About time those Domers got in a conference.Capella said:ACC Network will launch by August 2019 & ACC extends conference grant of rights thru 2036, sources told @ESPN
ACCs new grant of rights means if Notre Dame joins football conference before 2036, it has to be ACC
Yeah Miami seems way too high. Boise State too high as well IMO.UGA seems high. They have what? 2 BCS bowl wins and 1 or 2 SEC titles? How does that get your top 10?
Miami seems high too - had maybe the greatest team ever in 2001 and another in 2002 but they've been nearly non-existent since then.
Exactly my thought. Ridiculous to have them ahead of LSU, even without the fact that they were caught paying their players.Tiger Fan said:LSU and USC should be flip flopped
in fact, USC should be further down the top 10Exactly my thought. Ridiculous to have them ahead of LSU, even without the fact that they were caught paying their players.
It would surprise me. BYU is the obvious #1 and Houston probably #2. Not sure what either of those schools bring to the conference. At least with UCF you get into the Florida recruiting mix as a whole.Wouldn't surprise me to see Memphis and Cincy.
I can see Houston to the extent it keeps the Texas/central time zone thing the Big 12 has. Right now, the team is fun to watch but that can change.It would surprise me. BYU is the obvious #1 and Houston probably #2. Not sure what either of those schools bring to the conference. At least with UCF you get into the Florida recruiting mix as a whole.
I'd be surprised if Houston gets an invite. Why would TCU or Texas Tech or OK State want to give Houston entrance into their club? Its too risky that Houston will overtake them.I can see Houston to the extent it keeps the Texas/central time zone thing the Big 12 has. Right now, the team is fun to watch but that can change.
It's not like Houston gives them new TV markets. All of the rest of the teams gives them a larger footprint.I'd be surprised if Houston gets an invite. Why would TCU or Texas Tech or OK State want to give Houston entrance into their club? Its too risky that Houston will overtake them.
Not sure what this means. What club?I'd be surprised if Houston gets an invite. Why would TCU or Texas Tech or OK State want to give Houston entrance into their club? Its too risky that Houston will overtake them.
Hell at this point Houston is basically SEC country. I want Houston, Memphis, Cincy, and BYU. If they have to go 16 get Colorado State and UCF.And Memphis gives them Fedex with a recruiting footprint in SEC country
I hear you, but they have to expand. Big 12 is clearly at the bottom of the pecking order as far as the Power 5 conferences are concerned, nothing they do now will change that.Not sure what this means. What club?
Big 12 needs the TV market, which is the biggest in all the South. Last year the Big 12 had two of the top 10 rated games, Houston is good for everyone.
Memphis and Cincinnati are smaller markets and neither school offers anything of value. Rather not expand at all than let either of those schools in.
Houston and Tampa are 10th and 11th respectively. They both have a lot of other unappetizing traits, but tv market isn't one of them.I don't think any of the available schools bring much to the table in terms or tv markets or anything like that. That's why they are available. They should go after the school's with the best overall athletic programs. Houston is a no-brainer imo.
I understand that those are large cities. I should have been more specific. Neither school is close to the top draw in their hometown. I just don't think it's a big deal for those schools specifically. Maybe we should go after Villanova or Georgia State instead.Houston and Tampa are 10th and 11th respectively. They both have a lot of other unappetizing traits, but tv market isn't one of them.
As a USF fan, I don't get the UCF love coupled with the USF ignoring. They're the same ####hole school.
I would guess though that a good portion of that 10th highest Houston TV market is already tuning into Texas, Oklahoma, TCU etc games. The question is if adding Houston adds enough incremental value to the conference to cut them into the revenue pie but if that is also enough to make it worth it for the Texas-area schools to grant them P5 status. The latter is probably a tougher sell to TCU and Oklahoma State.Houston and Tampa are 10th and 11th respectively. They both have a lot of other unappetizing traits, but tv market isn't one of them.
As a USF fan, I don't get the UCF love coupled with the USF ignoring. They're the same ####hole school.
Well of course none of these schools are the biggest draws in a market that big. If they were, they wouldn't be available. I think the hope is to take some of these schools on and then reap the rewards as they grow.I understand that those are large cities. I should have been more specific. Neither school is close to the top draw in their hometown. I just don't think it's a big deal for those schools specifically. Maybe we should go after Villanova or Georgia State instead.
I know next to nothing about UCF and USF, and I don't think it's likely they expand into FL, but who knows.
10th biggest tv market (and 3rd biggest in the south) is extremely appetizing. Or they could go Memphis so the recruiters could just send the cash express instead of using snail mail.Houston and Tampa are 10th and 11th respectively. They both have a lot of other unappetizing traits, but tv market isn't one of them.
