What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

The Next POTUS - Here are the odds, who is the best bet? (2 Viewers)

$10 each on everyone +10000 or higher, $80 down

$50 each on Trump and Biden at +2500, now up to $180.

$100 each on Walker at +900 and Sanders at +1200, $380 spent.

Good chance at at least doubling with a Walker win, or winning even more if Sanders, Trump, Biden, or the longshots take it.
better chance you are throwing away $640 when Hillary wins.
0% chance Hillary wins the general election.
might be the wrongest thing anyone has ever said.

EDIT: but if you truly believe that, you should really bet your life savings against her. you could double your money.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd go Huckabee +6600. There's a lot of dead weight at better odds in front of him. He's far Right enough ( and social Conservative enough) that he could sneak a couple of early strong showings in the primaries.
I'll give you double that if you like.
No fun betting on chalk. Christe, Cruz, Carson, Fiorina...they aren't winning no matter what. Trump's a dangerous clown who only hurts the socially liberal/fiscally conservative. Huckabee's the highest ranked social conservative on the board.....something that Santorum showed in 2012 can create waves. He'll run a traditional "Conservative Red Meat" platform. He's like the mid-major that has 5 starting seniors.

 
Clinton is a terrible value, obviously.

I think anybody on the bottom half of the list is probably just throwing money away.

So who on the top half of the list other than Hillary has any shot at all at actually winning?

Bush - sure

Rubio - doubt it, too conservative

Walker - maybe

Sanders - doubt it, way too socialist

Carson, Trump, Biden - :lol:

Christie - don't see it

Cruz - way too conservative

Kasich - no idea who this even is

Paul - :oldunsure:

So that leaves me with Jeb and Walker as "value" picks. But I don't really believe either of them are going to win.
If Bernie is way too socialist then America is. His positions poll with majority support.
If that is true, then we are truly totally ####ed as country.

He won't win in any event, because an indpendent can't. The system is too rigged against them.
Good thing he is running as a democrat then.
Oh is he a Democrat again? :lmao:
As you said the system is rigged
It is rigged against Indpendents for sure.

I wasn't aware that Bernie was running as a Democrat. I don't follow politics super closely.

The fact his positions poll well is frightening, but then again, he is a populist.
I have yet to find any of his postions scary.
I find his position on a 79 year old being president pretty scary.
Seems healthy enough but yes I will be looking at his VP pick very closely of we get that far.

 
Clinton is a terrible value, obviously.

I think anybody on the bottom half of the list is probably just throwing money away.

So who on the top half of the list other than Hillary has any shot at all at actually winning?

Bush - sure

Rubio - doubt it, too conservative

Walker - maybe

Sanders - doubt it, way too socialist

Carson, Trump, Biden - :lol:

Christie - don't see it

Cruz - way too conservative

Kasich - no idea who this even is

Paul - :oldunsure:

So that leaves me with Jeb and Walker as "value" picks. But I don't really believe either of them are going to win.
If Bernie is way too socialist then America is. His positions poll with majority support.
If that is true, then we are truly totally ####ed as country.

He won't win in any event, because an indpendent can't. The system is too rigged against them.
Good thing he is running as a democrat then.
Oh is he a Democrat again? :lmao:
As you said the system is rigged
It is rigged against Indpendents for sure.

I wasn't aware that Bernie was running as a Democrat. I don't follow politics super closely.

The fact his positions poll well is frightening, but then again, he is a populist.
I have yet to find any of his postions scary.
That doesn't surprise me in the least.
Yeah I support raising the minimum wage, making education spending less.by just paying for it. I believe we need trade deala that are fair to Americans not whatever mudhut country they intend to pay nothing. Ooh scary.

