PlasmaDogPlasma
Footballguy
Those still aren't the final numbers.Trump 268
Cruz 142
Rubio 78
With Alaska out.
Those still aren't the final numbers.Trump 268
Cruz 142
Rubio 78
With Alaska out.
Hardly a mandate. Not even 50% in a single state. But in his victory speech tonight he put on a great display of persuasive speaking.bolzano said:Quick delegate projections: Trump is on track for 262 delegates, Cruz for 215, and Rubio for 93.
https://twitter.com/FiveThirtyEight/status/704896284000444420
I'm all in for S.E. Cupp and Amanda Carpenter. I like the John King boards too, and sad to admit I like Van Jones. But S.E. and Amanda are a good draw.I have been really impressed with their analysis/programming...except for that 8 person panel nonsense. Though they seemed to iron that out a bit lately.
Cruz is still an actual contender, unlike Kasich.If Cruz dropped it could have been two more states for Trump tonight.
Van Jones has been the most impressive to me by far. And I have never been a Van Jones fan....AT ALL.I'm all in for S.E. Cupp and Amanda Carpenter. I like the John King boards too, and sad to admit I like Van Jones. But S.E. and Amanda are a good draw.
Closer than anyone else is reporting in here though.Those still aren't the final numbers.
I read that during "Crossfire" he and Newt Gingrich became very close, and even after the show was cancelled still maintained a friendship.Van Jones has been the most impressive to me by far. And I have never been a Van Jones fan....AT ALL.
These guys are doing a great job they are counting the ballots right here they are focused they are ignoring the fact that I'm standing right next to them being as distracting as I can possibly be who knows how many they have looks like 45 or 50 or 55 ballots now they are starting over and counting from the beginning this is so e xciting looks like it may be a while before the final tally is in.We have live coverage from Anchorage.
I think it's over. I don't see how they take it from Trump if he's way out in front. They talk of the party being split, but they permanently destroy the party if they nominate someone the voters didn't put in the lead. It's better to have one bad election I'd think than to go through that.So what some people keep saying on TV is that Trump might reach the convention without the 1200 delegates he needs. But even so, he'll still have a sizable lead on everyone else. Suppose he reached the convention a hundred short and the powers that be gave the nomination to somebody else way behind? Can you imagine? That really would destroy the GOP.
They have to give it to Trump. On March 15 he wins Florida and Ohio unless Rubio and/or Kasich can pull a rabbit out of a hat. And then it's over, right? No more shenanigans.
These guys are doing a great job they are counting the ballots right here they are focused they are ignoring the fact that I'm standing right next to them being as distracting as I can possibly be who knows how many they have looks like 45 or 50 or 55 ballots now they are starting over and counting from the beginning this is so e xciting looks like it may be a while before the final tally is in.
The CNN guy on that assigment is thinking "who the hell did I piss off to deserve this".If they don't give it to Trump, the GOP would be more fractured than if they give it to him. Trump displayed some humility and sounded more like a unifier then ever before in tonight's victory speech. If he starts to sound more presidential, he could might be able to overcome the demographic disadvantage Republicans have in the general election. In Florida, Romney lost by less than 1% in 2012. I'm voting for Hillary, but I have to admit that his speech and Q&A tonight was very good. He reached out to women by talking about the good things done by PP.So what some people keep saying on TV is that Trump might reach the convention without the 1200 delegates he needs. But even so, he'll still have a sizable lead on everyone else. Suppose he reached the convention a hundred short and the powers that be gave the nomination to somebody else way behind? Can you imagine? That really would destroy the GOP.
They have to give it to Trump. On March 15 he wins Florida and Ohio unless Rubio and/or Kasich can pull a rabbit out of a hat. And then it's over, right? No more shenanigans.
Trump still needs, what, 400 delegates? A brokered convention is not entirely eliminated at this point.. Jake Tapper just asked him if he was in denial about the race.
It would hardly be the first time a front runner was left out in the cold after the convention.So what some people keep saying on TV is that Trump might reach the convention without the 1200 delegates he needs. But even so, he'll still have a sizable lead on everyone else. Suppose he reached the convention a hundred short and the powers that be gave the nomination to somebody else way behind? Can you imagine? That really would destroy the GOP.
They have to give it to Trump. On March 15 he wins Florida and Ohio unless Rubio and/or Kasich can pull a rabbit out of a hat. And then it's over, right? No more shenanigans.
Yea, I get what many will say "well, that is now, if he wins the nomination they will unite behind him".. and I just don't see it myself..A growing number of Republicans, including freshman U.S. Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, have said in recent days that they will never vote for Trump, even if he is the party’s nominee in November.
