What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Bishop Sankey - Best RB in the 2014 Draft (2 Viewers)

If you think NFL teams place that much emphasis on the combine I think you're way off base. The combine is nowhere near as important as the actual game film to NFL teams. Let's remember that NFL teams have access to ALL of the footage on these players, including coaches tape which is a far better analysis tool.
In general (and this isn't meant to be pointed at anyone in this thread) I think there are too many Youtube scouts who simply look at the highlights and create a strong opinion on players. Keep in mind just 8 months ago everyone was clamoring for Lache Seastrunk as a feature back. The guy is an after thought now.
Lache Seastrunk looked a hell of a lot better than Sankey in his first NFL preseason action.

 
If you think NFL teams place that much emphasis on the combine I think you're way off base. The combine is nowhere near as important as the actual game film to NFL teams. Let's remember that NFL teams have access to ALL of the footage on these players, including coaches tape which is a far better analysis tool.
I really don't think that. When I watched him play in cuttups available on draftbreakdown I just didn't see much impressive so I'm wondering what people are seeing that I'm not.

I usually don't let the combine change my opinion much on people, Sankey was actually a guy I had to go back and watch after the combine because his numbers were phenomenal. But, I still didn't see it. I can't begin to guess what the Titans used to base their decision of Sankey on... I've heard he really impressive in interviews, he was well liked by previous coaches, and works his ### off in practices and in the weight room. Couple all of that with his impressive stats in the PAC12, I still don't see him as the #1 prospect in this class and it all comes back to what I see when he plays.

IMO.

 
From Rotoworld:

Coach Ken Whisenhunt identified Bishop Sankey as a player that stood out in Saturday's preseason opener.

The Titans' starters logged 10 plays, with Shonn Greene getting seven snaps and Dexter McCluster getting the three third-down reps. That's not what to expect going forward. Sankey racked up 75 yards on 13 touches, gaining praise from Whiz despite blowing a blitz pickup. The second-round rookie is likely to lose goal-line work to Greene, but should emerge as the lead back in this RBBC. Expect some first-team reps in Friday's second preseason game. Aug 11 - 8:39 AM

Source: Nashville Tennessean

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9408/bishop-sankey

 
From Rotoworld:

Coach Ken Whisenhunt identified Bishop Sankey as a player that stood out in Saturday's preseason opener.

The Titans' starters logged 10 plays, with Shonn Greene getting seven snaps and Dexter McCluster getting the three third-down reps. That's not what to expect going forward. Sankey racked up 75 yards on 13 touches, gaining praise from Whiz despite blowing a blitz pickup. The second-round rookie is likely to lose goal-line work to Greene, but should emerge as the lead back in this RBBC. Expect some first-team reps in Friday's second preseason game. Aug 11 - 8:39 AM

Source: Nashville Tennessean

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9408/bishop-sankey
Here's what he actually said... via the presser.

(On players who stood out)

There were a lot of things that were typical of a game like that. There were some good plays and some plays, it seemed like, for a lot of guys. Bishop Sankey, he did okay. He had a couple of things that we’ve got to get cleaned up. Damion Stafford, like I said, both of those guys last night. They had some good plays. They had some things we have to correct, but there were a number of guys that did good things, but there’s also a lot of work to do.
"Okay"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He put the T in Stankey. He looked small and not explosive or elusive at all. Might want to change the title of this thread to 7th best RB in the draft because he showed nothing to indicate he's the #1 back in this class.
Whisenhunt pegs Bishop Sankey as a standout

Coach Ken Whisenhunt identified Bishop Sankey as a player that stood out in Saturday's preseason opener.

The Titans' starters logged 10 plays, with Shonn Greene getting seven snaps and Dexter McCluster getting the three third-down reps. That's not what to expect going forward. Sankey racked up 75 yards on 13 touches, gaining praise from Whiz despite blowing a blitz pickup. The second-round rookie is likely to lose goal-line work to Greene, but should emerge as the lead back in this RBBC. Expect some first-team reps in Friday's second preseason game.

Source: Nashville Tennessean Aug 11 - 8:39 AM

Looks like not everyone agrees with your confident assessment...