 
I'd go Huckabee +6600. There's a lot of dead weight at better odds in front of him. He's far Right enough ( and social Conservative enough) that he could sneak a couple of early strong showings in the primaries.
I'll give you double that if you like.
No fun betting on chalk. Christe, Cruz, Carson, Fiorina...they aren't winning no matter what. Trump's a dangerous clown who only hurts the socially liberal/fiscally conservative. Huckabee's the highest ranked social conservative on the board.....something that Santorum showed in 2012 can create waves. He'll run a traditional "Conservative Red Meat" platform. He's like the mid-major that has 5 starting seniors.
there's a lot of fun betting on chalk when you win money.

many people around here cleaned up betting Obama over Romney last election. polling data showed he was a much bigger favorite than the oddsmakers had him listed at. was literally free money with no risk. good times.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Kasich is the best bet. He's had some rise in the polls since he entered and has some likability.

 
$10 each on everyone +10000 or higher, $80 down

$50 each on Trump and Biden at +2500, now up to $180.

$100 each on Walker at +900 and Sanders at +1200, $380 spent.

Good chance at at least doubling with a Walker win, or winning even more if Sanders, Trump, Biden, or the longshots take it.
better chance you are throwing away $640 when Hillary wins.
0% chance Hillary wins the general election.
I'll bet $100 she wins, but you've got to be give me 100:1 odds. Sounds like easy money for you.
I'll put up $100 to your $50.

 
Since we have limited space, we'll leave it only for the ones who have a shot

4-1 odds Jeb. He looks just like Mike Francesa, sounds like a giant turd and has the same genetic makeup of the biggest screwup of a president but he's married to a Hispanic woman, seems to be sensible and not a total nutcase (compared to the other guys in the field). He has name recognition, was a governor of a big swing state, looks like the mind of dweeb who wears dockers on a Sunday but falls in that "the evil you know is better than the evil you don't" category for most

8-1 Scott Walker. Honestly he is winning this republican nomination thing and it won't be close but he can't be considered a favorite until he walks up to Jeb and gives him a wedgie, hopefully it of the atomic variety

14-1 Rubio. Might be higher if he can get a more clear consistent message and stops playing to the crazies

20-1. Christie. His chances are probably lower but he will destroy in the debates

30-1 the black guy. Ben Carson

35-1 Rand Paul. Sorry Zed but we're not ready for his type of truth and anybody who believes that 9/11 was an inside job probably shouldn't hold a top office positron

40-1 Ted Cruz. He is considered the intellectual voice of the TeaParty movement which is like saying you are the the skinniest guy at fat camp
There is no chance in hell he wins the nomination, zero. Still he is higher than the next few chumps

45-1 Huckabee. I swear to you that this guy has Hulk Hogan skeletons in his closet. (The bang your buddy's wife type not the hate on Virgil type)

55-1 Trump. He is 10-1 odds worse than Huckabee and Huckabee has NO shot. His fall from the top will be meteoric but entertaining all the way through

The rest of them: Bobby Jindal is a giant turd, Pataki is a douce, Fiorina would lose an election for 8th grade treasure yet she still continues to blow her fortune running, Kasich the average American hasn't heard of him, even the politically involved couldn't pull him out of a lineup and even his own wife wouldn't vote for him. Lindsay Graham, sorry dude but no. Rick Perry put on those glasses and hopes nobody recognizes him as the giant troll that he is. Rick Santorum has as much of a shot as he did four years ago, four years before that and four years before that and then there are a few other guys who I can't remember which is probably a good thing..or not

 
Clinton is a terrible value, obviously.

I think anybody on the bottom half of the list is probably just throwing money away.

So who on the top half of the list other than Hillary has any shot at all at actually winning?

Bush - sure

Rubio - doubt it, too conservative

Walker - maybe

Sanders - doubt it, way too socialist

Carson, Trump, Biden - :lol:

Christie - don't see it

Cruz - way too conservative

Kasich - no idea who this even is

Paul - :oldunsure:

So that leaves me with Jeb and Walker as "value" picks. But I don't really believe either of them are going to win.
If Bernie is way too socialist then America is. His positions poll with majority support.
If that is true, then we are truly totally ####ed as country.

He won't win in any event, because an indpendent can't. The system is too rigged against them.
Good thing he is running as a democrat then.
Oh is he a Democrat again? :lmao:
As you said the system is rigged
It is rigged against Indpendents for sure.

