*** Official Baseball Wagering Thread *** (1 Viewer)

[MarshallPlan]

Detroit Tigers

J. Verlander +121

Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.

Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.

Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________

Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers*

*Action



Boston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).

Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.

Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........

________________________________________________________________________________

__

GLTA

It's lines like the bolded above which confuse the general consensus into thinking teams like the Sox and Yanks are good bets. Just because they have a good record doesn't make them a good bet. What if Boston was lined at -300 in each home game? 12-5 would be far from profitable. I'm giving an extreme example, but why wouldn't Statfox or Covers just put up how any units the Sox have made bettors this year at home. It would give the general bettor a better sense of how good the Red Sox are against the number. I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

Maine is -140. You think that's a cheap price? I'd rather take the proven pitcher in Zambrano here, slow start but we know he is going to get hot. At +130, its a good bet. I disagree that Maine is attractive at all tonight.

 

[guru_007]

ugh, I thought someone agreed REPEATEDLY to not post here

BTW, I'll be on the Sox tonight, so that JTC can enjoy Wakefield's performance and know he's on my team

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

ugh, I thought someone agreed REPEATEDLY to not post here

BTW, I'll be on the Sox tonight, so that JTC can enjoy Wakefield's performance and know he's on my team

I think we are going to take the UNDER 9.5 Wake has been really good this season and the Sox traditionally do not score him a lot of runs. It really has plagued him the past few years. I have a bad feeling about the Sox tonight but Im not betting Detroit.

 

[Steelnation]

Detroit Tigers

J. Verlander +121

Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.

Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.

Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________

Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers*

*Action



Boston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).

Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.

Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........

________________________________________________________________________________

__

GLTA

It's lines like the bolded above which confuse the general consensus into thinking teams like the Sox and Yanks are good bets. Just because they have a good record doesn't make them a good bet. What if Boston was lined at -300 in each home game? 12-5 would be far from profitable. I'm giving an extreme example, but why wouldn't Statfox or Covers just put up how any units the Sox have made bettors this year at home. It would give the general bettor a better sense of how good the Red Sox are against the number. I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

WTF are you talking about?The last I checked the Yankee's are below .500

MP =

 

[Steelnation]

Can someone please post the Bodog RL and ML for:

Braves

Yankees

Cubs

TIA

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

The syndicate really likes Florida to get off the Schneid tonight. Mitre has been pitching very well. This is a pretty nice number to play at +104, I know Florida has been on a skid but this is a very winnable game for them.

 

[guru_007]

The syndicate really likes Florida to get off the Schneid tonight. Mitre has been pitching very well. This is a pretty nice number to play at +104, I know Florida has been on a skid but this is a very winnable game for them.

Sorry, you guys are screwed....I'm on this one at +109Also like:

Boston -129

Washington +180

o9 Houston/SF -115

g'luck

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

The syndicate really likes Florida to get off the Schneid tonight. Mitre has been pitching very well. This is a pretty nice number to play at +104, I know Florida has been on a skid but this is a very winnable game for them.

Sorry, you guys are screwed....I'm on this one at +109Also like:

Boston -129

Washington +180

o9 Houston/SF -115

g'luck

Good, we are all going to make some money.

 

[MarshallPlan]

Detroit Tigers

J. Verlander +121

Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.

Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.

Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________

Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers*

*Action



Boston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).

Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.

Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........

________________________________________________________________________________

__

GLTA

It's lines like the bolded above which confuse the general consensus into thinking teams like the Sox and Yanks are good bets. Just because they have a good record doesn't make them a good bet. What if Boston was lined at -300 in each home game? 12-5 would be far from profitable. I'm giving an extreme example, but why wouldn't Statfox or Covers just put up how any units the Sox have made bettors this year at home. It would give the general bettor a better sense of how good the Red Sox are against the number. I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

WTF are you talking about?The last I checked the Yankee's are below .500

MP =

Moron, I understand the Yankees are below .500. We are looking at the past 10 yrs here and analyzing the situation. I hate the Yanks, I'm a big Red Sox fan, but the Yankees will get back on track once their pitching comes around. Please don't respond to any of my posts, seriously. You bring nothing to the table.