 
Well, I dont have to worry about whether or not he is going to be good anymore. Essentially traded Sankey and Golden Tate (plus Hillman) for Le'veon Bell.

I definitely feel more comfortable with Bell

 
ghostguy123 said:
Well, I dont have to worry about whether or not he is going to be good anymore. Essentially traded Sankey and Golden Tate (plus Hillman) for Le'veon Bell.

I definitely feel more comfortable with Bell
Wow. Steal.

 
Bishop Sankey getting attention from Ken Whisenhunt; fantasy value rising

Tennessee Titans running back Bishop Sankey is turning all the right heads. We break down the fantasy implications.

The Tennessee Titans are calling Shonn Greene their starting running back through one preseason game, but rookie Bishop Sankey, the favorite to ultimately win the job, is getting some recognition. Titans coach Ken Whisenhunt identified Sankey, the third running back on the field, as a player who "got his attention," according to Jim Wyatt of The Tennessean.

Sankey, a second-round pick in the 2014 NFL Draft, was behind both Greene and Dexter McCluster on the running back depth chart going into the preseason opener. But he got more playing time than either, and he took advantage of it. While he did struggle to pick up consistent yardage on the ground -- he had 13 carries for just 37 yards -- he managed three receptions for 38 yards and a touchdown.

Fantasy Impact: The receiving yardage is significant, because it's one of Greene's biggest weaknesses. Greene has been a productive running back in the past, but he had just 295 yards in 11 games with the Titans last season, and had just six receptions for 39 yards in that time.

Many feel Sankey will get the starting nod when it comes to the regular season, and it's hard to disagree with the notion. As to whether or not he's a strong fantasy option ... we need to see a little more, but he's expected to play a big role in Tennessee's offense this season. Greene, for now, should be avoided.

 
ghostguy123 said:
Well, I dont have to worry about whether or not he is going to be good anymore. Essentially traded Sankey and Golden Tate (plus Hillman) for Le'veon Bell.

I definitely feel more comfortable with Bell
Wow. Steal.
I'm not a fan of that trade at all, but mostly because I'm not a big believer in Bell and think Tate is vastly underrated because of his time in Seattle.

 
Zac Stacy wasn't that great in preseason last year. He still became the starter eventually.

 
Zac Stacy was a waiver wire pickup in most leagues. Sankey is going as RB20-25. Huge difference. Do I think Sankey could be Zac Stacy? sure. Do I think hes a good value at that point in nonPPR? hell no.

 
Zac Stacy was a waiver wire pickup in most leagues. Sankey is going as RB20-25. Huge difference. Do I think Sankey could be Zac Stacy? sure. Do I think hes a good value at that point in nonPPR? hell no.
I think that value means less in dynasty. If you think Sankey/Stacy/Or anyone is going to be a great NFL player you take them - if you pay a little premium - so be it...

Different story in redraft. I however think Sankey is still a value in redrafts.... There are some stiffs being taken in front of him...

 
Rotoworld:

The Tennessean says it's "easy to envision" Bishop Sankey as the primary ball-carrier this season.

We're not reading into Sankey's zero first-team snaps in the preseason opener, and neither is top beat man Jim Wyatt. Shonn Greene and Dexter McCluster are specialty players, and the Titans made Sankey the first back off the board because of his all-around ability. He's a strong bet to emerge as the lead dog of this RBBC sooner rather than later. "We believe in him, and what we have seen so far, we like what we see," said coach Ken Whisenhunt. Owners should note that Sankey will almost certainly lose goal-line work to Greene.

Related: Shonn Greene, Dexter McCluster

Source: Nashville Tennessean

Aug 13 - 9:57 AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bishop Sankey seems likely to win starting job; fantasy value trending up...

Bishop Sankey is primed to beat out Shonn Greene for the starting job. We break down the fantasy implications.

Tennessee Titans running back Bishop Sankey could wind up being the team's starter going into the regular season. It's "easy to envision him as the primary ball-carrier," according to a report from Jim Wyatt of The Tennessean. Head coach Ken Whisenhunt gave Shonn Greene, the current starter, a very small vote of confidence before the preseason opener when he said that Greene was the top back because of experience.

