Somebody PLEASE get me a Tito effing Landrum bobblehead.Don't think this has been brought up much, but Tuesday nights at Busch III have been a season-long celebration of the 1985 uncrowned World Series Champions.
August 18 is Tito Landrum Bobblehead Night. No shtick.
I know we have some Tito Landrum fans here, so I thought I'd give a heads-up.
Yesterday was more about effectiveness that workrate. He gave up four runs in the top of the fifth and was due to lead off the bottom. So he got yanked for a pinch-hitter. However, the question about season-long usage still stands, primarily because of the usage jump over last season, but also because the team has a 5-game lead in the division and and even bigger over the other division leaders. There's also some recent history to give concern: under similar circumstances a couple years ago, the Cards shut down Shelby Miller without formally announcing it to anyone.What do you think will happen with Carlos Martinez's usage? He's at 40% more IP this year than last year's 99.2 and the most he's ever thrown in a season was 104. Yesterday he was pulled after 74 pitches.
He's a triple-threat behind the plate: plus caller, plus-plus framer, and no one even bothers running on him. I'd like to think he's a sure-fire HOFer, but he probably hasn't hit enough home runs to get into Cooperstown.Going to suck when the day comes that we find he was the reason the pitching was always better than expected.
Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?He's a triple-threat behind the plate: plus caller, plus-plus framer, and no one even bothers running on him. I'd like to think he's a sure-fire HOFer, but he probably hasn't hit enough home runs to get into Cooperstown.Going to suck when the day comes that we find he was the reason the pitching was always better than expected.
Pudge was great in the 90s, and then you have guys like Campanella, Dickey, and Carter that have claims.Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?He's a triple-threat behind the plate: plus caller, plus-plus framer, and no one even bothers running on him.I'd like to think he's a sure-fire HOFer, but he probably hasn't hit enough home runs to get into Cooperstown.Going to suck when the day comes that we find he was the reason the pitching was always better than expected.
No. If you accept the premise that it is tougher to be an effective catcher now than it was in any earlier era, it's not crazy at all.Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?He's a triple-threat behind the plate: plus caller, plus-plus framer, and no one even bothers running on him. I'd like to think he's a sure-fire HOFer, but he probably hasn't hit enough home runs to get into Cooperstown.Going to suck when the day comes that we find he was the reason the pitching was always better than expected.
More crazy to not think that, IMO.Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?He's a triple-threat behind the plate: plus caller, plus-plus framer, and no one even bothers running on him.I'd like to think he's a sure-fire HOFer, but he probably hasn't hit enough home runs to get into Cooperstown.Going to suck when the day comes that we find he was the reason the pitching was always better than expected.
I'm not sure about that. Deadball era catchers like Roger Bresnahan and Buck Ewing had minimal protective gear by modern standards, dealt with more stolen base attempts and had to catch dirty, scuffed up spheroids that wouldn't be suitable for BP nowadays. Catchers up until recently bore full responsibility for calling pitches and didn't have reams of historical data available before games and between innings. While tracking of pitch framing is new, I suspect smart catchers have been doing this instinctively for a long time.No. If you accept the premise that it is tougher to be an effective catcher now than it was in any earlier era, it's not crazy at all.Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?He's a triple-threat behind the plate: plus caller, plus-plus framer, and no one even bothers running on him.I'd like to think he's a sure-fire HOFer, but he probably hasn't hit enough home runs to get into Cooperstown.Going to suck when the day comes that we find he was the reason the pitching was always better than expected.
