EBF
Footballguy
I think Torrey has slipped into Mike Wallace/Stevie Johnson/Mike Williams territory where people have realized that he's really just a #2 WR masquerading as a #1 because Baltimore doesn't have anything better. I think guys like Adams/Robinson/Moncrief/Beckham might have a similar destiny, so it's not necessarily a horrible thing to cash out the pick for the older version of that kind of talent. However, I think you miss that sell high window where the guy is still a nebulous young prospect fresh on the scene who may or may not have top 10 upside, and thus can convince people to overpay based on the idea that he might become a bona fide star and not just another "meh" depth player. After Torrey's rookie year, you could've argued that he had Pro Bowl upside. After three years, it seems like a stretch.
Thus, even if I knew that Moncrief and Robinson were headed for the same fate, I might prefer them simply because when they first show signs of potential, people will be far more likely to think they can be great (and pay accordingly) than they might with a guy like Smith or Wallace who now look proven mediocrities. I basically feel the same way about Maclin, although maybe he can have a career year in that scheme. It seems to suit him well.
Nothing wrong with a useful depth player. You sacrifice some upside though.
Thus, even if I knew that Moncrief and Robinson were headed for the same fate, I might prefer them simply because when they first show signs of potential, people will be far more likely to think they can be great (and pay accordingly) than they might with a guy like Smith or Wallace who now look proven mediocrities. I basically feel the same way about Maclin, although maybe he can have a career year in that scheme. It seems to suit him well.
Nothing wrong with a useful depth player. You sacrifice some upside though.