I wasn't aware that Bernie was running as a Democrat. I don't follow politics super closely.

The fact his positions poll well is frightening, but then again, he is a populist.
I have yet to find any of his postions scary.
That doesn't surprise me in the least.
Yeah I support raising the minimum wage, making education spending less.by just paying for it. I believe we need trade deala that are fair to Americans not whatever mudhut country they intend to pay nothing. Ooh scary.
Ok. I think Sanders is a populist dip#### and you think he is terrific. (I will say I admire his independence and ethics in terms of his campaign finances, I just don't like anything else.)

We aren't going to agree and I have no problem with that.

Unlike many folks (and I'm not meaning to imply you are one of them) I have no problem having friendly interactions with people with whom I have sharp differences of opinion on things like politics or economics.

 
If something happened to Hillary, i think Gore could step in and clinch the nomination pretty easily. Would he beat the Republicans? I don't know but he did win the popular vote when he ran.

 
My money is on Hillary, and there isn't a close second.

Gun to my head, I'd go with Jeb as my second, but wouldn't feel very good about it.

 
Maybe Hillary and Jeb are the favorites right now but who wants to bet on the chalk? So who is the best bet? (Odds from http://www.oddsshark.com/entertainment/us-presidential-odds-2016-futures )

Hillary Clinton -110
...
I like trends.

On 7/17/15 Hillary was running at...

Clinton sits atop the Democratic presidential nominee list at -700 odds at Bovada...
http://politicaldispute.com/2015/07/17/betting-odds-to-win-2016-united-states-presidential-election-republican-candidate/

... which means that she is a lot closer to even now.

 
Clinton is a terrible value, obviously.
she is?

she's a lock for the Democrat nomination IMO, and will be a decent favorite in the general election.

-110 seems like a steal on her to me. I already started loading up.
Not that I think it's a bad bet, but wasn't Hillary even more of a favorite 15 months out from '08?

Of course, there doesn't appear to be an Obama on the horizon this time (though, 15 months out from '08, I'd have bet anything that Americans would absolutely not elect a dude named Barack Obama).

 
I really think Rubio or Walker have a shot. Main feeling on this board seems to be that Democrats are a shoe in and the odds show Hillary as the favorite (although i think that's because she is the clear cut leader in the primary and the Repubs have such a wide field).

What has happened since the last election, where the Dems got clocked, that makes anyone feel that the perception of the country is that it has turned the corner? Foreign policy is a train wreck right now, the economy may be in an official recovery but wages are down, hours are down, and nobody I know on the street is feeling much relief. Still tons of problems w/ Obamacare. I'm just not seeing what Obama has done since November to turn this tide around? Not to mention that the supreme court basically removed a huge wedge issue from the election when they legalized gay marriage, you can't run on equality now that we have that equality.

The one thing everyone seems to be banking on is the hispanic vote but I don't know about that. Obama is practically handing the Republicans Florida w. his Cuban policy and there is a really angry undercurrent right now on immigration that's ready to explode. It's exactly what Trump is tapping into. If it's making people listen to someone like Trump imagine when someone reasonable and electable starts parroting a more restrained and palatable version of what Trump is drawing people in with.

And let's not forget that there is a good chance the black vote is going to be abysmal in the next election. The community is angry, many people already don't like Hillary from the last primary, and the black community is pretty angry right now at the Dems. I don't think they're switching sides but I think they may stay home.

PP is really firing up the evangelical base (like me) who have been sidelines for a couple of elections.

This is no shoe in for the Dems.

 
Biden is the best odds. Hillary could be derailed with all the scandals.

Bush is also good odds imo. But the odds are still stacked against any Republican. Democrats pretty much have 232 of the 270 electoral college votes needed. Republicans have 164, and 144 are up for grabs - key states being FL (29), OH (18), NC (15) and VA (13). Expect to see a ticket of Bush and Kasich, and a reasonably close election as a result.

 
If something happened to Hillary, i think Gore could step in and clinch the nomination pretty easily. Would he beat the Republicans? I don't know but he did win the popular vote when he ran.
I voted for Gore and think he would have been a fine President but his work on climate change since then brings a lot of baggage with it.

