What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official 2015 Off-Season Dynasty Completed Trades Thread** (1 Viewer)

Graham being traded a lot
Yeah, but probably cause he is actually attainable now. Watkins being traded a lot also.

Graham still going for a nice haul though most times from what I see.

I own Graham and Gronk in an FFPC league and I can't see trading either. Such a huge (projected/theoretical) advantage over the other TEs out there.
That's exactly it. Graham has been pretty much off limits in TE premium leagues until this offseason.

 
12 team Superflex no PPR. Passing TDs 6pts.

Mike Evans

Jarvis Landry

Blake Bortles

1.06

For

Matt Ryan

Adrian Peterson

Vincent Jackson

2.06

 
Graham being traded a lot
Yeah, but probably cause he is actually attainable now. Watkins being traded a lot also.

Graham still going for a nice haul though most times from what I see.

I own Graham and Gronk in an FFPC league and I can't see trading either. Such a huge (projected/theoretical) advantage over the other TEs out there.
Yep. That's how I see it as well. These perceived drops in value of elite players like Graham and DT is more a matter of these players finally being possible to trade for at all. But you still have to pay elite prices to get them.

 
Graham being traded a lot
Yeah, but probably cause he is actually attainable now. Watkins being traded a lot also.

Graham still going for a nice haul though most times from what I see.

I own Graham and Gronk in an FFPC league and I can't see trading either. Such a huge (projected/theoretical) advantage over the other TEs out there.
Yep. That's how I see it as well. These perceived drops in value of elite players like Graham and DT is more a matter of these players finally being possible to trade for at all. But you still have to pay elite prices to get them.
Right. Almost the same prices they would have cost 2 years ago. When you have a stud like that, trade them heading into the final year where you can get that "stud" haul.

See the Calvin thread. Lat year was the time to sell, now it's far too late to get a stud haul

 
FFPC - Just traded a 2015 7th round pick, for WR John Brown. And WR Marquise Wilson for mid picks in the 2015 4th, and 5th rounds

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Two Qb league:

Gave: Peyton Manning

Got: Ryan Tannehill

I also Roster Brock Osweiller, Aaron Rodgers, and Big Ben.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't really like tannehill but I like that trade for you. Surprised the other guy was willing to give up a solid qb prospect in a 2qb league for a guy who at least technically might not play again.

If the luck owner has a sucky number two I would offer ben tannehill and an elite receiver for him. Would love to pair him with Rodgers in a 2qb dynasty.

 
12 team Superflex no PPR. Passing TDs 6pts.

Mike Evans

Jarvis Landry

Blake Bortles

1.06

For

Matt Ryan

Adrian Peterson

Vincent Jackson

2.06
Evans side even in super flex
No PPR AND 6pt passing TDs? Sounds to me like QB scoring is significantly higher than WR scoring which, in a super flex, makes Matt Ryan the most valuable piece in the trade by a substantial margin. Positional requirements and yardage scoring could change things, however.

 
12 team Superflex no PPR. Passing TDs 6pts.

Mike Evans

Jarvis Landry

Blake Bortles

1.06

For

Matt Ryan

Adrian Peterson

Vincent Jackson

2.06
Evans side even in super flex
No PPR AND 6pt passing TDs? Sounds to me like QB scoring is significantly higher than WR scoring which, in a super flex, makes Matt Ryan the most valuable piece in the trade by a substantial margin. Positional requirements and yardage scoring could change things, however.
i like this type of thread but learned from viewing that people value picks no matter what and everything is in a vacuum. in a superfles Ryan is a precious piece and in no way does Evans have more value the half the qbs in a superflex non ppr. this is how this thread can hurt evaluations when people blindly pick their favorite player.

 
FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

 
Another Graham deal. 16 team TE premium 1.5 ppr IDP league

Sammy Watkins

Brandin Cooks

Jerry Hughes

for

Jimmy Graham

Larry Fitzgerald
Jimmy

12 team TE premium league (1 .5 PPR for TE, 1 PPR for all others)

I gave: Watkins, Ertz, 1,06

I got: Graham

I'm pretty set at WR so I felt like I could part with Watkins. Also see a drop-off after the first 5 picks as of now. Still have the 1.09 as well
Jimmy

FFPC 12-team

Team A- 2.3, 2.4, 2.6 and Montee Ball

Team B- 1.8 and Andre Williams

Both teams rebuilding.
I will take Ball and all the 2nds.

