All he'd have to do is retire, and he could keep this pace going for decades!How long can Sankey maintain his current pace????
All he'd have to do is retire, and he could keep this pace going for decades!How long can Sankey maintain his current pace????
About the time that your joke becomes funny?How long can Sankey maintain his current pace????
Until about 2 years after he's deadHow long can Sankey maintain his current pace????
Thanks. Interesting how quickly Tennessee gave up on Sankey this year after he started well out of the gate.Biabreakable said:Bishop Sankey snaps and stats by game:
TAM 23 38.3% 12 rushing attempts 74 yards 6.17ypc 1TD 3 targets 2 receptions 12 yards 1TD
CLE 32 40.0% 12 rushing attempts 42 yards 3.50ypc 0TD 2 targets 0 receptions
IND 19 23.5% 5 rushing attempts 10 yards 2.00ypc 0TD 2 targets 2 receptions 31 yards
BUF 23 33.3% 7 rushing attempts 20 yards 2.86ypc 0TD 3 targets 3 receptions 23 yards
MIA 18 26.1% 3 rushing attempts 13 yards 4.33ypc 0TD 3 targets 1 reception 7 yards
ATL 2 3.7%
HOU 2 3.1%
CAR 3 6.5% 2 rushing attempts 7 yards 3.5ypc
OAK 1 1.6%
JAX 3 4.3% 1 target 0 receptions
NYJ 0 0.0%
He's well-rested.Biabreakable said:[SIZE=10pt]Bishop Sankey snaps and stats by game:[/SIZE]
TAM 23 38.3% 12 rushing attempts 74 yards 6.17ypc 1TD 3 targets 2 receptions 12 yards 1TD
CLE 32 40.0% 12 rushing attempts 42 yards 3.50ypc 0TD 2 targets 0 receptions
IND 19 23.5% 5 rushing attempts 10 yards 2.00ypc 0TD 2 targets 2 receptions 31 yards
BUF 23 33.3% 7 rushing attempts 20 yards 2.86ypc 0TD 3 targets 3 receptions 23 yards
MIA 18 26.1% 3 rushing attempts 13 yards 4.33ypc 0TD 3 targets 1 reception 7 yards
ATL 2 3.7%
HOU 2 3.1%
CAR 3 6.5% 2 rushing attempts 7 yards 3.5ypc
OAK 1 1.6%
JAX 3 4.3% 1 target 0 receptions
NYJ 0 0.0%
All summer they used the FB(three FBs and occasionally Andrews as FB even)Thanks. Interesting how quickly Tennessee gave up on Sankey this year after he started well out of the gate.Biabreakable said:Bishop Sankey snaps and stats by game:
TAM 23 38.3% 12 rushing attempts 74 yards 6.17ypc 1TD 3 targets 2 receptions 12 yards 1TD
CLE 32 40.0% 12 rushing attempts 42 yards 3.50ypc 0TD 2 targets 0 receptions
IND 19 23.5% 5 rushing attempts 10 yards 2.00ypc 0TD 2 targets 2 receptions 31 yards
BUF 23 33.3% 7 rushing attempts 20 yards 2.86ypc 0TD 3 targets 3 receptions 23 yards
MIA 18 26.1% 3 rushing attempts 13 yards 4.33ypc 0TD 3 targets 1 reception 7 yards
ATL 2 3.7%
HOU 2 3.1%
CAR 3 6.5% 2 rushing attempts 7 yards 3.5ypc
OAK 1 1.6%
JAX 3 4.3% 1 target 0 receptions
NYJ 0 0.0%
What happened in the Miami game - fumble, missed protections?Thanks. Interesting how quickly Tennessee gave up on Sankey this year after he started well out of the gate.Biabreakable said:Bishop Sankey snaps and stats by game:
TAM 23 38.3% 12 rushing attempts 74 yards 6.17ypc 1TD 3 targets 2 receptions 12 yards 1TD
CLE 32 40.0% 12 rushing attempts 42 yards 3.50ypc 0TD 2 targets 0 receptions
IND 19 23.5% 5 rushing attempts 10 yards 2.00ypc 0TD 2 targets 2 receptions 31 yards
BUF 23 33.3% 7 rushing attempts 20 yards 2.86ypc 0TD 3 targets 3 receptions 23 yards
MIA 18 26.1% 3 rushing attempts 13 yards 4.33ypc 0TD 3 targets 1 reception 7 yards
ATL 2 3.7%
HOU 2 3.1%
CAR 3 6.5% 2 rushing attempts 7 yards 3.5ypc
OAK 1 1.6%
JAX 3 4.3% 1 target 0 receptions
NYJ 0 0.0%
What's the thinking here of not using a FB when they spend a high pick on one and the previous year they drafted a RB in the 2nd round who needs one?If they made Sankey the starter and gave him 30 carries the next few weeks. He would still stink because they won't give him a FB and he can't roll in the single-back set.
