chet
Footballguy
Nothing other than within 30 days usually.Did he give an update on the TypeA meeting date/time?
Nothing other than within 30 days usually.Did he give an update on the TypeA meeting date/time?
Yeah, but he's nailed the Drew Rosenhaus routine.He's refusing to give timelines now because of angry shareholders.
Haha
They were. The last caller made a good point to include the ease of administration for LL in mild patients in the write-up. Visit Dr. office and receive a shot. No IV. Good point about Remdesivir not being a viable option for this patient population.Better questions on this call.
Also made explicit the assumption most had that these patients were not in the hospital or on oxygen.They were. The last caller made a good point to include the ease of administration for LL in mild patients in the write-up. Visit Dr. office and receive a shot. No IV. Good point about Remdesivir not being a viable option for this patient population.
4:04 Mulholland opens. He introduces everyone. He reminds everyone that boiler plate warnings exists and goes into it with the same gravitas of a seasoned statesman or telemarketer I can't tell which. The important thing is everyone is reminded investing comes with risks.
4:06 A wild Nader appears.
-FDA asked for EUA based on CD 10 data.
-Clinical Results Getting Significance is important. Phase 3 endpoint determined from Phase 2 results. Primary endpoint, Clinical Significant, we had clinical significance. GOOD NEWS: Secondary endpoint we achieved NEWS2 50% in Leronlimab versus 20% placebo. Reducing serious events over 2.5 times because of Leronlimab preventing complications. 70% of SAEs in placebo, so without Leronlimab things get worse.
-Phase 3 chance of hitting primary if NEWS, and number of patients. We would go for 75 to 80 patients. Safety has already been demonstrated thanks to HIV patients.
4:13 Doctor Kelly very encouraged. Objective evidence. Physiological parameters. Randomized, doubled blinded placebo control study. Mild to Moderate 81%. 20 million infections out there. NEWS2 objective way of snapshotting who is at risk over time.
4:15 Doctor Lazari hard to imagine to have a better study. Immunomodulator. We would see biggest bang for our buck in severe cases. To get this result in moderate, healthier group, is good. Reduced symptoms, also when should this drug should be used.
(Quick note: my investment partner has a medical background and says this is good and this is a good call so far.)
Lazari believes we have the first working drug for COVID.
4:18 Nader CD 12 195 interim analysis. Moves to HIV, 49 patients only using Leronlimab. Good results from them. We are getting academic notice. We asked Scott Kelly to get top people in the various fields we are looking at for. These scientists will be on the website stating they support our drug.
4:21 Kelly lists off rooster of our Science Advisory Board. Additional physicians coming on board for transplants, cancer, COVID.
(Quick Note: Unlike other CCs Adam Feuerstein has chickened out and not Tweeted any lies at this time 4:23pm EST 8/12/2020)
Onboarding scientists have nice credentials including time spent at NIH. Kelly sounds very excited about these people.
Q&A
HC Wainwright: Congratulations on data placebo group number typical? Kelly points out we don't have much mild to moderate data out there, we are looking at symptoms.
Lazari off the top rope states the importance NEWS2 and why we would get an approval. Kelly drop kicks with the point that NEWS2 is objective.
Nader states top line sent, wants guidance and open to meeting for emergency use.
Mulholand reads questions.
One patient died after study. 50 year old female with substance history. High score in terms of risk. 33 days after day 0, not related to drug. COD not sent to company.
Major media and big pharma waiting in the wings. So where are we with media response. Nader states top line sent to media, and pharma groups who asked for it. Transfer of information happening right now.
Question about COVID or Leronlimab outside of Primary and Secondary. Wants to know about wealth of data collected. Clinical outcome submitted. Blood work not submitted, data from blood work not as dramatic in the mild/moderate population. Learning where we best fit in during treatment time. Before or After oxygen needed, after minimal symptoms. Ideal treatment time being deterimined.
NASDAQ update comment letter not yet received. 10K to be filed with SEC. 10k and audited data an important part of that.
Projected revenue. Never commented on future revenues, Doctor Lazari, distribution networks up and ready.
Nader if we do get approval, how many vials. Potential is 2.5 billion in sales based on previously stated comments.
Why is Patterson not on advisory board? Patterson's lab used at one time. Patterson's lab isn't being used at this time.
Some blowhard talks about being weak in marketing and media. Nader states he doesn't write PR, we run them by lawyers. We can't puff our news. We have to be a company that can uplist by being professional.
Question about papers. Nader stated we are hoping to submitted. Others being reviewed. These are paper of physicians. Group of people working on 5 different publications.
DSMV efficacy or safety. Only safety looked at, interim note done yet.
How many went onto 02 from both testing populations. 50% venting need in Leronlimab. Only 2 one from each no need to report.
Approval in other countries happen without the FDA? There are countries that want the top line report sent to them. We are pursuing these countries and own regulatory body.
O2 data 84% didn't need it on leronlimab, placebo 79% delta of 5%. So no reporting cause meh.
EUA approval question on time. Nader finally won't give a timeline that he can't answer. So we will have to wait and see. But once they know we will know.
Type A meeting submitted a week ago so 30 days to hear.
195 enrollment 175. Nader states learning not to give guesses. We are hopefull to get it done soon.
Important Note: Nader is actually realizing not to overpromise it seems. Wild stuff.
EUA question about phase 2 approval before phase 3. Remdesivir. Still phase 3 has to be done. Nader has no idea if FDA will approve. If phase 3 we go to moderate patients.
Question about Webcast for DATA. Then some blah blah blah stuff.
Overall good stuff.
We need to see the rooster before we can make any productive comments on his team's chances at the title.Notes from another board:
Kelly lists off rooster of our Science Advisory Board.