12 team Superflex no PPR. Passing TDs 6pts.

Mike Evans

Jarvis Landry

Blake Bortles

1.06

For

Matt Ryan

Adrian Peterson

Vincent Jackson

2.06
Give me the Ryan side in most scoring formats in a superflex league. Admittedly I am not as high on Evans as some either.

Pretty even if the other team is rebuilding though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team Superflex no PPR. Passing TDs 6pts.

Mike Evans

Jarvis Landry

Blake Bortles

1.06

For

Matt Ryan

Adrian Peterson

Vincent Jackson

2.06
Evans side even in super flex
No PPR AND 6pt passing TDs? Sounds to me like QB scoring is significantly higher than WR scoring which, in a super flex, makes Matt Ryan the most valuable piece in the trade by a substantial margin. Positional requirements and yardage scoring could change things, however.
i like this type of thread but learned from viewing that people value picks no matter what and everything is in a vacuum. in a superfles Ryan is a precious piece and in no way does Evans have more value the half the qbs in a superflex non ppr. this is how this thread can hurt evaluations when people blindly pick their favorite player.
Bortles could easily come close to Ryan in the next year or two, and I am willing to take that chance to secure everything else added on the Bortles side.

 
FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill
Depending on where the first rounder was, I either hate this or dislike it greatly. Give me CJ and Hop.

 
FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill
I would take the 1st

I think you maybe could have gotten something small along with Hill so Hopkins but close enough team needs could dictate

Two Qb league:

Gave: Peyton Manning

Got: Ryan Tannehill

I also Roster Brock Osweiller, Aaron Rodgers, and Big Ben.
I like it

 
16 team ppr IDP. Defense scores well. Watt scored as much as Leveon Bell last season.

Randall Cobb

J Pierre Paul

Mychal Kendricks

Morgan Burnett

for

JJ Watt

Martavis Bryant

2016 1st (prolly 1.10-1.12)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
16 team ppr IDP. Defense scores well. Watt scored as much as Leveon Bell last season.

Randall Cobb

J Pierre Paul

Mychal Kendricks

Morgan Burnett

for

JJ Watt

Markavis Bryant

2016 1st (prolly 1.10-1.12)
Cobb side for me even if he ends up in the worst offensive situation out there.

Watt is a massive stud in balanced IDP though so I understand someone paying the price

 
FFPC 12-team

Team A- 2.3, 2.4, 2.6 and Montee Ball

Team B- 1.8 and Andre Williams

Both teams rebuilding.
I value those 3 picks more than 1.8. I don't really like Ball or Williams much but I'd prefer Ball so I'd much rather be on side getting the picks and Ball.

Main value I see in Williams is apparently other teams really value him, he was traded in an FFPC league I'm in yesterday for Harvin.

 
FFPC 12-team

Team A- 2.3, 2.4, 2.6 and Montee Ball

Team B- 1.8 and Andre Williams

Both teams rebuilding.
I value those 3 picks more than 1.8. I don't really like Ball or Williams much but I'd prefer Ball so I'd much rather be on side getting the picks and Ball.

Main value I see in Williams is apparently other teams really value him, he was traded in an FFPC league I'm in yesterday for Harvin.
Not sure whether that is love for Williams or hate for Harvin. I have banished that guy from all my teams. So that means he will be huge this year!

 
10 team 2QB 3WR 3RB 2TE 1Flex .5ppr - Not involved pretty massive trade

Team A trades: Dez Bryant, Jordan Cameron, Jeremy Hill, Jarvis Landry

Team B trades: Jimmy Graham, Alshon Jeffery, Isaiah Crowell, 2.06

Trade came with the comment "Sick of Jimmy's random donuts" although with some sarcasm to it

Both teams are championship contenders

 
FFPC 12-team

Team A- 2.3, 2.4, 2.6 and Montee Ball

Team B- 1.8 and Andre Williams

Both teams rebuilding.
I value those 3 picks more than 1.8. I don't really like Ball or Williams much but I'd prefer Ball so I'd much rather be on side getting the picks and Ball.

Main value I see in Williams is apparently other teams really value him, he was traded in an FFPC league I'm in yesterday for Harvin.
Not sure whether that is love for Williams or hate for Harvin. I have banished that guy from all my teams. So that means he will be huge this year!
I'll just say on Harvin if I could pick the two least desirable teams I'd want my WR playing on the past two seasons it would be Seattle and the Jets. Got to think things can only get better.

