Dan Lambskin
Footballguy
:excellent posting:
I bet lots of people quit caring about the Belmont if there is no chance of a triple crown. Spread the races out more then if running every 2 weeks for everyone is to hard.The Belmont is a mile and a half and the horses typically go balls to the walls. There's a sound strategy to giving your horse 5 weeks off between the KD and the Belmont. It freshens them up while you let the other horses tire themselves out. These aren't race cars. They are three year old animals and they get tired. They also have personalities, just like your pet dog. Getting beat in a race can sometimes negatively impact a top tier horse that is used to winning. Winning a triple crown SHOULD be hard. The horses that pull it off should be special. I have no problem with an owner/trainer who wants to skip the Preakness. None. They don't care about a triple crown - you do. They DO care about earnings and future stud fees. It's their investment, they should get the highest ROI possible.They can still win if they ran in the other 2.You don't understand why a horse owner would want to win a race and make money?Don't understand this thinking when horse racing could use a triple crown winner.It's always full of lurkers waiting to spoil a possible triple crown.Good news is that the Belmont should be loaded.
Good posting. If someone is ever going to F with a horse, the rail is as easy a target as any. Baffert obviously won't, but who knows about the rest.Pat Forde @YahooForde · 6m6 minutes ago
American Pharoah and stablemate Dortmund will be next to each other on inside, 1-2 posts. Firing Line on far outside in 8. In between:filler
Sure. But if you go to the teller and tell them dollar tri and say 1 over 28 it's the same thing.Dan Lambskin said:$50 exacta...1 over 2,8 would be what you'd be calling out there for $100
Tri would be 1 with 2,8 with 2,8
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
$20 tri box = $20 x 6 bets = $120I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
Great idea. I play the dogs mostly, so an 8 horse field is a typical field for dogs. I've hit plenty of 15-20 dollar trifectas in dog races with similar odds to the top 3 in the Preakness.I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
the 2 and 8 aren't going to be anywhere near the 10-1 odds for the place horse last year. If it comes in 1-2-8, I'm thinking the tri is lucky to pay in the $12-15 range.I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
Agreed. Just trying to figure out if the superfecta payout will be <> 5x the trifecta.the 2 and 8 aren't going to be anywhere near the 10-1 odds for the place horse last year. If it comes in 1-2-8, I'm thinking the tri is lucky to pay in the $12-15 range.I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
Your question is really tough. Can't you do a blend of the 2 at lesser amounts? The small field of 8 makes it tough. I do think a tri-box of the top 3 will pay awful, no matter who wins. Supers; however, they can change drastically. If the 5 or 6 makes it into the winning superfecta over say 4 or 7 (or even the 3) things can change fairly significantly.Agreed. Just trying to figure out if the superfecta payout will be <> 5x the trifecta.the 2 and 8 aren't going to be anywhere near the 10-1 odds for the place horse last year. If it comes in 1-2-8, I'm thinking the tri is lucky to pay in the $12-15 range.I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
Horse racing is steeped in tradition. It isn't changing because some of us are so hell bent on seeing a triple crown winner. There's a reason why being a triple crown winner is so special. Cheapening the high cost and achievement to become one isn't what horse racing needs nor wants. I'll watch the Belmont regardless of whether or not we might see a TC winner, but I'm a horse racing fan. I'd be furious if changes were forced upon this sport to appeal to the casual fan.I bet lots of people quit caring about the Belmont if there is no chance of a triple crown. Spread the races out more then if running every 2 weeks for everyone is to hard.The Belmont is a mile and a half and the horses typically go balls to the walls. There's a sound strategy to giving your horse 5 weeks off between the KD and the Belmont. It freshens them up while you let the other horses tire themselves out. These aren't race cars. They are three year old animals and they get tired. They also have personalities, just like your pet dog. Getting beat in a race can sometimes negatively impact a top tier horse that is used to winning. Winning a triple crown SHOULD be hard. The horses that pull it off should be special. I have no problem with an owner/trainer who wants to skip the Preakness. None. They don't care about a triple crown - you do. They DO care about earnings and future stud fees. It's their investment, they should get the highest ROI possible.They can still win if they ran in the other 2.You don't understand why a horse owner would want to win a race and make money?Don't understand this thinking when horse racing could use a triple crown winner.It's always full of lurkers waiting to spoil a possible triple crown.Good news is that the Belmont should be loaded.
just the brisnet version so far: http://www.brisnet.com/brisnet_promos/Preakness15.pdfAnyone have a link to the Preakness form yet?