Everyday you say you played for example:

Marlins

Braves

Yankees

I'm making up the plays by the way - without giving the prices. You can't NOT list the prices, that's beyond belief. You mine as well have posted you played the Pistons tonight. Then after the game said you played them +20. Same thing, who the heck knows.

Baseball is so far and away from simply picking the winners it's unbelievable. Like Guru said, I thought someone said he'd never post here again (me). Sorry I got back involved...seriously. Sometimes it's so easy here picking on people it hurts.

 

[MarshallPlan]

I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

Maine is -140. You think that's a cheap price? I'd rather take the proven pitcher in Zambrano here, slow start but we know he is going to get hot. At +130, its a good bet. I disagree that Maine is attractive at all tonight.

Yeah, I think Maine is as solid as they come. Remember how pro-Maine I was in last years playoffs instead of El Duque. Some pitchers just do it for me and cheaply - Maine is one of them. Add in the fact the Mets are much better and I think -140 is about fair, could be up to -160 to me. My numbers all say Maine is much better and I trust them, Zambrano lives off his rep to me for the most part although I do respect him. I see the Mets lost 10-1 and Maine got beat up. I was at the Phils game and saw a walk off HR which is sweet. So be it for Maine, he'll be cheaper next start.

 

[Steelnation]

Detroit Tigers

J. Verlander +121

Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.

Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.

Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________

Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers*

*Action



Boston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).

Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.

Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........

________________________________________________________________________________

__

GLTA

It's lines like the bolded above which confuse the general consensus into thinking teams like the Sox and Yanks are good bets. Just because they have a good record doesn't make them a good bet. What if Boston was lined at -300 in each home game? 12-5 would be far from profitable. I'm giving an extreme example, but why wouldn't Statfox or Covers just put up how any units the Sox have made bettors this year at home. It would give the general bettor a better sense of how good the Red Sox are against the number. I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

WTF are you talking about?The last I checked the Yankee's are below .500

MP =

Moron, I understand the Yankees are below .500. We are looking at the past 10 yrs here and analyzing the situation. I hate the Yanks, I'm a big Red Sox fan, but the Yankees will get back on track once their pitching comes around. Please don't respond to any of my posts, seriously. You bring nothing to the table.

Everyday you say you played for example:

Marlins

Braves

Yankees

I'm making up the plays by the way - without giving the prices. You can't NOT list the prices, that's beyond belief. You mine as well have posted you played the Pistons tonight. Then after the game said you played them +20. Same thing, who the heck knows.

Baseball is so far and away from simply picking the winners it's unbelievable. Like Guru said, I thought someone said he'd never post here again (me). Sorry I got back involved...seriously. Sometimes it's so easy here picking on people it hurts.

First of all Mr I talk #### but keep my $ in my pocket, why do I need to post prices (which I do when I have them locked), especially when I say I am leaning and have yet to actually check the line?

You seem to think because you number crunch, provide number theories and predict line movement you are bringing something to the table and I am not?

"Baseball is so far and away from simply picking the winners it's unbelievable. "

This is as amusing as it gets.....at the end of the day EVERY bet we place is a flip of the coin 50-50, is it not? We can talk value, right side, trends, etc but you either win or lose, I keep it simple.

I think I went 2-0 in the MLB yesterday, what did you offer?

Dude just #### or go ahead and put your $ where your mouth is. Your a clown MP, you talk #### but you keep your $ in your pocket.......When you take big hits or add to your stack then come talk too me. Until then your like that little kid in the schoolyard that barks all day and when it is time to step up you run back to class.........

I take shots but at the end of the day I MAKE

 

[prosopis]

Shake zula, you're betting home run-lines, and in parlays to boot. Quite frankly, you shouldn't expect to win.

Arizona, for instance, was 8 - 4 on this homestand coming into tonight. 6 of those were by 1 run; yet there you go laying 1.5 just because you want a bigger possible payoff.

Not trying to bust your balls man (I lost tonight also), but the above is not what Marshall Plan would call "strong sports betting", if you know what I mean.

Generally people that bet these will go broke, so eventually they may learn. Maybe not. They think by turning their favorite into a dog this is +EV in the longrun. It's not our money Sonny, so why try to teach them. I've given up by now, it's useless.