 
10 team 2QB 3WR 3RB 2TE 1Flex .5ppr - Not involved pretty massive trade

Team A trades: Dez Bryant, Jordan Cameron, Jeremy Hill, Jarvis Landry

Team B trades: Jimmy Graham, Alshon Jeffery, Isaiah Crowell, 2.06

Trade came with the comment "Sick of Jimmy's random donuts" although with some sarcasm to it

Both teams are championship contenders
I'll take the Dez side but close

 
One More Rep said:
VarsityBlues123 said:
Ernol said:
One More Rep said:
12 team Superflex no PPR. Passing TDs 6pts.

Mike Evans

Jarvis Landry

Blake Bortles

1.06

For

Matt Ryan

Adrian Peterson

Vincent Jackson

2.06
Evans side even in super flex
No PPR AND 6pt passing TDs? Sounds to me like QB scoring is significantly higher than WR scoring which, in a super flex, makes Matt Ryan the most valuable piece in the trade by a substantial margin. Positional requirements and yardage scoring could change things, however.
i like this type of thread but learned from viewing that people value picks no matter what and everything is in a vacuum. in a superfles Ryan is a precious piece and in no way does Evans have more value the half the qbs in a superflex non ppr. this is how this thread can hurt evaluations when people blindly pick their favorite player.
Bortles could easily come close to Ryan in the next year or two, and I am willing to take that chance to secure everything else added on the Bortles side.
That's extremely optimistic, haha. But I do like the rest of the pieces in the trade and don't think it was awful or anything.

 
10 team 2QB 3WR 3RB 2TE 1Flex .5ppr - Not involved pretty massive trade

Team A trades: Dez Bryant, Jordan Cameron, Jeremy Hill, Jarvis Landry

Team B trades: Jimmy Graham, Alshon Jeffery, Isaiah Crowell, 2.06

Trade came with the comment "Sick of Jimmy's random donuts" although with some sarcasm to it

Both teams are championship contenders
I'll take the Dez side but close
Agreed

 
maxhyde said:
fruity pebbles said:
16 team ppr IDP. Defense scores well. Watt scored as much as Leveon Bell last season.

Randall Cobb

J Pierre Paul

Mychal Kendricks

Morgan Burnett

for

JJ Watt

Markavis Bryant

2016 1st (prolly 1.10-1.12)
Cobb side for me even if he ends up in the worst offensive situation out there.Watt is a massive stud in balanced IDP though so I understand someone paying the price
16 teams Watt is a beast
 
10 team 2QB 3WR 3RB 2TE 1Flex .5ppr - Not involved pretty massive trade

Team A trades: Dez Bryant, Jordan Cameron, Jeremy Hill, Jarvis Landry

Team B trades: Jimmy Graham, Alshon Jeffery, Isaiah Crowell, 2.06

Trade came with the comment "Sick of Jimmy's random donuts" although with some sarcasm to it

Both teams are championship contenders
Dez for me but close deal

 
maxhyde said:
fruity pebbles said:
16 team ppr IDP. Defense scores well. Watt scored as much as Leveon Bell last season.

Randall Cobb

J Pierre Paul

Mychal Kendricks

Morgan Burnett

for

JJ Watt

Markavis Bryant

2016 1st (prolly 1.10-1.12)
Cobb side for me even if he ends up in the worst offensive situation out there.Watt is a massive stud in balanced IDP though so I understand someone paying the price
16 teams Watt is a beast
Sorry I was unaware that beast >> massive stud

 
Ernol said:
FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill
"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC

 
Two Qb league:

Gave: Peyton Manning

Got: Ryan Tannehill

I also Roster Brock Osweiller, Aaron Rodgers, and Big Ben.
weak for this year, good for every year thereafter.
i have a very strong team so the regular season isn't a big concern/. I need somebody who can score in weeks 14-16. Tannehill far outplayed manning in those weeks. He was #2 behind only Matt Ryan. In fact in the second half of the season they were almost even in points. I like my chances of Tannehill scoring more than Manning immediately and the deal just gets better for me once Manning Retires.

 
FFPC so ppr with dual flex, cutdown week, team A has 1 wr and no depth, team b has a lot of decent wrs but too many guys to keep so some must be cut.