 
Maybe Hillary and Jeb are the favorites right now but who wants to bet on the chalk? So who is the best bet? (Odds from http://www.oddsshark.com/entertainment/us-presidential-odds-2016-futures )

Hillary Clinton -110
...
I like trends.

On 7/17/15 Hillary was running at...

Clinton sits atop the Democratic presidential nominee list at -700 odds at Bovada...
http://politicaldispute.com/2015/07/17/betting-odds-to-win-2016-united-states-presidential-election-republican-candidate/

... which means that she is a lot closer to even now.
huh?

At Bovada right now:

Democratic nomination:

Clinton: -699

Sanders: +800

Biden: +800

O'Malley: +3300

Warren: +5000

Now you have to only bet $699 to win $100 but 2 weeks ago you had to bet $700 to win $100.

$1 savings!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If something happened to Hillary, i think Gore could step in and clinch the nomination pretty easily. Would he beat the Republicans? I don't know but he did win the popular vote when he ran.
I voted for Gore and think he would have been a fine President but his work on climate change since then brings a lot of baggage with it.
Not to mention the fact that if Mitt Romney is evil incarnate because he made a lot of money in private equity, Gore is at least a minor demon.

 
I'm not sure that the people that think the Democrats have this wrapped up realize that the people that voted for Obama twice was something that historically really has never happened before. The mix of people that vote in these elections usually looks nothing like what happened in 2008 and 2012.

Now, it could be this is the start of a new era where young people come out and vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats, but I'm not ready to assume that just yet. It could be the combination of a young, black, charismatic candidate like Obama got the vote out like we haven't seen before.

One thing for sure, Hillary doesn't have a 10th of the charisma of Obama or her husband for that matter. Her negatives are off the charts and, despite what anyone says, I think this is the best crop of Republican candidates we have seen in years. Trump is a nut, but he's not gonna get the nomination. Walker, Rubio, and yes Bush are good candidates. Bush has his brother hanging around his neck, but Jeb, to me, seems more well spoken and thoughtful and he has proven popular with Hispanics...

This reminds me of President Gore who had it wrapped up, supposedly, except he was a horrible campaigner and horrible speaker and horrible debater with no charisma...

 
Interesting.

Scandal is the only thing that brings Hillary down.

Wait for the email thing to ride out, and then bet her heavily. The electoral college falls well on the side of Democrats this time around, even per Republican pollsters. It's not even an issue thing; the votes in a stratified country don't seem to add up for R's.

Hope I'm wrong, but Hillary wins this going away.

 
Understand the Biden comments, but his own party can't stand him. That isn't good for voter turnout.
Fair enough, but Eephus has a good point. What happens if Hillary has a heart attack, falls and can't get up, or gets splashed with holy water a couple of months from now? Biden is the person best positioned (IMO) to pick up the mantle, and he'd have at least a reasonable shot at winning a general election.
Oh, and :lmao: at the holy water thing. Awesome.
 
I'm not sure that the people that think the Democrats have this wrapped up realize that the people that voted for Obama twice was something that historically really has never happened before. The mix of people that vote in these elections usually looks nothing like what happened in 2008 and 2012.

Now, it could be this is the start of a new era where young people come out and vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats, but I'm not ready to assume that just yet. It could be the combination of a young, black, charismatic candidate like Obama got the vote out like we haven't seen before.

One thing for sure, Hillary doesn't have a 10th of the charisma of Obama or her husband for that matter. Her negatives are off the charts and, despite what anyone says, I think this is the best crop of Republican candidates we have seen in years. Trump is a nut, but he's not gonna get the nomination. Walker, Rubio, and yes Bush are good candidates. Bush has his brother hanging around his neck, but Jeb, to me, seems more well spoken and thoughtful and he has proven popular with Hispanics...

This reminds me of President Gore who had it wrapped up, supposedly, except he was a horrible campaigner and horrible speaker and horrible debater with no charisma...
In fairness to Gore - he did win the most votes - probably got the most in Florida as well.