Trump’s open admiration for tyrannical rulers in other countries, his encouragement of violence at his political rallies, his eagerness to restrict the freedom of the press, his rejection of equality under the law for minority groups, his lack of any coherent political beliefs and the many liberal positions he has adopted in the past all combine to make him anathema to many Republicans.
At least with Hilary, you know what you're getting. We have no idea what crazy think Drumpf could come up with. Where does he stand on the major issues? No one has a clue. Hell, I don't think he does either.Here is an article in regards to what I was talking about yesterday:
Yea, I get what many will say "well, that is now, if he wins the nomination they will unite behind him".. and I just don't see it myself..
This is beyond "hold your nose and vote for him" there is utter contempt for him in the upper echelon's of the GOP and it seems some of them would rather deal with Hillary then Trump..![]()
You misspelled "narrowly". Half the electorate are Democrats and/or female. Plus Trump is about to be exposed for what he really is.The dirty truth and the elephant in the room that nobody is talking about is this, whites will overwhelmingly vote for Trump, minorities are going to overwhelmingly vote for Hillary.
Do with that what you will.
No, nominating a guy like Trump would destroy the GOP. Stopping him at the convention would demonstrate that there are still some responsible adults in that party who realize that it was a bad idea to let the kids play unsupervised with lawn darts.So what some people keep saying on TV is that Trump might reach the convention without the 1200 delegates he needs. But even so, he'll still have a sizable lead on everyone else. Suppose he reached the convention a hundred short and the powers that be gave the nomination to somebody else way behind? Can you imagine? That really would destroy the GOP.
Newsflash: the majority of whites have voted Republican in every presidential election since at least 1968.The dirty truth and the elephant in the room that nobody is talking about is this, whites will overwhelmingly vote for Trump, minorities are going to overwhelmingly vote for Hillary.
Do with that what you will.
It will be absolutely fascinating to watch. The problem is, one of them will end up POTUS.Your side generally has more guns, really just math.
From what I see via Facebook where I know people's politics (and being a vet I have a lot of righty friends), it seems my establishment GOP friends and family dislike the thought of Trump more than my lefty friends. Trump is getting the nod IMO, so I will be very curious to see what the Rubio types say when it's Hillary v Trump. This election is just a string ofops.
I Don't get this at all. So you basically go against the will of your voters and somehow they're going to come out and vote for your anointed one?No, nominating a guy like Trump would destroy the GOP. Stopping him at the convention would demonstrate that there are still some responsible adults in that party who realize that it was a bad idea to let the kids play unsupervised with lawn darts.
When one of your kids is throwing a tantrum, you need to calmly move the kid into a quiet area and stop them from flinging stuff into your china hutch. Give them a chance to calm down and come their senses, and then explain patiently to them how their behavior was inappropriate and not to be repeated.I Don't get this at all. So you basically go against the will of your voters and somehow they're going to come out and vote for your anointed one?
You forgot to mention that in your analogy you have a special needs kid.When one of your kids is throwing a tantrum, you need to calmly move the kid into a quiet area and stop them from flinging stuff into your china hutch. Give them a chance to calm down and come their senses, and then explain patiently to them how their behavior was inappropriate and not to be repeated.
Yes, that's how I view Trump voters.
Exactly...Id be more fascinated with it if that end result would be different.It will be absolutely fascinating to watch. The problem is, one of them will end up POTUS.
Zero possibility of that if he doesn't win Florida.. and right now the average polls have him losing to Trump by 20This is probably already posted in another thread but Nate Silver has some interesting thoughts on a brokered convention: Can Republicans Still Take the Nomination Away From Trump?
If I were a betting man, I'd still put money on Rubio.
I'm really torn on this Ivan. I agree with you about Trump voters. I'd love nothing more than to see the Republican Party repudiate Trump.When one of your kids is throwing a tantrum, you need to calmly move the kid into a quiet area and stop them from flinging stuff into your china hutch. Give them a chance to calm down and come their senses, and then explain patiently to them how their behavior was inappropriate and not to be repeated.
Yes, that's how I view Trump voters.
When one of your kids is throwing a tantrum, you need to calmly move the kid into a quiet area and stop them from flinging stuff into your china hutch. Give them a chance to calm down and come their senses, and then explain patiently to them how their behavior was inappropriate and not to be repeated.
Yes, that's how I view Trump voters.
I want him too. He is a total tool. Can't stand him. Total phony.Agreed. He really could be jeopardizing any chance to run in the future, especially if he loses big in FLA. Bret Baer brought up a good point in that the border areas of Georgia and Alabama that share radio and TV with Florida overwhelmingly went to Trump tonight. If Trump wins Florida handily and Cruz finishes within striking distance of Rubio, why would the GOP ever back him again? He's young, he's a sharp guy, he's just not ready yet. Maybe someday he will be and that ship may have sailed after what has transpired in this race.