Team A trades TY Hilton

Team B trades Michael Floyd, Allen Robinson, Brian Quick

 
FFPC so ppr with dual flex, cutdown week, team A has 1 wr and no depth, team b has a lot of decent wrs but too many guys to keep so some must be cut.

Team A trades TY Hilton

Team B trades Michael Floyd, Allen Robinson, Brian Quick
3 is better than 1. Give me that side by a good margin.

 
Ernol said:
FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill
"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC
That was about my thoughts on the CJ Anderson trade. I'm guessing he's pretty sure about it being a non-playoff team. I have no idea what league that trade was made or who he made it with but maybe some people don't like to provide context that helps evaluate trades, like this is a surefire non-playoff pick, out of respect for the other owner in the event they have reason to think they might be reading these boards.

I would absolutely prefer Hopkins over Hill.

 
FFPC so ppr with dual flex, cutdown week, team A has 1 wr and no depth, team b has a lot of decent wrs but too many guys to keep so some must be cut.

Team A trades TY Hilton

Team B trades Michael Floyd, Allen Robinson, Brian Quick
3 is better than 1. Give me that side by a good margin.
Same here
I'm in this league and thought it was a win for both sides. Team giving up the 3 players was staring at some tough cuts if they could not swing this type of deal, and trust me I know they'd been trying .Now, I think that team could have done a better job of avoiding this situation with some earlier moves but thought they dug themselves out of the hole nicely with this trade.

 
Ernol said:
FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill
"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC
That was about my thoughts on the CJ Anderson trade. I'm guessing he's pretty sure about it being a non-playoff team. I have no idea what league that trade was made or who he made it with but maybe some people don't like to provide context that helps evaluate trades, like this is a surefire non-playoff pick, out of respect for the other owner in the event they have reason to think they might be reading these boards.

I would absolutely prefer Hopkins over Hill.
Thank you. Apparently some people do not understand how far-reaching FBGs message board are.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it really that difficult to say you think a pick is definitely a non playoff pick even if that team reads this?? Good grief.

Althouh that team would have to be very very bad to be a sure non playoff team after adding Anderson.

 
In all fairness, 6/12 make the playoffs in those leagues. and then due to the structure if the guy has a really bad team you are getting pick 4, not pick 1 (there is a playoff for draft positions). The only way to get a top pick is to guess right on the good team to miss the playoffs. These draft picks are no sure things, there is a wide variance between what the expected pick is and what it winds up being in a lot of cases. At least that has been my experience in these, I've been in 3 of them for a few years now

 
pizzatyme said:
Hey girl, I think you're fine. You wanna go back to my place and have a drink? Meanwhile...posting on FB that you're about to hook up with this skank.

The art of negotiation is not to slap the hand that feeds, no matter how small your critique may be.
Sure, so lying to their face is just soooo much better. Dont be a girl.

The guy asking for help a few weeks ago is criticizing a guy with three FFPC titles and some 2nds. Love it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In all fairness, 6/12 make the playoffs in those leagues. and then due to the structure if the guy has a really bad team you are getting pick 4, not pick 1 (there is a playoff for draft positions). The only way to get a top pick is to guess right on the good team to miss the playoffs. These draft picks are no sure things, there is a wide variance between what the expected pick is and what it winds up being in a lot of cases. At least that has been my experience in these, I've been in 3 of them for a few years now
yes all you can do is gauge if it's a non-playoff team or not, the rest is all up to chance. I've made 4 trades in FFPC leagues acquiring teams future #1 picks. In 3 of those cases I was extremely confident the picks would be non-playoff teams the 4th I considered 60/40 or so to be a non-playoff team.

Turns out all the picks were non-playoff teams. The 3 I was sure confident would be non-playoff teams were all so bad they stunk in the draft playoffs and all the picks ended up being 5 and 6(this was done twice in the league I'm in with you). The pick from the team I viewed as 60/40 to be a non-playoff team barely missed the playoffs and won the draft playoffs and earned me pick 1.1.

 
Man, people aren't including important info needed to evaluate a trade now for fear of insulting a fellow owner?

I understand not wanting to be like "this team sucks, guaranteed top-4 pick". But at least give your rationale for the trade, delicately if need be (I think it has a decent chance to be a top-5 pick, etc).

 
Bad teams can also make a move or two and be much better and actually win a losers bracket game or two.

There is some luck in it for sure though. Get more than one of the bsd teams picks:)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top