What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (2 Viewers)

12 Team PPR QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium. Not involved.

Team G gives Antonio Brown, 1.06

Team Z gives: Gronk
Brown/1.6
Those are my thoughts too, personally. Not by a ton, if Gronk comes back healthy. Big IF.
How is recovering fully from an ACL a big if? Everybody comes back nowadays.
I think you may be diminishing the risk, a tad. Arm and back problems, now the knee, many many surgeries.

Yes, everybody comes back from ACL, but not everyone at the same rate, so he may have a more reasonable year, even if he plays the whole way.

In the above deal, Brown a picture of youth, health and consistency, the 1.06 quite valuable in this year's Draft. So, yeah, I like that side.

Funny, it's entirely possible Gronk comes back strong, and then you could not get him at that price, for years.

 
12 Team PPR QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium. Not involved.

Team G gives Antonio Brown, 1.06

Team Z gives: Gronk
Brown/1.6
Those are my thoughts too, personally. Not by a ton, if Gronk comes back healthy. Big IF.
How is recovering fully from an ACL a big if? Everybody comes back nowadays.
I think you may be diminishing the risk, a tad. Arm and back problems, now the knee, many many surgeries. Yes, everybody comes back from ACL, but not everyone at the same rate, so he may have a more reasonable year, even if he plays the whole way.

In the above deal, Brown a picture of youth, health and consistency, the 1.06 quite valuable in this year's Draft. So, yeah, I like that side.

Funny, it's entirely possible Gronk comes back strong, and then you could not get him at that price, for years.
In a TE premium league, on a PPG basis Gronk is pretty much untouchable. All I'm really saying is that if you're worried about the injuries, you should get more than this.

 
Team A Gives Trent Richardson/2014 3.2 rookie pick/2014 3.11 rookie pick

Team B Gives Terrance Williams/2014 Rookie pick 2.1/2014 Rookie Pick 2.4

12 team league ppr

 
14 team league with devy players. .75/1/1.25 PPR for RB/WR/TE. Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 FLEX.

Gave:

WR Justin Blackmon

2015 1st round devy pick

Got:

TE Jordan Cameron

2015 2nd round rookie pick

My team is pretty strong, so the devy pick will most likely be mid-late. Same with the 2nd rounder, which is also from my team.

The 1.25 PPR for TE makes a pretty big difference in their flex value. Cameron would've finished as WR18 last season, right between Fitzgerald and Allen.

 
14 team league with devy players. .75/1/1.25 PPR for RB/WR/TE. Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 FLEX.

Gave:

WR Justin Blackmon

2015 1st round devy pick

Got:

TE Jordan Cameron

2015 2nd round rookie pick

My team is pretty strong, so the devy pick will most likely be mid-late. Same with the 2nd rounder, which is also from my team.

The 1.25 PPR for TE makes a pretty big difference in their flex value. Cameron would've finished as WR18 last season, right between Fitzgerald and Allen.
Close one. One of those things where if I had two teams I would like one to have Blackmon and the other to have Cameron.

If Blackmon could magically never have an off field issue again, I would prefer him, but I think I lean Cameron right now

 
If Blackmon could magically never have an off field issue again, I would prefer him, but I think I lean Cameron right now
Agree with that. I had half a mind to pass on this deal, as there's plenty of downside. Blackmon has a higher ppg ceiling than Cameron and with the devy pick thrown in, it could turn out to be a 1-for-2 where the other guy gets the best player in the deal and a free lottery ticket to boot.

But I favor Cameron straight up over Blackmon in TE-premium scoring for the time being, mainly because he doesn't have the threat of massive suspension hanging over his head. I think he's the real deal and actually a little undervalued based on comments in some of the offseason threads. I've gone back and watched everything I can find on him with the Browns. To me, he looks pretty legit. We'll see how it works out.

 
If Blackmon could magically never have an off field issue again, I would prefer him, but I think I lean Cameron right now
Agree with that. I had half a mind to pass on this deal, as there's plenty of downside. Blackmon has a higher ppg ceiling than Cameron and with the devy pick thrown in, it could turn out to be a 1-for-2 where the other guy gets the best player in the deal and a free lottery ticket to boot.

But I favor Cameron straight up over Blackmon in TE-premium scoring for the time being, mainly because he doesn't have the threat of massive suspension hanging over his head. I think he's the real deal and actually a little undervalued based on comments in some of the offseason threads. I've gone back and watched everything I can find on him with the Browns. To me, he looks pretty legit. We'll see how it works out.
I am with you on the Cameron deal. Guy looks legit to me. Especially as a raw athlete learning to play TE.