As a USF fan, I don't get the UCF love coupled with the USF ignoring. They're the same ####hole school.
Exactly, and I guess that's my point. Markets and footprints and that crap shouldn't be a top priority, because none of the available schools move the needle in that regard.Well of course none of these schools are the biggest draws in a market that big. If they were, they wouldn't be available. I think the hope is to take some of these schools on and then reap the rewards as they grow.
At this point they don't. Things change.Exactly, and I guess that's my point. Markets and footprints and that crap shouldn't be a top priority, because none of the available schools move the needle in that regard.
Maryland was added because of the DC TV market, their endowment, and the buying power of their alumni.I would guess though that a good portion of that 10th highest Houston TV market is already tuning into Texas, Oklahoma, TCU etc games. The question is if adding Houston adds enough incremental value to the conference to cut them into the revenue pie but if that is also enough to make it worth it for the Texas-area schools to grant them P5 status. The latter is probably a tougher sell to TCU and Oklahoma State.
I obviously don't know how the league's TV contracts are structured but the primary reason Rutgers and Maryland were so valuable to the B1G was because BTN could get something like $0.40 cents a subscriber in states where they did not have a team, but about $1 more per sub when they did. That's how the two schools added $50MM in extra BTN revenue year 1.
BYU is a lock if they want in right? So that only leaves 1 or 3 spots. I just can't see Memphis with that God-awful academic rep, tiny market and wretched football program. Doesn't make sense, nobody cares about basketball.10th biggest tv market (and 3rd biggest in the south) is extremely appetizing. Or they could go Memphis so the recruiters could just send the cash express instead of using snail mail.
The only thing that matters about 2 and 3 is that it tends to fit the traditional profile of B1G schools. Louisville has the same, if not stronger, but the B1G wasn't taking them.Maryland was added because of the DC TV market, their endowment, and the buying power of their alumni.
ACC still could have poached then, but yeah that was just so incredibly dumb.I still don't understand how the B12 whiffed on Louisville. Handmade partner for WVU, lots of papa johns money, great programs. What a massive whiff. Could've added them and BYU and went for a swim in the money pool.
I'm actually still kinda surprised the ACC took Louisville. Their academics are so far below everyone else, just never thought they'd go in that direction.I still don't understand how the B12 whiffed on Louisville. Handmade partner for WVU, lots of papa johns money, great programs. What a massive whiff. Could've added them and BYU and went for a swim in the money pool.
I agree that they are going power 5 but the Pac 12 took a meeting with Houston at UH's request. I wouldn't read too much into that.Maryland was added because of the DC TV market, their endowment, and the buying power of their alumni.
Also fwiw, ESPN radio went over the top 15 rated cfb games last year in Houston and the Big 12 had just 4 games. The Pac 12 is already talking to Houston, they are going power 5.
The University of Maryand system is way over a billion though and it's a top research university. It fits into the B1G perfectly.I agree that they are going power 5 but the Pac 12 took a meeting with Houston at UH's request. I wouldn't read too much into that.
I was surprised to see how small Maryland's endowment is according to wiki. Not that much bigger than Memphis'.
I agree with this. Max Brown will be crazy good though. O and D lines will not be able to hang with Alabama but should be remarkably better late in year than early.sportsbook.ag
Was with a buddy yesterday who went to USC. He is way down on the program and thinks they get murdered by Bama early. Thinks Helton is a waste of carbon and hiring Lynn Swann with no previous AD experience was head spinningly stupid.
Absolutely no chance? Sounds like a guy that would be happy to lay 100-1 odds.There is absolutely no chance that Washington wins the PAC 12 this year.
Nah. USC had longer highs highs than LSU. Multiple Heismans, ridiculous winning streak, multiple titles. Nothing wrong with it. Think they should be #2 actually.
ACC realized they would die if they just continued to focus on academia.I'm actually still kinda surprised the ACC took Louisville. Their academics are so far below everyone else, just never thought they'd go in that direction.
Why would I do that when I can get better odds in Vegas? While I think Washington is improving, they are not close to winning the PAC 12 this year. They may finally have a winning record in the PAC 12 at 5-4. I see losses vs Stanford, at Oregon, at Utah, USC. Heck, I think they may lose at WSU and possibly at AZ.Absolutely no chance? Sounds like a guy that would be happy to lay 100-1 odds.
They are co-favorites along with Stanford at 3-1 odds. Everybody loves UW this year. Lofty expectations for a team that went 7-6.Absolutely no chance? Sounds like a guy that would be happy to lay 100-1 odds.
Rutgers likely breaking in a new QB in a definitely brand new offense Week 1 against potentially the best secondary in the country. Looking forward to it!They (UW) do have the best secondary in the country, potentially.