 
I'm not sure that the people that think the Democrats have this wrapped up realize that the people that voted for Obama twice was something that historically really has never happened before. The mix of people that vote in these elections usually looks nothing like what happened in 2008 and 2012.

Now, it could be this is the start of a new era where young people come out and vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats, but I'm not ready to assume that just yet. It could be the combination of a young, black, charismatic candidate like Obama got the vote out like we haven't seen before.

One thing for sure, Hillary doesn't have a 10th of the charisma of Obama or her husband for that matter. Her negatives are off the charts and, despite what anyone says, I think this is the best crop of Republican candidates we have seen in years. Trump is a nut, but he's not gonna get the nomination. Walker, Rubio, and yes Bush are good candidates. Bush has his brother hanging around his neck, but Jeb, to me, seems more well spoken and thoughtful and he has proven popular with Hispanics...

This reminds me of President Gore who had it wrapped up, supposedly, except he was a horrible campaigner and horrible speaker and horrible debater with no charisma...
If you suggest that Gore lost because he has no charisma and Obama won, in part, because he has lots of charisma, then you obviously think charisma is an important (in not necessary) quality for a candidate. Why then do you give Donald Trump who is way ahead in all Republican candidate polls and easily the most charismatic GOP candidate no chance of winning that party's nomination?

 
Clinton is a terrible value, obviously.

I think anybody on the bottom half of the list is probably just throwing money away.

So who on the top half of the list other than Hillary has any shot at all at actually winning?

Bush - sure

Rubio - doubt it, too conservative

Walker - maybe

Sanders - doubt it, way too socialist

Carson, Trump, Biden - :lol:

Christie - don't see it

Cruz - way too conservative

Kasich - no idea who this even is

Paul - :oldunsure:

So that leaves me with Jeb and Walker as "value" picks. But I don't really believe either of them are going to win.
If Bernie is way too socialist then America is. His positions poll with majority support.
If that is true, then we are truly totally ####ed as country.

He won't win in any event, because an indpendent can't. The system is too rigged against them.
Good thing he is running as a democrat then.
Oh is he a Democrat again? :lmao:
As you said the system is rigged
It is rigged against Indpendents for sure.

I wasn't aware that Bernie was running as a Democrat. I don't follow politics super closely.

The fact his positions poll well is frightening, but then again, he is a populist.
I have yet to find any of his postions scary.
That doesn't surprise me in the least.
Yeah I support raising the minimum wage, making education spending less.by just paying for it. I believe we need trade deala that are fair to Americans not whatever mudhut country they intend to pay nothing. Ooh scary.
Ok. I think Sanders is a populist dip#### and you think he is terrific. (I will say I admire his independence and ethics in terms of his campaign finances, I just don't like anything else.)

We aren't going to agree and I have no problem with that.

Unlike many folks (and I'm not meaning to imply you are one of them) I have no problem having friendly interactions with people with whom I have sharp differences of opinion on things like politics or economics.
No blood no foul. If I agree with something you post I'll say so. If I don't I'll say so. Isn't at all personal or serious business.

 
I really think Rubio or Walker have a shot. Main feeling on this board seems to be that Democrats are a shoe in and the odds show Hillary as the favorite (although i think that's because she is the clear cut leader in the primary and the Repubs have such a wide field).

What has happened since the last election, where the Dems got clocked, that makes anyone feel that the perception of the country is that it has turned the corner? Foreign policy is a train wreck right now, the economy may be in an official recovery but wages are down, hours are down, and nobody I know on the street is feeling much relief. Still tons of problems w/ Obamacare. I'm just not seeing what Obama has done since November to turn this tide around? Not to mention that the supreme court basically removed a huge wedge issue from the election when they legalized gay marriage, you can't run on equality now that we have that equality.

The one thing everyone seems to be banking on is the hispanic vote but I don't know about that. Obama is practically handing the Republicans Florida w. his Cuban policy and there is a really angry undercurrent right now on immigration that's ready to explode. It's exactly what Trump is tapping into. If it's making people listen to someone like Trump imagine when someone reasonable and electable starts parroting a more restrained and palatable version of what Trump is drawing people in with.