Please stick to your word MP and take a hike.....

Sure thing. Good luck, you'll need it.

bump

 

[prosopis]

Today I have:

Chc +113

Det +119

 

[Angry Beavers]

Today I have:Chc +113Det +119

That was a quick vacation.............. I have the feeling my hiatus may come crashing down after one day

 

[MarshallPlan]

Detroit Tigers

J. Verlander +121

Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.

Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.

Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________

Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers*

*Action



Boston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).

Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.

Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........

________________________________________________________________________________

__

GLTA

It's lines like the bolded above which confuse the general consensus into thinking teams like the Sox and Yanks are good bets. Just because they have a good record doesn't make them a good bet. What if Boston was lined at -300 in each home game? 12-5 would be far from profitable. I'm giving an extreme example, but why wouldn't Statfox or Covers just put up how any units the Sox have made bettors this year at home. It would give the general bettor a better sense of how good the Red Sox are against the number. I think Maine is a cheap price at home against Zambrano. I like Maine, always have. Plus, much better team in the NY Mets. Rockies and White Sox look attractive too.

WTF are you talking about?The last I checked the Yankee's are below .500

MP =

Moron, I understand the Yankees are below .500. We are looking at the past 10 yrs here and analyzing the situation. I hate the Yanks, I'm a big Red Sox fan, but the Yankees will get back on track once their pitching comes around. Please don't respond to any of my posts, seriously. You bring nothing to the table.

Everyday you say you played for example:

Marlins

Braves

Yankees

I'm making up the plays by the way - without giving the prices. You can't NOT list the prices, that's beyond belief. You mine as well have posted you played the Pistons tonight. Then after the game said you played them +20. Same thing, who the heck knows.

Baseball is so far and away from simply picking the winners it's unbelievable. Like Guru said, I thought someone said he'd never post here again (me). Sorry I got back involved...seriously. Sometimes it's so easy here picking on people it hurts.

First of all Mr I talk #### but keep my $ in my pocket, why do I need to post prices (which I do when I have them locked), especially when I say I am leaning and have yet to actually check the line?

You seem to think because you number crunch, provide number theories and predict line movement you are bringing something to the table and I am not?

"Baseball is so far and away from simply picking the winners it's unbelievable. "

This is as amusing as it gets.....at the end of the day EVERY bet we place is a flip of the coin 50-50, is it not? We can talk value, right side, trends, etc but you either win or lose, I keep it simple.

I think I went 2-0 in the MLB yesterday, what did you offer?

Dude just #### or go ahead and put your $ where your mouth is. Your a clown MP, you talk #### but you keep your $ in your pocket.......When you take big hits or add to your stack then come talk too me. Until then your like that little kid in the schoolyard that barks all day and when it is time to step up you run back to class.........

I take shots but at the end of the day I MAKE

I was going to bold your above statement, but it's already bolded. Every bet is 50/50? What about Spurs +4, +3? Under 204? Those "coinflip" bets?You gamble for the fun of it, I understand, most do. If you are simply flipping coins then the vig will eat you up and you will be a losing gambler. It's as simple as that, if you'd like to argue that fact then go ahead.

"I went 2-0 in MLB yesterday" Great job. There's 140 more days of MLB.

I made about 900 plays in the MLB last year in just three months. I put plenty of money where my mouth is and came out slightly behind. Due to the recent gambling legislation, I don't feel safe putting my money out there with just one book. Lots of -EV plays would be made by me.

You say you make money, but if you flip coins and pay the vig you won't make money. Sorry, that's just the math talking. Nobody wants to believe the math is the most important thing in gambling, they think they can flip coins at a 53% rate. You may flip 100 coins at a 53% rate, but go ahead and flip 1,000,000 and get back to me with the results. I think we did this project in 9th grade in one of my classes.

 

[Steelnation]

Yankees RL -115

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

Marshall you are much more useful when capping games than critiquing betting styles. Sure, you make some valid points and you should definately include them in your book, but I don't think anyone here is shopping for your book today.

Get back to work, man. Let's see some sharp capping. You are losing your edge in that department I think.