In so many words, that's tantamount to saying Sankey will be the guy once its clear his inexperience will not be detrimental to the team. Again going back to the report from Wyatt, it would be tough to keep Sankey off the field because of his versatility. He can run inside or outside, and he's got great hands in the passing game.

Fantasy Impact: Many are calling it at this point, and it's hard to argue with them. The Titans invested in Sankey over backs that were more highly regarded because they like what he brings to the table. He'll need to work on his pass protection, like any rookie back needs to, but aside from that he seems like a surefire starter.

As to his actual fantasy value, that's still an interesting question. Sankey obviously should not be made a RB1 by any means, but he's got a high ceiling and has the potential to contribute big numbers early and often. We'll likely have a better idea when we see how he's used in the second and third preseason games.

 
Titans WR Nate Washington on Bishop Sankey: We believe in him

While it was a necessary move in the offseason for the team, the Tennessee Titans knew they suffered a major loss by cutting running back Chris Johnson after six seasons. Needing a replacement, they drafted former Washington Huskies star Bishop Sankey in the second round back in May, hoping that he can fill the shoes of Johnson as best as he could.

Well if the first preseason game the team played last weekend against the Packers was any indication, they might be headed in the direction of being just fine.

In the time that he saw on the field, Sankey rushed the ball 13 times for 37 yards, and he also scored a receiving touchdown from five yards out. He certainly left a lasting impression on veteran wide receiver Nate Washington, that’s for sure.

“To say he has huge shoes to fill, we can’t put that all on him with C.J. leaving,” Washington said. “This offense has to do it collectively, and make the splash plays that C.J. made. But we believe in him, and what we have seen so far, we like what we see.”

There’s a long way to go yet to see whether or not Sankey can end up being as valuable as Johnson was for this team, but he got off to a good start.

 
Zac Stacy was a waiver wire pickup in most leagues. Sankey is going as RB20-25. Huge difference. Do I think Sankey could be Zac Stacy? sure. Do I think hes a good value at that point in nonPPR? hell no.
RBs just fall off a cliff after 18 IMO. Anything after that is a complete crapshoot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zac Stacy was a waiver wire pickup in most leagues. Sankey is going as RB20-25. Huge difference. Do I think Sankey could be Zac Stacy? sure. Do I think hes a good value at that point in nonPPR? hell no.
RBs just fall off a cliff after 18 IMO. Anything after that is a complete crapshoot.
It's pretty much a crapshoot with RBs after 4.
I don't consider Sankey a crapshoot - draft him with confidence.If you live by the phrases "he has never done it before" or "I must see it to believe it" then you'll miss out on the hot rookie every time!

Sankey is ultra-talented!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm concerned, he has some good moments against 3rd/4th quarter preseason defenses but he seems to be logging time behind greene, mcluster AND washington.

 
That was some very limited action for Sankey. He never came back in after the "fumble" which appeared to be a botched exchange where he tried to grab the ball instead of letting it come to him.

I saw Greene go down, but it didn't look all that serious. It was the knee he had issues with but everything I'm seeing says that he'll be fine - http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2014/08/15/shonn-greene-tennessee-titans-new-orleans-saints/14149277/

Saw a bit more burst from Sankey last night on the 13 yard gain where he bounced a bit outside outrunning a d-lineman, that was certainly the highlight of the night. The ankle tackle or two was like seeing him in a Washington jersey all over again... another meh performance in my book.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm concerned, he has some good moments against 3rd/4th quarter preseason defenses but he seems to be logging time behind greene, mcluster AND washington.
Any news on Greene's knee injury? That is the kind of break Sankey seems to need.
That's kind of telling he needs a break like that against shon greene lol
The guy is a rookie. You really think it's "telling"? I'm not a Sankey or Greene lover, apologist, hater, or whatever but some of you guys (on both sides) are really jumping to conclusions a little early, no?

 
I'm concerned, he has some good moments against 3rd/4th quarter preseason defenses but he seems to be logging time behind greene, mcluster AND washington.
Any news on Greene's knee injury? That is the kind of break Sankey seems to need.
That's kind of telling he needs a break like that against shon greene lol
The guy is a rookie. You really think it's "telling"? I'm not a Sankey or Greene lover, apologist, hater, or whatever but some of you guys (on both sides) are really jumping to conclusions a little early, no?
Seriously, get a grip people. I'm a Sankey owner in every league and FWIW I thought Greene looked good last night. If he's healthy it will probably be a Gio/BJGE situation this year.