And let's not forget that there is a good chance the black vote is going to be abysmal in the next election. The community is angry, many people already don't like Hillary from the last primary, and the black community is pretty angry right now at the Dems. I don't think they're switching sides but I think they may stay home.

PP is really firing up the evangelical base (like me) who have been sidelines for a couple of elections.

This is no shoe in for the Dems.
Pol Pot?

 
The reason the Democrats got killed in the last cycle was mostly gerrymandering. Senate looks better this cycle. It will be a while before we get the house back. The GOP isn't winning a national election right now. They couldn't beat Obama and his numbers sucked last cycle.

 
NCCommish said:
The reason the Democrats got killed in the last cycle was mostly gerrymandering. Senate looks better this cycle. It will be a while before we get the house back. The GOP isn't winning a national election right now. They couldn't beat Obama and his numbers sucked last cycle.
They don't have to beat Obama this time. It's almost certainly going to be Hillary Clinton they have to beat. Obama as an incumbent, even with poor numbers, is still a much better candidate that Hillary Clinton. The majority of Americans aren't going to struggle to find reasons not to vote for her.

I think Jeb makes a pretty good bet here.

 
NCCommish said:
The reason the Democrats got killed in the last cycle was mostly gerrymandering. Senate looks better this cycle. It will be a while before we get the house back. The GOP isn't winning a national election right now. They couldn't beat Obama and his numbers sucked last cycle.
They don't have to beat Obama this time. It's almost certainly going to be Hillary Clinton they have to beat. Obama as an incumbent, even with poor numbers, is still a much better candidate that Hillary Clinton. The majority of Americans aren't going to struggle to find reasons not to vote for her.

I think Jeb makes a pretty good bet here.
You mean Jeb who just called for dismantling Medicare? I wouldn't bet on it.

 
In that list the best flier is Walker, IMO. I think he ends up the nominee for the GOP. The election will come down to turnout and there the Republicans may just have a shot if they can get people to come out.

 
General Malaise said:
Eephus said:
You'd think FBGs would have a better understanding of how oddsmaking works
You know who you don't find in the wagering threads? The guys who bicker endlessly about politics here.
:goodposting: There is an unwritten rule (or maybe someone said it) that when you discuss political bets in the FFAWT, that you do so in a non-partisan manner. I think as a whole we are all way up on political bets, in my case mostly because 538's numbers were truer than the books.

I think the Republicans are facing an uphill battle, both demographically (country getting less white and younger) and ideologically (more people favoring gay marriage, embracing the ACA, etc.). I also think that, objectively speaking, the most recent Dem president was more successful than the most recent GOP president.

That said, Clinton's a dog of a candidate compared to Obama. The email thing could be a real issue, same with her health. The Dem machine could make a call to try and anoint someone new and try to push Hillary aside if they think she's going to be vulnerable, with Biden being the most likely candidate, the stuff about his son is pretty compelling stuff.

I'd probably take longshots on both Biden and Trump at 25-1. I think Trump's chances are more legitimate than people think, and he's going to have to tack pretty hard to the center and possibly walk back a lot of the #### he's said about Latinos, but I think he has the best chance of pulling away centrist voters from a Democrat. It seems bizarre and unthinkable that he could win the Presidency, but you could say the same about a black guy being President or Commando being the governor of CA.

 
General Malaise said:
Eephus said:
You'd think FBGs would have a better understanding of how oddsmaking works
You know who you don't find in the wagering threads? The guys who bicker endlessly about politics here.
:goodposting: There is an unwritten rule (or maybe someone said it) that when you discuss political bets in the FFAWT, that you do so in a non-partisan manner. I think as a whole we are all way up on political bets, in my case mostly because 538's numbers were truer than the books.

I think the Republicans are facing an uphill battle, both demographically (country getting less white and younger) and ideologically (more people favoring gay marriage, embracing the ACA, etc.). I also think that, objectively speaking, the most recent Dem president was more successful than the most recent GOP president.

