I can't say good or bad things about getting fitted because I haven't done it. I've put a lot of time into considering it, but just haven't pulled the string.I'm looking to purchase a set of irons. I've been looking into the AP2's (I hit some this weekend). Anyone have any suggestions on the cheapest place to grab a set? Anyone on here looking to sell a set? Not sure if this is the right thread for this.
This helped with the accuracy. I was exaggerating my shoulder turn and focusing too much on my finish. I kept my shoulders quieter and I am striking the ball better. Thanks for the tip.easy fix. Keep your left shoulder parallel to target just a fraction longer than normal, or try to keep it aimed parallel of target AT IMPACT.Pulling my short irons a ton. On a 120 yard shot, I will land 25 yards left of my target. Some are straight pulls, some are pulls with a hook for good measure. So frustrating to miss greens from the fairway inside 150 yards.
usually these pulled irons are a result of turning the left shoulder out too early before impact which causes the hands to roll early and you just pull it.
same here dude....####### crazy. been playing for almost 30 years now.you know it still upsets me I don't have a hole in one in my career I have eagles from the fairway I have a 1 putt Eagles on par 4 but I don't have a hole-in-one all the hacks that I play with have a hole in one and I get my balls busted all the time
15 inch cup - 12 hole courses ...6 holes a side sounds like would be good for you Thorn.Played 9 after work yesterday. Was -1 thru 6. Finished bogey-double-double.
![]()
The golf game I came up with is far cooler than that.15 inch cup - 12 hole courses ...6 holes a side sounds like would be good for you Thorn.Played 9 after work yesterday. Was -1 thru 6. Finished bogey-double-double.
![]()
I would gladly trade my hole in one for being able to play better... I suck.
ouch5.25..15
43 Out
45 In
6 Fairways, 3 GIR, 33 putts, one three putt, 1 OB
slow round yesterday - 5.5 hrs - but that's probably right for a holiday. only had one double (#15) where i knocked one OB. put a ball in a lateral hazard on #3 but got out with a bogey. was working on distance control and hit some really solid shots. short game was much better: didn't fluff or duff a chip all day. missed all three birdie putts though.
side note: we got paired with a single who was playing from the blues. nice guy, kinda quiet. was two Under after five holes, with a lip-out eagle on #3. turns out, he played on the Nationwide Tour for about five years. he tells this story:
Final Round of US Open Qualifying in 2010. he's leading by one stroke going into the last two holes. has a downhill, sidehill lie for his second shot (ball below his feet). addresses the ball, starts his back swing, and his ball moves (downhill) about 1/2 a revolution. in mid-swing, he thinks "Well, now i've got to hit it since I've already addressed it and started my swing." as he reaches the top of his backswing, and starts downward, the ball moves again, about another 1' down hill. so he stops mid-swing and steps away from the ball. there are a bunch of Marshals and Rules Officials around him, but nobody sees this happen. he calls a One Stoke Penalty on himself and finishes the round. goes on to lose in a playoff and miss his shot at Pebble Beach.
brutal.
Same here. Most painful Almost was on the edge of the cup in a tourney to win a Rolex.same here dude....####### crazy. been playing for almost 30 years now.you know it still upsets me I don't have a hole in one in my career I have eagles from the fairway I have a 1 putt Eagles on par 4 but I don't have a hole-in-one all the hacks that I play with have a hole in one and I get my balls busted all the time
concentrating on getting max clubhead speed after impact always gets me to my left side.Shot a 76. Hit 4/14 fairways, 9/18 greens. 29 putts. 3 birdies 6 bogeys and a double. Was hitting out of the rough so often. If this course had trees I'd have shot an 84 or so.
I'm swinging so much inside to out with the driver that if I don't close the club face with my right hand at Impact its 20 yards right. If I do #### the fave it's a hard draw or hook. Just can't clear to the left side for some reason.
Sounds like someone needs to hit 100 drives on the range, really focus on tempo and balanceI suck.