Wonder if Nader can get the FBG staff to rate his team.We need to see the rooster before we can make any productive comments on his team's chances at the title.
What did they say to lead you to believe that?Haven’t got a comment back from them yet.
He said he said they haven't received a comment letter back from nasdaq.What did they say to lead you to believe that?
lolHe said he said they haven't received a comment letter back from nasdaq.
rooster This is interesting to me and I wish they would have commented more on it. NP says top line sent to media... What media? is that media Proactive video? Is it Dr. Yo or Dr. Been? Because those are the only people that have shown any interest in interviewing NP or Dr. Patterson. And Proactive gets paid to interview NP.Major media and big pharma waiting in the wings. So where are we with media response. Nader states top line sent to media, and pharma groups who asked for it. Transfer of information happening right now.
Because they can't fill a large trial in a timely manner. See: Waiting On S-C To Finish Enrolling, We're StillI dont understand the M-M Phase 3 trial size being the same.
First, we hopefully have interim and then final S-C results and its a moot point...in which case who cares.
But, if in some scenario the Phase 3 of M-M becomes important why do you want to be flailing around on the whims of a small sample size in a population where we already know it is harder to symptom measure changes due to M-M nature.
I get that, but as I was trying to point out...if Phase 3 M-M is important (meaning S-C failed), then having a non statistically significant results because the trial size is too small would be the death nail in CYDY Covid coffin. I don't think thats the place to #### around.Because they can't fill a large trial in a timely manner. See: Waiting On S-C To Finish Enrolling, We're Still
He seemed to infer it was sent to major media outlets, I think he said major media. Certainly wasn't talking about proactive.This is interesting to me and I wish they would have commented more on it. NP says top line sent to media... What media? is that media Proactive video? Is it Dr. Yo or Dr. Been? Because those are the only people that have shown any interest in interviewing NP or Dr. Patterson. And Proactive gets paid to interview NP.
Seems with news like this someone would be on somewhere other than Youtube podcast shows like randypanties. CNN, Fox... CNBC? We have a drug that is useful in combating Covid19. Excellent p-value in NEWS2 parameters. Shown to calm cytokine storm and bring viral load to zero. Dr. Yo will be interested to talk about it I suppose.
Going to go out on a limb and guess tomorrow's Christmas in the djmich household.I get that, but as I was trying to point out...if Phase 3 M-M is important (meaning S-C failed), then having a non statistically significant results because the trial size is too small would be the death nail in CYDY Covid coffin. I don't think thats the place to #### around.
This is where honestly they should partner up with BP vs throw themselves under the bus.
I'd like to add some more back tomorrow, only got 5k more at EOD today, hopefully price stays down.
Solid conference call, solid results. -10% tomorrow.This was BIG BIG news!
Setting the O/U for tomorrow at -7%
Nah. It is gonna jump to about $15/share because I will be sitting in a car all day unable to do anything about it.Solid conference call, solid results. -10% tomorrow.
Does AF do another hit piece? He only tweeted Tuesday.Solid conference call, solid results. -10% tomorrow.
He went pretty silent quick yesterday though. No follow ups at all.Does AF do another hit piece? He only tweeted Tuesday.
Guy has a vendetta.
SameNah. It is gonna jump to about $15/share because I will be sitting in a car all day unable to do anything about it.
You’re welcome, gents. Enjoy your riches.
Surely he comments today. Truth has not bridled him yet, why start now?He went pretty silent quick yesterday though. No follow ups at all.
I feel like he has to back off a little at this point, he has stretched the limits the past few days. Stat has to be concerned about credibilty i would think. To call it a failure was a huge stretch.
Right. Which means today the blood will be back in the water most likely.Theoretically, people couldn't short today. No reason to say anything.
Might be a volatile morning. Open around 4.60, run up to 4.70 then drop to low 4's.Capella said:Right. Which means today the blood will be back in the water most likely.
paging BassnBrewMight be a volatile morning. Open around 4.60, run up to 4.70 then drop to low 4's.
I just pulled a BnB and sold the excess I bought the other day (under 4) at 4.70. Off a nickle on the run up. Drop has started...paging BassnBrew
On it. Unloaded some at $4.66. Should have sold more.paging BassnBrew
If it breaks 4.30...lookout below. Otherwise I'm looking up if that holds.So what's the target buy price today?
I'm back to just my long position holdings. To start another short term, day/week play, I'll be looking at low 4's. Starting around 4.15 maybe...So what's the target buy price today?
Battle at 4.30 taking place now, until we get back above 4.40 I think bears have the ball.If it breaks 4.30...lookout below. Otherwise I'm looking up if that holds.
I'm not worried. The Bears never score.Battle at 4.30 taking place now, until we get back above 4.40 I think bears have the ball.
This is where I need to be. I need to accept that my shares might be worthless down the road and check in quarterly on news. The daily grind too much.If I could not look at this stock price for two months, I think that would be really beneficial.
This is basically where I am, at least emotionally. I do look everyday but I’m not really tied to it. Unless something crazy stupid happens I have not thoughts of making moves. I’m in long.This is where I need to be. I need to accept that my shares might be worthless down the road and check in quarterly on news. The daily grind too muchIf I could not look at this stock price for two months, I think that would be really beneficial.
Exactly. Especially now that there's efficacy from mild to moderate. Set it and forget it.This is basically where I am, at least emotionally. I do look everyday but I’m not really tied to it. Unless something crazy stupid happens I have not thoughts of making moves. I’m in long.
Sounds like you need a drinkThis is where I need to be. I need to accept that my shares might be worthless down the road and check in quarterly on news. The daily grind too much.