You're arguing a different point than the one I was making. Obviously Yadi isn't in any type of historical greatness discussion if we assume the difficulty of the catcher job has remained constant or gotten easier over time. However, I will say Yadi is a "victim" of his own success on the lack of stolen base attempts he sees: teams got so tired of watching him throw out would-be basestealers they pretty much stopped running on him. His thrown-out percentage is artificially low because of this, too.Yadi is 2nd all-time in Total Zone Runs as a C behind Pudge, about 75% of Pudge's TZR is about 60% of the games. I'm sure Yadi's lofty status in all-time TZR is due to that stat heavily skewed towards modern players because of increased available data in the modern game, but no active catcher is likely to reach half of Yadi's TZR total by the end of their careers.Eephus said:I'm not sure about that. Deadball era catchers like Roger Bresnahan and Buck Ewing had minimal protective gear by modern standards, dealt with more stolen base attempts and had to catch dirty, scuffed up spheroids that wouldn't be suitable for BP nowadays. Catchers up until recently bore full responsibility for calling pitches and didn't have reams of historical data available before games and between innings. While tracking of pitch framing is new, I suspect smart catchers have been doing this instinctively for a long time.Bruce Dickinson said:No. If you accept the premise that it is tougher to be an effective catcher now than it was in any earlier era, it's not crazy at all.fred_1_15301 said:Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?
I'll be shocked if Yadi has even a 10% ballot year in HOF voting. Jorge Pasada, Buster Posey, and Joe Mauer will all get more HOF consideration.Catchers haven't gotten a lot of love from HoF voters. Bill Freehan was the Molina of his day and he was one and done on the ballot. Ted Simmons has been near the bottom of vet committee voting. The best current and near-future candidates (Piazza and Pudge) are being painted with the broad brush of PEDs. Molina has been a great player but he's entered his decline phase now and probably won't get a huge number of MVP shares going forward. He'll have his supporters when he goes on the ballot but I think he'll struggle to make 75%. Hope I'm wrong.
SB and CS rates haven't changed significantly since the turn of the century. This is even though R/G and HR rates are down over the same period. My guess is analytics have something to with it and teams are getting more situational about SB but I'm a bit surprised the success rates haven't really budged. Maybe it's all related to the Molina brothers and all hell will break out when Yadi retires.You're arguing a different point than the one I was making. Obviously Yadi isn't in any type of historical greatness discussion if we assume the difficulty of the catcher job has remained constant or gotten easier over time. However, I will say Yadi is a "victim" of his own success on the lack of stolen base attempts he sees: teams got so tired of watching him throw out would-be basestealers they pretty much stopped running on him. His thrown-out percentage is artificially low because of this, too.Yadi is 2nd all-time in Total Zone Runs as a C behind Pudge, about 75% of Pudge's TZR is about 60% of the games. I'm sure Yadi's lofty status in all-time TZR is due to that stat heavily skewed towards modern players because of increased available data in the modern game, but no active catcher is likely to reach half of Yadi's TZR total by the end of their careers.Eephus said:I'm not sure about that. Deadball era catchers like Roger Bresnahan and Buck Ewing had minimal protective gear by modern standards, dealt with more stolen base attempts and had to catch dirty, scuffed up spheroids that wouldn't be suitable for BP nowadays. Catchers up until recently bore full responsibility for calling pitches and didn't have reams of historical data available before games and between innings. While tracking of pitch framing is new, I suspect smart catchers have been doing this instinctively for a long time.Bruce Dickinson said:No. If you accept the premise that it is tougher to be an effective catcher now than it was in any earlier era, it's not crazy at all.fred_1_15301 said:Am I crazy to consider him the best defensive catcher ever?
I'm keeping Oct 30-Nov 1 clear. Just in case.If they could get Moss productive at first and IF Holliday and Grichuk could get back before the post-season...
It's a very smart move. They have a tough matchup tonight anyways so why not line him up against the Bucs. If they win tonight, it's gravy.Lyons instead of Wacha tonight. Hope the resting strategy for the stretch run doesn't backfire.
Not arguing with the theory. But pitchers tend to be creatures of habit. Getting them out of their routine, especially when they're grooving, makes me nervous.It's a very smart move. They have a tough matchup tonight anyways so why not line him up against the Bucs. If they win tonight, it's gravy.Lyons instead of Wacha tonight. Hope the resting strategy for the stretch run doesn't backfire.