Can't hit fairways, which means I can't hit greens. But I can get up and down and I don't three putt. yay.
I played in a scramble on Friday and was crushing drives using my buddies new Taylor Made 15. It's all in my legs and tempo, timing and balance, so you nailed it. My swing can be upper body heavy and that's when I get into problems. I feel like I had a breakthrough.Sounds like someone needs to hit 100 drives on the range, really focus on tempo and balanceI suck.
Can't hit fairways, which means I can't hit greens. But I can get up and down and I don't three putt. yay.
youre talking about a block, not a shank. a shank is off the hosel and is often actually nearly a good shot. block is a whole other thing and would require seeing it. you could probably id it yourself by shooting vid from opposite the ball.Also w hitting every iron straight out to the right the whole way (again not slicing, just a straight shank right). I'm wondering if I'm getting my body through way in front of my hands.
My finish was solid in every shot, belt buckle facing the target every time. It's another possibility that my body is already moving through the ball well before my hands get there.
Source?For those interested in some industry news about participation and the health of the industry.
Spoiler alert, we lost nearly another 1M golfers in 2014.[SIZE=10.5pt]:[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The golfer base (Age 7+, played 1+ rounds in 2014) declined by 900K to settle in at 22M in total. This is now an 8M net loss of golfers since our peak back in 2002 just shy of 30M golfers (29.8M for those of you keeping score at home). This represents an annual decline of 4% which is most assuredly not within statistical sampling error (sorry NGF). What you do see however in the new Trend Comparison is that NGF's logic that stabilization equals a rate of decline not greater than before could be applied. The 2014 rate of decline in the golf consumer base is not meaningfully different than the 5-year annual rate of decline of 3.7%. So the slope of our downward trend hasn't increased, I guess there's some comfort in that but I wouldn't call a continuing decline of 4% of our consumer base "stabilization" unless I were just desperately groping for something non-negative to say.[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Participation Rate (combining Population change and number of Participants change) also declined due to a flat US Population and the decline in Golf Participants. We're now below 8% participation among the Age 7+ population, a "relevancy" level not seen since NSGA began their survey in 1985 (it was at 10% when the survey began and had never registered below that mark until the current post-2000 slide began).[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Frequency Rate (rounds per golfer per year) declined slightly to just under 22 rounds per year. As you see in the directional arrow, this does fall within the error range for the annual comparison. This has been the saving grace of the current cycle and is due to the fact that we're retaining a higher portion of both the Committed and 55+ age golfers.[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Play Rate (rounds per capita per year, incorporates population change, participation and frequency rates in one measure) fell 0.1 rounds which doesn't seem like much but, on a relatively low base number of 1.8 for 2013, is a 6% decline in the measure. Here again, the positive spin that could be applied to this is that the annual rate of change didn't get any worse but the year-on-year comparison is still a downer.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]Unfortunately, in summary, the results from the 2014 consumer survey are not very encouraging on multiple fronts. We continue to bleed golfers at a substantial rate and the level of involvement remains heavily skewed to the low end of the scale. On the (semi) positive side, our frequency rate is holding steady and Committeds don't appear to be dropping out of the system wholesale. One other encouraging fact is that we're not bleeding rounds (~1%/yr) at the same rate as golfers (~4%/yr) so that also reinforces the belief that we're primarily losing fringe vs. core golfers.[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]Of our 900K golfer loss, the majority of it (both in count and % change) came from the Casuals group which dropped by roughly 600K golfers or 7% vs. '13[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Involveds held their own from '13 to '14 at roughly 7M golfers and 32% of total golfers. As you can see from the Share-of-Golfers set of measures, the primary shift this year was Involveds gained share by holding steady in the face of a large exodus of Casuals[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]Looking at the critical segment of Committeds, we saw a meaningful drop in this group as well (remember they could have simply "down-shifted" to Involveds) but in line with the overall franchise loss[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]On the opposite end of involvement, the Singles, this year we surprisingly saw that we held our own in this group vs. seeing them defect in large numbers as in previous years. This again could be the result of a high attraction rate offset by high defection or it could be that we actually retained a large number of Singles from '13 (I'll touch on this critical knowledge gap in the closing section below)[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]This year we've also added the reference point of where the involvement distribution curve was in 1990 back when the three involvement group criteria (2-9 rds/yr, 10-39 rds/yr, 40+ rds/yr) were established. Back then, NSGA wasn't tracking single day participants but we've been able to proxy in from 1990 the likely size of that group and establish these baseline distributions. The big takeaway from this comparison is that Singles have significantly increased in their contribution to the golfer base and Involveds have decreased significantly. You can understand that while an increase in contribution by the Singles involvement group and a drop in Involveds is not a good scenario for rounds, revenue etc. (although I could probably argue that it wouldn't be bad for equipment manufacturers if the majority of those Singles bought equipment), one could argue that we're getting good trial and those are the future Involveds, they just haven't yet "grown up" in their tenure in the sport. [/SIZE]
confidential....I shouldn't be copying and pasting, but wanted to share some of the data.Source?For those interested in some industry news about participation and the health of the industry.