If they had any reasonable OC they'd use a FB. They don't.
If they had a creative OC, they'd use Sankey and Fowler/Andrews at FB and force the D to account for two threats. They don't.
You guys are wanting a square peg round hole here. And week one where he did well....Fowler had 45 snaps
He has been inactive in 3 games thus far this season. Data pulled from PFR.What happened in the Miami game - fumble, missed protections?Thanks. Interesting how quickly Tennessee gave up on Sankey this year after he started well out of the gate.Biabreakable said:Bishop Sankey snaps and stats by game:
TAM 23 38.3% 12 rushing attempts 74 yards 6.17ypc 1TD 3 targets 2 receptions 12 yards 1TD
CLE 32 40.0% 12 rushing attempts 42 yards 3.50ypc 0TD 2 targets 0 receptions
IND 19 23.5% 5 rushing attempts 10 yards 2.00ypc 0TD 2 targets 2 receptions 31 yards
BUF 23 33.3% 7 rushing attempts 20 yards 2.86ypc 0TD 3 targets 3 receptions 23 yards
MIA 18 26.1% 3 rushing attempts 13 yards 4.33ypc 0TD 3 targets 1 reception 7 yards
ATL 2 3.7%
HOU 2 3.1%
CAR 3 6.5% 2 rushing attempts 7 yards 3.5ypc
OAK 1 1.6%
JAX 3 4.3% 1 target 0 receptions
NYJ 0 0.0%
Eight OL because their line stinks.cstu said:What's the thinking here of not using a FB when they spend a high pick on one and the previous year they drafted a RB in the 2nd round who needs one?If they made Sankey the starter and gave him 30 carries the next few weeks. He would still stink because they won't give him a FB and he can't roll in the single-back set.
If they had any reasonable OC they'd use a FB. They don't.
If they had a creative OC, they'd use Sankey and Fowler/Andrews at FB and force the D to account for two threats. They don't.
You guys are wanting a square peg round hole here. And week one where he did well....Fowler had 45 snaps
You said this another time and are the only one that says so.Biabreakable said:Bri you make an interesting observation regarding the use of a FB.
What is a bit strange to me about this is that Sankey was used almost exclusively as a single back out of a spread system in college. So he didn't need a FB to be successful before. Why now?
Running game - Hello Inside Zone
The Huskies rushed the ball 53 times against Boise State and averaged 5.2 yards per carry (excluding Price's sack at the end of the first half) . Bishop Sankey averaged over a yard better than that. And they did it all while running basically the same play over and over again. Out of those 53 run calls, I think at least 30-35 of them were Inside Zones.
Zone blocking isn't new, of course. It rose to prominence during the 1990s in the NFL, after having been refined by Howard Mudd and Alex Gibbs (both of whom coached the Seahawks O-line at different times, though Gibbs only briefly) from concepts that were introduced by the Man himself.
The thing that makes zone blocking especially powerful for college teams is the synergy that it creates when it is combined with shotgun and pistol spread formations and a HUNH philosophy. Obviously it enables the zone read, which is probably one of the most important and truly new ideas to come along in football in some time. That topic has absolutely been done to death, but if you really want to learn everything there is to know about the zone read, go here (but take a shower afterward).
Beyond the zone read, the other reasons zone blocking schemes are so wonderfully matched to a HUNH spread philosophy are the following:
1. Athletic and slightly leaner o-linemen thrive in zone blocking schemes. Their body types and conditioning levels are also better suited to playing at a fast pace.