Sounds like a wimp move but just throw the 125 on your best bet to show, if it really is an all chalk race you should cash out easy.Short of one of them falling the @#$k over, I can't see anyone but Divining Rod even having a chance of hitting the board. There's no Oxbow here that's going to explode into his best effort. I thought there was a chance Materiality could be that horse, but Pletcher sent him to NY.
Mr. Z, Bodhisattva, and Tale of Verve have no business being here. Tale of Verve should be 99-1. The other two have been in races against this class and were found severely wanting. I can't fathom any of them eating up the big 3 down the stretch at a mile 3/16. Danzig Moon is a nice horse, but nothing more. He took to the track like flies to crap in Kentucky and still couldn't muster better than 5th. A nice effort to be sure, but he made up no ground in the stretch. Unless he improves dramatically or some ill fate befalls one of the top contenders, I can't see him finishing better than 4th.
Divining Rod is the only horse other than Danzig Moon that even has a prayer of cashing. With that said, I still think he's outclassed here and would need a quantum leap forward along with one of the favorites simply not firing to get into the mix.
No money to be made on this race, IMO. I opened an account online for the Derby and got a $125 bonus in non-refundable wagering credits that I have to play Saturday or I lose them. I would play some undercard races but don't know if I'll be home, so I may have to spread $125 on this race. Probably will just try to about break even so I can turn the credits into real money and just cash it out.
If i was to do this, I'd probably be better off playing the top 3 horses to show at $40 each. That way I'm covered in the event that something goes seriously awry with Pharoah. Throw the extra $5 on a longshot.Sounds like a wimp move but just throw the 125 on your best bet to show, if it really is an all chalk race you should cash out easy.Short of one of them falling the @#$k over, I can't see anyone but Divining Rod even having a chance of hitting the board. There's no Oxbow here that's going to explode into his best effort. I thought there was a chance Materiality could be that horse, but Pletcher sent him to NY.
Mr. Z, Bodhisattva, and Tale of Verve have no business being here. Tale of Verve should be 99-1. The other two have been in races against this class and were found severely wanting. I can't fathom any of them eating up the big 3 down the stretch at a mile 3/16. Danzig Moon is a nice horse, but nothing more. He took to the track like flies to crap in Kentucky and still couldn't muster better than 5th. A nice effort to be sure, but he made up no ground in the stretch. Unless he improves dramatically or some ill fate befalls one of the top contenders, I can't see him finishing better than 4th.
Divining Rod is the only horse other than Danzig Moon that even has a prayer of cashing. With that said, I still think he's outclassed here and would need a quantum leap forward along with one of the favorites simply not firing to get into the mix.
No money to be made on this race, IMO. I opened an account online for the Derby and got a $125 bonus in non-refundable wagering credits that I have to play Saturday or I lose them. I would play some undercard races but don't know if I'll be home, so I may have to spread $125 on this race. Probably will just try to about break even so I can turn the credits into real money and just cash it out.![]()
Yes it's over though...some longshot won. Apparently it goes off around 5:00 ESTIs the Susan still a thing?
I'll go with something similar, but will chalk it up underneath, AP should control the money at the top of the ticket.General Malaise said:That's why I'm taking a shot on Dortmund again. Loved him so hard two weeks ago and think he's still capable of being the best 3YO horse. I locked in at 5-1 offshore and hope to get something like that tomorrow at the OTB. 4-1 fine too. Will wheel him with the field for kicks. Won't spend a ton of dough on this one. Just enough to keep me interested.
What happened? Went too overboard and they banned it?Man, 10 years ago, I'd be 15 Natty Boes deep in the infield by now. Frigging Gen Y had to ruin BYOB.