delusional
Footballguy
I am not questioning the guy ( he isn't a kid ). I am questioning why him when Carimi was there? Logic should have prevailed here. You have a great OL Coach in Mudd. I would rather have the younger player if both players are equals in talent for the simple fact of age & experience. Potential wise Carimi has 4 more years on playing time then then Watkins. That is 4 less years of growing with the coaching staff ( Mudd ). I don't buy the well he is mature excuse either. Most lineman are mature because it is a wicked position to play that actually takes a brain & the right attitude. Watkins will be what? 27 at the start of the season. Hope to god he doesn't get injured. As any significant time off at his age could be devastating. He pretty much has to come in and play well right off the bat.Also, dont quote King...we all seen some of his mock drafts in the past, they don't mean nothing. Do I hope the pick works? Hell yes I do. But why does it seem like every draft we come out with something that makes us scratch our heads & him being 27 at the start of the season is a head scratcher.As for Reids drafts...yea very questionable over the years. The square peg round hole theory through most of them.It never stops.If this kid grades out to a 1st round pick then if you are the Eagles you take him at 23. It doesn't matter how old he is. Even at his age he can easily play 8 yrs in the NFL at his position. If he has 1st round talent you would sign up for that in a minute. The best part is that none of the "negative" posters have questioned his ability, just his age.Everyone likes to talk about taking the lineman in the 1st round and pencilling him in for the next 10 years. How often does that happen anyway? It isn't likely.Its like this every year. The Eagles ALWAYS throw some sort of curveball in the draft. You can not tell me this wasn't one of them either. When something seems so obvious, the Eagles have to do the opposite. When you have the coaches on the eagles staff that you do, wouldnt it be wise to draft a young player who they would be able to mold that potentially would be around for 10 years ( espeically at OLine )...This guy is going to be 32 by the time his rookie contract is up.
Last edited by a moderator:


Sorry...that's a ridiculous statement. PHYSICAL progression maybe, but the 4 years experiance says that there's likely a ton of room for technical progression. And when there's room for that in a guy who's projected as an immediate starter by almost every expert.....well......your statement makes ZERO sense!