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

Our two best plays today are:

Florida +100

Arizona -113

 

[MarshallPlan]

Marshall you are much more useful when capping games than critiquing betting styles. Sure, you make some valid points and you should definately include them in your book, but I don't think anyone here is shopping for your book today.Get back to work, man. Let's see some sharp capping. You are losing your edge in that department I think.

I never intended to critique betting styles, I just don't understand why writeups say Boston is 12-5 at home this year, yet they can easily losing you money at the same time. Steelnation got me going and I went off the edge - he obviously is way wrong. Records don't mean much in baseball. Look at the Royals last year, they were moneymakers. Tenn Titans were 8-8 SU but 11-5 ATS. Records mean little. Not publishing a book. :( Nobody would buy it and nothing I would put in it would be earthshattering. I am losing my edge in the capping department, after all I haven't capped since the Super Bowl. I'm not that good of a capper, I'm more of shopper - that's how I'm successful. We've discussed this many times before. With the new changing market, I would have quite a tough time. Just talking with Red last weekend, got me to understand the best lines are no longer out there, it's one maybe two books and that's it. Things just look right to me sometimes. SA -3 didn't seem right in gm 4. Jazz -4' did. Suns Over tonight just looks right - no capping needed no writeups, no stats. It just seems right - this is me flipping coins. I've said it before, combine my shopping with Gambler/JTC/Red's capping and we'd be one heck of a tandem. I'll "get back to work" when the time is right.

 

[Steelnation]

Marshall you are much more useful when capping games than critiquing betting styles. Sure, you make some valid points and you should definately include them in your book, but I don't think anyone here is shopping for your book today.

Get back to work, man. Let's see some sharp capping. You are losing your edge in that department I think.

I never intended to critique betting styles, I just don't understand why writeups say Boston is 12-5 at home this year, yet they can easily losing you money at the same time. Steelnation got me going and I went off the edge - he obviously is way wrong. Records don't mean much in baseball. Look at the Royals last year, they were moneymakers. Tenn Titans were 8-8 SU but 11-5 ATS. Records mean little. Not publishing a book. Nobody would buy it and nothing I would put in it would be earthshattering.

I am losing my edge in the capping department, after all I haven't capped since the Super Bowl. I'm not that good of a capper, I'm more of shopper - that's how I'm successful. We've discussed this many times before. With the new changing market, I would have quite a tough time. Just talking with Red last weekend, got me to understand the best lines are no longer out there, it's one maybe two books and that's it.

Things just look right to me sometimes. SA -3 didn't seem right in gm 4. Jazz -4' did. Suns Over tonight just looks right - no capping needed no writeups, no stats. It just seems right - this is me flipping coins.

I've said it before, combine my shopping with Gambler/JTC/Red's capping and we'd be one heck of a tandem. I'll "get back to work" when the time is right.

+62 Units for the year.....yeah I am WAY wrong MP I crunch numbers for a living, it is what a Fortune 100 company pays me to do.

Whenever you want to go head to head on picks, let me know..... :(

 

[guru_007]

Wow....lots of nice stuff out there today.

So far I'm on

Yanks/ChiSox o9.5 - game 1

Atlanta (Davies) -135 @ Washington

Long loving looks at:

Chicago +115 (although I've sworn off ever betting on the Cubs again)

Rockies +109

o9.5 Texas/TB

If these go any higher, I'll have to bite at:

Arroyo +173 vs Peavy

Maroth +130 vs Tavarez (hate betting against the Sox at home though)

Silva +180 vs Sabathia

 

[guru_007]

+62 Units for the year.....yeah I am WAY wrong MP I crunch numbers for a living, it is what a Fortune 100 company pays me to do.Whenever you want to go head to head on picks, let me know.....

Do us all a favor and stop taking MP's stinky bait. Dude's been on a lot of ignore lists for years now. Post plays, hopefully with some solid rationale, and we'll all be good.

 

[Steelnation]

+62 Units for the year.....yeah I am WAY wrong MP I crunch numbers for a living, it is what a Fortune 100 company pays me to do.Whenever you want to go head to head on picks, let me know.....