2. Becoming a good zone blocking team is very repetition intensive. Programs that fully buy into the HUNH and practice the right way get more reps (many more reps) than under traditional college practice methods.
3. KISS factor (as in Keep it Simple Stupid). Many NFL teams and some college teams only have two running plays, inside zone and outside zone. A team that is fully committed to it can have an awesome running attack with only those two plays. That simplicity dovetails nicely with the imperative to simplify an offense in order to run it at a break-neck speed. Properly executed zone blocking also requires very little in the way of pre-snap adjustments to account for zone blitzes, stunts and slants. That also fits nicely with the HUNH.
There is a mountain of material available on the interwebz on the ZBS (zone blocking scheme), but you don't have to Google it for yourself. Here is a short video by football nerd/hipster/savant Scott Gerlach that is very informative and here is a pretty clear article from the always excellent Chris Brown.
Andrews got in some trouble at WKU for twitter and Mett acted up with Watt. There were many players that about stopped tweeting.I was looking at Sankey's twitter feed and I guess the Huskies won a bowl game or something? So that is notable. However his whole twitter feed is about college football. He does not seem to be talking about his pro career at all.
Not that there is much for him or anyone to say about his pro career right now. But looking at that had me thinking Sankey is still living in the past.
They don't move anyone, they don't do squat.Bri based on your observations what type of blocking scheme do the Titan use the most? Zone or Man blocking? How often do they pull guards or tackles on their running plays?
Was he a change of pace RB in college? What is the basis of your assumption about Bishop Sankeys abilities that limit him to a COP role?Holy crap, this is a boatload of effort spent on at best a CoP RB.
In case you haven't noticed, he's not in college any longer. He has a record of performance in the pros. RBs a lot more prolific in college than Sankey have failed to perform at the pro level. Why you would want to reach back to what are now meaningless stats in predicting his future only demonstrates how weak your position is.Biabreakable said:Was he a change of pace RB in college? What is the basis of your assumption about Bishop Sankeys abilities that limit him to a COP role?Bronco Billy said:Holy crap, this is a boatload of effort spent on at best a CoP RB.
Nothing spectacular here. He does a nice job of making the first tackler miss on his second reception and then he gets low while running into a pack of defenders. He uses his hand to keep his knee from hitting the ground but he somewhat tackles himself, seems like he was expecting contact. He does get tackled after kind of rolling over after he lost his footing. There was a pack of defenders there, not saying he could have gotten much more, but it would be nice to see him at least try to keep the play alive instead of tripping on the turf. Maybe this is what Wis meant about footwork?Nice plays in final minute, only noticed him one other play
This is a stupid play they do almost every week if not every week and has never worked-not once!Andrews does a good job of hitting the hole and he had some decent runs after the Patriots were focused on stopping the pass. He had another good run when Jones was going for the strip instead of wrapping up on him.
The play where Mariota is injured it seemed like the LG fault. No one blocks 91 who is standing up but very near the LOS. Mariota looks to his right after the snap and does not seem aware that he might have a free rusher coming from his blind side. The two inside defenders run a stunt and the LG follows his guy around the center picking the pass rusher up near the RG. Andrews also helps combination block on this stunting defender on the right side of the center.
It is a terribly bad missed assignment. No one made any effort whatsoever to slow the pass rusher on this play. It is bad coaching and player awareness.
Got too much to do to watch it again. I was dead certain the LB gets bottled up by Andrews in a 5 man mishmash around the C. It was LB Jamie Collins that hit and injured Mariota with his tackle. Were there two LBs one on the line? I'll watch again later. I was positive the DT opposite Spain was who got ignoredIf they are faking the run I could almost see it being a useful fake once in awhile. But there is no play action on that play where Mariota gets hurt.Andrews is lined up on Mariotas left in the pistol slightly behind him. This shading helps him support the LT if there is a blitz to the outside. Without run action it does not make sense to fake that the guard is pulling across. This play was 3rd down and 8 however and they do not pull the LG across.
It does seem like the RB is responsible for picking up on this play and Andrews misses his assignment. That sounds terrible if they have been asking McCluster to pick up DTs in pass protection. That is a bad match up. Why in the world would you put your players in a situation to fail like this?