Spoiler alert, we lost nearly another 1M golfers in 2014.[SIZE=10.5pt]:[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The golfer base (Age 7+, played 1+ rounds in 2014) declined by 900K to settle in at 22M in total. This is now an 8M net loss of golfers since our peak back in 2002 just shy of 30M golfers (29.8M for those of you keeping score at home). This represents an annual decline of 4% which is most assuredly not within statistical sampling error (sorry NGF). What you do see however in the new Trend Comparison is that NGF's logic that stabilization equals a rate of decline not greater than before could be applied. The 2014 rate of decline in the golf consumer base is not meaningfully different than the 5-year annual rate of decline of 3.7%. So the slope of our downward trend hasn't increased, I guess there's some comfort in that but I wouldn't call a continuing decline of 4% of our consumer base "stabilization" unless I were just desperately groping for something non-negative to say.[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Participation Rate (combining Population change and number of Participants change) also declined due to a flat US Population and the decline in Golf Participants. We're now below 8% participation among the Age 7+ population, a "relevancy" level not seen since NSGA began their survey in 1985 (it was at 10% when the survey began and had never registered below that mark until the current post-2000 slide began).[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Frequency Rate (rounds per golfer per year) declined slightly to just under 22 rounds per year. As you see in the directional arrow, this does fall within the error range for the annual comparison. This has been the saving grace of the current cycle and is due to the fact that we're retaining a higher portion of both the Committed and 55+ age golfers.[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Play Rate (rounds per capita per year, incorporates population change, participation and frequency rates in one measure) fell 0.1 rounds which doesn't seem like much but, on a relatively low base number of 1.8 for 2013, is a 6% decline in the measure. Here again, the positive spin that could be applied to this is that the annual rate of change didn't get any worse but the year-on-year comparison is still a downer.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10.5pt]Unfortunately, in summary, the results from the 2014 consumer survey are not very encouraging on multiple fronts. We continue to bleed golfers at a substantial rate and the level of involvement remains heavily skewed to the low end of the scale. On the (semi) positive side, our frequency rate is holding steady and Committeds don't appear to be dropping out of the system wholesale. One other encouraging fact is that we're not bleeding rounds (~1%/yr) at the same rate as golfers (~4%/yr) so that also reinforces the belief that we're primarily losing fringe vs. core golfers.[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]Of our 900K golfer loss, the majority of it (both in count and % change) came from the Casuals group which dropped by roughly 600K golfers or 7% vs. '13[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]The Involveds held their own from '13 to '14 at roughly 7M golfers and 32% of total golfers. As you can see from the Share-of-Golfers set of measures, the primary shift this year was Involveds gained share by holding steady in the face of a large exodus of Casuals[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]Looking at the critical segment of Committeds, we saw a meaningful drop in this group as well (remember they could have simply "down-shifted" to Involveds) but in line with the overall franchise loss[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]On the opposite end of involvement, the Singles, this year we surprisingly saw that we held our own in this group vs. seeing them defect in large numbers as in previous years. This again could be the result of a high attraction rate offset by high defection or it could be that we actually retained a large number of Singles from '13 (I'll touch on this critical knowledge gap in the closing section below)[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=10.5pt]This year we've also added the reference