I like Blackmon but I have trust issues so I will give up the devy pick to take a shot on a guy I like in TE premium

 
12 team PPR

A: Rookie 1.12 and 2.02

B: Crabtree
I think I would take the picks but it is close
You and I are usually on the same page, but I'm not seeing this one. Isn't your realistic best case scenario for those picks to luck into a WR as good as Crabtree, even in this deep class?
I just don't love Crabtree. It could be a case of being over confident too. In 2012, another deep draft class I had pick 2.01 and 2.04 and I landed Jeffery and Wright. I just think I could do the same this year.

 
12 team PPR

A: Rookie 1.12 and 2.02

B: Crabtree
I think I would take the picks but it is close
You and I are usually on the same page, but I'm not seeing this one. Isn't your realistic best case scenario for those picks to luck into a WR as good as Crabtree, even in this deep class?
I just don't love Crabtree. It could be a case of being over confident too. In 2012, another deep draft class I had pick 2.01 and 2.04 and I landed Jeffery and Wright. I just think I could do the same this year.
You might be right. Just seems like even if Crabtree is only ever a high-end WR2, it's still the safer way to go. Which feels strange to say, as I'm usually a risk-taker in trades.

 
Team A Gives Trent Richardson/2014 3.2 rookie pick/2014 3.11 rookie pick

Team B Gives Terrance Williams/2014 Rookie pick 2.1/2014 Rookie Pick 2.4

12 team league ppr
Give me Williams by a landside
I would give up TWilliams for Richardson as I don't believe Williams has elite upside but I'd probably balk on including the pick upgrades in this draft.
How anyone can trade for Trent Richardson after last season I will never know.

 
Team A Gives Trent Richardson/2014 3.2 rookie pick/2014 3.11 rookie pick

Team B Gives Terrance Williams/2014 Rookie pick 2.1/2014 Rookie Pick 2.4

12 team league ppr
Give me Williams by a landside
I would give up TWilliams for Richardson as I don't believe Williams has elite upside but I'd probably balk on including the pick upgrades in this draft.
How anyone can trade for Trent Richardson after last season I will never know.
I would trade for him if the price is right. I would probably send an early to mid second for him. Not 2 and a player.

 
Team A Gives Trent Richardson/2014 3.2 rookie pick/2014 3.11 rookie pick

Team B Gives Terrance Williams/2014 Rookie pick 2.1/2014 Rookie Pick 2.4

12 team league ppr
Give me Williams by a landside
I would give up TWilliams for Richardson as I don't believe Williams has elite upside but I'd probably balk on including the pick upgrades in this draft.
How anyone can trade for Trent Richardson after last season I will never know.
I would trade for him if the price is right. I would probably send an early to mid second for him. Not 2 and a player.
Understandable, I just do not think people would cut bait with him at that price but I would take a chance too for that.

 
Team A Gives Trent Richardson/2014 3.2 rookie pick/2014 3.11 rookie pick

Team B Gives Terrance Williams/2014 Rookie pick 2.1/2014 Rookie Pick 2.4

12 team league ppr
Give me Williams by a landside
I would give up TWilliams for Richardson as I don't believe Williams has elite upside but I'd probably balk on including the pick upgrades in this draft.
How anyone can trade for Trent Richardson after last season I will never know.
I would trade for him if the price is right. I would probably send an early to mid second for him. Not 2 and a player.
Understandable, I just do not think people would cut bait with him at that price but I would take a chance too for that.
I agree with that. I have tried getting him in one league. The owner still wants top 5 rb price for him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Team A Gives Trent Richardson/2014 3.2 rookie pick/2014 3.11 rookie pick

Team B Gives Terrance Williams/2014 Rookie pick 2.1/2014 Rookie Pick 2.4

12 team league ppr
Give me Williams by a landside
I would give up TWilliams for Richardson as I don't believe Williams has elite upside but I'd probably balk on including the pick upgrades in this draft.
How anyone can trade for Trent Richardson after last season I will never know.
I would trade for him if the price is right. I would probably send an early to mid second for him. Not 2 and a player.
Understandable, I just do not think people would cut bait with him at that price but I would take a chance too for that.
Yeah, it plays both ways. How can anyone trade for him, but no one will give him up cheap. His ADP is still sky high at 40.3. I think there's a few players in the 40s/50s/60s you could swap him for and feel good about especially if it fits your team make up. There's a tier of WR in there - Hilton, Torrey, DJax, Decker, Wright - who I think you can give up where you have depth for a hope and a prayer. Yes he looked terrible but stranger things have happened, and time is on his side. On the other side Williams' ADP is too low at 88 by about a round or a round and a 1/2. Top 60 player vs. top 75 player is what it comes down to for me, and two high 2nds to get that upgrade is a bit much.