Watching it from the end zone view I can see Mariota communicating a protection to the center before the snap. The Patriots are showing 6 potential pass rushers. 93 stunts inside getting sandwiched by the center and right guard, Andrews also helps so they are triple teaming this guy. The NT gets passed on to the LG and that is why the LB is free through the gap with no one picking him up. Based on the protection call only the RB could pick up the blitzing LB.
Yeah I kind of thought the same thing from watching the broadcast view of the play. When I watched the end zone view it becomes clear that the LG picks up the NT after a little help from the center. This is likely what they were adjusting for pre snap. 93 who stunts inside gets picked up by the center Warmack and Andrews as well, so 3 on 1 there while they let 91 come free on the blitz. If they shifted protection so theleft guard is picking up the stunt then the only player who could block 91 is the RB who instead helps against 93.Bri said:Got too much to do to watch it again. I was dead certain the LB gets bottled up by Andrews in a 5 man mishmash around the C. It was LB Jamie Collins that hit and injured Mariota with his tackle. Were there two LBs one on the line? I'll watch again later. I was positive the DT opposite Spain was who got ignoredIf they are faking the run I could almost see it being a useful fake once in awhile. But there is no play action on that play where Mariota gets hurt.Andrews is lined up on Mariotas left in the pistol slightly behind him. This shading helps him support the LT if there is a blitz to the outside. Without run action it does not make sense to fake that the guard is pulling across. This play was 3rd down and 8 however and they do not pull the LG across.
It does seem like the RB is responsible for picking up on this play and Andrews misses his assignment. That sounds terrible if they have been asking McCluster to pick up DTs in pass protection. That is a bad match up. Why in the world would you put your players in a situation to fail like this?
Watching it from the end zone view I can see Mariota communicating a protection to the center before the snap. The Patriots are showing 6 potential pass rushers. 93 stunts inside getting sandwiched by the center and right guard, Andrews also helps so they are triple teaming this guy. The NT gets passed on to the LG and that is why the LB is free through the gap with no one picking him up. Based on the protection call only the RB could pick up the blitzing LB.
The play where Wright lines up at FB is another one of Wis cute plays. He has a lot of those. Half the time he is out thinking himself though and making execution more difficult as a trade off for being tricky. The defense often gets tricked too because they never would imagine the Titans running such plays because the plays suck.Is Wright going to lead block?Bri said:Bia, thanks for the huge effort on the Tampa offense. That is a great writeup of the offense that never was for them. (Also Andrews was out injured then)
FB got like 40ish plays
You point out Stevens is lined up at FB and Wright shifting there.
I didn't see Klug in your writeup but this is the time of year he was still getting some love.
Andrews should have returned to be extra trickery since he has practiced FB and RB and slot. Not so much trickery, just "you don't know what we're doing by looking at the huddle."
Mariota can be so slick with his fakes and option stuff.
Whisenhunt truly might have had a good plan. They were a top pass D or 2nd for the first half of the year. (It has gotten progressively worse) A good gameplan and some wise play calls really could have stolen a win here N there in the first half of the season though.
I think Whis panicked and the way he went so "gung ho" for the TE my gut says assistant HC/TE coach Mularkey had a say in the switch to being so predominantly TE heavy. One play cost them three Ws to start the year. They could have been 6-1 or 6-0 or somesuch. Tyrod Taylor 3rd and a zillion running for a first was one. I forget the third. The other was Klug at FB, Fowler running at RB on the final second and the D all over it so he failed gloriously trying to make something happen. They should have never went left but straight ahead, bad play call on Whis. I do also blame Lebeau for Taylor getting a first. You can't make a scheme to stop that? The difference is, Lebeau is a gem and Whis isn't. Whis panicked and Lebeau stayed the course and has made them statistically wayyyy better than anyone thinks they are as a D.
That O was a page out BB or Heimerdinger's book. Maybe not the best talent on O but we're gonna create some mismatches....such a shame
Very nice article Bri thanks for the link. Still having some issues getting all the gifs to load as the author may have overdone this a bit.Bri said:Hey Bia, you ought to emulate this guy's blog/article layout and do your thing.
http://www.battleredblog.com/2015/12/30/10660964/the-film-room-what-to-do-in-tennessee
This seems custom made for you