thriftyrocker said:
I think Watkins is safer (even in Oakland) but Patterson's upside is higher. That comes with a caveat though because I think Patterson reaching his all world upside is pretty slim. It's a fair deal to me. The pick offers a little bit of benefit in liquidity and possible appreciation but I think most teams want Patterson so that's a minor concern.
Physically, maybe. But technically, Watkins is better today than Patterson ever will be. Patterson is learning how to play WR on the job. He'll gain some polish and might even learn to run the entire route tree, but he'll never be technician--it's too late in the process for that.
Patterson's upside was always a bigger Percy Harvin with less polish and more size, and I think we forgot that. Now that we're all looking for the next Josh Gordon, we're shoving the square through the circle shape.
Boom or bust WR2 is the likely outcome for Patterson, imo. I say this as a Patterson owner in more than one league, but he has a ways to go before he can be relied on to be a steady NFL WR2. The homeruns will be there, but I wouldn't count on them happening at pace they did over the 2nd half of the season.