What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*****Official 2016 Kentucky Derby Thread***** (1 Viewer)

Good news is that the Belmont should be loaded.
It's always full of lurkers waiting to spoil a possible triple crown.
Don't understand this thinking when horse racing could use a triple crown winner.
You don't understand why a horse owner would want to win a race and make money?
They can still win if they ran in the other 2.
The Belmont is a mile and a half and the horses typically go balls to the walls. There's a sound strategy to giving your horse 5 weeks off between the KD and the Belmont. It freshens them up while you let the other horses tire themselves out. These aren't race cars. They are three year old animals and they get tired. They also have personalities, just like your pet dog. Getting beat in a race can sometimes negatively impact a top tier horse that is used to winning. Winning a triple crown SHOULD be hard. The horses that pull it off should be special. I have no problem with an owner/trainer who wants to skip the Preakness. None. They don't care about a triple crown - you do. They DO care about earnings and future stud fees. It's their investment, they should get the highest ROI possible.
I bet lots of people quit caring about the Belmont if there is no chance of a triple crown. Spread the races out more then if running every 2 weeks for everyone is to hard.
 
Pat Forde @YahooForde · 6m6 minutes ago
American Pharoah and stablemate Dortmund will be next to each other on inside, 1-2 posts. Firing Line on far outside in 8. In between:filler
Good posting. If someone is ever going to F with a horse, the rail is as easy a target as any. Baffert obviously won't, but who knows about the rest.

Post time: 6:18 p.m. Saturday at Pimlico Race Course in Baltimore. Purse: $1.5 million. Distance: 1 3/16 miles. TV: NBC.



PP horse (weight) jockey/trainer odds



1. American Pharoah (126) Espinoza/Baffert 4-5

2. Dortmund (126) Garcia/Baffert 7-2

3. Mr. Z (126) Nakatani/Lukas 20-1

4. Danzig Moon (126) Leparoux/Casse 15-1

5. Tale of Verve (126) Rosario/Stewart 30-1

6. Bodhisattva (126) McCarthy/Corrales 20-1

7. Divining Rod (126) Castellano/Delcaour 12-1

8. Firing Line (126) Stevens/Callaghan 4-1

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Go up to the teller say 1 over 28. Play it 50 times for 100 bucks and collect your minimal amount of money for the tri. Sound about right?

 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dan Lambskin said:
$50 exacta...1 over 2,8 would be what you'd be calling out there for $100

Tri would be 1 with 2,8 with 2,8
Sure. But if you go to the teller and tell them dollar tri and say 1 over 28 it's the same thing.
 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.

 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
$20 tri box = $20 x 6 bets = $120

Super = 3 x 2 x 1 x 5 = 30 bets x $4 = $120

Sorry if I wasn't clear in my last post.

 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.
 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.
I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.

 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.
I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.
Great idea. I play the dogs mostly, so an 8 horse field is a typical field for dogs. I've hit plenty of 15-20 dollar trifectas in dog races with similar odds to the top 3 in the Preakness.
 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.
I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.
the 2 and 8 aren't going to be anywhere near the 10-1 odds for the place horse last year. If it comes in 1-2-8, I'm thinking the tri is lucky to pay in the $12-15 range.

 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.
I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.
the 2 and 8 aren't going to be anywhere near the 10-1 odds for the place horse last year. If it comes in 1-2-8, I'm thinking the tri is lucky to pay in the $12-15 range.
Agreed. Just trying to figure out if the superfecta payout will be <> 5x the trifecta.

 
You guys think the payout will be better tri boxing the top 3 for $20 or playing a superfecta 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 1,2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 for $4?
I'm not sure if you're trying to say you only want to spend 20.00 total on the trifecta bet. A one dollar tri box you are suggesting would cost 6 dollars so a 20.00 box would cost you 120.00. Also the Superfecta you are suggesting wouldn't cost 4.00, it would cost 30.00 for the one dollar Superfecta.
The total layout is $120 in either case. Also, both wagers only require 1,2,8 to finish top 3 to cash. Only question is whether or not the $1 super will pay more or less than 5 times the $1 trifecta payout.
My fault. I just didn't really understand. I think it depends on which horse finishes on top. If it's AP I think the dollar tri would be somewhere around 20.00. It will be a tough decision, I'd go with the trifecta bet.
I probably will. I just went back and looked at last year's payouts figuring that would be a decent comparison with California Chrome winning and no longshots on the board. $1 trifecta was $38 and super was $173 - less than 5x the payout.
the 2 and 8 aren't going to be anywhere near the 10-1 odds for the place horse last year. If it comes in 1-2-8, I'm thinking the tri is lucky to pay in the $12-15 range.
Agreed. Just trying to figure out if the superfecta payout will be <> 5x the trifecta.
Your question is really tough. Can't you do a blend of the 2 at lesser amounts? The small field of 8 makes it tough. I do think a tri-box of the top 3 will pay awful, no matter who wins. Supers; however, they can change drastically. If the 5 or 6 makes it into the winning superfecta over say 4 or 7 (or even the 3) things can change fairly significantly.