That said, Clinton's a dog of a candidate compared to Obama. The email thing could be a real issue, same with her health. The Dem machine could make a call to try and anoint someone new and try to push Hillary aside if they think she's going to be vulnerable, with Biden being the most likely candidate, the stuff about his son is pretty compelling stuff.

I'd probably take longshots on both Biden and Trump at 25-1. I think Trump's chances are more legitimate than people think, and he's going to have to tack pretty hard to the center and possibly walk back a lot of the #### he's said about Latinos, but I think he has the best chance of pulling away centrist voters from a Democrat. It seems bizarre and unthinkable that he could win the Presidency, but you could say the same about a black guy being President or Commando being the governor of CA.
Trump has so many negatives. He may win the nomination but no way he wins nationally. Even Bernie beats him head to head. So do Clinton and Biden

 
In that list the best flier is Walker, IMO. I think he ends up the nominee for the GOP. The election will come down to turnout and there the Republicans may just have a shot if they can get people to come out.
Wait until Walkers scandals hit the big stage, he is done. Oh and Democrats turn out for Presidential elections, its off years we suck.

 
Rubio is good value. I think his stock will rise once Trump implodes, and he's likable enough to win the GOP nomination and then win the general election.

I might have said that about Walker before, but I saw him on TV the other day and was surprised at how vanilla he sounded. He sounded like a guy who was scared of what is coming, not a guy ready to make a charge.

 
Fennis said:
Sinn Fein said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Walking Boot said:
$10 each on everyone +10000 or higher, $80 down

$50 each on Trump and Biden at +2500, now up to $180.

$100 each on Walker at +900 and Sanders at +1200, $380 spent.

Good chance at at least doubling with a Walker win, or winning even more if Sanders, Trump, Biden, or the longshots take it.
better chance you are throwing away $640 when Hillary wins.
0% chance Hillary wins the general election.
I'll bet $100 she wins, but you've got to be give me 100:1 odds. Sounds like easy money for you.
In for a hundred.

 
Fennis said:
Sinn Fein said:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
Walking Boot said:
$10 each on everyone +10000 or higher, $80 down

$50 each on Trump and Biden at +2500, now up to $180.

$100 each on Walker at +900 and Sanders at +1200, $380 spent.

Good chance at at least doubling with a Walker win, or winning even more if Sanders, Trump, Biden, or the longshots take it.
better chance you are throwing away $640 when Hillary wins.
0% chance Hillary wins the general election.
I'll bet $100 she wins, but you've got to be give me 100:1 odds. Sounds like easy money for you.
In for a hundred.
at 100:1 odds?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NCCommish said:
Fennis said:
NCCommish said:
RedmondLonghorn said:
NCCommish said:
RedmondLonghorn said:
NCCommish said:
RedmondLonghorn said:
NCCommish said:
RedmondLonghorn said:
Clinton is a terrible value, obviously.

I think anybody on the bottom half of the list is probably just throwing money away.

So who on the top half of the list other than Hillary has any shot at all at actually winning?

Bush - sure

Rubio - doubt it, too conservative

Walker - maybe

Sanders - doubt it, way too socialist

Carson, Trump, Biden - :lol:

Christie - don't see it

Cruz - way too conservative

Kasich - no idea who this even is

Paul - :oldunsure:

So that leaves me with Jeb and Walker as "value" picks. But I don't really believe either of them are going to win.
If Bernie is way too socialist then America is. His positions poll with majority support.
If that is true, then we are truly totally ####ed as country.

He won't win in any event, because an indpendent can't. The system is too rigged against them.
Good thing he is running as a democrat then.
Oh is he a Democrat again? :lmao:
As you said the system is rigged
It is rigged against Indpendents for sure.

I wasn't aware that Bernie was running as a Democrat. I don't follow politics super closely.

The fact his positions poll well is frightening, but then again, he is a populist.
I have yet to find any of his postions scary.
I find his position on a 79 year old being president pretty scary.
Seems healthy enough but yes I will be looking at his VP pick very closely of we get that far.
This is BS and you know it. He could pick Sarah Palin and you would vote for him (twice on Sunday too).

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top