO, he was fairly invisible and unexplosive last year. He can still catch and run routes so he'll be a good NFL wr for what the Pats will use him for but those game breaking plays are gone.
and basically when all value is gone....they actually could have gotten something for him back then.So Mikey will trade a player that quits on his team and wants to be traded... but he'll wait a couple seasons before doing it. Fuuuuu he's a joke.
considering the number of high picks they have and their roster, there's a very small chance any 5th or 6th would ever make the team in the next couple years. They are worthless picks to themChad Johnson and Albert Haynesworth for a 2013 5th and a 2012 6th. lol.
I think he's laughing because it's a steal....as always with this team.considering the number of high picks they have and their roster, there's a very small chance any 5th or 6th would ever make the team in the next couple years. They are worthless picks to themChad Johnson and Albert Haynesworth for a 2013 5th and a 2012 6th. lol.
He might be laughing cause he's a comedian.I think he's laughing because it's a steal....as always with this team.considering the number of high picks they have and their roster, there's a very small chance any 5th or 6th would ever make the team in the next couple years. They are worthless picks to themChad Johnson and Albert Haynesworth for a 2013 5th and a 2012 6th. lol.
If a smurf like Branch (who has also lost a step IMO) can put up 61/818/6 with Brady tossing the ball to him last season, then what do you think Chad will put up?I will be surprised to see less than 72/950/8, and it wouldn't shock me to see 82/1100/10Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
Now we're talkin'. If memory serves, didn't Branch do that in less than a season?If a smurf like Branch (who has also lost a step IMO) can put up 61/818/6 with Brady tossing the ball to him last season, then what do you think Chad will put up?I will be surprised to see less than 72/950/8, and it wouldn't shock me to see 82/1100/10Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
Haha, I forgot all about that.So Ocho will get traded, but not Palmer? I don't understand...'eakfootball said:Hernandez had better refuse to give up 85.
Let me clear up what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying Ocho won't surpass 1000 yards. But I think he's going to be drafted as a high end wr2/low end wr1. And with the way Brady spreads the ball, outside of Welker in a ppr, I don't think anyone is going to have fair value that matches their adp. If Ocho's adp keeps him in reasonable territory tho, I will pounce. I expect to need a 4th round pick to scoop him up tho, I'd rather grab someone else later. I don't put anything past chad, I just think he is going to be over rated.If a smurf like Branch (who has also lost a step IMO) can put up 61/818/6 with Brady tossing the ball to him last season, then what do you think Chad will put up?I will be surprised to see less than 72/950/8, and it wouldn't shock me to see 82/1100/10Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
I would be surprised if he hits 10 TDs- he has just never been that type of WR- only getting to double digits once in his career (and that was for 10). In his prime though he was a catch and yardage machine- a good year is more likely to be 85/1200/6 than 1,000/8.Now we're talkin'. If memory serves, didn't Branch do that in less than a season?If a smurf like Branch (who has also lost a step IMO) can put up 61/818/6 with Brady tossing the ball to him last season, then what do you think Chad will put up?I will be surprised to see less than 72/950/8, and it wouldn't shock me to see 82/1100/10Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
Probably just splitting hairs here, but he has 66 TDs in 10 yrs or 6.6/yr; and NE should offer more TD opportunities IMO than the Bengals. However, I agree with you that double digit TDs are less likely than the 5-8 range. I'm guessing though that this is a change of scenery that will reap benefits for both the Patriots and Chad, and expect a resurgence in the twilight of Ochocinco's career. I don't view him as selfish or as a cancer, and Brady is a HUGE upgrade from what Chad has been dealing with the last 4 seasons. I won't over reach for him, but if leaguemates are hesitant to draft him, and I can get him say 25-30 WRs or so deep into a draft, I will be very pleased indeed.I would be surprised if he hits 10 TDs- he has just never been that type of WR- only getting to double digits once in his career (and that was for 10). In his prime though he was a catch and yardage machine- a good year is more likely to be 85/1200/6 than 1,000/8.Now we're talkin'. If memory serves, didn't Branch do that in less than a season?If a smurf like Branch (who has also lost a step IMO) can put up 61/818/6 with Brady tossing the ball to him last season, then what do you think Chad will put up?I will be surprised to see less than 72/950/8, and it wouldn't shock me to see 82/1100/10Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
A slower Chad Ocho that's lost a step is still a pretty phenomenal #3 receiver.Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
Looks like we are pretty close- here is how I got to this preliminary conclusionProbably just splitting hairs here, but he has 66 TDs in 10 yrs or 6.6/yr; and NE should offer more TD opportunities IMO than the Bengals. However, I agree with you that double digit TDs are less likely than the 5-8 range. I'm guessing though that this is a change of scenery that will reap benefits for both the Patriots and Chad, and expect a resurgence in the twilight of Ochocinco's career. I don't view him as selfish or as a cancer, and Brady is a HUGE upgrade from what Chad has been dealing with the last 4 seasons. I won't over reach for him, but if leaguemates are hesitant to draft him, and I can get him say 25-30 WRs or so deep into a draft, I will be very pleased indeed.I would be surprised if he hits 10 TDs- he has just never been that type of WR- only getting to double digits once in his career (and that was for 10). In his prime though he was a catch and yardage machine- a good year is more likely to be 85/1200/6 than 1,000/8.Now we're talkin'.If a smurf like Branch (who has also lost a step IMO) can put up 61/818/6 with Brady tossing the ball to him last season, then what do you think Chad will put up?I will be surprised to see less than 72/950/8, and it wouldn't shock me to see 82/1100/10Chad is still over rated at this point. He HAS lost a step. Not a ton, but he's not as fast as he was in his fantasy football prime. In my eyes, this move gives Wes Welker more value because coverage will be more focused on taking away deep balls from Tate Ocho and Branch, letting Wes roam free under neath.
If memory serves, didn't Branch do that in less than a season?
I don’t really think TO belongs here- his TD #s are just ridiculous compared to these guys and Ocho looks a lot more like them than T.O. If I took him out the projection would go up in catches and yards a bit but drop in TDs for a line of
87.8/1251.6/5.9