Do us all a favor and stop taking MP's stinky bait. Dude's been on a lot of ignore lists for years now. Post plays, hopefully with some solid rationale, and we'll all be good.

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

If these go any higher, I'll have to bite atSilva +180 vs Sabathia

Minnesota's pretty tempting to me too. I keep looking at that one, +180 now? It was +165 this morning. Sabathia wasn't very good in his last outing and Minnesota is very recently starting too hit.

 

[Gambler]

Pretty much the same ole spoutin' and toutin' here. Which I no longer have the time or urge to do.

But I'll offer these 3 tonight

Balt +157

Milw +134 but raining like hell

SFG +104

GLTA

 

[prosopis]

Today I have:Chc +113Det +119

That was a quick vacation.............. I have the feeling my hiatus may come crashing down after one day

1 day but it felt like much longer YTD 50/54/5Parlay 8/10units +21

 

[prosopis]

CWS +113

 

[guru_007]

Oy, I wish I knew the Mets were playing their "C" team today

No Reyes, Wright, Beltran, LoDuca

 

[Sea Leopard of Death]

Is it cold in here?

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

This afternoon we are taking the ChiSox +127. Its a crime the Cubs are this big favorites the way they are playing. Once Dempster goes in the tank, it usually lasts a bit. I think they will be reeling off that meltdown yesterday and the ChiSox come in with some confidence taking 2 of 3 from the Yanks.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

I've got to take Penny and the Dodgers tonight. Just a clearly better pitcher, especially of late, and lay next to nothing. They're playing well, (although so is Anaheim) and had the day off at home yesterday. Not that it matters much, especially in baseball, but Angels return from a road trip late last night so one team is way more rested with a much better pitcher (which is what I'm mostly going on). Seems like good value.

Good enough for me on a Friday night...2 units....no, 3....

 

[prosopis]

YTD 51/54/5

parlays 8/10

units +22

Today I have:

CWS/Chc U10.5 -110

Az/Pitt O7.5 +100

parlay Chc -120, NYM -128

 

[JaxBill]

Two parlays-

ChC -125

ATL (second game of DH with Smoltz) -110

Mets -128

M

arlins -128

 

[prosopis]

YTD 52/55/5

parlays 9/10

units +24

 

[cosjobs]

I'd appreciate a little positive vibes toward the Diamondbacks, up 9-8 in the 9th to close out a 5-teamer

5 tms PARLAY 20/1487 901.

Diamondbacks (Arizona)ML +138

WON911. Twins (Minnesota) +150

WON918. Astros (Houston)PS -1½ +135 LP J Koronka - L / W Rodriguez -L (1-6)

WON919. Blue Jays (Toronto)ML +145 AG (13-2)

WON921. Marlins (Florida)PS -1½ +120 LP D Willis - L / J Seo - R (7-2)

 

[cosjobs]

I'd appreciate a little positive vibes toward the Diamondbacks, up 9-8 in the 9th to close out a 5-teamer

5 tms PARLAY 20/1487 901.

Diamondbacks (Arizona)ML +138

WON911. Twins (Minnesota) +150

WON918. Astros (Houston)PS -1½ +135 LP J Koronka - L / W Rodriguez -L (1-6)

WON919. Blue Jays (Toronto)ML +145 AG (13-2)

WON921. Marlins (Florida)PS -1½ +120 LP D Willis - L / J Seo - R (7-2)

Backs win 9-8, thanks for the sweat

 

[BigA]

Hey Prop - Nice opening...... but there is a typo in the Thread title.....

The Dog System sheet is up and running. I just checked it this evening. I have a link if anyone needs it.............

before anyone asks....: http://roarinsonoran.hypermart.net/cgi-bin...ms/dogsystem.pl

Can't wait for the season to start

anyone useing the system have any updates?..I would like to join the party

 

[prosopis]

I'd appreciate a little positive vibes toward the Diamondbacks, up 9-8 in the 9th to close out a 5-teamer

5 tms PARLAY 20/1487 901.