There are far more "white people" in the country. But a lot of them will not vote for Trump IMO. He has a niche market not the general market.The dirty truth and the elephant in the room that nobody is talking about is this, whites will overwhelmingly vote for Trump, minorities are going to overwhelmingly vote for Hillary.
Do with that what you will.
Trump has Florida locked up. It will be a landslide win.Zero possibility of that if he doesn't win Florida.. and right now the average polls have him losing to Trump by 20![]()
So far though..."most" of them are not voting for him.I'm really torn on this Ivan. I agree with you about Trump voters. I'd love nothing more than to see the Republican Party repudiate Trump.
...But this is our system. They voted for him. Republican voters have a right to the guy most of them voted for.
Dem President - 63.4%
Rep President - 35.4%
Independent - 1.2%
The count of delegates says this is far from over... . Trump - 316, Cruz - 226, Rubio - 106I'm really torn on this Ivan. I agree with you about Trump voters. I'd love nothing more than to see the Republican Party repudiate Trump.
...But this is our system. They voted for him. Republican voters have a right to the guy most of them voted for.
I don't see the not chance part of that.dparker713 said:He won't chance it if Trump is the nominee. Whereas Mitt could get in specifically because Trump is the nominee.
If you assume current voting patterns hold (ie Trump sweeps the rest of the south sans FL and monopolizes the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast and you assume he takes CA), Cruz, Rubio, and Kasich basically have to prevent him from winning 3 out of 4 of Ohio, Illinois, FL, and Missouri on the 15th. Any combo of 3 of those basically puts Trump on a fairly assured path to 1237. If Trump wins 0,1, or 2 of those contests, you probably end up with some type of brokered convention. If he sweeps all 4, the nomination fight is for all intents over.The count of delegates says this is far from over... . Trump - 316, Cruz - 226, Rubio - 106
Question for those that know better then I...
Let's say Rubio drops as he should after March 15th.. does he get to "give" those delegates to who he wants, or do they just stay with a none candidate??
Let's say Rubio drops as he should after March 15th.. does he get to "give" those delegates to who he wants, or do they just stay with a none candidate??
I'd bet on it.Leeroy Jenkins said:With Trump not sweeping and his wins only having 35%, at most seemingly, of the vote this thing has a real chance of being a brokered convention.
If Rubio formally endorses another candidate, then his delegates would be obligated to vote for that candidate. Otherwise, the delegates would be considered "uncommitted".
Quote
Let's say Rubio drops as he should after March 15th.. does he get to "give" those delegates to who he wants, or do they just stay with a none candidate??
short of a miracle win by Rubio, he drops on March 16th and his current 106 delegates would probably go to Cruz as no way is he endorsing Trump..
And this mentality is why the GOP deserves to die.When one of your kids is throwing a tantrum, you need to calmly move the kid into a quiet area and stop them from flinging stuff into your china hutch. Give them a chance to calm down and come their senses, and then explain patiently to them how their behavior was inappropriate and not to be repeated.
Yes, that's how I view Trump voters.
In simple terms...delegates are locked to each candidate until after the first round of balloting at the convention (assuming nobody has the 50%). Then they can be released.The count of delegates says this is far from over... . Trump - 316, Cruz - 226, Rubio - 106
Question for those that know better then I...
Let's say Rubio drops as he should after March 15th.. does he get to "give" those delegates to who he wants, or do they just stay with a none candidate??
How could that matter at the Republican convention?
On the first ballot (or in a handful of states beyond that), bound delegates will have to vote for the candidate they are bound to. But if no candidate gets a majority on the first vote, then it gets interesting. Delegates bound to one candidate but aligned with another could then be crucial.
But we’re still talking about a long-shot scenario, right?
Sure, but it’s not as long of a shot as it perhaps once was.
Nevertheless, the system of delegate allocation in both parties is designed to convert the chaos of the invisible primary — if there is any left over — into order and typically before the end of primary season.
If 2016 proves any different, it will be because of the changes I’ve described here.
I disagree with the second line, but this is another one of those issues where I know I'm in the minority. Direct democracy is a terrible idea, and our system contains lots of little anti-democratic snags for a reason. Back in the day, nominations were sorted out in a smoke-filled room by party elders, not by the common rabble. Say what you will about "party elders," but they never would have seriously entertained the notion on nominating somebody like Donald Trump. In fact, I'm kind of inclined to go a little further and use Trump as Exhibit A for why the modern primary system is inferior to the smoke-filled room. But again, that's just me, and I'm very open about not being a big fan of democracy to start with.I'm really torn on this Ivan. I agree with you about Trump voters. I'd love nothing more than to see the Republican Party repudiate Trump.
...But this is our system. They voted for him. Republican voters have a right to the guy most of them voted for.