This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
It's really just Spiller and the 2014 picks. That may be a slight overpay, but it could be worth it if Spiller's poor 2013 season wasn't strictly due to the high ankle sprain.
Stability? How does that work?
I'm in a few leagues where I'm going this route - it's not always all it's cracked up to be. Those guys are all very up and down.
Not all QB1 production is created equal. Arod gives you about 3+ ppg over these QBs you listed (5-6 vs Brady). 3ppg isn't insignificant, and is the difference between Lacy and Woodhead/Joique/Mathews last year.
I've got Rodgers in most of my leagues, and with the exception of 2011, so is he. The real difference here is a less than a handful of points per game, and that's not worth Spiller and two firsts. It's not close.
I wouldn't call Roddy/Gerhart/2015 2nd as being equal to Wayne/Tanny/Heath/2015 3rd. The rest of the deal you aren't quoting is very, very, very slanted in Roddy's favor.
Funny I keep hearing his poor performance. He didn't get the touches due to ankle injury but his Ypc was great and he still led the team in rushing yards.
Agree to disagree then. I like certainly like Roddy, Gerhardt, 2nd more than Wayne, Tannehill, Heath, 3rd -- but not even close to enough to offset the rest of that deal.
The fact that he didn't pull away from a 32/33 year old RB, after his coaches said they would run him until he puked is part of a "poor" season (perhaps I should have said "disappointing" instead).
There's no shame in not completely taking the job from Fred Jackson -- regardless of any coach speak or Jackaon's age. Jackson is damn good -- good enough to serve up walking papers to Marshawn Lynch, and good enough to be the best RB in the entire NFL prior to getting hurt in 2011.Dr. Octopus said:
I would say Ellington Crabtree by a landslide!maxhyde said:
I would say Ellington Crabtree by a landslide!maxhyde said:
There was a lot of negotiating back and forth on this. I also have the 1.03, 1.05, and 1.11...each of those picks came up during negotiations.Coeur de Lion said:
So you are saying team B had a 25% chance of keeping Foster so he just gave Gio away too? I want in on that action
Gio for Rice and TRich is still not even close. Congrats to Team A for fleecing one of the few remaining fantasy players who believe TRich is an NFL caliber RB.
He limped off the field after every other carry all season. What else is there to attribute it to?Dr. Octopus said:
Count me as shocked too .... even in a two QB set, gave up too much value for a third tier QB and second tier WR. Especially when a likely 1st tier WR (even if a year out) and a [robable QB starter could have been had with the picks. You can't toss RBs that are not stuck in a RBBC so easily either.
No. I can see why someone would want to keep the Marshall side, but that's how expensive Julio is.You can disagree with it, but if the guy paid market value then by definition he didn't get hosed.
That's market value. Do you disagree? Or do you just not like this particular deal because of the rosters involved?
Not certain anyone got "hosed" here.
I would pay that for Julio. The only known commodity on the other side is Marshall and I rather have Julio. Who knows what Woods and the 1.3 will do for your roster?
Yup. Paid Marshall + Seastrunk + Dwayne Allen for Demaryius recently and paid Cobb + Bell for Julio after his injury. I think those are similar prices and wouldn't consider either an overpay for either top-5 WR.
I wouldn't pay that for Julio. I wouldn't say a person got hosed but I wouldn't pay it.
Agreed. Woods isn't crazy valuable, but the 1.03 is.
The first trade is okay. If you're talking Leveon Bell in the 2nd, I'd definitely prefer Cobb + Bell over Julio.
That package is not likely to land anyone a top 3-5 WR. Still, as good as Floyd is, what is essentially a little more than 1.3 and 1.5 for Floyd is a nice haul.
I'd call that an even trade, and I would probably pay it to get Julio, but I agree that the 1.03 is very valuable.
Maybe it shouldn't......... But we both know damn well that picks 3 and 5 would get a top 5 WR from a couple people per league in the ffpc.
I don't agree. But then, I can't think of any two non-top-7-WR players that I'd take for a top-5 WR, other than Graham/Gronk. If that jumble of words makes sense. So it's a given that I wouldn't prefer Cobb/Bell.
