***OFFICIAL CYDY/Leronlimab Thread*** (2 Viewers)

[Capella]

  But he was talking theoretical.  Clearly, the patient died from Covid and was in the treatment arm.

If this is the case, there is no way in hell the stock is heading north. (I think you guys are being presumptive). 

 

[BassNBrew]

But it may not be drug related, it may be.

1. Drug related - doubt it.

2. Covid related - likely

3. Run over by a garbage truck - possible, but why not say so.

 

[BassNBrew]

If this is the case, there is no way in hell the stock is heading north. (I think you guys are being presumptive). 

Exactly.

 

[Otis]

Was raving about this stock to my BIL a couple weeks ago. He today tells me he got in around $9, and is down 40%.  Sweet stonk. 

 

[Don Hutson]

Yup.  Doesn't look good when your only patient who dies from a mild/moderate case of Covid was taking the cure.

It even attacks the efficacy in the S/C trial a bit since the patient was severe and critical before dying.

 

[Capella]

Was raving about this stock to my BIL a couple weeks ago. He today tells me he got in around $9, and is down 40%.  Sweet stonk. 

smooth

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

Was raving about this stock to my BIL a couple weeks ago. He today tells me he got in around $9, and is down 40%.  Sweet stonk. 

stock was under $1 when most of us got in a few months ago. buying at $9 is great shtick.

 

[stbugs]

JFC, what the hell is going on in here? NP who can’t keep from blurting our dates is somehow holding info back?

SMH. Why won’t someone just buy this company so we can close this thread?

 

[stbugs]

If this is the case, there is no way in hell the stock is heading north. (I think you guys are being presumptive). 

Presumptive? Never. I don’t even know what I am reading right now. Is everyone in here a Whyatt alias? Some serious crap getting thrown against the wall lately. So many bad assumptions/takes. Now, we are holding back results that were done over the weekend because LL kills people. SMH.

 

[kevzilla]

I'm not sure owning OTC biotech stock is for everyone

 

[Whyatt]

Presumptive? Never. I don’t even know what I am reading right now. Is everyone in here a Whyatt alias? Some serious crap getting thrown against the wall lately. So many bad assumptions/takes. Now, we are holding back results that were done over the weekend because LL kills people. SMH.

 

[Capella]

36 minutes ago, Don Hutson said:  Clearly, the patient died from Covid and was in the treatment arm.

If you believe this to be true you can’t possibly be holding stock right? Serious question. If that comes out in the report it’s a 2 dollar stock. 

 

[Charlie Harper]

I think Nader said the patient died 33 days after the trial started and they were in the treatment arm.  And then he said that a patient dying from a car accident would be considered as an SAE.  But he was talking theoretical.  Clearly, the patient died from Covid and was in the treatment arm.

Do you have a link where NP said this? Just want to see the whole context of his reply.

A death in the treatment arm would make sense why they're holding back efficacy results. They want all the info to present a strong case in light of the death.

 

[stbugs]

If you believe this to be true you can’t possibly be holding stock right? Serious question. If that comes out in the report it’s a 2 dollar stock. 

I think I’m leaning towards selling so I don’t have to come in this thread anymore. Really kicking myself for not selling at $10 now.

 

[BassNBrew]

Do you have a link where NP said this? Just want to see the whole context of his reply.

A death in the treatment arm would make sense why they're holding back efficacy results. They want all the info to present a strong case in light of the death.

 

[Don Hutson]

Do you have a link where NP said this? Just want to see the whole context of his reply.

A death in the treatment arm would make sense why they're holding back efficacy results. They want all the info to present a strong case in light of the death.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/924762/cytodyn-showcases-its-patient-safety-data-from-its-phase-2-coronavirus-trial-924762.html

 

[chet]

I talked with her on the phone about this.  It's a good marker but she just wont make the leap you guys are because she knows it is not directly related.

All due respect to your daughter but Jay Lalezari who runs Quest Clinical Research said that the SAE data could indicate efficacy.  He has run over 250 clinical trials.  

 

[Don Hutson]

All due respect to your daughter but Jay Lalezari who runs Quest Clinical Research said that the SAE data could indicate efficacy.  He has run over 250 clinical trials.  

Jay is an insider

 

[chet]

Was raving about this stock to my BIL a couple weeks ago. He today tells me he got in around $9, and is down 40%.  Sweet stonk. 

God forbid you tell him when the stock was $0.30.  You're right--you really do suck at managing money.

 

[BassNBrew]

I think I’m leaning towards selling so I don’t have to come in this thread anymore. Really kicking myself for not selling at $10 now.

Dear magic 8-ball, is this an FC alias?

Magic 8-ball, "My sources say not enough gold holdings"

 

[chet]

Jay is an insider

True but that doesn't mean that he's making this up.  He wouldn't put his reputation on the line to placate NP.  I agree that 99% of the time, the SAE data is for safety only.  This is the exception.

 

[Don Hutson]

True but that doesn't mean that he's making this up.  

I agree.  And if you look at my posts, I've been trying to figure out if the treatment arm having less SAEs than the placebo arm is indicative of efficacy.  These scientists aren't being forthright.  We know leronlimab has zero SAEs.  Placebos cause zero SAEs.  So all of the SAEs are from Covid.  The treatment arm having significantly less SAEs than the placebo arm is evidence of efficacy.  Scientists seem preprogrammed to say not necessarily but without a counter reason.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

All due respect to your daughter but Jay Lalezari who runs Quest Clinical Research said that the SAE data could indicate efficacy.  He has run over 250 clinical trials.  