Diamondbacks (Arizona)ML +138

WON911. Twins (Minnesota) +150

WON918. Astros (Houston)PS -1½ +135 LP J Koronka - L / W Rodriguez -L (1-6)

WON919. Blue Jays (Toronto)ML +145 AG (13-2)

WON921. Marlins (Florida)PS -1½ +120 LP D Willis - L / J Seo - R (7-2)

Backs win 9-8, thanks for the sweat

That was a great game. That kid Reynolds who came up looks real good. I always enjoy seeing someones first big league HR. Hopefully this game gets the D backs on a roll. Today we get R Johnson pitching and he should be getting up to speed now.

 

[prosopis]

I'd appreciate a little positive vibes toward the Diamondbacks, up 9-8 in the 9th to close out a 5-teamer

5 tms PARLAY 20/1487 901.

Diamondbacks (Arizona)ML +138

WON911. Twins (Minnesota) +150

WON918. Astros (Houston)PS -1½ +135 LP J Koronka - L / W Rodriguez -L (1-6)

WON919. Blue Jays (Toronto)ML +145 AG (13-2)

WON921. Marlins (Florida)PS -1½ +120 LP D Willis - L / J Seo - R (7-2)

Awesome hit for you Cosjobs

 

[prosopis]

Az -127

parlay Atl -126, NYM -139

 

[laughinboy_2000]

Hey Prop - Nice opening...... but there is a typo in the Thread title.....

The Dog System sheet is up and running. I just checked it this evening. I have a link if anyone needs it.............

before anyone asks....: http://roarinsonoran.hypermart.net/cgi-bin...ms/dogsystem.pl

Can't wait for the season to start

anyone useing the system have any updates?..I would like to join the party

OK, so I'm curious as to how successful the Dog System is. I'm throwing some small change on the following underdogs mentioned within the system.Toronto +131

Pittsburgh +126

Texas +118

KC +145

All for $20.00

GLTA

 

[BigA]

Hey Prop - Nice opening...... but there is a typo in the Thread title.....

The Dog System sheet is up and running. I just checked it this evening. I have a link if anyone needs it.............

before anyone asks....: http://roarinsonoran.hypermart.net/cgi-bin...ms/dogsystem.pl

Can't wait for the season to start

anyone useing the system have any updates?..I would like to join the party

OK, so I'm curious as to how successful the Dog System is. I'm throwing some small change on the following underdogs mentioned within the system.Toronto +131

Pittsburgh +126

Texas +118

KC +145

All for $20.00

GLTA

even though R. Johnson isnt a top 20, I passed on the game

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

Give me something on tonight's game, will ya?!

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

I'd appreciate a little positive vibes toward the Diamondbacks, up 9-8 in the 9th to close out a 5-teamer

5 tms PARLAY 20/1487 901.

Diamondbacks (Arizona)ML +138

WON911. Twins (Minnesota) +150

WON918. Astros (Houston)PS -1½ +135 LP J Koronka - L / W Rodriguez -L (1-6)

WON919. Blue Jays (Toronto)ML +145 AG (13-2)

WON921. Marlins (Florida)PS -1½ +120 LP D Willis - L / J Seo - R (7-2)

Backs win 9-8, thanks for the sweat

Nice Damon. He does this every 6 months or so, like clockwork.

 

[laughinboy_2000]

Not a bad day at 2-2 using the Dog System for the first time. Positive money is all I'm looking for.

For the Year:

2-2 Record

+$11 so far

Todays Underdog plays:

BoSox +125

Twins +105

Brewers +110

All for $20

GLTA

 

[prosopis]

YTD 53/55/5

parlay 10/10

units +24

Today I like

Mil +103

Bos +129

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

That's funny, I like Milwaukee too, as well as Boston (not quite as much)...

Let's see, a $50 three team Brewers/Boston/Nats, cosjobs-style, pays...ooooh...$666!!! Make it a buck..

 

[Jefferson the Caregiver]

At this point, Boston as a dog is pretty much a must play every time, doesn't matter on pitching matchup. They are definately + money this year as a dog, I think a few units ahead at the least.

 

[Sonny Lubick Blowup Doll]

At this point, Boston as a dog is pretty much a must play every time, doesn't matter on pitching matchup. They are definately + money this year as a dog, I think a few units ahead at the least.

I just got it at a whopping +135. I even got the Brewers at a decent +110.