 
I will leaning towards taking this route over boxing the top horses in a super: 1 with 2,8 with 2,8 with 3,4,5,6,7 ....$1 super is $10.

 
Good news is that the Belmont should be loaded.
It's always full of lurkers waiting to spoil a possible triple crown.
Don't understand this thinking when horse racing could use a triple crown winner.
You don't understand why a horse owner would want to win a race and make money?
They can still win if they ran in the other 2.
The Belmont is a mile and a half and the horses typically go balls to the walls. There's a sound strategy to giving your horse 5 weeks off between the KD and the Belmont. It freshens them up while you let the other horses tire themselves out. These aren't race cars. They are three year old animals and they get tired. They also have personalities, just like your pet dog. Getting beat in a race can sometimes negatively impact a top tier horse that is used to winning. Winning a triple crown SHOULD be hard. The horses that pull it off should be special. I have no problem with an owner/trainer who wants to skip the Preakness. None. They don't care about a triple crown - you do. They DO care about earnings and future stud fees. It's their investment, they should get the highest ROI possible.
I bet lots of people quit caring about the Belmont if there is no chance of a triple crown. Spread the races out more then if running every 2 weeks for everyone is to hard.
Horse racing is steeped in tradition. It isn't changing because some of us are so hell bent on seeing a triple crown winner. There's a reason why being a triple crown winner is so special. Cheapening the high cost and achievement to become one isn't what horse racing needs nor wants. I'll watch the Belmont regardless of whether or not we might see a TC winner, but I'm a horse racing fan. I'd be furious if changes were forced upon this sport to appeal to the casual fan.

 
Short of one of them falling the @#$k over, I can't see anyone but Divining Rod even having a chance of hitting the board. There's no Oxbow here that's going to explode into his best effort. I thought there was a chance Materiality could be that horse, but Pletcher sent him to NY.

Mr. Z, Bodhisattva, and Tale of Verve have no business being here. Tale of Verve should be 99-1. The other two have been in races against this class and were found severely wanting. I can't fathom any of them eating up the big 3 down the stretch at a mile 3/16. Danzig Moon is a nice horse, but nothing more. He took to the track like flies to crap in Kentucky and still couldn't muster better than 5th. A nice effort to be sure, but he made up no ground in the stretch. Unless he improves dramatically or some ill fate befalls one of the top contenders, I can't see him finishing better than 4th.

Divining Rod is the only horse other than Danzig Moon that even has a prayer of cashing. With that said, I still think he's outclassed here and would need a quantum leap forward along with one of the favorites simply not firing to get into the mix.

No money to be made on this race, IMO. I opened an account online for the Derby and got a $125 bonus in non-refundable wagering credits that I have to play Saturday or I lose them. I would play some undercard races but don't know if I'll be home, so I may have to spread $125 on this race. Probably will just try to about break even so I can turn the credits into real money and just cash it out.

 
Short of one of them falling the @#$k over, I can't see anyone but Divining Rod even having a chance of hitting the board. There's no Oxbow here that's going to explode into his best effort. I thought there was a chance Materiality could be that horse, but Pletcher sent him to NY.

Mr. Z, Bodhisattva, and Tale of Verve have no business being here. Tale of Verve should be 99-1. The other two have been in races against this class and were found severely wanting. I can't fathom any of them eating up the big 3 down the stretch at a mile 3/16. Danzig Moon is a nice horse, but nothing more. He took to the track like flies to crap in Kentucky and still couldn't muster better than 5th. A nice effort to be sure, but he made up no ground in the stretch. Unless he improves dramatically or some ill fate befalls one of the top contenders, I can't see him finishing better than 4th.

Divining Rod is the only horse other than Danzig Moon that even has a prayer of cashing. With that said, I still think he's outclassed here and would need a quantum leap forward along with one of the favorites simply not firing to get into the mix.

No money to be made on this race, IMO. I opened an account online for the Derby and got a $125 bonus in non-refundable wagering credits that I have to play Saturday or I lose them. I would play some undercard races but don't know if I'll be home, so I may have to spread $125 on this race. Probably will just try to about break even so I can turn the credits into real money and just cash it out.
Sounds like a wimp move but just throw the 125 on your best bet to show, if it really is an all chalk race you should cash out easy. :shrug:

 
Short of one of them falling the @#$k over, I can't see anyone but Divining Rod even having a chance of hitting the board. There's no Oxbow here that's going to explode into his best effort. I thought there was a chance Materiality could be that horse, but Pletcher sent him to NY.

Mr. Z, Bodhisattva, and Tale of Verve have no business being here. Tale of Verve should be 99-1. The other two have been in races against this class and were found severely wanting. I can't fathom any of them eating up the big 3 down the stretch at a mile 3/16. Danzig Moon is a nice horse, but nothing more. He took to the track like flies to crap in Kentucky and still couldn't muster better than 5th. A nice effort to be sure, but he made up no ground in the stretch. Unless he improves dramatically or some ill fate befalls one of the top contenders, I can't see him finishing better than 4th.

Divining Rod is the only horse other than Danzig Moon that even has a prayer of cashing. With that said, I still think he's outclassed here and would need a quantum leap forward along with one of the favorites simply not firing to get into the mix.

