Anarchy99
Footballguy
Notable changes that I can tell . . .No, of course it doesn't matter in terms of analyzing this next game. Hunt being out matters, maybe other pieces have changed. - I think the history is kind of interesting, but we've gone through this with the Seahawks, the Saints, the Cards, and other past downtrodden teams, which at one time actually included the Pats themselves. - I do think Reid's coaching history might be relevant and especially so in light of Belichick's.
For NE . . .
Gronk more limited than he was than in Week 6.
Gordon not playing (but was new to the team and didn't do much).
Edelman looking A LOT better than his second game back after missing a year and suspended 4 games.
JC Jackson now a legit CB (didn't play in the first game).
Rex Burkhead back (was on IR the first game).
Dorsett only played 3 snaps the first game.
Overall, NE as a team in very good health.
Last 4 games, defense playing much better.
For KC . . .
No Hunt (had 431 YFS and 4 TD in 2 games against NE)
Eric Berry back.
Not so sure what else is different for the Chiefs this time compared to the game vs. NE in the regular season.
Last edited by a moderator:
it’s just me making that assertion that altitude is a distinct and unique home field advantage. Why would you cast that across all Patriots fans? Seems somewhat small-minded.
says KC and Saints have 28% chance to win SB while NE has 20% and she's almost always right. and she's picking KC to go to the SB. and she's mentioning that the Pats are incredibly weak at special teams and with the Cheetah returning kicks there's a good chance that he breaks a long return in this ( possible snow) game. She has Chiefs winning rather easily ( her words) 31-27, noting the front 7 of KC is vastly underrated, and the home crowd a BIG FACTOR here.