This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I understand being upset with the status quo. But Trump isn't the answer for anti-establishment. The guy funded and endorsed previous candidates for President. Sure I guess he's "ant-establishment" because he isn't PC. But voting for Trump and thinking he's so much different than Hilary, Cruz, Rubio, etc. isn't correct.
I posted an article yesterday.. basically it all comes down to Ohio and Florida..If Trump wins both of those then it is all over no matter what Rubio or Kasich do..
OK, but it seems like the most likely scenario is Trump wins Florida but Kasich wins Ohio. If that happens, we have a lot of race left.I posted an article yesterday.. basically it all comes down to Ohio and Florida..If Trump wins both of those then it is all over no matter what Rubio or Kasich do..
The numbers just don't work to stop a Trump
Hopefully.. Last year I'd have said there was only a .00000000000000000000001% chance I'd ever vote for Hillary..OK, but it seems like the most likely scenario is Trump wins Florida but Kasich wins Ohio. If that happens, we have a lot of race left.I posted an article yesterday.. basically it all comes down to Ohio and Florida..If Trump wins both of those then it is all over no matter what Rubio or Kasich do..
The numbers just don't work to stop a Trump
Trump's results last night now give him a pretty real possibility to get to 1237 if he just wins FL, but loses OH. If he wins both, this is over.
If you don't trust someone to do what's right, you'd have to be pretty crazy to vote for them as President.Hopefully.. Last year I'd have said there was only a .00000000000000000000001% chance I'd ever vote for Hillary..
Short of Kasich being the GOP nominee that goes up to 1% as I don't trust Cruz or Trump to do what is right for the country.
Not saying I trust Hillary to do what's right... But with the Senate more than likely staying GOP controlled for at least the next 2 years, at least there would be someone to stop the
While I agree, I'd want no part of Trump in the general. Everything about his campaign is unpredictable.
It comes down to theIf you don't trust someone to do what's right, you'd have to be pretty crazy to vote for them as President.Hopefully.. Last year I'd have said there was only a .00000000000000000000001% chance I'd ever vote for Hillary..
Short of Kasich being the GOP nominee that goes up to 1% as I don't trust Cruz or Trump to do what is right for the country.
Not saying I trust Hillary to do what's right... But with the Senate more than likely staying GOP controlled for at least the next 2 years, at least there would be someone to stop the
you know that can be kept in check vs. the you don't know that might be part of a group that has full control..So in your mind a vote for Trump and the GOP is a vote to redistribute earning power to the masses?
Exactly how I feel as well. We need to change Washington, everything from special interests and IMO getting term limits on all congressmen and senators (8 years max then back to work in society no more career congressman and senators).
"Ohio Gov. John Kasich gets a 62 - 29 percent job approval rating, his highest ever. The Republican presidential contender even gets 42 percent of Democrats, with 45 percent disapproving. "
Side note, how in the hell is Hogan allowed to wear his doo rag in court. Looks bizarre
the only Reagan Democrats he could hope to get are if somebody goes to the polls dressed like Ronald with one of those president masks
I see you're being obtuse for the sake of getting into an internet argument. Cool stuff, bro.
Ok, so let's pretend you're not fishing for a fight.
Give The Donald credit for one thing, he's the first Republican in a while promising to actually do things if elected. Now, they're really stoopid things but it's still a break from the typical obstruction against change that is usually foremost. If nothing else, maybe he can get more of the GOP base thinking that change isn't necessarily bad.
I think it's more than just the anti-establishment vote. Only one party runs on the message that government is the problem. When the Tea Party Republicans started unseating established Republican law makers, the party (and their press agents) chose largely to embrace that movement instead of condemning it. Guys like Cantor and Paul Ryan for Christ's sake were labeled RINOs. You can't let that happen and then wonder why John Kasich doesn't do better in a national GOP campaign. John Kasich's entire message is that he's an adult and a technocrat who can balance budgets. They could have tried that same message with MItt in 2012 but instead the primaries forced him to pretend to be more in line with the crazies that were already hijacking the party.
I don't really disagree with any of this. Sad state of affairs, because I truly think a guy like Kasich (regardless of party affiliation) would be good for this country right now.
Oh these charts screw up my screen on my phone. Would love to stick a hot poker up your ### for it
Here's a plan for action within first 100 days in office: https://www.johnkasich.com/resultsnow/Give The Donald credit for one thing, he's the first Republican in a while promising to actually do things if elected. Now, they're really stoopid things but it's still a break from the typical obstruction against change that is usually foremost. If nothing else, maybe he can get more of the GOP base thinking that change isn't necessarily bad.
Also -- is anybody surprised that Peens is a Trumpkin?
or 
is about it
and a good one at that 