point of where the involvement distribution curve was in 1990 back when the three involvement group criteria (2-9 rds/yr, 10-39 rds/yr, 40+ rds/yr) were established. Back then, NSGA wasn't tracking single day participants but we've been able to proxy in from 1990 the likely size of that group and establish these baseline distributions. The big takeaway from this comparison is that Singles have significantly increased in their contribution to the golfer base and Involveds have decreased significantly. You can understand that while an increase in contribution by the Singles involvement group and a drop in Involveds is not a good scenario for rounds, revenue etc. (although I could probably argue that it wouldn't be bad for equipment manufacturers if the majority of those Singles bought equipment), one could argue that we're getting good trial and those are the future Involveds, they just haven't yet "grown up" in their tenure in the sport. [/SIZE]
In Idaho we have a very STUPID State-wide Golf Association that is doing their part to kill the game at least for kids. Example:cool. will keep it here.
eta: that news sucks, but is really just telling us what we already know. there were a lot of fringe who were not likely to be keepers in wake of tiger. first sign of financial stress they were always going to shake off. but with economy and job market stabilizing it probably wouldn't take much to get some of them back. just something eye catching on the tv. need rory, speith, or even tiger to shake the ground a bit. but could be a little while. still curious to see what china could mean for us manufacturers. and need to get the kids interested again. ricky fowler aint the silver bullet either.
One arguable upside to the correction is I think it's time many of these dumps who bring on billy casper, palmer, etc to operate ####ty properties on life support for however long just be allowed to die. thin the herd a bit. so many poorly run/operated courses out there wasting resources and money to present a poor product. and can we stop the trend of calling public golf courses semi-private and god forbid country clubs?
and our guy didn't make the cut. sucks. really nice guy.Nike laid off 40% of their golf reps yesterday. Not a typo.
nice binocularsplayed in, and won, a scramble yesterday. our team is now back-to-back champions. pretty sure everyone involved with this event hates us.
each team member got one of this for First Place.
not too shabby.
i'm gonna keep it. like how it's solar powered, and has a USB for phone charging too.can you trade it in for a boom box?
there was a tournament we had 3 groups enter every year. Was a friends memorial tournament. One of our groups won every year for 8 years. Legitimate!!I have 4 of those stupid trophies.played in, and won, a scramble yesterday. our team is now back-to-back champions. pretty sure everyone involved with this event hates us.
each team member got one of this for First Place.
not too shabby.
45 - 39 for me today. 36 putts38 44. My old deceleration with my pitches showed up today
Most people think if they swing harder the ball goes farther. Not really true.I played in a scramble on Friday and was crushing drives using my buddies new Taylor Made 15. It's all in my legs and tempo, timing and balance, so you nailed it. My swing can be upper body heavy and that's when I get into problems. I feel like I had a breakthrough.Sounds like someone needs to hit 100 drives on the range, really focus on tempo and balanceI suck.
Can't hit fairways, which means I can't hit greens. But I can get up and down and I don't three putt. yay.
Sounds like a block/push, not a shank.Also w hitting every iron straight out to the right the whole way (again not slicing, just a straight shank right). I'm wondering if I'm getting my body through way in front of my hands.
My finish was solid in every shot, belt buckle facing the target every time. It's another possibility that my body is already moving through the ball well before my hands get there.
Interesting. I know they are bringing Nike Golf back into the main group, instead of it being independent. But that wouldn't affect the reps. Are they just stretching territories?Apple Jack said:and our guy didn't make the cut. sucks. really nice guy.Nike laid off 40% of their golf reps yesterday. Not a typo.