How long until he figures out you can't put this guy in a high leverage situation? And by high leverage, I mean any MLB game regardless of the score.
Of all the reasons why it is important to get Jordan Walden back, "one fewer reason for Matheny to call the bullpen and say, 'Get Broxton up' " might be the most important.How long until he figures out you can't put this guy in a high leverage situation? And by high leverage, I mean any MLB game regardless of the score.
Exactly.I get less anxious when Maness puts a runner on than when Rosenthal does. I feel like Maness can make the next batter hit a two-hopper right at Peralta, where Rosenthal has to risk an extra-base hit to get that strikeout or popout.
There is 0 chance that the Bucs go with anyone but Cole in the WC game. Just like there is 0 chance that the Cubs go with anyone but Arrieta. That could be a great battle but I just think Arrieta has possibly been the best pitcher in baseball since the AS break. Either way, the Cards would catch a break to not have to face either of those guys twice in a 5 game series. That is the reward for being the best team in baseball over a 162 game season.Yeesh.
Cole pitched a GREAT game and PIT deserved to win tonight.
However...
What purpose was served sending Lackey out to pitch the top of the 8th against the middle of the order?
Case for: He was only on 92 pitches, pitcher's spot was leading off bottom of 8th, down two runs with Cole dealing death so game was pretty much a lost cause.
Case against: fourth trip through the order, pitch count was going to get well into triple digits to finish the 8th, no way Lackey pitches that 8th in a playoff game so may as well practice for that, whomever finished the 8th was going to be lifted for a pinch-hitter in the bottom no matter what.
Would much rather seen what Cishek could have done starting the 8th with no one on, even knowing he gave up two runs when the finally brought him in.
Based on what I saw tonight and all season, I really, REALLY hope PIT uses Cole in the wild card game.
That strategy would not be a fan favorite decision but it's not necessarily a bad idea. I like the way you thinkI guess there is too much at stake in the WC game to go with anyone besides the ace. Probably too tough to tell everyone, "We're not trying to win one game; we're trying to win the World Series" at the press conference after losing the WC because you went with the #2 starter so the ace could potentially pitch two games in the DS.
Thank you for your kind words.That strategy would not be a fan favorite decision but it's not necessarily a bad idea. I like the way you thinkI guess there is too much at stake in the WC game to go with anyone besides the ace. Probably too tough to tell everyone, "We're not trying to win one game; we're trying to win the World Series" at the press conference after losing the WC because you went with the #2 starter so the ace could potentially pitch two games in the DS.![]()
Bringing up Piscotty has worked out pretty well so far.Kinda feels like they REALLY needed that.
Playing the WC winner in the 5-game series is helpful. PIT with only one game of Cole or the Cubs with only one Arrieta start weakens them. The 7-game series favors the deep rotation, except of course when the opponent is sending Greinke and Kershaw out there twice.Bob Sacamano said:Getting guys back and healthy has to help. But is Grichuk really healthy if he can't make throws from the OF?
I still fear the lack of a true ace is going to come back to bite them.
How long until he figures out you can't put this guy in a high leverage situation? And by high leverage, I mean any MLB game regardless of the score.

For whatever it's worth, if the Bucs lose to the Cubs in the WC game, I will be rooting hard for you guys to beat the Cubs and then go all the way. Never thought I would feel that way about a Cardinals team but I do.What's next? Maddon complaining about vigilante tactics Heyward used to throw at runners trying to score from third?
FWIW, the Pirates are the only other NL playoff horse I'm interested in backing. If it can't be the team I've been rooting for my whole life, I'd rather it not be a top-3 market team with enormous advantages.For whatever it's worth, if the Bucs lose to the Cubs in the WC game, I will be rooting hard for you guys to beat the Cubs and then go all the way. Never thought I would feel that way about a Cardinals team but I do.What's next? Maddon complaining about vigilante tactics Heyward used to throw at runners trying to score from third?![]()