 
12 team ppr - QB / 2RB / 3 WR / TE / FL

Thought this one was pretty interesting. I wasn't involved. I'd take the 1.01 - but could see the argument for both sides.
I think this is a solid win for the team getting the draft pick. Watkins is a better WR with equally freaky upside, imo.
I think Watkins is safer (even in Oakland) but Patterson's upside is higher. That comes with a caveat though because I think Patterson reaching his all world upside is pretty slim. It's a fair deal to me. The pick offers a little bit of benefit in liquidity and possible appreciation but I think most teams want Patterson so that's a minor concern.

 
As a Patterson owner in multiple leagues you would have to add something (not anything huge, but something) to the 1.01 to get me to swap. Especially since we are pre-combine and pre-draft. Patterson has shown he can ball at the NFL level and now he's getting Norv as his OC.

If you aren't a believer then I can easily see someone preferring the 1.01.

 
14-team Devy PPR

Gave: 2.5, Jonathon Stewart

Got: David Wilson

Sure a bit of a gamble for Wilson, but all the news recently suggests he should be fine. I do also have Andre Brown too for insurance. Figured 2.5 is more like a mid-20s pick since it's a 14-teamer with devys. Some of the studs like Watkins, Lee, Carey and Seastrunk are all gone so even the 1st round could get slim by the end. And Stewart has never lived up to the hype or done anything.

 
thriftyrocker said:
I think Watkins is safer (even in Oakland) but Patterson's upside is higher. That comes with a caveat though because I think Patterson reaching his all world upside is pretty slim. It's a fair deal to me. The pick offers a little bit of benefit in liquidity and possible appreciation but I think most teams want Patterson so that's a minor concern.
Physically, maybe. But technically, Watkins is better today than Patterson ever will be. Patterson is learning how to play WR on the job. He'll gain some polish and might even learn to run the entire route tree, but he'll never be technician--it's too late in the process for that.

Patterson's upside was always a bigger Percy Harvin with less polish and more size, and I think we forgot that. Now that we're all looking for the next Josh Gordon, we're shoving the square through the circle shape.

Boom or bust WR2 is the likely outcome for Patterson, imo. I say this as a Patterson owner in more than one league, but he has a ways to go before he can be relied on to be a steady NFL WR2. The homeruns will be there, but I wouldn't count on them happening at pace they did over the 2nd half of the season.

 
thriftyrocker said:
I think Watkins is safer (even in Oakland) but Patterson's upside is higher. That comes with a caveat though because I think Patterson reaching his all world upside is pretty slim. It's a fair deal to me. The pick offers a little bit of benefit in liquidity and possible appreciation but I think most teams want Patterson so that's a minor concern.
Physically, maybe. But technically, Watkins is better today than Patterson ever will be. Patterson is learning how to play WR on the job. He'll gain some polish and might even learn to run the entire route tree, but he'll never be technician--it's too late in the process for that.

Patterson's upside was always a bigger Percy Harvin with less polish and more size, and I think we forgot that. Now that we're all looking for the next Josh Gordon, we're shoving the square through the circle shape.

Boom or bust WR2 is the likely outcome for Patterson, imo. I say this as a Patterson owner in more than one league, but he has a ways to go before he can be relied on to be a steady NFL WR2. The homeruns will be there, but I wouldn't count on them happening at pace they did over the 2nd half of the season.
This is what I never understand about fantasy football. Sure Watkins can be a great pick but it is all about being safe with upside. We all know Patterson is about to explode and can play in the NFL. Sammy Watkins had a busted year in college just two years ago. But Sammy is more coveted? Why? This hyping of players needs to stop. Evans or any other WR in the draft could be better as time moves on. Wanting Watkins over Patterson is a perfect example of how people value age more than even production.

 
This is what I never understand about fantasy football. Sure Watkins can be a great pick but it is all about being safe with upside. We all know Patterson is about to explode and can play in the NFL. Sammy Watkins had a busted year in college just two years ago. But Sammy is more coveted? Why? This hyping of players needs to stop. Evans or any other WR in the draft could be better as time moves on. Wanting Watkins over Patterson is a perfect example of how people value age more than even production.
If you want to counter any of my points, feel free. But I laid out why I value Sammy more than Patterson, so "people value age more than even production" is a strawman; at least.

