woof. not good.5 drops on the day so far. The rust? It's there.
Nice story. I'm sure he'll get it together soon. Most players need a game or two to come back full strength from a mid season injury return.
Not every team has a Revis and Cromartie tandem where the 3rd and 4th options would get that many targets though.Gotta love the targets. He's startable now.
Brady is averaging over 40 passes per game this seasonNot every team has a Revis and Cromartie tandem where the 3rd and 4th options would get that many targets though.Gotta love the targets. He's startable now.
Oh I know and I'm not LaFell won't get some, I'm just not sold on being startable all the time with that many drops and also without Lewis in the lineup.Brady is averaging over 40 passes per game this seasonNot every team has a Revis and Cromartie tandem where the 3rd and 4th options would get that many targets though.Gotta love the targets. He's startable now.
If you believe the drops are here to stay, then avoid. But Lafell produced very well when Vereen was around as a pass-catching back. I think the one x factor is Amendola, who's had a bit of a resurgence lately. But I'll take my chances.Oh I know and I'm not LaFell won't get some, I'm just not sold on being startable all the time with that many drops and also without Lewis in the lineup.Brady is averaging over 40 passes per game this seasonNot every team has a Revis and Cromartie tandem where the 3rd and 4th options would get that many targets though.Gotta love the targets. He's startable now.
I suspect the D was covering people who might catch the ball.He was getting open a lot
I cannot see LaFell being a "good" play this week. I'd rather seem him evolve and earn the trust back. Definitely a contrarian play as not many will own or start him this week. He's too far down the rankings. He's seen more as a WR 4 or 5 right now, with upside when things begin to click again. Bench hold material.Ace zero1 said:A good play this week or what?
Most people play real fantasy football.....I cannot see LaFell being a "good" play this week. I'd rather seem him evolve and earn the trust back. Definitely a contrarian play as not many will own or start him this week. He's too far down the rankings. He's seen more as a WR 4 or 5 right now, with upside when things begin to click again. Bench hold material.Ace zero1 said:A good play this week or what?
It was his first game back, and those weren't all easy catches," Brady said. "He's been great here and we're going to keep finding ways to get him the ball."74 catches last year, 7 TDs, averaged 60 yards/game. He started only 13 games (probably worked up to starter since the team was new). That's workable.
Last year:
Edelman, 134 targets, 11 drops
Lafell, 119 targets, 3 drops
Bilichick will give Lafell another shot.
wild pitchThat ball was low but it's another drop by LaFell.
Awful.Yeah, I'm pretty much forced to start him this week. Arob and jmatt are on bye so it might be a decent play. Redemption from last week.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU4UTDrSwQcLook at the game logs last year. 1st two games he had 14 targets 4 catches. Went over 100 with TD in the KC, disaster, 1 catch the next week. Thereafter he was s FF WR2 (& IRL pretty much matched Edlelman's production.) finished WR22, WR 20 PPG.
![]()
Seems right on schedule to me. I'll start him week 11 to cover a bye & see how it plays out after Thanksgiving.
They should both benefit. Dobson isn't very good. He's been getting plenty of targets as it is.Does he get a bump up on the Edelman news, or will Edelman's targets go mostly to Amendola?
Agreed, although I dont think Amendola will get fed quite as much as Edelweiss week to week.They should both benefit. Dobson isn't very good. He's been getting plenty of targets as it is.Does he get a bump up on the Edelman news, or will Edelman's targets go mostly to Amendola?
It didnt appear to me he was playing behind any other NE WRs. The NE offense looked headscratchingly bad in the first half, and average at best overall this week. Certainly credit due to BUF, but they seemed out of sync. I was going against Blount in my league and was wondering if he was a late scratch because I swear he didnt even touch the ball in the first half.Why was he playing behind Dobson and Harper..... I was in and out of sleep and didn't see much of the game. Lost by .2 though and find out he didn't play much of the first half...?
Anybody have any insight on this?
Is it the two TE two WR sets that he doesn't play in? I think they were running a lot of that.I think they came out in the first possession trying a few things out.
The entire first drive looked choreographed every play had multiple presnap motions.