Yep it could.  Exactly what she said but not proof.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

1. Drug related - doubt it.

2. Covid related - likely

3. Run over by a garbage truck - possible, but why not say so.

3 because it has to be included.   This is not subjective.

 

[Don Hutson]

Yep it could.  Exactly what she said but not proof.

I'm pretty sure that everything your daughter said is exactly what @Whyatt said.  People here should start being appreciative of his opinions.  And appreciative of your daughter's opinions, too.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

I'm pretty sure that everything your daughter said is exactly what @Whyatt said.  People here should start being appreciative of his opinions.  And appreciative of your daughter's opinions, too.

I respectfully disagree. 

 

[Don Hutson]

I respectfully disagree. 

Whyatt has been spot on.  If you disagree, can you be specific?

 

[dkp993]

I'm pretty sure that everything your daughter said is exactly what @Whyatt said.  People here should start being appreciative of his opinions.  And appreciative of your daughter's opinions, too.

Agree. @Whyatt is clearly not a troll and I don’t think he’s a shorter.  He’s a person with an opposing opinion about a OTC stock with what looks like a promising drug and a CEO in over his head.  Not hard to see why there would be some opposing opinions.  

 

[Golf Guy 69]

Whyatt has been spot on.  If you disagree, can you be specific?

His first post was about shorting the stock.  We can keep going.

 

[CR69]

This thread makes my head hurt. Every day I have flash backs to the scam coin days of crypto in 2013-2014. 

 

[Whyatt]

Whyatt has been spot on.  If you disagree, can you be specific?

Agree. @Whyatt is clearly not a troll and I don’t think he’s a shorter.  He’s a person with an opposing opinion about a OTC stock with what looks like a promising drug and a CEO in over his head.  Not hard to see why there would be some opposing opinions.  

I appreciate these posts.

Recall my first post was pre-Covid. Imagine no Covid and with the RTF, what kind of shape would CYDY be in now? 

 

[Don Hutson]

I appreciate these posts.

Recall my first post was pre-Covid. Imagine no Covid and with the RTF, what kind of shape would CYDY be in now? 

CYDY was $1 pre-Covid.  CYDY has a market cap of $3 billion which is a lot for a company with one drug and zero revenue.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

I appreciate these posts.

Recall my first post was pre-Covid. Imagine no Covid and with the RTF, what kind of shape would CYDY be in now? 

You can just say your identity.  Most know my real info.

 

[dkp993]

I appreciate these posts.

Recall my first post was pre-Covid. Imagine no Covid and with the RTF, what kind of shape would CYDY be in now? 

Probably in the $2/3 range and we’d all be talking about the HIV and Cancer possibilities of the drug (which I know your not a believer in) like we were to start. And at where I got in 2/3 would still be an amazing gain.  

 

[fantasycurse42]

I’m the panicky scared money

I went golfing at 2 (Florida is so hot, I think I lost 20 balls), figured it would close at $5, pleasantly surprised at $5.40, not like it really matters right now. Volatility is coming, I said it earlier in the week, if you don’t have conviction, sell your shares and get out.

Otis recommending at $9 is now my favorite thing about Cytodyn  TBH, his BIL might as well hold now, hopefully he’ll thank you later. 

 

[Golf Guy 69]

This is so fun.

 

[Capella]

This is so fun.

It really has pepped up some boring summer weeks. 

 

[Don Hutson]

You can just say your identity.  Most know my real info.

He is clearly a FBG.  He literally has the same opinions as your daughter.  Whyatt is an asset.  You guys getting offended that he has a differing opinion means you guys need to get yours heads out of the sand.

 

[chet]

I appreciate these posts.

Recall my first post was pre-Covid. Imagine no Covid and with the RTF, what kind of shape would CYDY be in now? 

They'd be in great shape with cancer trials enrolling and possibly a breakthrough designation already.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

He is clearly a FBG.  He literally has the same opinions as your daughter.  Whyatt is an asset.  You guys getting offended that he has a differing opinion means you guys need to get yours heads out of the sand.

I just gave legitimate criticism from my daughter.  It had nothing to do with shorting, AF, or a bs reason for username.  Let alone saying it's a pump and dump and throwing away that to justify other points I make.  

Just not the same.

 

[Don Hutson]

I just gave legitimate criticism from my daughter.  It had nothing to do with shorting, AF, or a bs reason for username.  Let alone saying it's a pump and dump and throwing away that to justify other points I make.  

Just not the same.

Literally the same

 

[Golf Guy 69]

Username was made to respond in this thread.  

 

[Don Hutson]

Username was made to respond in this thread.  

I am the one who brought up his first post and I am the one that made the Chet/Wyatt/Weird Science connection.  He is here because the FBG forum brings in a lot of people from a lot of different expertise.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

Literally the same

Do you know me?  Have I donated over 5 figures on this site?  Have I met close to 100 fbgs IRL?  Have people on this board been to my house?  

Yes

 

[Golf Guy 69]

Now tell me about that guy.

 

[Otis]

So we’re selling right?

 

[CGRdrJoe]

Now tell me about that guy.

Small hands and doesn’t play HU for a $1,000 

 

[chet]

So we’re selling right?

Thank God you said that.

 

[Golf Guy 69]

I think we need to go in with the shorts when we sell.  

 

[Golf Guy 69]

Our 250k will make a huge run.