 
I'm concerned, he has some good moments against 3rd/4th quarter preseason defenses but he seems to be logging time behind greene, mcluster AND washington.
Any news on Greene's knee injury? That is the kind of break Sankey seems to need.
That's kind of telling he needs a break like that against shon greene lol
The guy is a rookie. You really think it's "telling"? I'm not a Sankey or Greene lover, apologist, hater, or whatever but some of you guys (on both sides) are really jumping to conclusions a little early, no?
Agreed. Doesn't really say anything other than this is the current depth chart and it's the flipping preseason... everything is so fluid right now it's hard to read into anything depth chart related.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm concerned, he has some good moments against 3rd/4th quarter preseason defenses but he seems to be logging time behind greene, mcluster AND washington.
Any news on Greene's knee injury? That is the kind of break Sankey seems to need.
That's kind of telling he needs a break like that against shon greene lol
The guy is a rookie. You really think it's "telling"? I'm not a Sankey or Greene lover, apologist, hater, or whatever but some of you guys (on both sides) are really jumping to conclusions a little early, no?
Seriously, get a grip people. I'm a Sankey owner in every league and FWIW I thought Greene looked good last night. If he's healthy it will probably be a Gio/BJGE situation this year.
Exactly what I've been promoting all along. Sankey is not a 3 down stud and Greene is very credible between the tackles.

 
I'm concerned, he has some good moments against 3rd/4th quarter preseason defenses but he seems to be logging time behind greene, mcluster AND washington.
Any news on Greene's knee injury? That is the kind of break Sankey seems to need.
Hyperextended knee. Day to day.
Thanks. He has a history of knee problems, right?
He's had 2 'scopes on the same knee he hyperextended.

 
Was offered M. Ball for Sankey and WR Randle in a PPR dynasty. Looks okay but seems to early to give up on Sankey doesn't it?

 
Was offered M. Ball for Sankey and WR Randle in a PPR dynasty. Looks okay but seems to early to give up on Sankey doesn't it?
I believe next year than Sankey will be ranked higher than Ball.

Ball should have a better 2014 if you are in win now mode.

 
Was offered M. Ball for Sankey and WR Randle in a PPR dynasty. Looks okay but seems to early to give up on Sankey doesn't it?
I do that deal ASAP and not even think of looking back. Getting the known bell cow in Denver over a likely RBBC RB and a WR who looks like he's not going to evolve into a WR1 looks awfully appealing to me.

 
Was offered M. Ball for Sankey and WR Randle in a PPR dynasty. Looks okay but seems to early to give up on Sankey doesn't it?
I do that deal ASAP and not even think of looking back. Getting the known bell cow in Denver over a likely RBBC RB and a WR who looks like he's not going to evolve into a WR1 looks awfully appealing to me.
Absolutely do the deal. I'm not sure what there is to even think about.

 
Was offered M. Ball for Sankey and WR Randle in a PPR dynasty. Looks okay but seems to early to give up on Sankey doesn't it?
I do that deal ASAP and not even think of looking back. Getting the known bell cow in Denver over a likely RBBC RB and a WR who looks like he's not going to evolve into a WR1 looks awfully appealing to me.
Especially as a Broncos fan.

 
Was offered M. Ball for Sankey and WR Randle in a PPR dynasty. Looks okay but seems to early to give up on Sankey doesn't it?
I do that deal ASAP and not even think of looking back. Getting the known bell cow in Denver over a likely RBBC RB and a WR who looks like he's not going to evolve into a WR1 looks awfully appealing to me.
Especially as a Broncos fan.
Which has no bearing in the decision

 
Yikes. Right now--for 2014--Ball might be the more steady play. Going forward I don't trust Broncos RBs without Manning there. I mean, the guy who beat out Ball and Hillman last year looks like he might lose out to Lamar Miller. That's a steep dropoff from perceived talent.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top