No money to be made on this race, IMO. I opened an account online for the Derby and got a $125 bonus in non-refundable wagering credits that I have to play Saturday or I lose them. I would play some undercard races but don't know if I'll be home, so I may have to spread $125 on this race. Probably will just try to about break even so I can turn the credits into real money and just cash it out.
Sounds like a wimp move but just throw the 125 on your best bet to show, if it really is an all chalk race you should cash out easy. :shrug:
If i was to do this, I'd probably be better off playing the top 3 horses to show at $40 each. That way I'm covered in the event that something goes seriously awry with Pharoah. Throw the extra $5 on a longshot.

 
That's why I'm taking a shot on Dortmund again. Loved him so hard two weeks ago and think he's still capable of being the best 3YO horse. I locked in at 5-1 offshore and hope to get something like that tomorrow at the OTB. 4-1 fine too. Will wheel him with the field for kicks. Won't spend a ton of dough on this one. Just enough to keep me interested.

 
Is the Susan still a thing?
Yes it's over though...some longshot won. Apparently it goes off around 5:00 EST

likely going to invest in the Pick 5 tomorrow and single on AP..maybe small backup to FL and Dortmund

Also Twin Spires offered a money back guarantee on your win bet if your horse runs 2nd* so I put $25 on Firing Line

*$50 max and only for first $10K Wagered

Certainly possible he runs 3rd or worst but I figure it's worth the shot

Not sure Dortmund wants to go classic distances...hard to say for sure from 1 race but he was never really blowing anyone out before

 
Heading to Santa Anita tomorrow for the 1st time. Will be betting on the Preakness for the fun of it. Thinking about putting $50 on Dortmund to win.

 
I'm heading to a blues festival tomorrow morning so played a little bit this afternoon and cashed, basically enough to cover all of my Preakness bets in advance wagering. So I got that going for me - which is nice.

I don't really have any new insight. If it was a monsoon I would move American Pharoah and Danzig way up and play a 1 way exacta with those 2.

But it looks like a warm day with scattered thunderstorms that only jump from 10% to 40% chance at about 3pm. So the track will be sealed and it may not rain at all before the race. In any case, I had to bet in advance and can't change my tickets anyway. If anything, I may add the above exacta in online wagering at the 11th hour.

The only stand I'm making is that Firing Line will be 1st or 2nd. I think he gets the perfect, comfortable trip, can make his move whenever he wants, and then it will just be if he's good enough to win. If he bounces (some say he's better with a lot of time off between races) then I'm not cashing. I don't have AP/Dortmund exacta boxes.

My plays:

$100 exacta American Pharoah-Firing Line

$50 exacta's Firing Line on top of American Pharoah and Dortmund

$20 exacta box Firing Line and Dortmund (so actually have $70 if it comes that way with Firing Line on top - this was my last bet in case AP gets a bad trip or something)

I also played several $10 trifectas and $5 Supers putting Danzig Moon and Divining Rod in the 3rd/4th slots - again, just in case one of the big 3 stumbles or something I have a shot at a score.

Mostly I'm just playing to have action. I can't see a big score here unless the tri's/supers pay more than I think. No reason to think the big 3 won't run well. All 3 can make their own race near the front end, can avoid trouble, etc. The Derby horses who struggle at Pimlico are typically closers who got a fast pace at Churchill and then don't get the same set up at Pimlico. Not the case this year. If anything, the big 3 should control the race more in the Preakness then they did in the Derby. Hopefully it's a great race. Good luck to all.

 
dot. Big teeball game this morning then headed turf side.

JS I am piggybacking your plan as best I can communicate to the tellers.

 
General Malaise said:
That's why I'm taking a shot on Dortmund again. Loved him so hard two weeks ago and think he's still capable of being the best 3YO horse. I locked in at 5-1 offshore and hope to get something like that tomorrow at the OTB. 4-1 fine too. Will wheel him with the field for kicks. Won't spend a ton of dough on this one. Just enough to keep me interested.
I'll go with something similar, but will chalk it up underneath, AP should control the money at the top of the ticket.

2-1-8 straight tri ($15)

2-8-1 straight tri ($15)

2-1-4 straight tri ($5)

2-1-7 straight tri ($5)

2-8-7 straight tri ($5)

2-8-4 straight tri ($5)

$50 total bet

:moneybag:

 
here's my P4 ticket. have a stake in a P5 that allows for much more chaos...unfortunately 1st leg 2-1 Fav ran down our 6-1 and that was one of the legs we fanned really wide on. good chance to hit and lose $ if it's super chalky

0.50 Pick-4

1, 5, 7, 9, WT, 2, 4, 5, WT, 1, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, WT, 1

$0.50 Pick-4

1, 5, 7, WT, 2, 5, WT, 1, 9, 11, WT, 1, 2, 8

edit:backup was entered wrong

 
Last edited by a moderator:
$2 ATB 1

$1 ex box 1 2 4 8

$1 tri box 1 2 4 8

$2 show 4

$2 show 8

$46

:deadhorse:

a

-QG

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top