 
Concept Coop said:
Denver724 said:
Unless Watkins ends up playing for the Raiders.
I'd still take Watkins, personally. I'm not targeting either guy for their 2014 production and situations are fluid.
Makes me sick imaging a talent like Watkins wasting away for 5 years in Oakland.

 
We all know Patterson is about to explode and can play in the NFL.
We do? I rate Patterson fairly high, but I don't think his 469 receiving yards as a rookie counts as stronger evidence than Sammy's college career.

Neither one is a proven NFL commodity by any means.

 
Got an interesting one for you guys that I just completed.

League is a Superflex Tiered PPR - Starting 1 QB/WR/RB/TE 4 Flex RB/WR/TE 1 Superflex QB/RB/WR/TE (PPR 1.5 TE, 1 WR, 0.5 RB)

Gave: Tony Romo, Brandon Marshall, 2014 Rookie 2.11

Received: Matt Ryan, Eric Decker, 2014 Rookie 1.10, 2014 Devy 1.10 (That rookie 1.10 should be valued around 2.03ish in a non devy league based on who is rostered)

 
Got an interesting one for you guys that I just completed.

League is a Superflex Tiered PPR - Starting 1 QB/WR/RB/TE 4 Flex RB/WR/TE 1 Superflex QB/RB/WR/TE (PPR 1.5 TE, 1 WR, 0.5 RB)

Gave: Tony Romo, Brandon Marshall, 2014 Rookie 2.11

Received: Matt Ryan, Eric Decker, 2014 Rookie 1.10, 2014 Devy 1.10 (That rookie 1.10 should be valued around 2.03ish in a non devy league based on who is rostered)
I'd take my shot with Marshall and Romo.

 
Got an interesting one for you guys that I just completed.

League is a Superflex Tiered PPR - Starting 1 QB/WR/RB/TE 4 Flex RB/WR/TE 1 Superflex QB/RB/WR/TE (PPR 1.5 TE, 1 WR, 0.5 RB)

Gave: Tony Romo, Brandon Marshall, 2014 Rookie 2.11

Received: Matt Ryan, Eric Decker, 2014 Rookie 1.10, 2014 Devy 1.10 (That rookie 1.10 should be valued around 2.03ish in a non devy league based on who is rostered)
I'd take my shot with Marshall and Romo.
I'd take the Ryan side, but am higher on Decker than most. In this format Winston, Mariota, Hundley, Petty and Hackenberg are quality devy options at QB. If they are all gone, major value will slide elsewhere. While I've never played in a devy super-flex, but pondering it, I think the devy picks would all be very valuable and the most affordable way to add quality QBs to your roster.

 
14-team Devy PPR

Gave: 2.5, Jonathon Stewart

Got: David Wilson

Sure a bit of a gamble for Wilson, but all the news recently suggests he should be fine. I do also have Andre Brown too for insurance. Figured 2.5 is more like a mid-20s pick since it's a 14-teamer with devys. Some of the studs like Watkins, Lee, Carey and Seastrunk are all gone so even the 1st round could get slim by the end. And Stewart has never lived up to the hype or done anything.
Nice work. I would take Wilson in that deal every time.

 
Got an interesting one for you guys that I just completed.

League is a Superflex Tiered PPR - Starting 1 QB/WR/RB/TE 4 Flex RB/WR/TE 1 Superflex QB/RB/WR/TE (PPR 1.5 TE, 1 WR, 0.5 RB)

Gave: Tony Romo, Brandon Marshall, 2014 Rookie 2.11

Received: Matt Ryan, Eric Decker, 2014 Rookie 1.10, 2014 Devy 1.10 (That rookie 1.10 should be valued around 2.03ish in a non devy league based on who is rostered)
I'd take my shot with Marshall and Romo.
I'd take the Ryan side, but am higher on Decker than most. In this format Winston, Mariota, Hundley, Petty and Hackenberg are quality devy options at QB. If they are all gone, major value will slide elsewhere. While I've never played in a devy super-flex, but pondering it, I think the devy picks would all be very valuable and the most affordable way to add quality QBs to your roster.
Devy draft is for those eligbile for the 2015 NFL draft, so the first 3 will be available to be picked, Hackenberg sadly will not!

 
Devy draft is for those eligbile for the 2015 NFL draft, so the first 3 will be available to be picked, Hackenberg sadly will not!
I really like it for you, then. Gurley, Yeldon, Davis, Gordon, Cooper, DGB -- I had assumed these guys would have bee rostered.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top